http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=%22main+stream+media%22+propagandists Tue, 21 May 2013 07:43:01 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=%22main+stream+media%22+propagandists Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:59:53 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a96_1313801431 dfaugust2k ~"main stream" media propaganda machine still going strong http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a96_1313801431 dfaugust2k Coulter Slams Media for Never Vetting Obama "main stram" media, propagandists, anti-Americans, anti-journalism, liars Fri, 12 Aug 2011 16:22:02 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=430_1313179971 dfaugust2k Did media cover up Sen. Durbin's confrontation with reporter? Chicago, August 11, 2011 - This week U.S. Senator Dick Durbin held a press conference with members of the mainstream media to talk about the downgrade crisis. But the Senator's scripted storyline veered off-course when a conservative reporter - me - showed up to ask an embarrassing question. Namely, "Senator, you've blamed the tea party...but do you bear any responsibility for this downgrade crisis?" What, you didn't hear about this incident in the media? For those of you that need more proof that journalism is dead, read on. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL)Monday was another beautiful day for a mainstream media cover-up in Chicago. But it would not have been complete without a picnic-basket full of hypocrisy from our very own U.S. Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois. You may remember Dick. He's the Senator that hysterically compared the treatment of the Gitmo detainees to Nazis, Soviet gulags, and Pol Pot. While calling for an end to "hateful" rhetoric, he's the one who wrongfully pointed his crooked finger at the Tea Party Movement and Gov. Sarah Palin, blaming them for the Tucson massacre and the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Recently, he's the one that, hypocritically, accused the Tea Party Republicans of "political extortion" in the debt ceiling debate. While the markets were tanking - Durbin took some time out to have a press conference and dish to his friends in the Chicago media about the S&P downgrade of our nation's sterling credit rating. Given his history, I expected more of the same accusatory rhetoric about the tea party from Durbin. Since the report of the downgrade hit the newswires last Friday, members of Durbin's party have been in full anti-tea party spin control. "The fact of the matter is that this is essentially a tea party downgrade," said former White House advisor David Axelrod on CBS's "Face the Nation." Sen. John Kerry must have received the same memo. "This is the tea party downgrade," said Kerry on NBC's "Meet the Press." I went to Durbin's press conference to set the record straight. My objective: some journalistic balance. Not only did Durbin refuse to answer the question but his cronies in the Chicago media went on the attack. One of those crony journalists was Jim Anderson, news director for the Illinois Radio Network. You can hear him in the background telling Durbin, "He organizes tea party rallies." In media terms, that's called being fair and impartial. That's what a real journalist does. I stood my ground and asked the question a number of times. "You're not allowed to ask questions during a press conference," bleated Anderson. "We are going to have you thrown out by the cops," he said, running interference for Durbin. In addition to doing news for the Illinois Radio Network, Anderson apparently moonlights as an unpaid member of Dick Durbin's staff. A special agent was soon dispatched to have me escorted out of the room, where I, as press, had a right to be. At least, that's what I read, once upon a time, in the U.S. Constitution. I am an independent social journalist for the Washington Times Communities and contribute to the American Spectator, and Breitbart.com among others. No other blogger, freelance journalist, or other member of the media was asked to show their credentials at this event. In fact, the event was sponsored by City Club of Chicago and was open to media and the public. This brings us to the eternal question: Who is media and who is not? Who gets to decide? Sen. Dick Durbin? His friends in the Chicago media? Are public officials accountable to the public? Do we have the right to question authority? Or must we just accept what they bestow upon us? Do we have the right to question the media? Or do we have to let the so-called "real" journalists impose their own idea of news? Of truth? During my exchange with him, Sen. Durbin told (instructed) the media, "You guys aren't going to cover this are you?" And the media...didn't. Is this collusion between a high-ranking member of the Democrat party and the supposedly unbiased mainstream media? Do I sympathize with the gripes of the Tea Party? Yes and yes. The media and the Democrats accuse the tea party, conservatives, and Republicans in general of being "uncivil." They compare us to terrorists "strapped with explosives" because we are trying to change Washington; because we want fairness in the media; because we are trying to put an end to corruption, fraud, and the redistribution of wealth that is considered "routine." To an inside-the-beltway hack, to oppose the status quo - that must truly be "terrifying." Of course, I've been accused of being