http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=Humiliation Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:19:54 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=Humiliation Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:12:03 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2f9_1371128795 aydeo The exclusion of women or any form of discrimination by private individuals in public spaces in Israel will now be defined as a criminal offence entailing one-year incarceration, a new amendment published by the Justice Ministry's (Livni) legislation and advisory department revealed. The memorandum, regarding the Prohibition of Discrimination in Products, Services, Admittance to Places of Entertainment and Public Spaces Law, places criminal sanctions on private individuals involved in discriminating or disgracing a person. The present law forbids those dealing in public services or promoting products sold in public spaces to engage in any form of discrimination. For example, the discrimination of a person by a bus company or one of its drivers is a criminal offence. The amendment adds an additional felony to the list - discrimination at the hands of an individual attempting to bar a person from enjoying public products or services in a public place. If up until now a bus driver who denied services to a person based on discriminatory motives, then he would face criminal sanctions. As of Wednesday, any private individual, or group of private individuals involved, for example, in barring a woman from a seat on a bus, face up to one-year in prison. The memo contained a considerably "wide base of behaviors considered humiliating actions." Among them, it includes a vocal conversation about the discriminated person in the person's presence and "spitting in the person's presence without the intention of hitting them, but solely in the attempt to debase them." In explaining the memorandum, the ministry said that it created an "additional tool to battle the disgraceful social phenomenon of discrimination, which finds its base in intolerance and prejudice, not only by those offering public services but also by public individuals active in humiliating." Justice MinsterTzipi Livni said "phenomena such as women's exclusion, segregation between Jews and Arabs, racial selection at night clubs or anywhere in Israeli society are intolerable and immoral. It is our role to curb these phenomena and battle them. "Against those perpetrating discrimination there should be zero tolerance. Israel is a democracy based on the principles of justice, equality and freedom. Whenever discrimination rears its ugly head it undermines these principles and damages the moral backbone of our society." http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4391582,00.html Second photo shows a news report about a bus line in which Ultra-Orthodox asked women to seat in the back, Third photo shows Naama Margolis from the town of Beit Shemesh, which was harrassed by radical Ultra-Orthodox last year http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2f9_1371128795 aydeo 1 year prison term for women's <span class="highlight">humiliation</span> in Israel Prison,Discrimination,Women,Ultra-Orthodox Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:19:13 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=786_1371439019 USMC_SRT Dear Mr. Security Agent, Federal, state, or local. You, the man or woman with the badge, the sworn LEO or FLEA and those who inhabit the many law enforcement niches in between and on all sides. This essay is directed to you, because in the end, how this turmoil about gun control turns out will depend largely upon your decisions and actions over the coming months and years. I sincerely wish that members of Congress-who may soon be voting on new gun control measures-would read this essay, but I realize that's a pipe dream, considering the impenetrable bubbles around those exalted entities. So I'll settle for you, Mr. (or Ms.) Security Agent, since you already gobble up everything on the internet, and I don't have to seek you out. A decade ago I wrote the novel Enemies Foreign and Domestic, a tale about how tragic events involving the misuse of firearms can be used by an evil administration to misinform and mold public opinion to support its malign anti-freedom policies. No, my novel was not predicting "Operation Fast and Furious" a decade before that covert policy of "pursuing gun control under the radar," (which was President Obama's explanation to Sarah Brady for his lack of overt political action). That inter-agency gun-walking policy, remember, resulted in the deaths of over four hundred Mexicans and two U.S. federal agents, murdered in an effort to discredit the Second Amendment and lead to more restrictive gun control laws in America. (If Nixon-or any Republican, for that matter-were in office, the intentional bloodbath would be called Murdergate, but today's collaborating Woodwards and Bernsteins are in on the cover-up.) Instead of gun-walking thousands of AK-47s to Mexican drug cartel assassins (who would believe that?), Enemies Foreign and Domestic begins with a sniper opening fire on a packed football stadium. A thousand innocent fans die, some from the ninety bullets fired but most in the ensuing panic stampede. In a traumatized America, the fictional stadium massacre results in the banning of all semi-automatic rifles, with no buyback, no grandfathering of weapons already owned, and no sunset clause. Citizens had to turn them in for destruction or face years in federal prison. The page-one stadium massacre was simply a plot device chosen to launch the story in high gear and set the stage to immediately and fully explore the main theme of the novel: the calculated transformation of our Constitutional republic into a socialist police state. Since I prefer to write tightly wound fiction transpiring at a rapid pace in a compressed time period, I examined the imposition of totalitarian controls over the course of just a few weeks, not years or decades. 