http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=100 Sat, 25 May 2013 08:13:51 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=100 Sat, 25 May 2013 07:23:00 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2f1_1369475683 Garcia Neto Freedom 100, prova da Indy Lights, categoria de acesso da F'ormula Indy, teve uma margem de vit'oria de apenas 0s0026, quatro carros lado a lado! http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2f1_1369475683 Garcia Neto Simplesmente inacredit'avel! A chegada da Freedom <span class="highlight">100</span>, prova da Indy Lights Real Sat, 25 May 2013 06:08:54 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e57_1369476067 Zurm 100% true. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e57_1369476067 Zurm Paul Weston on EDL Radio Paul,Weston,EDL,Radio Sat, 25 May 2013 00:38:15 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=218_1369456490 Detroit Iron Friday, May 24, 2013 By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington TimesTerrorism analysts are rebutting President Obama's assertion that the "scale of the threat" from Islamic terrorists has reverted to pre-Sept. 11, 2001, levels."This is a total fabrication," said Steven Emerson , whose Investigative Project on Terrorism tracks radical Islam. "The 'scale of this threat' in the 1990s never closely resembled the terrorist attacks post 9/11. This is an outright lie." The Heritage Foundation has been cataloguing foiled terror attacks post-9/11 by Islamic groups. The number: 54. James Carafano , a military analyst at Heritage , said the 1990s' numbers "were a fraction of that." Mr. Obama on Thursday delivered a speech at the National Defense University that came close to declaring victory over al Qaeda , saying it is now operating franchise groups. He also declared an end to the global campaign against terrorism, saying the U.S. would focus on individual cells. "As we shape our response, we have to recognize that the scale of this threat closely resembles the types of attacks we faced before 9/11," the president said. Before the Boston Marathon bombing, allegedly conducted by two jihadists, the U.S. was the target of at least five Muslim attacks since 2009 (two of which succeeded) whose plots went undetected by the FBI or CIA: o Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad opened fire at a military recruiting office in Little Rock, Ark., in June 2009, killing one soldier. o Najibullah Zazi, who said he was a member of al Qaeda , tried to detonate bombs in New York City's subway in September 2009. o Army Maj. Nadal Malik Hassan opened fire at a soldier processing center at Fort Hood, Texas, killing 13. o Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried to explode a bomb hidden in his underwear onboard a flight to Detroit in December 2009. o Faisal Shahzad attempted to detonate a car bomb in Times Square in May 2010. Mr. Emerson said the U.S. homeland faced no such consistent Islamic plots in the 1990s. "In terms of the number of attacks, it's like a 100-to-1 what has happened post-9/11 compared with pre-9/11," he said. Said the Heritage report: "The long war on terrorism is far from over." Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/24/experts-contradict-obama-islamic-terror-threat/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&amp;utm_medium=RSS&amp;google_editors_picks=true#ixzz2UHAw4fVO Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=218_1369456490 Detroit Iron Experts contradict Obama on Islamic terror threat obama Fri, 24 May 2013 20:05:43 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b5e_1369440159 SAPD_HRT Dozens of Phoenix police officers stepped up in a show of support for the daughter of their fallen comrade on Wednesday. Tatum Raetz -- the daughter of Officer Daryl Raetz, who was fatally struck by an SUV in the line of duty on Sunday -- was joined by her father's colleagues at her kindergarten graduation, according to KSAZ-TV. Close to 100 officers from around the area crowded into the small auditorium to watch the young girl get her diploma as her mother sat in the front row with tears in her eyes. "The purpose of us is to be here in proxy for Daryl and to let her know that we're here for her," Phoenix Police Officer Keith Garn told the news station. The officers said that seeing the little girl smile helps ease the pain of losing one of their own. "Maybe not everybody knew him personally as an officer, but he's our brother and he always will be and we will support his family forever and this is just the first step," Sara Garza of the Phoenix Police Department Drug Enforcement Bureau said. "We honor his memory, but we celebrate and we're there with his family and that's the most important thing we can do." The 29-year-old police officer was a six-year veteran of the department and was an Iraqi war veteran. 1) Tatum Raetz, the daughter of fallen Phoenix Officer Daryl Raetz, was joined by close to 100 officers at her kindergarten graduation on May 22. 