uncivil before. I've also been threatened by other journalists before . But this isn't about civility; it's about control. The Democrats and their media cronies want to control the news and information. They want to control the political system and its system of punishments and rewards. This system is fundamentally anti-freedom and they - the powers that be - are "OK" with that. I was held to a different standard because I write for conservative news outlets and Sen. Durbin didn't like my question. The mainstream media are merely an adjunct to the Obama campaign and the Democrat National Committee. Not one of them reported this incident. The economic crisis is not helped by a compliant, subservient media that tampers with news to help their candidates and causes. In the abscessed cavity of newsrooms around Chicago, this exchange and the remarks Sen. Durbin made to the media's microphones exists. In Chicago, NBC, CBS, ABC, the Chicago Sun-Times, and every other news outlet, have shown their true colors. They weren't red, white, and blue. And neither are Durbin's. Conservative satirist and commentator William J. Kelly is also a contributor to Breitbart.com and edits the Tea Party Reports for the Washington Times Communities. He is a native from Chicago's Southside. Email questions to him at williamjkellyrebuild@gmail.com. http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/bill-kellys-truth-squad/2011/aug/11/media-cover-up-durbin-confrontation-reporter/ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=430_1313179971 dfaugust2k PROPAGANDIST media cover up : Sen. Durbin's confrontation with reporter /democRATs AND CENSORSHIP "main stream media" propagandists, corruption, one party rule, censorship, blacklisting Sat, 13 Aug 2011 23:12:37 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=db8_1313291388 dfaugust2k "These protests were supposed to be the rebirth of the Left going into the 2012 campaign" and yet when the "unions threw everything they had" they came up short of taking the state senate from Repubilcans, NewsBusters publisher Brent Bozell noted on today's "Fox & Friends." Because the effort completely fizzled, it's no surprise the liberal broadcast media spent very little time reporting the results of Tuesday's recall election. "This was a huge Republican victory that nobody heard about," the Media Research Center founder added. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2011/08/12/mrcs-bozell-august-12-fox-friends-discussing-how-media-downplayed-wis-reca http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=db8_1313291388 dfaugust2k MRC's Bozell on August 12 'Fox & Friends' Discussing How Media Downplayed Wis. Recall Elections "main stream media", liars, "journalists", propagandists, scumbags Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:17:49 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=91d_1313543707 dfaugust2k Propagandist scumbag spreading disinformation and lies, left-wing liars' business as usual http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=91d_1313543707 dfaugust2k ~and here's the lying POS sargent shultz lying again liars, leftists, shultz, main stream media, propagandists Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:09:07 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fad_1315432951 dfaugust2k What if Congressional Black Caucus Were Accused of Wanting Jews Gassed? Dennis Prager Sep 6th, 2011 Imagine a Jewish Congress member accusing the members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) of wanting to see Jews gassed. How would any decent American - on the right or left - describe such a statement? Loathsome? Morally reprehensible? An obvious lie? All three descriptions would be entirely accurate. Next question: How much media exposure would that slander be given? Would it make the front page of The New York Times and The Washington Post? Would we read ferocious editorials from coast to coast? Would the story lead on TV newscasts? Correct on all three, again. Final question: Would said congressman be allowed to stay in office? We all know the answer to that one, too. So here's a real question: If a black congressman charged that members of Congress who support the tea party "would love to see you and me (blacks) hanging from a tree," what's the difference between that libel and the made-up libel about the CBC wanting to see Jews gassed? The answer, of course, is that there is no difference. But because the left thinks in terms of race, gender and class rather than in traditional moral terms of right and wrong, and because the left dominates the media, only one of these two libels would be given the national attention and opprobrium they would both deserve. Last week, Indiana Congressman Andre Carson told a CBC gathering in Florida that members of Congress who are members of the tea party want to see blacks "hanging from trees." Because he is both a Democrat and a black congressman, the liberal news media, which means essentially all of our news media, has barely reported what is an almost uniquely vicious libel in American political history. Given this uniqueness, it demands an explanation. First, it is meant to create racial tension. Without racial tension - specifically, black Americans resenting white Americans, especially conservatives - the Democratic Party fears that it cannot survive as a national force. And it is right. The day the majority of black Americans adopt the attitude