http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=Cheerleaders Tue, 21 May 2013 22:55:54 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=Cheerleaders Wed, 15 May 2013 13:15:36 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=17f_1368636590 uticamarco Suspended High School Twerk Team. Music by DJ FM. "b00ty b00ty butt cheeks" JJRS Productions. Videography produced by #WETMILK. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=17f_1368636590 uticamarco Suspended High School Twerk Team suspended, high, school, twerk, twerks, twerking, team, cheerleader, cheerleaders, highschool, butt, cheeks, dancing, yoga pants, tights, leggings, girls, music, women, Wed, 15 May 2013 17:25:11 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=79f_1368652988 LostRothschild Don't underestimate the anti's power to ignore reality... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disarming Realities: As Gun Sales Soar, Gun Crimes Plummet Larry Bell, Contributor A couple of new studies reveal the gun-control hypesters' worst nightmare...more people are buying firearms, while firearm-related homicides and suicides are steadily diminishing. What crackpots came up with these conclusions? One set of statistics was compiled by the U.S. Department of Justice. The other was reported by the Pew Research Center. According to DOJ's Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. gun-related homicides dropped 39 percent over the course of 18 years, from 18,253 during 1993, to 11,101 in 2011. During the same period, non-fatal firearm crimes decreased even more, a whopping 69 percent. The majority of those declines in both categories occurred during the first 10 years of that time frame. Firearm homicides declined from 1993 to 1999, rose through 2006, and then declined again through 2011. Non-fatal firearm violence declined from 1993 through 2004, then fluctuated in the mid-to-late 2000s. And where did the bad people who did the shooting get most of their guns? Were those gun show "loopholes" responsible? Nope. According to surveys DOJ conducted of state prison inmates during 2004 (the most recent year of data available), only two percent who owned a gun at the time of their offense bought it at either a gun show or flea market. About 10 percent said they purchased their gun from a retail shop or pawnshop, 37 percent obtained it from family or friends, and another 40 percent obtained it from an illegal source. While firearm violence accounted for about 70 percent of all homicides between 1993 and 2011, guns were used in less than 10 percent of all non-fatal violent crimes. Between 70 percent and 80 percent of those firearm homicides involved a handgun, and 90 percent of non-fatal firearm victimizations were committed with a handgun. Males, blacks, and persons aged 18-24 had the highest firearm homicide rates. The March Pew study, drawn from numbers obtained from the Bureau of Justice Statistics and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, also found a dramatic drop in gun crime over the past two decades. Their accounting shows a 49 percent decline in the homicide rate, and a 75 percent decline of non-fatal violent crime victimization. More than 8 in 10 gun homicide victims in 2010 were men and boys. Fifty-five percent of the homicide victims were black, far beyond their 13 percent share of the population. Pew researchers observed that the huge amount of attention devoted to gun violence incidents in the media has caused most Americans to be unaware that gun crime is "strikingly down" from 20 years ago. In fact, gun-related homicides in the late 2000s were "equal to those not seen since the early 1960s." Yet their survey found that 56 percent believed gun-related crime is higher, 26 percent believed it stayed about the same, and 6 percent didn't know. Only 12 percent of those polled thought it was lower. The Pew survey found that while women and elderly were actually less likely to become crime victims, they were more likely to believe gun crime had increased in recent years. On the other hand, men, who were more likely to become victims, were more likely know that the gun rate had dropped. Those gun crime rates certainly aren't diminishing for lack of supply...at least not for law-abiding legal buyers. Last December, the FBI recorded a record number of 2.78 million background checks for purchases that month, surpassing a 2.01 million mark set the month before by about 39 percent. That December 2012 figure, in turn, was up 49 percent from a previous record on that month the year before. FBI checks for all of 2012 totaled 19.6 million, an annual record, and an increase of 19 percent over 2011. Firearms sellers can thank the gun-control legislation lobbies for much of this business windfall. Marked demand increases have been witnessed over the past five years thanks to the 2008 and 2012 elections of U.S. history's most successful, if unintentional, gun salesman as president. The firearms market got a huge added boost after the tragic shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut activated a renewed legislative frenzy. If that gun-purchasing fervor has abated with the defeat of several congressional regulation proposals, as I'm sure it has, you surely wouldn't have known it by witnessing the