2) Officer Daryl Raetz http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b5e_1369440159 SAPD_HRT Police Turn Out for Fallen Phoenix Officer's Daughter Phoenix, Police, daughter Fri, 24 May 2013 18:22:06 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=993_1369433944 USMC_SRT Marines do many things to relieve stress during breaks at work. Some go out for a smoke break or gather around for some "water cooler" talk, while others go outside to catch a whiff of fresh air. Sgt. Emmanuel Dickson, however, does not do any of those things. Dickson, an administrative specialist with personnel sourcing, Marine Forces Reserve, takes "pull-up breaks" instead. "Everyday individuals sit in front of their computers, and by the end of the day, they are exhausted and tired and do not feel like doing anything," he said. "I go out to do pull-ups because it gets my blood pumping and keeps my mind going. It will get me feeling energized." His frequent trips to the pull-up bar have earned him the top spot on the MARFORRES Pull-Up Campaign leader board. The campaign, which kicked off April 1, aims to have Marines perform more pull-ups through friendly competition, according to Sgt. Maj. James T. Booker, the MARFORRES and Marine Forces North sergeant major. As a part of the campaign, installing new sets of pull-up bars and inspiring participants to do more sets will ultimately help Marines improve their future physical fitness test scores. For Dickson, this just meant writing down what he was already doing. "When came out, it gave me an opportunity to do... something I just like to do... go out there and knock out as many as I can whenever I can," said Dickson, a native of Kaduna, Nigeria. Pull-ups have always been a part of his workout regimen. Dickson, who can perform 38 pull-ups now, said to stay overall physically fit he takes part in everything from cross-fit to gymnastics. However, he prefers bodyweight exercises like pull-ups. He declared that fitness is a lifestyle and being inactive is not an option. "He's always out there and he's really good at ," said Sgt. Enrique Trevino, administrative specialist with MARFORRES Installation Personnel Administration Center, and also a teammate of Dickson's. "I'm glad he's on my team." Dickson said he never planned on doing so many pull-ups, but the campaign motivated him to beat or match the number he performed the day before. The campaign website has an individual leader board, lead by Dickson who has logged more than 2,500 pull ups since mid-April. There is also a team leader board, which shows the teams and sections with the most pull-ups. Team "Lat's for Days," Dickson's and Trevino's team, has lost most of its team members either to a different duty station or temporary additional duty. This means that Dickson and Trevino have to carry the team while other members are gone. So far they have been successful holding the team in the top spot, while Trevino is also holding the second spot on the individual leader board. Trevino said they like to go out as a team and face-off because it allows them to motivate each other and ultimately build camaraderie by competing between themselves. Marines around Marine Corps Support Facility New Orleans started to notice Dickson's name on top of the leader board. Some have been curious about what he is doing and what his routine is, but others approached him with something else. Dickson has been getting called out publically; one friendly competitor in the MARFORRES Pull-Up Campaign video vowed to take his spot on the pull-up throne. But Dickson sees it as a win-win situation. He loves it when other Marines are motivated and work hard on improving themselves, even if it means trying to beat him as the top dog. For MARFORRES Pull-Up Campaign Video, visit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01gB6LEDgtQ . * &amp; ** Sgt. Emmanuel Dickson, an administrative specialist with personnel sourcing, Marine Forces Reserve, takes a break after doing a set of pull-ups here, May 20. Dickson says he can currently perform 38 pull-ups in a row, and performs more than 100 pull-ups every day. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=993_1369433944 USMC_SRT The Pull-up Champ: Marine performs pull-ups all the way to the top USMC, Marines, Pull, Up, Fri, 24 May 2013 16:50:20 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ae0_1369427258 SpartacusTesla http://www.vice.com/read/we-watched-the-stockholm-suburbs-burning ... really beginning to love this channel. Media blowing things out of proportion is not a new thing. But after this weeks events and public ( as well as LiveLeak ) response from everyone, I am beginning to realize something else: Many people WANT drama in their lives. They WANT to have an enemy to hate. So they easily allow themselves to feel threatened, when in reality, the things that should scare us more ( Cancer from cigarettes and pollution, deteriorating health care, less fulfilling lives then our parents and grandparents who had less technology, Justin Bieber's new album coming out) are overlooked. The population of Muslims in England is less than 5%. That's a fact. One man was killed earlier this week by 2 lunatics. Sad, but it was one man. How many dies from drunk driving or cancer from cigarettes since then in England? Here are the statistics on Muslim population in England, and please read the VICE article, it's not what you would expect, and it has given me a newfound respect to the way Swedes conduct themselves. Population of England : 53 Million United Kingdom Census 2011 suggesting that by 2011 the total Muslim population had reached 2.7 million, 4.8% of the total population 1,500 mosques for 2.7 million Muslims. Go to any mosque on Friday the holy day, and I promise you at most you will see a couple hundred. Which shows only a small percent even go to the mosque during the holy day, no different than church. Search as much as you want for videos and photos of the &quot;riots&quot; in London the other night, and you will see the same guys, and the same footage. Perhaps 50-100 drunks walking around the town all night long. That's all. That's all. Relax everyone. Relax. Census YearMuslim (% of Total population)Registered MosquesMuslims per mosque19610.11 77,14319710.46 307,53319811.11 1493,71119911.86 4432,14420013.07 6142,60620114.80 1,5001,912 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ae0_1369427258 SpartacusTesla VICE article on the RIOTS in Sweden and