1. The TSA: On the road to the American police state Consider: The TSA was born in the panicked backwash of 9/11, which is understandable given the events of that day, when Muslim maniacs screaming allahu akbar murdered 3,000 Americans and others in the name of Islamic global jihad. But a decade after 9/11, due entirely to political correctness, it's completely out of the question to profile Mohammed at the airport yet absolutely necessary for that bloated agency to "randomly" select your pre-teen or teenage daughter for a body search performed by a government matron in a TSA uniform. This frequently under-the-clothes and against-the-skin complete body search may done in full public view, or in a hidden back room, solely at the discretion of the TSA agents involved. Meanwhile, Mom and Dad stand off to the side where they have been directed to wait, saying nothing, scarcely moving, avoiding random eye contact lest a TSA security agent catch a wayward smirk or utterance of protest. To pull out a cell phone camera at this time would surely invite arrest. To walk over and grab the matron by the arm is out of the question. Defending your child from the indignity would lead only to your being Tasered and handcuffed on the cold airport floor. After that, your entire family may wind up in some TSA airport detention cells, conveniently located right on your concourse and unknown to you until then. Better to stew in silence, let the incident pass, and try to forget it. So in the year 2013, in the land of the free and the home of the brave, we stand with our eyes averted, burning with humiliation, while our spouses or children are groped above and below the waist by blue-gloved government prison guards-only we are in an airport in a free country, and not in a prison! Or are we? A virtual open-air prison, where government security agents can pat down ordinary citizens at will is the accepted "new normal." Did that happen often in East Germany, I wonder? In the Soviet Union? Does it happen today in Cuba? Officially sanctioned crotch groping in the name of "security?" (Why, again, was it that the TSA was created? Oh yes, Islamic jihad terrorists destroyed some big buildings and killed thousands of people in New York City on September 11 way back in the year 2001. It was because of that very bad day in lower Manhattan and many other acts of bloody Muslim terrorism around the world going on for decades, especially hijacking and blowing up lots of airliners full of people. It's so easy to forget why exactly it is that we need to become a police state for our own safety.) And now we read that the TSA is yet again expanding and branching out, like an octopus on steroids. This suddenly gargantuan federal agency is not only running routine checkpoints and stop-and-frisk operations in airports, but at bus and train stations also. Eight thousand times in 2010, if you can believe the government's own accounting figures. Your papers, please! These checkpoints and mobile searching stations are called VIPR Teams, a telling acronym for Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response Teams. Folks, you cannot make this stuff up. Well, actually, you can. Way back in 2002 in Enemies Foreign and Domestic I invented FIST checkpoints, for Firearms Inspections Stop Terrorism. I leave it to you as to which sounds more coolly ominous and plausible in fact and in fiction-VIPRs or FISTs. The advance word is that at the next stop on this express lane to tyranny, we will be seeing the TSA on our highways, setting up roaming vehicle checkpoints. For our "public safety," of course. Watch the recent YouTube video of the Texas state trooper digitally raping a mother and daughter by the side of a Texas highway to see law enforcement checkpoint authority run amok, and wonder at the future of our nation and our hard-won legacy of individual freedom. If you can stomach to watch it. Welcome to the USSA, comrades! How in the world did this happen? When did we wake up to find our freedom stolen in the night-and all in name of "homeland security" and "public safety"? 2. Nobody needs an assault weapon! And now in the wake of yet another disgusting example of the worst human depravity, this time in an elementary school in New England, we are told by the government that some firearms are simply too dangerous for citizens to possess. We are told that limiting or removing these firearms from private hands will increase the general public safety. We are told that it is a small thing to give up semi-automatic rifles, which the political and cooperating media elites will dutifully call "assault weapons," even though nobody can quite define the term. In any case, we are told, nobody needs an "assault weapon" with a thirty-round magazine. Well, actually, almost nobody needs them. Apparently, Mr. Security Agent and his comrades need them, lots of them. Tens of thousands of new "assault weapons," enough to shoot all of the billions (with a "b") of .223 and .40 caliber hollow-point bullets recently purchased by our federal law enforcement agencies in unprecedented new acquisitions. Are we suddenly expecting a foreign invasion I missed reading about? Wouldn't that be the job of the military? Why do our federal law enforcement agencies suddenly need tens of thousands of "assault weapons" and billions of new hollow-point (not training) bullets, many times more than in previous years? Evidently, it's very dangerous on the Homeland Security front, and Mr. Security Agent needs a lot of firepower to be able to put down all of the assorted troublemakers and problem children out in the "uncontrolled spaces" of America. You can't have too much firepower if you work for our government law enforcement agencies! But in the name of public safety the government is going to whittle your allowable firearms down step by step, first eliminating semi-automatic rifles, then pistols, and eventually on down to the last bolt-action hunting rifles and shotguns, which may be kept at a government armory, and signed out for an approved day of hunting with a few shells. (Make sure to retrieve your empty brass for the counting.) So, step by step, the government is going to take away any ability the average citizen might have to resist a rampaging mob or roving gangs of bandits during a breakdown in law and order, or any demands at all made by a tyrannical government sometime in the murky future. 3. Trust us, we're from the government. So at the historical moment that our nation is turning into a police state, with no expectation of privacy, even of our private parts in public airports or on public highways, we are commanded to grant even greater trust in our government's perpetual future benevolence, to have blind faith that at no point in the future will our government turn tyrannical. But in the year 2013, has the government already earned our trust, or our disgust, with its current abuses of its police powers? In this environment of steadily creeping tyranny, should we comply with government demands for our increasing disarmament? I wrote Enemies Foreign and Domestic a decade ago with the hope that eventually anti-gun liberals would discover it and it would provide them with a virtual road map to understanding conservative thinking about firearms and their place in society. Additionally, I wrote the novel hoping that if it were successful, it might provide me a platform and a microphone to discuss these issues at some dangerous time in the future. That time is now. Well-meaning, gun-loathing liberals need to understand that they are blindly tossing matches into a dynamite factory with their threats to severely limit and restrict the Second Amendment. They must understand the other point of view in order not to send America careening into a deadly minefield, the existence of which they are, evidently, blissfully unaware. 