overwhelmingly enormous annual NRA convention in Houston earlier this month. Attendance was estimated to be more than 70,000 people from all over the country. Those attendees weren't all guys either...not by a long shot. Last year, the National Shooting Sports Foundation reported that participation by women increased both in target shooting (46.5%) and hunting (36.6%) over the past decade. Also, 61% of firearm retailers responding to a NSSF survey reported an increase in female customers. A 2009 NSSF survey indicated that the number of women purchasing guns for personal defense increased a whopping 83 percent. Is John Lott, the author of "More Guns, Less Crime" right? Does the rapid growth of gun ownership and armed citizens have anything to do with a diminishing gun violence trend? His expansive research concludes that state "shall issue" laws which allow citizens to carry concealed weapons do produce a steady decrease in violent crime. He explains that this is logical because criminals are deterred by the risk of attacking an armed target, so as more citizens arm themselves, danger to the criminals increases. Whether or not you buy that reasoning, and it does make sense to me, what about the notion that tougher gun laws have or would make any difference? With the toughest gun laws in the nation, Chicago saw homicides jump to 513 in 2012, a 15% hike in a single year. The city's murder rate is 15.65 per 100,000 people, compared with 4.5 for the Midwest, and 5.6 for Illinois. Up to 80 percent of Chicago murders and non-fatal shootings are gang- related, primarily young black and Hispanic men killed by other black and Hispanic men. Would tightening gun laws even more, or "requiring" background checks, change these conditions? Gwainevere Catchings Hess, president of the Black Women's Agenda (BWA), Inc., an organization that strongly advocates strict gun-control legislation, rightly points out that "In 2009, black males ages 15-19 were eight times as likely as white males the same age, and 2.5 times as likely as their Hispanic peers to be killed in a gun homicide." Those are terrible statistics, but here are some others. Today, 72% of black children are born out of wedlock, as are 53% of Hispanic children and 36% of white children. Back in 1965, 25% of black children were born out of wedlock, nearly one-third fewer. As a result, promiscuous rappers, prosperous dope peddlers and street gang leaders are becoming ever more influential role models. It's probably no big stretch of imagination to correlate such grossly disproportionate crime and victimization rates with comparably staggering rates of single-parent families, those without fathers in particular. Yet in the general population, and although the agenda-driven media hasn't noticed, we can be grateful that gun violence has been trending downward since 1993 when it hit its last peak. Don't want to credit a rise in gun ownership and concealed carry by law-abiding citizens for this good news? Fine. But then, don't imagine that gun legislation is the reason or answer either. Leave that illusion to gun-control cheerleaders in the media. http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybel...rimes-plummet/ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=79f_1368652988 LostRothschild As Gun Sales Soar, Gun Crimes Plummet 2, 2nd, second, amendment, gun, firearm, rights, constitution, tyranny, freedom Tue, 14 May 2013 06:24:01 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2a6_1368524428 MortenHj Yeah this is some epic freedom right here. And these thugs are unleashed on Syria to Democratize it? Give me a break, fucking idiots. The brutes of a supremacist ideology; salafism that incorporates takfirism, show what they are good for. Here is also the aftermath of the incident where the same thugs are exposed even more. http://au.news.yahoo.com/today-tonight/video/watch/2e86729e-b78a-34da-80f1-8dd65a8933bb/troubled-suburbs-reaction/ I love the question "Was the punch sectarian motivated or are you just a thug" LMAO On a side-note im never uploading a 155 mb file here ever again.... Taken from Syria Tube on Facebook http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2a6_1368524428 MortenHj Sectarian Fsa <span class="highlight">cheerleaders</span> terrorize Muslims in Australia Syria, Australia, fsa, terrorism, extremism, salafism, takfirism, idiots, thugs, brutes Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:46:42 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5fd_1367230851 MortenHj New York Times &lt;--- Click here for source link This is a Wahhabi terrorist uprising and have always been that. only cheerleaders in the West with their house-arabs have defended this bullshit. The mass-media is fueled by emotions and the amount of emotions invested in fsa terrorist support is to high for it to be dropped by any negative information. April 27, 2013 Islamist Rebels Create Dilemma on Syria PolicyBy BEN HUBBARDCAIRO - In Syria's largest city, Aleppo, rebels aligned with Al Qaeda control the power plant, run the bakeries and head a court that applies Islamic law. Elsewhere, they have seized government oil fields, put employees back to work and now profit from the crude they produce. Across Syria, rebel-held areas are dotted with Islamic courts staffed by lawyers and clerics, and by fighting brigades led by extremists. Even the Supreme Military Council, the umbrella rebel organization whose formation the West had hoped would sideline radical groups, is stocked with commanders who want to infuse Islamic law into a future Syrian government. Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of. This is the landscape President Obama confronts as he considers how to respond to growing evidence that Syrian officials have used chemical weapons, crossing a "red line" he had set. More than two years of violence have radicalized the armed opposition fighting the government of President Bashar al-Assad, leaving few groups that both share the political vision of the United States and have the military might to push it forward. Among the most extreme groups is the notorious Al Nusra Front, the Qaeda-aligned force declared a terrorist organization by the United States, but other groups share aspects of its Islamist ideology in varying degrees. "Some of the more extremist opposition is very scary from an American perspective, and that presents us with all sorts of problems," said Ari Ratner, a fellow at the Truman National Security Project and former Middle East adviser in the Obama State Department. "We have no illusions about the prospect of engaging with the Assad regime - it must still go - but we are also very reticent to support the more hard-line rebels." Syrian officials recognize that the United States is worried that it has few natural allies in the armed opposition and have tried to exploit that with a public campaign to convince, or frighten, Washington into staying out of the fight. At every turn they promote the notion that the alternative to Mr. Assad is an extremist Islamic state. The Islamist character of the opposition reflects the main constituency of the rebellion, which has been led since its start by Syria's Sunni Muslim majority, mostly in conservative, marginalized areas. The descent into brutal civil war has hardened sectarian differences, and the failure of more mainstream rebel groups to secure regular arms supplies has allowed Islamists to fill the void and win supporters. The religious agenda of the combatants sets them apart from many civilian activists, protesters and aid workers who had hoped the uprising would create a civil, democratic Syria. When the armed rebellion began, defectors from the government's staunchly secular army formed the vanguard. The rebel movement has since grown to include fighters with a wide range of views, including Qaeda-aligned jihadis seeking to establish an Islamic emirate, political Islamists inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood and others who want an Islamic-influenced legal code like that found in many Arab states. "My sense is that there are no seculars," said Elizabeth O'Bagy, of the Institute for the Study of War, who has made numerous trips to Syria in recent months to interview rebel commanders. Of most concern to the United States is the Nusra Front, whose leader recently confirmed that the group cooperated with Al Qaeda in Iraq and pledged fealty to Al Qaeda's top leader, Ayman al-Zawahri, Osama bin Laden's longtime deputy. Nusra has claimed responsibility for a number of suicide bombings and is the group of choice for the foreign jihadis pouring into Syria. Another prominent group, Ahrar al-Sham, shares much of Nusra's extremist ideology but is made up mostly of Syrians. The two groups are most active in the north and east and are widely respected by other rebels for their fighting abilities and their ample arsenal, much of it given by sympathetic donors in the gulf. And both helped lead campaigns to seize military bases, dams on the Euphrates River and the provincial capital of Raqqa Province in March, the only regional capital entirely held by rebel forces. Nusra's hand is felt most strongly in Aleppo, where the group has set up camp in a former children's hospital and has worked with other rebel groups to establish a Shariah Commission in the eye hospital next door to govern the city's rebel-held neighborhoods. The commission runs a police force and an Islamic court that hands down sentences that have included lashings, though not amputations or executions as some Shariah courts in other countries have done. Nusra fighters also control the power plant and distribute flour to keep the city's bakeries running. While many residents initially feared them, some have come to respect them for providing basic services and working to fill the city's security vacuum. Secular activists, however, have chafed at their presence. At times, Nusra fighters have clashed with other rebels who reject their ideology. In the oil-rich provinces of Deir al-Zour and Hasaka, Nusra fighters have seized government oil fields, putting some under the control of tribal militias and running others themselves. "They are the strongest military force in the area," said the commander of a rebel brigade in Hasaka reached via Skype. "We can't deny it." But most of Nusra's fighters joined the group for the weapons, not the ideology, he said, and some left after discovering the Qaeda connection. "Most of the youth who joined them did so to topple the regime, not because they wanted to join Al Qaeda," he