Muslim Population stats in England london riots Fri, 24 May 2013 16:20:28 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1e2_1369426713 wirednixon "Is America ready for pat-downs at every event?" A new Department of Homeland Security bulletin warning of the security risks 3D printed guns pose may be setting the stage for 3D printer regulation or at the very least more intrusive pat downs when attending certain events. Liberator, single-shot 3D printed pistol, photo via DefCad.org. According to Fox News , a DHS memo is being sent to various state and federal law enforcement agencies cautioning, "Limiting plastic guns may be impossible," and that 3D guns pose "public safety risks." "Significant advances in three-dimensional (3D) printing capabilities, availability of free digital 3D printer files for firearms components, and difficulty regulating file sharing may present public safety risks from unqualified gun seekers who obtain or manufacture 3D printed guns," warns the bulletin compiled by the Joint Regional Intelligence Center," the memo states, as reported by Fox News. "This is a serious threat," a nervous law enforcement source reportedly told Fox, adding, "These could defeat magnetometers. The only security procedure to catch is a pat down. Is America ready for pat-downs at every event?" If this all sounds like you woke up in some real-life science fiction fantasy, allow me to bring you up to speed. Towards the beginning of May, an Austin-based 3D printing group known as Defense Distributed announced it was in its final stages of testing their coup de gr^ace, a functional firearm produced almost entirely out of plastic parts manufactured by a 3D printer, which the group named the "Liberator." On May 6, the group began distributing schematics for the single-shot pistol freely online, allowing anyone connected to the Internet to download them from anywhere in the world. The deliberately open nature of the gun's files led the State Department to issue a take-down notice to the group later that week claiming they had violated firearms export laws. However, the State Department was a day late and a dollar short as the files had already gone viral and by that time were already downloaded over 100,000 times . Additionally, the DHS memo obtained by Fox specifically mentions Defense Distributed by name. A section of the memo is even dedicated to their Liberator gun design, stating: "Magnetometers may fail to detect the Liberator, depending on device sensitivity. Though it is prohibited by federal law, manufacturers may deliberately omit the unnecessary metal insert, leaving only a small nail and ammunition as the sole metal component. Future designs could further reduce or eliminate metal entirely. "Unqualified gun seekers may be able to acquire or manufacture their own Liberators with no background checks." As Fox News reports, the DHS bulletin also warned "the firearms can be made without serial numbers or unique identifiers, hindering ballistics testing," and that as 3D printers inevitably become more affordable, "even more sophisticated printed guns will become easier to acquire." Last week, UK newspaper The Daily Mail claimed to have "exposed" the "massive international security risk" of 3D guns when they cheekily produced their own plastic weapon and sneaked it on board a Eurostar train. Several of the paper's readers, however, saw through their cunning ploy, noting they produced the firearm without the necessary metal firing pin, and didn't attempt to smuggle ammunition. "Yes - but did your intern manage to get any bullets on the train... no. Typical DM nonsense!," one savvy reader commented on their website. Even prior to its creation, the 3D printed gun had its fair share of political opponents. In December, Democrat NY Rep. Steve Israel called for the urgent renewal of legislation banning undetectable firearms set to expire at the end of this year. "With the advent of 3-D printers these guns are suddenly a real possibility, but the law Congress passed is set to expire next year. We should act now to give law enforcement authorities the power to stop the development of these weapons before they are as easy to come by as a Google search," Rep. Israel stated in a press release on his House site . Also, following the release and proliferation of the Liberator gun files, notorious gun grabber Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), attempted to persuade people, "Now anyone, a terrorist, someone who is mentally ill, a spousal abuser, a felon, can essentially open a gun factory in their garage...it must be stopped." Of course, the DHS bulletin is right on. As Internet patrons can attest, once something is online, the toothpaste is out of the tube, so to speak, but will the advent of the 3D printed gun actually backfire on us? The DHS is now actively engaged in painting this tremendous scientific advancement as a public threat, and in order to protect We the People from the big, bad 3D printed gun boogeyman, we must unquestionably hand them more control, give up more civil liberties and submit to more invasive pat-downs. Ah, the land of the free... Adan Salazar Infowars.com May 24, 2013 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1e2_1369426713 wirednixon PARADIGM SHIFT: LEAKED DHS Memo REVEALS THE ESTABLISHMENT IS TERRIFIED OF 3D PRINTED GUNS guns, plastic, para Fri, 24 May 2013 14:52:32 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bdc_1369418174 Jim V Schie London Soldier Killing HoaxI wish the footage of the lady going past came out the time i made the video. People don't understand they don't show it because it clearly shows PROPAGANDA HOAX the news cut the footage not me so do a SEARCH FOR SOLDIER KILLING AND YOU