4. The gun nuts To many liberals, the popular American hobby of collecting and shooting guns is a bizarre and shameful vice. Three or four pistols and long guns and a few hundred rounds of ammunition are routinely described in the popular media as an "arsenal." Perhaps in a Manhattan walk-up studio apartment, where that handful of guns had to be smuggled in and hidden, it would be considered an "arsenal." But out past the urban beltway, out in Red State America, that is what many folks I know keep in their car or truck for roadside emergencies, or impromptu plinking, or varmint-hunting opportunities. And hell, isn't that why we have guns out in Red State America? Damn sure is. Among other reasons. Millions of firearms aficionados in their later years have purchased a rifle, pistol or shotgun every year or two for decades. In millions of cases, these add up to dozens of firearms per household. A round dozen firearms of all types might be a good average. Some are hunting arms, some are military antiques, and increasingly, many are defensive pistols and modern sporting rifles, and yes, both are semi-automatic. For example, millions of AR-15 rifles have been purchased in just the last few years. Note that I did not say modern hunting rifles. That is a separate category, but the important thing to understand is that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting, and anybody who says it does is telling a lie. Those of us who enjoy firearms feel it deeply when some lunatic misuses one to slaughter innocents. Shooting ranges are virtually churches of gun safety, with safety rules posted everywhere, taught to one and all, and enforced strictly. Passing down our tradition of safe and responsible gun ownership from generation to generation is considered a sacred trust. When a firearm is misused by a criminal, our greatest wish is always that we had been present with our legally concealed pistols to stop the slaughter of unarmed, defenseless innocents. And more frequently than you might imagine, this actually happens. Consider this: the average number of victims per incident when the shooter is stopped by an armed civilian: three. The average number of victims when the shooter is stopped by a policeman: fourteen. Why? Because when every second is a matter of life and death, the police are still minutes away. Think about those numbers. Eleven people die needlessly if the shooting takes place in a "victim disarmament zone," where legal firearms are prohibited. This is why deranged shooters head for schools, malls, and theaters, where signs forthrightly proclaim that guns are forbidden. A "no firearms" sign draws such a person the way that a starving wolf is attracted to a pen full of helpless lambs. But when the killer is stopped by an armed civilian, the mainstream media rarely or never mention that fact, because it goes against their propaganda template: the inherent evil of guns in civilian hands. So those stories are spiked and the typical American never hears of them. Did you know that shortly before the tragedy in Connecticut, an armed civilian stopped a maniac in a packed shopping mall after he had killed only two victims, instead of twenty-seven? 5. If it bleeds, it leads: The media love maniacs. The same media that pointedly ignore frequent life-saving defensive uses of firearms consistently pours hours and days and weeks of attention upon the latest maniac who chooses a firearm as his tool of mass murder, so that the next potential insane villain cannot fail to notice the easy path to fame and immortality that the misuse of a gun can bring. But the greatest fame will only attach if they can beat the previous body-count record, a number constantly and loudly broadcast, so that no one can fail to hear it. The message to the unstable is clear: Come on, you crazy guys, can't you at least murder your way to thirty? The Virginia Polytechnic Institute madman is still leading the lone-wolf pack, but college students might resist, so maybe find an easier target to rack up higher numbers. Find a killing zone with younger and more helpless victims. The media's lesson was clear, and it was well learned by Adam Lanza when he set out to slaughter helpless little lambs instead of bigger and tougher sheep. The mainstream media pour a Niagara of crocodile tears over the most recent child victims, after doing everything for the killer but sign his name to their pre-written script. With such fanfare, is it any wonder that there is no lack of new monsters playing "beat the kill record" on a regular basis? It's almost become a recurring television reality show. Meanwhile, liberal politicians scheme about how to leverage the latest human tragedy into new gun control laws, laws that by definition will be obeyed only by the law-abiding, not by criminals. "Never let a good crisis go to waste," to paraphrase Obama confidant Rahm Emmanuel. And no better opportunity to trim the Second Amendment fangs and claws of their ideological enemies than in the immediate aftermath of another massacre wrought by a madman with a gun. But conservatives have also considered this phenomenon of grief exploitation for political ends, although from a very different ideological perspective. We look back a century and even longer, and see other nations and peoples that were also on the march forward toward "social progress" when the need for mandatory gun registration suddenly became an urgent national priority. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=786_1371439019 USMC_SRT Dear Government NWO, Government, Guns, Weapons Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:36:58 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fa3_1371429284 SAPD_HRT Dear Mr. Security Agent, Federal, state, or local. You, the man or woman with the badge, the sworn LEO or FLEA and those who inhabit the many law enforcement niches in between and on all sides. This essay is directed to you, because in the end, how this turmoil about gun control turns out will depend largely upon your decisions and actions over the coming months and years. I sincerely wish that members of Congress-who may soon be voting on new gun control measures-would read this essay, but I realize that's a pipe dream, considering the impenetrable bubbles around those exalted entities. So I'll settle for you, Mr. (or Ms.) Security Agent, since you already gobble up everything on the internet, and I don't have to seek you out. A decade ago I wrote the novel Enemies Foreign and Domestic, a tale about how tragic events involving the misuse of firearms can be used by an evil administration to misinform and mold public opinion to support its malign anti-freedom policies. No, my novel was not predicting "Operation Fast and Furious" a decade before that covert policy of "pursuing gun control under the radar," (which was President Obama's explanation to Sarah Brady for his lack of overt political action). That inter-agency gun-walking policy, remember, resulted in the deaths of over four hundred Mexicans and two U.S. federal agents, murdered in an effort to discredit the Second Amendment and lead to more restrictive gun control laws in America. (If Nixon-or any Republican, for that matter-were in office, the intentional bloodbath would be called Murdergate, but today's collaborating Woodwards and Bernsteins are in on the cover-up.) Instead of gun-walking thousands of AK-47s to Mexican drug cartel assassins (who would believe that?), Enemies Foreign and Domestic begins with a sniper opening fire on a packed football stadium. A thousand innocent fans die, some from the ninety bullets fired but most in the ensuing panic stampede. In a traumatized America, the fictional stadium massacre results in the banning of all semi-automatic rifles, with no buyback, no grandfathering of weapons already owned, and no sunset clause. Citizens had to turn them in for destruction or face years in federal prison. The page-one stadium massacre was simply a plot device chosen to launch the story in high gear and set the stage to immediately and fully explore the main theme of the novel: the calculated transformation of our Constitutional republic into a socialist police state. Since I prefer to write tightly wound fiction transpiring at a rapid pace in a compressed time period, I examined the imposition of totalitarian controls over the course of just a few weeks, not years or decades. 