said, speaking on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation. As extremists rose in the rebel ranks, the United States sought to limit their influence, first by designating Nusra a terrorist organization, and later by pushing for the formation of the Supreme Military Council, which is linked to the exile opposition group, the Syrian National Coalition. Although led by an army defector, Gen. Salim Idris, the council has taken in the leaders of many overtly Islamist battalions. One called the Syrian Liberation Front has been integrated nearly wholesale into the council; many of its members coordinate closely with the Syrian Islamic Front, a group that includes the extremist Ahrar al-Sham, according to a recent report by Ms. O'Bagy, of the Institute for the Study of War. A spokesman for the council, Louay Mekdad, said that its members reflected Syrian society and that it had no ties to Nusra or other radical groups. "The character of the Syrian people is Islamic, but it is stupid to think that Syria will turn into Afghanistan," he said. "That's just an excuse for those who don't want to help Syria." The Obama administration has said it needs more conclusive information before it acts on the Syrian government's reported use of chemical weapons. It remains unclear whether such action would translate to increased support for the rebels. In the past, United States officials saw the Islamist groups' abundant resources as the main draw for recruits, said Steven Heydemann, a senior adviser at the United States Institute of Peace, which works with the State Department. "The strategy is based on the current assessment that popular appeal of these groups is transactional, not ideological, and that opportunities exist to peel people away by providing alternative support and resources," he said. Mr. Heydemann acknowledged, however, that the current momentum toward radicalism could be hard to reverse. The challenge, he said, is to end the conflict before "the opportunity to create a system of governance not based on militant Islamic law is lost." Emile Hokayem, a Middle East analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, framed the rebels' dilemma another way: "How do you denounce the Nusra Front as extremists when they are playing such an important military role and when they look disciplined, resourceful and committed?" From the start, the Syrian government has sought to portray the rebels as terrorists carrying out an international plot to weaken the country, and the rise of extremist groups has strengthened its case and increased support among Syrians who fear that a rebel victory could mean the end of the secular Syrian state. Many rebels and opposition activists complain about the Western focus on Islamist groups, some even dismissing the opposition's ideological differences. "We all want an Islamic state and we want Shariah to be applied," said Maawiya Hassan Agha, a rebel activist reached by Skype in the northern village of Sarmeen. He said a country's laws should flow from its people's beliefs and compared Syrians calling for Islamic law with the French banning Muslim women from wearing face veils. "In France, people don't like face veils so they passed laws against them," he said. "It's the same thing here. It's our right to push for the laws we want." An employee of The New York Times contributed reporting from Aleppo, Syria. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5fd_1367230851 MortenHj Nowhere in rebel-controlled Syria is there a secular fighting force to speak of Syria, Aleppo, fsa, terrorism, al-qaeda, al-nusra, NY Times, extremism Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:51:18 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=050_1367174753 gemini By: Leo McKinstry Published: Sun, April 28, 2013 http://is.gd/6cVhz8 EU Commissioner Laszlo Andor is calling the shots on immigration What triggered his rage was the page one headline of this newspaper: "Migrants to get more benefits". Turning to me, he said: "It's a joke, isn't it? I worked for almost 50 years and all I get is a small state pension. So why do we owe a living to all these people who have nothing to do with our country?" That question would be echoed by millions of people who are fed up with being told that they have to take responsibility for an unceasing influx of foreigners to Britain. The forces of mass immigration and European integration have created a profound unfairness in our society. Through the benefits system, the NHS, schools, transport and housing, British citizens are required to support vast numbers of new arrivals who by definition have given little or nothing to our nation. Such a process is not only unaffordable but it also makes a mockery of basic justice. The social contract, by which we used to be governed, was based on the idea that help from the state was provided in return for past contributions or service. Promoting personal responsibility and social solidarity, it was never meant to be a system that handed out something for nothing. But that is exactly what it does today as our borders and national identity are systematically demolished. Tragically this problem is certain to worsen in the near future thanks to the European Union's determination to impose its will on our