WILL FIND SAME FOOTAGE the video of lady passing is the best if you can find it 100 percent PROPAGANDA HOAX http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bdc_1369418174 Jim V Schie London Soldier Killing Hoax!! New World Order Agenda! London, Hoax, New,world,order,devil, masons,terror,islam,Agenda Fri, 24 May 2013 14:04:47 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e43_1369418449 Ruptly An emergency drill by Russia's Ministry of Emergency Services (EMERCOM) was disrupted on Friday by an actual earthquake with its eipcentre off the coast of far east Russia. The magnitude 8.3 tremble was felt from Romania to Japan and it interrupted the drill which involved drones and other high-tech emergency equipment. The EMERCOM Minister Vladimir Puchkov, who had been attending the field drills, immediately organised a video conference with the regional EMERCOM head officials. Before the emergency drills ended, people were rescued from burning buildings, trains and aeroplanes by ambulances, drones and helicopters. In April, EMERCOM drew attention to itself when it debuted some of its new drones and unveiled plans to create a second robotics centre. The earthquake occurred at a depth of around 600 kilometres under the Sea of Okhotskin by the Sakhalin region off the coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula, according to the US Geological Survey. The tremors from the earthquake that reached Moscow thousands of miles away were less than 1 on the Richter scale. Russian authorities quickly stepped up in response to the natural disaster evacuating 850 people from two central buildings in Moscow during the first tremors felt in Moscow since 1977. The Moscow Centre for Crisis Management reported receiving a number of calls from Muscovites concerned about the tremors. No people live within a 100 kilometre radius of the earthquake's epicentre. The seismically active Kuril-Kamchatka arc was the centre of where the quake occurred. There was a brief tsunami warning for Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands issued by EMERCOM, but it was soon retracted. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e43_1369418449 Ruptly Russia: Earthquake tremors disrupt Russian emergency drill Russia, earthquake, emergency, Kamchatka, geology, natural disaster Fri, 24 May 2013 13:32:41 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0d4_1369415949 waterlawman &quot;English Mother Furker Do You Speak it&quot;? Vote and Share this Mother Furker Up. &quot;Please&quot;. Traditional Muslims who understand the Quran and the hadith believe that sharia (Islamic law) expresses the highest and best goals for all societies. It is the will of Allah. But is Islam just in its laws that Muhammad himself practiced and invented? I says no for ten verifiable reasons. Here are four points you must read. First, sometimes these ten points quote the Quran or omit it; sometimes they quote the hadith (reports of Muhammad's words and actions outside of the Quran) or omit it. This is done only to keep down the length of Post. No one should be fooled into believing that these harsh and excessive laws were invented in the fevered imagination of extremists who came long after Muhammad. These harsh and excessive laws come directly from the founder of Islam in his Quran and in his example in the hadith. Second, each of these ten reasons is well documented with quotations and references to the Quran, the hadith, and classical legal opinions. Muhammad himself actually laid down these excessive punishments and policies. Third, it must be pointed out that these harsh laws are not (or should not be) imposed outside of an Islamic court of law. Careful legal hurdles must be passed before the punishments are carried out. However, even in that case, it will become clear to anyone who thinks clearly that these punishments and policies are excessive by their very nature, and excess is never just, as Aristotle taught us in his Nicomachean Ethics. Fourth, One of the reasons we all sense that these Islamic punishments are harsh and excessive is that Christianity has also filled the globe. Even if one is not a Christian or is only a nominal Christian, he or she has breathed deeply of Christianity by virtue of laws and customs or even driving by churches. New Testament Christianity, when properly understood and followed, offers humanity dignity. 'Islam' stands for Muhammad, the earliest Muslims, and classical legal scholars. Here are the top ten reasons why sharia or Islamic law is bad for all societies. 10. Islam commands that drinkers and gamblers should be whipped. In 2001, Iranian officials sentenced three men to flogging not only for illicit sex (see reason no. nine), but also for drinking alcohol. In 2005, in Nigeria a sharia court ordered that a drinker should be caned eighty strokes. In 2005, in the Indonesian province of Aceh, fifteen men were caned in front of a mosque for gambling. This was done publicly so all could see and fear. Eleven others are scheduled to undergo the same penalty for gambling. After going through two previous confusing stages before coming down hard on drinkers and gamblers, the Quran finally prohibits alcohol and gambling in Sura 5:90-91; they do not prescribe the punishment of flogging, but the hadith does. A poor 'criminal' was brought to Muhammad who became angry: The Prophet felt it hard (was angry) and ordered all those who were present in the house, to beat him . (Bukhari, Punishments, nos. 6774-6775) Thus, we see no offer of help for the alcoholic when he is dragged before Muhammad and his followers. Why does Muhammad not offer rehabilitation? Why does he immediately go to corporal punishment? The later classical legal rulings follow