1. The TSA: On the road to the American police state Consider: The TSA was born in the panicked backwash of 9/11, which is understandable given the events of that day, when Muslim maniacs screaming allahu akbar murdered 3,000 Americans and others in the name of Islamic global jihad. But a decade after 9/11, due entirely to political correctness, it's completely out of the question to profile Mohammed at the airport yet absolutely necessary for that bloated agency to "randomly" select your pre-teen or teenage daughter for a body search performed by a government matron in a TSA uniform. This frequently under-the-clothes and against-the-skin complete body search may done in full public view, or in a hidden back room, solely at the discretion of the TSA agents involved. Meanwhile, Mom and Dad stand off to the side where they have been directed to wait, saying nothing, scarcely moving, avoiding random eye contact lest a TSA security agent catch a wayward smirk or utterance of protest. To pull out a cell phone camera at this time would surely invite arrest. To walk over and grab the matron by the arm is out of the question. Defending your child from the indignity would lead only to your being Tasered and handcuffed on the cold airport floor. After that, your entire family may wind up in some TSA airport detention cells, conveniently located right on your concourse and unknown to you until then. Better to stew in silence, let the incident pass, and try to forget it. So in the year 2013, in the land of the free and the home of the brave, we stand with our eyes averted, burning with humiliation, while our spouses or children are groped above and below the waist by blue-gloved government prison guards-only we are in an airport in a free country, and not in a prison! Or are we? A virtual open-air prison, where government security agents can pat down ordinary citizens at will is the accepted "new normal." Did that happen often in East Germany, I wonder? In the Soviet Union? Does it happen today in Cuba? Officially sanctioned crotch groping in the name of "security?" (Why, again, was it that the TSA was created? Oh yes, Islamic jihad terrorists destroyed some big buildings and killed thousands of people in New York City on September 11 way back in the year 2001. It was because of that very bad day in lower Manhattan and many other acts of bloody Muslim terrorism around the world going on for decades, especially hijacking and blowing up lots of airliners full of people. It's so easy to forget why exactly it is that we need to become a police state for our own safety.) And now we read that the TSA is yet again expanding and branching out, like an octopus on steroids. This suddenly gargantuan federal agency is not only running routine checkpoints and stop-and-frisk operations in airports, but at bus and train stations also. Eight thousand times in 2010, if you can believe the government's own accounting figures. Your papers, please! These checkpoints and mobile searching stations are called VIPR Teams, a telling acronym for Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response Teams. Folks, you cannot make this stuff up. Well, actually, you can. Way back in 2002 in Enemies Foreign and Domestic I invented FIST checkpoints, for Firearms Inspections Stop Terrorism. I leave it to you as to which sounds more coolly ominous and plausible in fact and in fiction-VIPRs or FISTs. The advance word is that at the next stop on this express lane to tyranny, we will be seeing the TSA on our highways, setting up roaming vehicle checkpoints. For our "public safety," of course. Watch the recent YouTube video of the Texas state trooper digitally raping a mother and daughter by the side of a Texas highway to see law enforcement checkpoint authority run amok, and wonder at the future of our nation and our hard-won legacy of individual freedom. If you can stomach to watch it. Welcome to the USSA, comrades! How in the world did this happen? When did we wake up to find our freedom stolen in the night-and all in name of "homeland security" and "public safety"? 2. Nobody needs an assault weapon! And now in the wake of yet another disgusting example of the worst human depravity, this time in an elementary school in New England, we are told by the government that some firearms are simply too dangerous for citizens to possess. We are told that limiting or removing these firearms from private hands will increase the general public safety. We are told that it is a small thing to give up semi-automatic rifles, which the political and cooperating media elites will dutifully call "assault weapons," even though nobody can quite define the term. In any case, we are told, nobody needs an "assault weapon" with a thirty-round magazine. Well, actually, almost nobody needs them. Apparently, Mr. Security Agent and his comrades need them, lots of them. Tens of thousands of new "assault weapons," enough to shoot all of the billions (with a "b") of .223 and .40 caliber hollow-point bullets recently purchased by our federal law enforcement agencies in unprecedented new acquisitions. Are we suddenly expecting a foreign invasion I missed reading about? Wouldn't that be the job of the military? Why do our federal law enforcement agencies suddenly need tens of thousands of "assault weapons" and billions of new hollow-point (not training) bullets, many times more than in previous years? Evidently, it's very dangerous on the Homeland Security front, and Mr. Security Agent needs a lot of firepower to be able to put down all of the assorted troublemakers and problem children out in the "uncontrolled spaces" of America. You can't have too much firepower if you work for our government law enforcement agencies! But in the name of public safety the government is going to whittle your allowable firearms down step by step, first eliminating semi-automatic rifles, then pistols, and eventually on down to the last bolt-action hunting rifles and shotguns, which may be kept at a government armory, and signed out for an approved day of hunting with a few shells. (Make sure to retrieve your empty brass for the counting.) So, step by step, the government is going to take away any ability the average citizen might have to resist a rampaging mob or roving gangs of bandits during a breakdown in law and order, or any demands at all made by a tyrannical government sometime in the murky future. 