country. As this paper revealed on Saturday, the EU Employment and Social Affairs Commissioner Lazlo Andor, a Left-wing Hungarian economist, wants to remove all restrictions for EU migrants on access to labour markets and benefits systems. In Commissioner Andor's brave new world of absolute free movement, the concepts of nationality and kinship will completely disappear. British taxpayers will owe the same obligations to someone from Budapest as they do to someone from Bolton. No discrimination against Europeans will be tolerated. The British Government will be required to inform foreign nationals fully of their rights to claim welfare, while it will also become easier for pressure groups to launch legal actions if they think any migrants have been victimised. Commissioner Andor's plan shows how badly our independence and democracy have been damaged by the EU. Britain once ruled the greatest empire the world has ever seen, yet we are turning into a subjugated province of the Brussels empire. It is nauseating that we should now be told how to run our labour market by an unaccountable, unelected academic who graduated from Karl Marx university in Budapest, runs an obscure Left-wing magazine and is a member of the economic board of the Hungarian Socialist Party. Rules about benefits and jobs should be decided by our Parliament, not by the EU's self-serving bureaucracy. Yet it is precisely because of its hatred for the concept of democratic sovereignty that the EU so strongly favours the unrestricted movement of people around Europe. Uncontrolled immigration is the ideal vehicle for destroying nationhood and patriotic allegiances while at the same time advancing the idea of European citizenship in a new federal superstate. Unrestricted immigration is bad enough now but it will become even more serious next year once people from Bulgaria and Romania are allowed to settle without restraint. A survey by BBC Newsnight last week showed that around 8 per cent of Romanians and almost 14 per cent of Bulgarians want to come here, a finding that implies the arrival of 2.6 million people from these two countries. That would be an utter disaster for Britain, completely wiping out any recent progress the coalition has made in the reduction of unemployment and the reform of the benefits system. The cheerleaders for immigration, like Commissioner Andor, say that this is scaremongering. In their narrative, migrants always boost national economies because they come to work, not to claim benefits. But such assertions are hollow propaganda. The reality is that unrestricted immigration is highly damaging to the economy. It drives down wages, lowers living standards, places an intolerable strain on the civic infrastructure and puts millions of indigenous workers on the scrapheap. Just as importantly, it is a pernicious myth that all migrants are hard-working. In fact, people from migrant communities are on average more likely to be unemployed than Britons. Only 29 per cent of Somalis and 46 per cent of Bangladeshis are economically active. In total last year at least 370,000 foreign nationals were on out-of-work benefits, costing more than lb2billion. Around 10 per cent of the entire social housing stock goes to foreigners, with the proportion in London rising to 20 per cent. The belief that all Eastern Europeans fulfil the stereotype of the hard-working Pole is just as fallacious. One in three of all Big Issue sellers, for instance, is estimated to be Romanian. Ministers have talked about cracking down on benefits for EU migrants. But such language will mean nothing while zealots such as Commissioner Andor remain in charge. Our only hope is to regain our independence by leaving the EU. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=050_1367174753 gemini Immigration: the British public is close to despair mass mmigration Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:11:12 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=209_1366998923 MortenHj Part of the speech made by the former (quit x2) leader of the "SNC" translated from Arabic to English by Eretz Zen I found it weird this was not uploaded here earlier, would have thought Eretz Zen would have uploaded it but I cannot find it in Syria channel. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moaz_al-Khatib basic info on the former Shell Executive puppet of the foreign "opposition". "He referred to al-Qaradawi as "our great Imam". Khatib has also referred to Shia Muslims as "rejectionists" and stated that the Shi'ites "establish lies and follow them", on occasions when he spoke to an Arab public." He is a promoter of sectarianism yet seems now to have "come clean" with the goal he has worked so hard to get to.But at least he finally comes clean with it. I do not expect fsa cheerleaders to do the same. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=209_1366998923 MortenHj Moaz al-Khatib on the conspiracy surrounding Syria Syria, Turkey, Iran, KSA, Qatar, imperialism, Islam, Shia-Sunni divide, terrorist leader, Moaz al-Khatib Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:58:28 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7ea_1361820971 chapalone Recreate Miami Dolphins Cheerleaders Back when Carly Rae Jepsen's "Call Me Maybe" was the hit summer song, Off the Bench featured a video of the Miami Dolphins cheerleaders doing a lip-sync video of it It appears that some of America's finest decided to do a shot-for-shot remake of the clip with another classic "Call Me Maybe" parody clip. I had posted this original one if you like then Vote it! http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7ea_1361820971 chapalone U.S. Soldiers in Afghanistan Do Call Me Maybe parody afghanistan,war,U.S. Soldiers,Carly Rae,Miami Dolphins,cheerleaders,parody,Recreate Fri, 22 Feb 2013 11:29:31 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=503_1361550348 CptSpaulding Cute girls http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=503_1361550348 CptSpaulding &quot;Call Me Maybe&quot; - Miami Dolphins <span class="highlight">Cheerleaders</span> &amp; U.S. Troops in Afghanistan afghanistan war Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:23:16 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6bb_1364404629 gemini There is a glimmer of hope - and that is the Cypriots' desire to reassert independence - UKIP Leader Nigel Farage MEP. http://www.ukipmeps.org/news_720_This-is-all-about-saving-the-euro-not-Cyprus.html The brinkmanship that has been on display over the Cypriot financial crisis makes obvious to all but the wilfully blind the level of political determination in Brussels to save the euro at all costs. No amount of empirical economic evidence - or misery for ordinary people - matters when the dreams of the continent's elite are threatened. After the French and Dutch rejected the European Constitution in 2005, the then European Commissioner for Communications, Margot Wallstr"om, put it perfectly. She and the other EU cheerleaders had invested "a lot of energy and political capital" in the project, she declared, and they were not going to give up on it. No matter what the people said, no matter what the economic realities were. Five years later, this delusion in the face of brute reality has reached its apogee in Cyprus. How can it be that the German parliament gets to vote on the wholesale theft of money from richer Cypriot depositors, while the Cypriot parliament has no such voice? Instead the theft is labelled "restructuring" - and as such there will be no Cypriot democratic oversight of the economic rape of their country. Be under no illusion: this is being done not to solve the Cypriot economy, but to save the euro. The crashing irony is that, in their February elections, the Cypriots threw out the Communists. One could ask why they bothered. But at what cost is the euro being saved? What we can see here is an almost deliberate attempt to set the people of Cyprus against each other. By restricting the damage to those who have deposited 100,000 euros in the bank (rather than across the board, as was the previous suggestion) they will be undermining social cohesion, pitting those with against those without. It destroys any pretence that the EU has at its heart a belief in democracy, or in those warm words so often repeated about it being the guardian of essential "European" qualities. In truth it was only a fair-weather friend and its behaviour in this storm, as in others, is to drop these benevolent ideas like hot stones. Worse still, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the Dutchman who heads the Eurogroup of eurozone finance ministers, has made it clear that this is now the template for all eurozone countries. Think about that for a moment. These politicians really believe that all the money in the eurozone is actually theirs - as if people have it on sufferance, and not by rights. Since Dijsselbloem spoke, bank shares in Spain, France and Italy have collapsed: citizens of these countries not unreasonably fear the worst. All this is done for the European elite's devious ends. One of which is the so-called "Target 2". This is the eurozone bank clearing system, by which private transfers of money from one member to another are cleared through the national central banks. If, for instance, 100 euros is moved from a Greek bank deposit to a German bank deposit, the Greek central bank ends up owing another 100 euros to the Bundesbank (through the European Central Bank). At present, the Bundesbank is owed 600 billion euros thanks to Target 2, mainly as a result of capital flight from Mediterranean countries. But, unlike with normal debts, the debtor countries have no contract or understanding about how this should be repaid. Cyprus has just been granted a 10 billion euro bail-out loan from the other eurozone countries. But the irony is that Cyprus is already in receipt of a bail-out worth 7.5 billion euros - this is the Target 2 debt of the central bank of Cyprus. And they are desperately trying to prevent this growing as a result of further capital flight. Perhaps this is the most ominous result of the Cyprus debacle. While the details of the controls to prevent money leaving Cyprus are not yet known, they will quickly lead to euros in a bank account there being worth less than euros in bank accounts elsewhere. I have been saying this since the start of the latest chapter of the crisis: that the level of risk and the prospects of contagion are such that those who have deposits in other southern European countries should get them