the Quran and the hadith, so we do not need to examine them here. It is sometimes argued that Islamic countries are pure, whereas the West is decadent. No one can argue with this latter claim, but are Islamic countries pure? The Supplemental Material, below, demonstrates that Islamic countries still have drinking and gambling in them. 9. Islam allows husbands to hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in their wives. In 2004, Rania al-Baz, who had been beaten by her husband, made her ordeal public to raise awareness about violence suffered by women in the home in Saudi Arabia. Saudi television aired a talk show that discussed this issue. Islamic scholar holding up rods that husbands may use to hit their wives. The Quran says: 4:34 . . . If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them , then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most high and great. (MAS Abdel Haleem, the Qur'an, Oxford UP, 2004) The hadith says that Muslim women in the time of Muhammad were suffering from domestic violence in the context of confusing marriage laws: Rifa'a divorced his wife whereupon 'AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. 'Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah's Apostle came, 'Aisha said, &quot;I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!&quot; (Bukhari) This hadith shows Muhammad hitting his girl-bride, Aisha, daughter of Abu Bakr: Muslim no. 2127: 'He struck me on the chest which caused me pain.' It is claimed that Islamic societies have fewer incidents of fornication and adultery because of strict laws or customs, for example, women wearing veils over their faces or keeping separate from men in social settings. But these results of fewer incidents of sexual 'crimes' may have unanticipated negative effects in other areas, such as the oppression of women. Generally, sharia restricts women's social mobility and rights, the more closely sharia is followed. For example, in conservative Saudi Arabia women are not allowed to drive cars. In Iran, the law oppresses women. For example, women's testimony counts half that of men, and far more women than men are stoned to death for adultery. Here is the supporting article for the ninth point. It has a long list of different translations of Sura 4:34, in order to resolve confusion over this verse, circulating around the web. This longer article has many links that demonstrate the oppression of women under Islamic law. 8. Islam allows an injured plaintiff to exact legal revenge-physical eye for physical eye. In 2003, in Saudi Arabia a man had two teeth extracted under the law of retaliation. In 2003, a court in Pakistan sentenced a man to be blinded by acid after he carried out a similar attack on his fiance. In 2005, an Iranian court orders a man's eye to be removed for throwing acid on another man and blinding him in both eyes. The Quran says: 5:45 And We ordained therein for them: Life for life, eye for eye, nose for nose, ear for ear, tooth for tooth and wounds equal for equal. But if anyone remits the retaliation by way of charity, it shall be for him an expiation. And whosoever does not judge by that which Allah has revealed, such are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrongdoers . . .). (Hilali and Khan, The Noble Qur'an, Riyadh: Darussalam, 1996) This passage allows for an indemnity or compensation instead of imposing the literal punishment of eye for an eye. No one should have a quarrel with this option. According to the hadith, the plaintiff also has the option to forgive, and this is legitimate, provided a judge oversees the process. The problem is the literal law of retaliation. The hadith and later legal rulings demonstrate that this excessive option was actually carried out. Islamic law calls all of humanity to march backwards 1,400 years BC and to re-impose the old law of retaliation literally, and the evidence suggest that the Torah never intended the law to be carried out literally. 7. Islam commands that a male and female thief must have a hand cut off. Warning! This short article has photos of severed hands. The reader should never lose sight of the fact that this punishment is prescribed in the Quran, the eternal word of Allah. It does not exist only in the fevered imagination of a violent and sick radical regime like the Taliban, which once ruled in Afghanistan. A Saudi cleric justifies chopping off hands here. The Quran says: 5:38 Cut off the hands of thieves, whether they are male or female, as punishment for what they have done-a deterrent from God: God is almighty and wise. 39 But if anyone repents after his wrongdoing and makes amends, God will accept his repentance: God is most forgiving and merciful. (Haleem) At first glance, verse 39 seems to accept repentance before the thief's hand is cut off. But the hadith states emphatically that repentance is acceptable only after mutilation. Muhammad himself says that even if his own daughter, Fatima, were to steal and then intercede that her hand should not be cut off, he would still have to cut it off (Bukhari, Punishments, no. 6788) 6. Islam commands that highway robbers should be crucified or mutilated. In September 2003, Scotsman Sandy Mitchell faced crucifixion in Saudi Arabia. He was beaten and tortured until he confessed to a crime he did not commit: a bomb plot masterminded by the British embassy. This punishment that it is the worst kind of execution and that two have been carried out in the last twenty years. In 2002 Amnesty International reports that even though Saudi Arabia ratified the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Convention against Torture) in October 1997, amputation is prescribed under both Hudud (punishments) and Qisas (law