3. Trust us, we're from the government. So at the historical moment that our nation is turning into a police state, with no expectation of privacy, even of our private parts in public airports or on public highways, we are commanded to grant even greater trust in our government's perpetual future benevolence, to have blind faith that at no point in the future will our government turn tyrannical. But in the year 2013, has the government already earned our trust, or our disgust, with its current abuses of its police powers? In this environment of steadily creeping tyranny, should we comply with government demands for our increasing disarmament? I wrote Enemies Foreign and Domestic a decade ago with the hope that eventually anti-gun liberals would discover it and it would provide them with a virtual road map to understanding conservative thinking about firearms and their place in society. Additionally, I wrote the novel hoping that if it were successful, it might provide me a platform and a microphone to discuss these issues at some dangerous time in the future. That time is now. Well-meaning, gun-loathing liberals need to understand that they are blindly tossing matches into a dynamite factory with their threats to severely limit and restrict the Second Amendment. They must understand the other point of view in order not to send America careening into a deadly minefield, the existence of which they are, evidently, blissfully unaware. 4. The gun nuts To many liberals, the popular American hobby of collecting and shooting guns is a bizarre and shameful vice. Three or four pistols and long guns and a few hundred rounds of ammunition are routinely described in the popular media as an "arsenal." Perhaps in a Manhattan walk-up studio apartment, where that handful of guns had to be smuggled in and hidden, it would be considered an "arsenal." But out past the urban beltway, out in Red State America, that is what many folks I know keep in their car or truck for roadside emergencies, or impromptu plinking, or varmint-hunting opportunities. And hell, isn't that why we have guns out in Red State America? Damn sure is. Among other reasons. Millions of firearms aficionados in their later years have purchased a rifle, pistol or shotgun every year or two for decades. In millions of cases, these add up to dozens of firearms per household. A round dozen firearms of all types might be a good average. Some are hunting arms, some are military antiques, and increasingly, many are defensive pistols and modern sporting rifles, and yes, both are semi-automatic. For example, millions of AR-15 rifles have been purchased in just the last few years. Note that I did not say modern hunting rifles. That is a separate category, but the important thing to understand is that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting, and anybody who says it does is telling a lie. Those of us who enjoy firearms feel it deeply when some lunatic misuses one to slaughter innocents. Shooting ranges are virtually churches of gun safety, with safety rules posted everywhere, taught to one and all, and enforced strictly. Passing down our tradition of safe and responsible gun ownership from generation to generation is considered a sacred trust. When a firearm is misused by a criminal, our greatest wish is always that we had been present with our legally concealed pistols to stop the slaughter of unarmed, defenseless innocents. And more frequently than you might imagine, this actually happens. Consider this: the average number of victims per incident when the shooter is stopped by an armed civilian: three. The average number of victims when the shooter is stopped by a policeman: fourteen. Why? Because when every second is a matter of life and death, the police are still minutes away. Think about those numbers. Eleven people die needlessly if the shooting takes place in a "victim disarmament zone," where legal firearms are prohibited. This is why deranged shooters head for schools, malls, and theaters, where signs forthrightly proclaim that guns are forbidden. A "no firearms" sign draws such a person the way that a starving wolf is attracted to a pen full of helpless lambs. But when the killer is stopped by an armed civilian, the mainstream media rarely or never mention that fact, because it goes against their propaganda template: the inherent evil of guns in civilian hands. So those stories are spiked and the typical American never hears of them. Did you know that shortly before the tragedy in Connecticut, an armed civilian stopped a maniac in a packed shopping mall after he had killed only two victims, instead of twenty-seven? 5. If it bleeds, it leads: The media love maniacs. The same media that pointedly ignore frequent life-saving defensive uses of firearms consistently pours hours and days and weeks of attention upon the latest maniac who chooses a firearm as his tool of mass murder, so that the next potential insane villain cannot fail to notice the easy path to fame and immortality that the misuse of a gun can bring. But the greatest fame will only attach if they can beat the previous body-count record, a number constantly and loudly broadcast, so that no one can fail to hear it. The message to the unstable is clear: Come on, you crazy guys, can't you at least murder your way to thirty? The Virginia Polytechnic Institute madman is still leading the lone-wolf pack, but college students might resist, so maybe find an easier target to rack up higher numbers. Find a killing zone with younger and more helpless victims. The media's lesson was clear, and it was well learned by Adam Lanza when he set out to slaughter helpless little lambs instead of bigger and tougher sheep. The mainstream media pour a Niagara of crocodile tears over the most recent child victims, after doing everything for the killer but sign his name to their pre-written script. With such fanfare, is it any wonder that there is no lack of new monsters playing "beat the kill record" on a regular basis? It's almost become a recurring television reality show. Meanwhile, liberal politicians scheme about how to leverage the latest human tragedy into new gun control laws, laws that by definition will be obeyed only by the law-abiding, not by criminals. "Never let a good crisis go to waste," to paraphrase Obama confidant Rahm Emmanuel. And no better opportunity to trim the Second Amendment fangs and claws of their ideological enemies than in the immediate aftermath of another massacre wrought by a madman with a gun. But conservatives have also considered this phenomenon of grief exploitation for political ends, although from a very different ideological perspective. We look back a century and even longer, and see other nations and peoples that were also on the march forward toward "social progress" when the need for mandatory gun registration suddenly became an urgent national priority. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fa3_1371429284 SAPD_HRT Dear Mr. Government NWO, Government, Weapon, Gun, Control Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:51:57 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=eb9_1371397457 Detroit Iron By KATE BRIQUELET Last Updated: 11:32 AM, June 16, 2013 Posted: 12:19 AM, June 16, 2013 In the latest black eye for the scandal-ridden State Department, a whistleblower claims she was run out of the foreign service after complaining about a consul general's alleged office trysts with subordinates and hookers. Kerry Howard says she was bullied, harassed and forced to resign after she exposed US Consul General Donald Moore's alleged security-threatening shenanigans in the Naples, Italy, office. As the post's community-liaison officer, Howard was charged with keeping workplace peace and advising higher-ups on the state of morale, but when she revealed allegations about her boss, State Department officials swept it under the rug, according to an Equal Employment Opportunity complaint she filed with the department's Office of Civil Rights. "It's cover-up after cover-up. It's absolutely hideous," she told The Post. "When our diplomats disrespect the Italians by hiring and firing them because they have seen too much - or use them for 'sex-ercise' - we have to question why we have diplomats abroad at taxpayer expense." Howard is just the latest whistleblower to allege that Hillary Rodham Clinton's State Department allowed sexual misbehavior to continue unchecked. Last week, The Post reported that Aurelia Fedenisn, an investigator at the department's inspector-general office, wrote a memo outlining eight cases of supposed sexual misconduct, but that they were removed from an IG report. The allegations included US Ambassador to Belgium Howard Gutman soliciting prostitutes, including minors, and at least seven agents in Clinton's security detail hiring hookers while traveling with her to Russia and Colombia. The soap opera in Italy unfolded in the fall of 2010, when Moore became the Naples consul general after serving in the same capacity at the US Embassy in Port au Prince, Haiti. As a senior foreign-service officer, Moore could make as much as $179,700 a year, State Department data says. Within days, he allegedly bedded a consulate employee, a single mom who fell in love with him. Howard detailed the alleged affair in certified letters to members of Congress, including California Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, in December, said Howard's lawyer, Lawrence Kelly. "More and more intimate details of their relationship became common knowledge," Howard wrote, adding that the staffer became pregnant and wanted to keep the baby, but that Moore insisted she get an abortion. "She informed anyone within earshot that she had had the abortion and had her tubes tied at his instruction," Howard wrote. "Morale continued to sink as this soap opera played out in our workplace on a daily basis." With the affair rumors swirling, Howard's supervisor, Pamela Caplis, instructed Howard to keep quiet, Howard claims. "I have already informed Frankfurt," Caplis allegedly said in what Howard claims was an attempt to head off the complaint. Still, on a February 2011 trip to Rome, Howard told the US Embassy's management officer, Frank Ledahawsky, that morale was "very bad" because of the alleged affair. "We have to save his career," Ledahawsky allegedly said. Shortly after the meeting, Moore was allegedly called to Rome and ordered to end his relationship with the employee. Howard thought her troubles would be over, but she became a target instead. Howard, who made about $16,000 annually in her part-time position, said that her office was moved five times without notification and that she was excluded from meetings and forbidden from attending a staff photo-op with Sen. John McCain. Howard says Caplis grilled her for the names of staffers speaking about Moore's relationships and, in one meeting, screamed she was a "backstabber." Colleagues ganged up on her, and one State Department security officer told her, "You better be careful, because they are out to get you," according to Howard's affidavit in the Office of Civil Rights investigation. Howard said the situation got even uglier when Moore became her direct supervisor in February 2012 after Caplis was reassigned. "Try not to be so perfect, and try to be less present in the consulate," Moore warned, according to Howard's affidavit. Meanwhile, bachelor Moore began a relationship with another subordinate, and "continued a pattern of other relationships which threaten the security of the consulate," the affidavit said. "The female visitors to the consulate, if they are logged properly, will provide a starting point for a broader inquiry," she hinted. Howard was clearer, however, in a recent memo to Feinstein. "It is also now known that the consul general entertains prostitutes, escorts and married women in his residence during the day during work hours," she wrote. "These women enter and leave the consulate via the front entrance . . . His household staff are required to clean his bathroom and change his linens after each woman leaves." Only Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) office replied to Howard's letters. In an e-mail, Rand aide Brett King wrote: "I received your message this morning regarding actions at the Consulate in Naples, Italy. Do we have your permission to share this information with other government agencies?" Howard resigned in May 2012. "I was left with no choice," she said in her affidavit. "I was forced to leave or suffer continued harassment and humiliation." Two months later, she filed the Equal Employment Opportunity complaint. Kelly said an independent investigator is close to concluding her probe, which included affidavits from seven former Italian consulate employees. Moore is still assigned to Naples. His office referred questions to the State Department, which declined to comment. kbriquelet@nypost.com http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/staten_island/new_state_shock_HPvwttBZGMt4KOuO57zPeP?utm_source=SFnewyorkpost&amp;utm_medium=SFnewyorkpost http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=eb9_1371397457 Detroit Iron Whistleblower accuses consul general of trysts with subordinates and hookers U.S. State Department, US Consul General Donald Moore Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:24:46 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0f0_1371316957 Lake8737 Google translate Reporter Wang Zhihai Metro foreign men with indecent words and gestures shame provocation passenger and a female passenger phones knocked persuaded eventually aroused public indignation, was the "fix." According to witnesses on the video, this foreign man by subway security when placed inside the trunk of a knife being security officers confiscated. This greatly dissatisfied foreign man and a dispute with security staff. After this expatriate man walked into the subway, the mouth has been swearing. 