that Washington Post correspondent Keith Richburg has written of in "Out of America: A Black Man Confronts Africa," the Democratic Party will be rendered irrelevant. As a black American, Richberg considers himself a member of the most fortunate group of blacks living anywhere in the world. No Democrat can win a presidential election without more than 90 percent of the black vote. And the only way to ensure that vote is to label whites in general and conservatives in particular as racists. Second, the CBC is happy to race-bait for the Democrats. The CBC's power emanates from its party's power, so its leaders need to tell fellow blacks regularly how despicable the American majority is - and therefore how only Democrats and the left can save them from everything ... even lynching. Third, it is the CBC - not the tea party - that should be described as racist. While race plays no role in tea party membership, race is the only criterion for membership in the CBC. One must be black. Nothing else matters. A black member of Congress whose district is largely non-black can be a member of the CBC, but a non-black Congressman whose district is largely black cannot be a member. Democratic Congressman Steven Cohen, whose Tennessee district is largely black, applied for membership in the CBC and was turned down for one reason: He is white. What we have here is a racist group hurling false accusations of racism at a group that is on no way racist. But since it is an axiom of the left that blacks cannot be racist - because whites are the authors of racism and because racism is only possible when practiced by the racial group in power - few call the CBC what it is. Fourth, when you are used to getting away with taking immoral positions, you feel free to continue doing so. In 2009, seven members of the CBC visited Fidel Castro. Not only were they full of praise for the tyrant - in that regard, they were hardly alone on the left - but they also refused to meet with any democratic dissidents, including Cuba's leading black dissenter. As a Washington Post editorial noted at the time, "In five days on the island, the (CBC) Congress members found no time for dialogue with Afro-Cuban dissident Jorge Luis Garcia Perez ... Mr. Garcia, better known as 'Antunez,' is a renowned advocate of human rights who has often been singled out for harsh treatment because of his color. "'The authorities in my country,' he has said, 'have never tolerated that a black person (could dare to) oppose the regime.' "His wife, Iris, is a founder of the Rosa Parks Women's Civil Rights Movement, named after an American hero whom Afro-Cubans try to emulate." As the snub of Cuba's leading black freedom fighters demonstrated, in a conflict between helping the left and helping blacks, the CBC chooses the left. On its website, the CBC calls itself "the conscience of the Congress since 1971." Its members probably believe it. But it has about as much truth as Congressman's Carson's accusation. http://frontpagemag.com/2011/09/06/what-if-congressional-black-caucus-were-accused-of-wanting-jews-gassed/ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fad_1315432951 dfaugust2k What if Congressional Black Caucus Were Accused of Wanting Jews Gassed? main-stream media, hypocrites, propagandists, liars, democRATs, socialists, progressives, communists, traitors Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:25:56 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=58c_1313709756 dfaugust2k This lying propagandist scumbag invites a Patriot on to talk about her book and does not. CNN, a "news" outlet? Give me a break. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=58c_1313709756 dfaugust2k PEIRS MORGAN style "journalism" CNN, main stream media, liars, propagandists, scumbags Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:12:19 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e0e_1331514428 dfaugust2k Posted on December 18, 2011 at 8:29am by Madeleine Morgenstern delusional failure~ President barack obama sat for an extensive interview with CBS's "60 Minutes" last week, though it appears the portion of the interview actually broadcast on TV left out a statement where Obama essentially declared himself the fourth best president in terms of his accomplishments. The statement was only made available online as part of the full interview on " 60 Minutes Overtime." According to a transcript posted on the "60 Minutes" website, Obama said he would hold his accomplishments so far as president against those of Lyndon B. Johnson, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. "I would put our legislative and foreign policy accomplishments in our first two years against any president - with the possible exceptions of Johnson, F.D.R., and Lincoln - just in terms of what we've gotten done in modern history," Obama told CBS's Steve Kroft. Watch the full interview below. The statement comes at the very end, around the 56:10 mark of the 56:53-minute video: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/60-minutes-edits-out-obamas-claim-that-hes-the-fourth-best-president/ ~"main stream" media still covering up for this delusional failure of a man, why do those lemming idiots still listen to these liars? http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e0e_1331514428 dfaugust2k '60 Minutes' Edits Out obunghole's Claim That He's the Fourth Best President obama, 60 minutes, liars, propagandists, openness and honesty