of retaliation). AI has recorded thirty-three amputations and nine cross-amputations where the alternate hand or foot is mutilated. The Quran says: 5:33 Those who wage war against God and His Messenger and strive to spread corruption in the land should be punished by death, crucifixion, the amputation of an alternate hand and foot or banishment from the land: a disgrace for them in this world, and then a terrible punishment in the Hereafter, 34 unless they repent before you overpower them: in that case bear in mind that God is forgiving and merciful. (Haleem) It may be difficult to accept, but the hadith says that Muhammad tortured these next people before he executed them. This scenario provides the historical context of Sura 5:33-34. The explanations in parentheses have been added by the translator: Narrated Anas: Some people . . . came to the Prophet and embraced Islam . . . hey turned renegades (reverted from Islam) and killed the shepherd of the camels and took the camels away . . . The Prophet ordered that their hands and legs should be cut off and their eyes should be branded with heated pieces of iron, and that their cut hands and legs should not be cauterized, till they died. (Bukhari, Punishments, no. 6802) The next hadith reports that the renegades died from bleeding to death because Muhammad refused to cauterize their amputated limbs. Then the hadith after that one reports that the renegades were not given water, so they died of thirst. They probably died of both causes: thirst and loss of blood. Islamic law says that these punishments are imposed for highway robbery, and in some cases crucifixion does not need a murder before it is imposed. For more information on Muhammad's brutality and the barbaric laws that flow out of it.. 5. Islam commands that homosexuals must be executed. In February 1998, the Taliban, who once ruled in Afghanistan, ordered a stone wall to be pushed over three men convicted of sodomy. Their lives were to be spared if they survived for 30 minutes and were still alive when the stones were removed. In its 1991 Constitution, in Articles 108-113, Iran adopted the punishment of execution for sodomy. In April 2005, a Kuwaiti cleric says homosexuals should be thrown off a mountain or stoned to death. On April 7, 2005, it was reported that Saudi Arabia sentenced more than 100 men to prison or flogging for 'gay conduct.' These homosexuals were lucky. Early Islam would have executed them, as these hadith demonstrate. Ibn Abbas, Muhammad's cousin and highly reliable transmitter of hadith, reports the following about early Islam and Muhammad's punishment of homosexuals: . . . 'If you find anyone doing as Lot's people did, kill the one who does it, and the one to whom it is done' (Abu Dawud no. 4447). This hadith passage says that homosexuals should be burned alive or have wall pushed on them: Ibn Abbas and Abu Huraira reported God's messenger as saying, 'Accursed is he who does what Lot's people did.' In a version . . . on the authority of Ibn Abbas it says that Ali had two people burned and that Abu Bakr had a wall thrown down on them. (Mishkat, vol. 1, p. 765, Prescribed Punishments) Though this punishment of a wall being toppled on them is extreme, the Taliban were merely following the origins of their religion. 6+- 4. Islam orders unmarried fornicators to be whipped and adulterers to be stoned to death. Fornication: In 2001, Iranian officials sentenced three men to flogging for illicit sex. The Quran says: 24:2 The fornicatress and the fornicator, flog each of them with a hundred stripes. Let not pity withhold you in their case, in a punishment prescribed by Allah, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a party of the believers witness their punishment. . (Hilali and Khan). The additions in the brackets, though not original to the Arabic, have the support of the hadith. These command flogging only of unmarried fornicators: Bukhari, Punishments, nos. 6831 and 6833. The classical legal rulings follow the Quran and the hadith closely, so we do not need to analyze them here. According to this report, in Iran a teenage boy broke his Ramadan fast, so a judge sentenced him to be lashed with eighty-five stripes. He died from the punishment. Though his sad case does not deal with fornication, it is cited here because it shows that lashing can be fatal. Adultery: In December 2004, Amnesty International reports: An Iranian woman charged with adultery faces death by stoning in the next five days after her death sentence was upheld by the Supreme Court last month. Her unnamed co-defendant is at risk of imminent execution by hanging. Amnesty International members are now writing urgent appeals to the Iranian authorities, calling for the execution to be stopped. She is to be buried up to her chest and stoned to death. This gruesome hadith passage reports that a woman was buried up to her chest and stoned to death: And when he had given command over her and she was put in a hole up to her breast, he ordered the people to stone her. Khalid b. al-Walid came forward with a stone which he threw at her head, and when the blood spurted on his face he cursed her . . . (Muslim no. 4206) The Prophet prayed over her dead body and then buried her. Truthfully, though, how effective was the prayer when Muhammad and his community murdered her in cold blood? The rest of the hadith says that Muhammad told Khalid not to be too harsh, but the Prophet's words drip with irony. Perhaps Muhammad meant that Khalid should not have cursed her. However, if they really did not want to be harsh, they should have forgiven her and let her go to raise her child. Later Islamic legal rulings follow the Quran and the hadith closely, so we do not need to analyze them here. Here is the support for the fourth reason. 