out as soon as possible. Don't just take my word for it. The economist and journalist Anatole Kaletsky yesterday made his support for my comments utterly clear on Twitter: "Anyone with more than 100,000 euros in a French, Spanish or Italian bank is crazy if individual, or criminally negligent if a company director." There is, however, a silver lining to all of this - a small one, but possibly the most important aspect in the whole sorry debacle. Cyprus is different from Greece, different from Ireland and different from Spain and Italy. In Cyprus we have a population that would prefer to leave the eurozone than comply with the privations of Germany and Brussels. We have a parliament that has already voted down one scheme, and is thus barred from debating this one. We have a Cypriot archbishop who supports his people rather than the EU. They are not happy and they are pointing to a new reality. That David Cameron is welcoming these plans shows how far the British political class is from any ideals of democracy, accountability and liberty. Instead, the future to him is a technocratic, post-democratic world, run in the most part by unelected, fanatical and deluded power-mongers in Brussels and Frankfurt. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6bb_1364404629 gemini This is all about saving the euro, not Cyprus cyprus baikout Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:15:37 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9e9_1361816987 pravdavoin A response to the item posted by user swat titled Assadists and Israeli's supporting Bashar in a rally Here is the same protest from a different angle. This clearly shows that the Zionist flag was not part of the pro Syrian protest and this is just more propoganda from the saudis and their cheerleaders. It is laughable that anyone would belive that the Syrian gov is zionist. The Syrian gov which arms Hezbollah and other resistance groups and is also the main ally of Iran. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9e9_1361816987 pravdavoin Debunking false propoganda by Swat Syria Propoganda swat Saudi Qatari Zionist Mon, 26 Nov 2012 03:44:22 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c1b_1353918962 Juujigun Who says bald isn't beautiful? Don't tell that to Megan M. and Crystal B., two Indianapolis Colts cheerleaders who agreed to have their heads shaved to benefit leukemia research during the Colts' 20-13 Sunday win over the Buffalo Bills at Indy's Lucas Oil Field. Of course, the fight to cure leukemia has been a major focus of this franchise since head coach Chuck Pagano was diagnosed with the disease in September. Earlier this month, over two dozen Colts players shaved their heads in a show of support for Pagano, who is undergoing chemotherapy to battle a condition that is in remission, according to recent reports. The cheerleaders got in the game when Blue, the team's overstuffed blue horse of a mascot, issued a challenge -- if one Colts cheerleader could raise $10,000 for leukemia research by November 25, she'd get her head shaved. That's only a good deal if you're a great person trying to help someone you care about, and that's clearly the case here -- Megan and Crystal raised over $22,000 on time, and sat down for the buzz cuts. Blue began the festivities before somebody more qualified took over. &quot;I've just had personal experiences with people who have had cancer,&quot; Megan told News 8's Daniel Miller. &quot;I've had mentors and family members and volunteer at Riley and met little girls who have lost their hair and beat cancer multiple times. Just seeing struggles they went through and how they could overcome that and still have confidence and fight this fight without their hair - they are really my inspiration for doing this.&quot; Megan and Crystal aren't alone. Local Great Clips salons are donating $10 to &quot;Blue's ChuckStrong Challenge&quot; for every person who agrees to have their heads shaved. 800 fans have had their heads shaved so far, and more than $250,000 has been raised for leukemia research by Colts representatives since the &quot;ChuckStrong&quot; campaign began. If you would like to know more about the campaign, visit the &quot;ChuckStrong&quot; section of the Colts' official website. The Colts' organization is filled with high-quality people, but what makes this the feel-good story of the year is that one season after finishing with the a 2-14 record and blowing up the organization in the offseason, this team has a 7-4 record and is in the thick of the AFC playoff race with interim head coach Bruce Arians. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c1b_1353918962 Juujigun Colts <span class="highlight">Cheerleaders</span> Have Their Heads Shaved at Game In Support of Chuck Pagano indianapolis colts,colts,cheerleaders,chuck pagano,chuckstrong,leukemia Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:19:00 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bfa_1353615276 star53 Watch how the troops match the Miami cheerleaders - move for move. This was posted today at Military.com. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bfa_1353615276 star53 "Call Me Maybe" - US Troops vs. Miami <span class="highlight">Cheerleaders</span> US Troops, vs., Miami Cheerleaders,Call Me Maybe