Advertisers

  • 1 User(s) that subscribed to channel 'colddoseofsumthin'
  • Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first
    • 1-Apr-2009 By: CiscoWes69:
      The writings about the %u201Cpaths of the sea%u201D in scripture predate ANY scientific %u201Cdiscovery%u201D of the oceanic currents. Maury was the first to take God for His word and search for them and he ended up finding them. This was written long before anyone had the ability to even float a boat out to where these paths of the sea are. The point is, this is one of many examples of where we have something written in scripture that couldn%u2019t have possibly been More..

      Posted Apr-2-2009 By 

      Reply (0) | Report

    • =============
      Posted 1 day ago by "CiscoWes69"
      Men penned the Bible that was inspired by God. Foremost, there are things written in the Bible a couple thousand years ago that have recently been "discovered" last century. Freshwater springs at the bottom of the ocean for example - if man just made all this up, how did they know about those? They had a submarine that could examine it? Matthew Maury - he took God at His word and searched for those "paths of the sea". M More..

      Posted Mar-28-2009 By 

      Reply (0) | Report

    • Comment of user 'colddoseofsumthin' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Comment of user 'colddoseofsumthin' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Comment of user 'colddoseofsumthin' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Comment of user 'colddoseofsumthin' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Posted 3 hours ago by "CiscoWes69"
      Check translations... could be describing anything - God will even give the unteachable people something to run with. As the saying goes, give someone enough rope and they eventually hang themselves.

      ============

      FYI: "God" didn't write the bible...men did. men who either believed in unicorns or understood that what they were writing was FICTION.

      you refuse to accept facts in favor of fiction and all you can say in response to me quoting More..

      Posted Mar-11-2009 By 

      Reply (0) | Report

    • Posted 16 hours ago by "CiscoWes69
      If we listen to the typical uninformed Bible scoffer, they completely throw the whole thing out, and they probably aren't even aware that modern archaeologists actually use the ancient texts as verification and to find lost cities.

      ============

      and all this proves is that the ancients who penned the bible could describe their surroundings. this is not proof of the existence of god...unless of course you want it to be

      as for the the legitimacy of More..

      Posted Mar-11-2009 By 

      Reply (0) | Report

    • Posted 16 hours ago by "CiscoWes69
      If we listen to the typical uninformed Bible scoffer, they completely throw the whole thing out, and they probably aren't even aware that modern archaeologists actually use the ancient texts as verification and to find lost cities.

      ============

      and all this proves is that the ancients who penned the bible could describe their surroundings. this is not proof of the existence of god...unless of course you want it to.

      one word: unicorns (isaiah 34:7)

      Posted Mar-10-2009 By 

      Reply (-1) | Report

    • Posted Feb-23-2009 by "CiscoWes69"
      Modern archaeologists use the Bible to find lost civilizations.

      ==============

      impressive. these ancient, superstitious men actually had the ability to use their eyes and describe their surroundings. wow. there must truly be a god after all.

      Posted 2 days ago by "colddoseofsumthin" (R)


      =========================

      If we listen to the typical uninformed Bible scoffer, they completely throw the whole thing out, and they proba More..

      Posted Mar-9-2009 By 

      Reply (0) | Report

    • Posted Feb-23-2009 by "CiscoWes69"
      you probably think that all living things are the result of pond scum evolving over billions of years? A pineapple and a porcupine share a common ancestor, right? Humans are distant relatives of field mice. You probably believe all this, and dare to chide someone else for their beliefs? You need to check the mirror.

      ================

      no, i suppose you're right...evolution follows no train of logic, research, evidence or study whatsoever. the consensu More..

      Posted Mar-9-2009 By 

      Reply (-1) | Report

    • Quoted comment by IIVXTII:
      lol didnt finish. Id say establishing the 14th largest economy with 40 million people, one of the greatest economic success stories in human history is worthy of a "finish" term. Of course the "stalemate" has yet to be solved- but considering the berlin wall fell after many years (which originally was a stalemate of ideologies like Korea) there is only optimism for the Korean peninsula. Call it propaganda as you will- but the facts are concrete in t More..

      Posted Mar-7-2009 By 

      Reply (0) | Report

    • what's interesting about you reply to my comment is that you commit almost every logical fallacy in the book. you love the straw men and false dilemmas almost as much as you enjoy making things up to fit your agenda. you're in denial pal...wake up from your slumber and stop assuming i'm what you want me to be and that i think what you want me to think. what you're truly frightened of is that i know the truth: you're a moron.

      Posted 5 days ago by "colddoseofsumthin

      Make stuff up top fit my More..

      Posted Feb-24-2009 By 

      Reply (2) | Report

    • Your message:
      ignorance must truly be blissful for you to be here on liveleak, gleefully proving to the rest of the world how clueless you really are.

      please explain how citing readily available, factual information is (as you've claimed): a childish attempt to justify anything? call it what you want, i call it (as would any logical/rational being) a sound argument.

      your laughably ignorant strategy of employing both straw man & red herring arguments to refute that bush did anything w More..

      Posted Feb-23-2009 By 

      Reply (1) | Report

    • Your message:
      why am i not surprised to discover that you're also an apologist for creationists.

      it makes perfect sense since, after 8 years of bush, the only people who could defend him are those in denial and those who consider fairy tales written thousand of years ago by ignorant, superstitious MEN, to be a factual resource.

      i can see where you're coming from though...it's easier keeping your head buried in the sand since the truth can be a bitter pill.
      =======================

      It More..

      Posted Feb-23-2009 By 

      Reply (1) | Report

      • no, i suppose you're right...evolution follows no train of logic, research, evidence or study whatsoever. the consensus among the world's scientific community believes what they believe, simply because they are all programmed (as you say).

        your brilliant dissertation has finally shown me the light and conclusively proven to me that it's so much more logical to believe in talking snakes (genesis 3:1-6), a race of giants (numbers 13:32-3), seas parting on command (exodus 14: 15-17), burning bush More..

        Posted Mar-6-2009 By 

        Reply (0) | Report

    You need to be registered in order to add comments!