3. Islam orders death for Muslim and possible death for non-Muslim critics of Muhammad and the Quran and even sharia itself. In 1989, Iran's Supreme Leader issued a fatwa (legal decree) to assassinate Salman Rushdie, a novelist, who wrote Satanic Verses, which includes questions about the angel Gabriel's role in inspiring the Quran. Now the extremists in the highest levels in Iran have recently renewed the fatwa. In 2005, The Muslim Council of Victoria, Australia, brought a lawsuit against two pastors for holding a conference and posting articles critiquing Islam. Three Muslims attended the conference and felt offended. The two pastors have been convicted based on Australia's vilification law. While on trial, one of them wanted to read from the Quran on domestic violence (see 9, above), but the lawyer representing the Council would not allow it. The pastors are appealing their conviction. In 2005, British Muslims have been campaigning to pass a religious hate speech law in England's parliament. They have succeeded. Their ability to propagandize has not been curtailed. Opponents of the law say that it stifles free speech that may criticize Muhammad, the Quran, and Islam. Here are the classical legal rulings. First, the Muslim deserves death for doing any of the following (Reliance of the Traveler pp. 597-98, o8.7): (1) Reviling Allah or his Messenger; (2) being sarcastic about 'Allah's name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat'; (3) denying any verse of the Quran or 'anything which by scholarly consensus belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong to it'; (4) holding that 'any of Allah's messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent'; (5) reviling the religion of Islam; (6) being sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law; (7) denying that Allah intended 'the Prophet's message . . . to be the religion followed by the entire world.' It is no wonder that critical investigation of the truth claims of Islam can never prevail in Islamic lands when the sword of Muhammad hangs over the scholars' head. The non-Muslims living under Islamic rule are not allowed to do the following (p. 609, o11.10(1)-(5)): (1) Commit adultery with a Muslim woman or marry her; (2) conceal spies of hostile forces; (3) lead a Muslim away from Islam; (4) mention something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet . . . or Islam. According to the discretion of the caliph or his representative, the punishments for violating these rules are as follows: (1) death, (2) enslavement, (3) release without paying anything, and (4) ransoming in exchange for money. These punishments also execute free speech-even repulsive speech-and freedom of religion or conscience. Ultimately, censorship testifies to a lack of confidence in one's position and message. If the message of Islam were truly superior, one could trust in the power of truth. As it stands, sharia with its prescribed punishments for questioning Muhammad, the Quran, and sharia itself testifies to their weakness since sharia threatens those who dare to differ. Muhammad (and today's Muslims) rely on violence and force to protect his message, besides reason and persuasive argumentation. The Quran and the hadith, both of which orders death to critics. 2. Islam orders apostates to be killed. In Iran an academic was condemned to death for criticizing clerical rule in Iran. The rulers assert that he was insulting Muhammad and Shi'ite laws. He was charged with apostasy. Apostates are those who leave Islam, like Salman Rushdie (see the linked article in no. three, above), whether they become atheists or convert to another religion. They are supposed to be killed according to the Quran, the hadith, and later legal rulings. See the previous point no. three for acts that entail leaving Islam according to Islamic law. Sayyid Maududi, a respected Islamic scholar, in this booklet argues that Sura 9:11-12 refers to apostates and that they should be put to death (scroll down to 'The Proof in the Quran for the Commandment to Execute Apostates'). This Muslim website has an overview of Islam on apostates. They should be given time to repent, but if they refuse, they must be killed. And the number one reason why sharia is bad for all societies . . . 1. Islam commands offensive and aggressive and unjust jihad. Muhammad is foundational to Islam, and he set the genetic code for Islam, waging war. In the ten years that he lived in Medina from his Hijrah (Emigration) from Mecca in AD 622 to his death of a fever in AD 632, he either sent out or went out on seventy-four raids, expeditions, or full-scale wars. They range from small assassination hit squads to kill anyone who insulted him, to the Tabuk Crusades in late AD 630 against the Byzantine Christians. He had heard a rumor that an army was mobilizing to invade Arabia, but the rumor was false, so his 30,000 jihadists returned home, but not before imposing a jizya tax on northern Christians and Jews. Money flowed into the Islamic treasury. So why would Muhammad get a revelation to dry up this money flow? What are some of the legalized rules of jihad found in the Quran, hadith, and classical legal opinions? (1) Women and children are enslaved. They can either be sold, or the Muslims may 'marry' the women, since their marriages are automatically annulled upon their capture. (2) Jihadists may have sex with slave women. Ali, Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law, did this. (3) Women and children must not be killed during war, unless this happens in a nighttime raid when visibility was low. (4) Old men and monks could be killed. (5) A captured enemy of war could be killed, enslaved, ransomed for money or an exchange, freely released, or beaten. One time Muhammad even tortured a citizen of the city of Khaybar in order to extract information about where the wealth of the city was hidden. (6) Enemy men who converted could keep their property and small children. This law is so excessive that it amounts to forced conversion. Only the strongest of the strong could resist this coercion and remain a non-Muslim. (7) Civilian property may be confiscated. (8) Civilian homes may be destroyed. (9) Civilian fruit trees may be destroyed. (10) Pagan Arabs had to convert or die. This does not allow for the freedom of religion or conscience. (11) People of the Book (Jews and Christians) had three options (Sura 9:29): fight and die; convert and pay a forced 'charity' or zakat tax; or keep their Biblical faith and pay a jizya or poll tax. The last two options mean that money flows into the Islamic treasury, so why would Muhammad receive a revelation to dry up this money flow? Thus, jihad is aggressive, coercive, and excessive, and Allah never revealed to Muhammad to stop these practices. The differences between jihad in Islam and the wars in the Old Testament. . There are vast differences between Islam and Judaism on this topic. Therefore, Islam is violent-unjustly and aggressively. Conclusion The nightmare must end. Sharia oppresses the citizens of Islamic countries. Islam must reform, but the legal hierarchy in Islamic nations will not do this because the judges and legal scholars understand the cost: many passages in the Quran and the hadith must be rejected, and this they cannot do. After all, the Quran came down directly from Allah through Gabriel, so says traditional theology. So how can Islam reform? But reform it must. It can start by rewriting classical fiqh (interpretations of law). Again, though, that would mean leaving behind the Quran and Muhammad's example. How can the legal hierarchy in Islamic nations do this? In contrast, the West has undergone the Enlightenment or the Age of Reason (c. 1600-1800+), so western law has been injected with a heavy dose of reason. Also, the New Testament tempers excessive punishments. At least when Christianity reformed (c. 1400-1600), the reformers went back to the New Testament, which preaches peace and love. So religion and reason in the West permit justice to be found more readily-the Medieval Church is not foundational to Christianity; only Jesus and the New Testament are. Can Islamic countries benefit from an Enlightenment that may deny the Quran and the hadith? This seems impossible. Islamic law threatens Muslims with death if they criticize Muhammad and the Quran, not to mention denying them. Since Islamic law cannot be reformed without doing serious damage to original and authentic Islam-the one taught by Muhammad-then a second plan must be played out. Sharia must never spread around the world. At least that much is clear and achievable. The hard evidence demonstrates beyond doubt that sharia does not benefit any society, for it contains too many harsh rules and punishments. One of the most tragic and under-reported occurrences in the West in recent years is the existence of a sharia court in Canada. Muslims are pushing for a sharia divorce courting Australia as well. Having a court of arbitration if it is based on western law and legal theory is legitimate, but sharia does not hold to this standard. Whether sharia is imposed gradually or rapidly, Canada should promptly shut down any sharia court, and Australia should never allow one. Such a court should never be permitted in the US, the rest of the West, or anywhere else in the world that is battling Islam. It is true that the Enlightenment teaches tolerance, but it also teaches critical thinking and reasoning. Sharia cannot stand up under scrutiny. It is intolerant and excessive, and Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ethics teaches the West that excess is never just. Thankfully, the province of Quebec, Canada, has forbidden sharia. This is the right initiative. Sharia ultimately degrades society and diminishes freedom. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0d4_1369415949 waterlawman Top Ten reasons why Sharia is bad for all Societies. sharia,Muslim,Qur'an,truth,Islam,news,politics,war,live-leak,warning,graphic,death,hi-jab,peace,race,love,hate,god,devil,luciferian,false,religion,christian Mon, 20 May 2013 14:23:01 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=649_1369073929 Jihad2IRQ Islamic State of Iraq and Alsham http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=649_1369073929 Jihad2IRQ Alnusra killed more than <span class="highlight">100</span> shabeeha Alnusra killed more than 100 shabeeha Thu, 23 May 2013 16:39:20 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6af_1369341311 Shireen Said Blood on Hands then No Blood on Hands - London 'Terrorist Beheading of British Soldier' 100% Hoax. I added another video to distance myself from the previous video, apparently I jumped to conclusions too early. The second video pretty much destroys the arguments from the first video, and totally debunks it. Apologize for jumping to conclusions too early! Also, the very grave racism and Islamophobia in many of the comments here below are really appalling, but they do not affect me personally since I'm a born Christian (Secular) and a Native Scandinavian . My family has lived in Scandinavia since the ice left after the last Ice Age. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6af_1369341311 Shireen Said Blood on Hands then No Blood on Hands - London 'Terrorist Beheading of British Soldier' <span class="highlight">100</span>% Hoax England, London, Woolwich, Hands, Blood, No Blood, Hoax