3 o'clock yesterday afternoon, a foreign man in a subway train abusive passengers, followed by a fight with a passenger. Wait until the trains start, this foreign man began to curse at random, in the car in order to avoid conflict with passengers, mostly turned our backs ignored. When the train station when approaching gold, foreign man standing astride, wielded arm cocked indecent gestures, one after another with the Chinese burst foul language, humiliation provocation passenger compartment. At this time, a girl walked up and consoled foreign man, but foreign man suddenly knocked the girl's cell phone to the ground, but also accused her of "cooking chicken, prostitutes." Expatriates girl knocked the phone moves, causing great anger passengers. Video footage showed several passengers swarmed Qunqiergong expatriates. Passengers angry fist, hit the expatriates head and back, hit the last about 30 seconds. It had also stood curse of foreigners who, bending his hands over his head, dodging fists. "Foreigners are playing a lot of punches, head without bloodshed." Xiaoyuan said hit inside a cluttered, some female passenger was worried about the safety of expatriates, shouting do not hit it. At this time, the train pulled into gold station, the train doors opened, several subway staff discouraged. Then hit the termination, which foreigners who bring their own luggage off to leave. Curse off the train expatriates provocation, Xiaoyuan say that the passengers from the train, a foreigner who has shares in alcohol, drink gaffe guess is, there are also foreign man dissatisfied passenger said knife confiscated by staff to passengers vent their anger. Media video screen is also a passenger, said passenger compartment expatriates had smelled alcohol on the body. Ultimately, expatriates abusive provocation, resulting Subway Line 5 was closed for the entire trains. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0f0_1371316957 Lake8737 Foreigner gets beaten for insulting people and rude behaviors on subway china,chinese,foreigner,beat,subway Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:49:05 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aa5_1371096997 TruthFoundation Funny interview,where richard dawkins exposes a muslim journalist to public humiliation,for those that just want the interview please use this youtube link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWfHkLbMm6w http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aa5_1371096997 TruthFoundation Richard Dawkins destroys islam Richard Dawkins,science,logic,funny interview Tue, 21 May 2013 15:57:12 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=25b_1369165933 th1sf8te CAMERON OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!! David Cameron enraged Tory rebels last night by striking a late deal with Labour to prevent his own MPs wrecking gay marriage legislation. The Prime Minister backed Labour's calls for an immediate consultation on the future of civil partnerships once gay marriages are legalised. This could either lead to them being extended to heterosexual couples or scrapped totally. Despite the opposition of half the Tory backbenchers, the 11th-hour deal, a humiliation for the PM, means same-sex marriages could take place next summer. Mr Cameron's reliance on Labour to force the measure through highlighted his divisions with his backbenchers. Gay marriage has become the latest in a series of issues sparking friction between the PM and traditionalist Tories. The legislation had looked to be in serious trouble yesterday as Labour threatened to vote to introduce civil partnerships for straight couples as well - a move which critics said could cost the Exchequer lb4billion by extending pension rights and inheritance tax breaks. Tory rebels were backing the move in an attempt to wreck the entire Bill. But the Government, which had previously suggested it would review civil partnerships within five years, headed off a potential defeat by agreeing to a consultation immediately. Sources said the review would be 'very thorough and very, very long'. In the Commons, Tory splits were highlighted by a clash between Sir Gerald Howarth and Margot James, the Tories' only openly gay woman MP. Miss James, welcoming the legislation, said many gay people had suffered abuse and anti-discrimination legislation was needed to protect them. But Sir Gerald replied: 'I fear that the playing field has not been levelled. I believe that the pendulum is now swinging so far the other way and there are plenty in the aggressive homosexual community who see this as but a stepping stone to something even further.' Veteran Tory Edward Leigh protested: 'If you dare disagree with the orthodoxy that gay marriage is the best thing since sliced bread, you are breaking a new taboo.' He suggested that the 'outlandish views of the loony left of the 1980s have now become embedded in high places'. 'What the Government is refusing to recognise is that they are not legislating this Bill to redefine marriage in a vacuum. Yvette Cooper, shadow home secretary, revealed that Labour would withdraw its support from the amendment tabled by Tory opponents of gay marriage. 'They are legislating in a culture which has been so coloured by political correctness that mild-mannered people expressing reasonable beliefs in moderate tones are treated like villains,' he added. She said: 'We know David Cameron's leadership is too weak to be able to push this through and to be able to get support on his own benches. 'We think that is a serious problem. But also we don't want to see gay couples who are desperate to set the date and get married at the mercy of this Tory infighting.' Last night Cabinet ministers Iain Duncan Smith and Owen Paterson voted with the rebels who were calling for registrars to opt-out of performing same sex marriages. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=25b_1369165933 th1sf8te PM's <span class="highlight">humiliation</span>: Cameron forced to accept last-minute deal with Labour to head off Conservative rebellion over gay marriage PM's humiliation: Cameron forced to accept last-minute deal with Labour to head off Conservative rebellion over gay marriage Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:49:52 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=036_1370467874 Setright The flag of the Syrian Arab Republic flies over the Al-Qusayr Farmers' Association for the first time in a year. A Syrian army infantryman had the privilege of raising it for eyes of the world. These young people are the spine of the National Defense Forces who participated in the liberation of Al-Qusayr . Syrian girls can cook too. Don't get any ideas. ON JUNE 3, 2013, SYRIAN PERSPECTIVE PREDICTED THE FALL OF AL-QUSAYR TO THE SYRIAN ARMY WITHIN FOUR DAYS. WHO PREDICTED CORRECTLY? SYRIAN PERSPECTIVE, THAT'S WHO. STICK WITH US PEOPLE AND YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH SHALL SET SYRIA FREE. What we could not publish on June 3, 2013 was the completion of the elaborate plan for the liberation of Al-Qusayr. Hezbollah's presence could no longer be concealed after Shaykh Hassan Nasrallah revealed that fact in a speech before the eyes and ears of the world. But, just as important, was the presence of thousands of militia fighters from Ba'ath Party Al-Shabeeba units, National Defense Forces and People's Army (who stepped into every square foot of territory cleaned up by the SAA Special Forces in order to secure it), our infantry and the superbly trained Hezbollah commandos. On June 3, 2013, the rebel army consisted of mostly fighters from Jabhat Al-Nusra with some die-hard elements of the Free Syrian Army. Their numbers were over 5,000. Many FSA had already either surrendered en masse (as we reported, 800 on one day) or had managed to sneak out in small numbers in the area of Dhab'ah. But that escape route was completely closed on June 3. It was here that the disgraced Lebanese Druze leader, Walid Jumblatt, stepped in to further sully the reputation of his family and the Progressive Socialist Party he leads by donning the mantle of the mediator in an effort to save the bacon of the doomed rebels trapped inside the northern quarter of the city. (Read yesterday's report about Jumblatt's treason). He claimed that he was trying only to save the 400 wounded rebels inside. The Syrian High Command rejected his reasoning and his efforts. On Wednesday, MI intercepted communications between a rebel leader by the name of "Qaassem" and another in Lebanon who spoke broken Arabic. The MI could have suppressed the contacts but allowed the two to conduct a tete a tete to learn about their mental state. According to our sources in Homs, (Wael is also in Homs now), the rebel in Al-Qusayr described his situation as "dire" ( http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=036_1370467874 Setright AL-QUSAYR IS NOW REBEL-FREE!! AL-QAEDA FANATICS ARRESTED IN THE HUNDREDS! FAKE SYRIAN ARMY LEAVES IN <span class="highlight">HUMILIATION</span>; BRILLIANT MILITARY TACTICS BY SYRIA Syria,Middle East, World News Mon, 27 May 2013 17:52:04 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=882_1369690727 OMERbinHATTAPcCc ALI IMRAN HEROES , http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=882_1369690727 OMERbinHATTAPcCc SYRIA ,<span class="highlight">humiliation</span>, THE SHEBBEHA WOMAN , syrian war Fri, 31 May 2013 22:04:33 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c8f_1370051370 caucasiannatio I don't know their exact nationality: yakut (from Sakha republic) or buryat (from republic of Buryatia) or tuvin (from Tuvin republic) or siberian asian jews (from jewish autonomous oblast of Birobidjan) http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c8f_1370051370 caucasiannatio Ethnic bullying dedovshina in russian army (part 2) siberian asian beat and bullie russian Russia,bullying,dedovshina,siberia,asian,yakut,buryat,tuvin,humiliation,beaten Wed, 29 May 2013 13:39:02 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8ac_1369848354 liliputanec Instead debated in Parliament representative of the Greek neo-fascist Golden Dawn Ilias Panagiotaros, shared justice on the road and demonstrated strength. It is unclear when this happened, but whole event captured by mobile phone. After vulgar appearance with a bunch of insults, parliament member of Greek ultranationalist party stick marked &quot;MK&quot; at the head of the driver, than with spray covers the MK markings of other trucks. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8ac_1369848354 liliputanec Member of the Golden Dawn attacked Macedonian citizen neo-fascist Golden Dawn Greek ultranationalist Macedonia attack harassment humiliation Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:54:11 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=06b_1370789334 gemini Johan Norberg 8 June 2013 http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/8927011/why-sweden-has-riots/ 'All of them should have been very happy,' Robert A. Heinlein begins his 1942 novel Beyond This Horizon. The material problem has been solved on this future earth, poverty and disease have been eradicated, work is optional. And yet parts of the citizenry are not enthusiastic. Some are bored, others are preparing a revolt. Why should that be, in such a utopian world? A similar puzzlement has been the dominant reaction from commentators after riots broke out and cars and buildings were burned in heavily immigrant-populated suburbs of Stockholm in late May. Sweden? Since the standard interpretation is that violence is the only weapon the marginalised have against an oppressive socioeconomic system, it is more difficult to explain it when it takes place in 'the most successful society the world has ever known', as Polly Toynbee once called it. But it hasn't stopped some from trying. If all you have is two terms of sociology studies, everything looks like a justified grievance. Leftists abroad have blamed the rioting on the liberalisation that has taken place in Sweden in recent years, and the supposed increase in inequality and poverty. The country's big social democratic daily, Aftonbladet, tried to point to the effects of austerity (in a country where it has not been implemented) and claimed that the kids in the suburb of Husby rioted because 'the health care centre, the post office, the midwives' centre and the youth centre have been wound up'. In fact, there are three youth centres in Husby. Its old health care centre closed, but a new one took its place. The midwives moved, but just one station away on the metro. You can find postal services 14 minutes from the centre, on foot. Where I live, you need to walk for 12 minutes. One shivers at the thought of what I could have been like had I lived another two minutes away. Would I also spend Friday nights torching nursery schools? The Swedish poverty rate may very well be too high, but at 1.2 per cent, no European country has a lower one. The average in the European Union is 8.8 per cent. If poverty is the cause of riots, almost every city on the continent should have been burned down before Stockholm's turn came, including most of those in Norway and Switzerland. But inequality has increased, you say. Yes, since the extremely egalitarian mid-1980s (the last time Stockholm saw large-scale youth riots, by the way). But since 2005, when Toynbee proclaimed Sweden the egalitarian utopia, it has barely moved. My country is the most equal in Europe save for Slovenia. Of course, some might argue that you need equality at Slovenia's level to maintain social harmony. That's unless you had heard of the series of mass protests - sometimes violent - which have rocked Slovenian cities since last November, resulting in the fall of the government. Low poverty and inequality, generous welfare benefits, and schools, universities and health care for free. A society in which you are not poor just because you don't work. All of them should have been very happy. In fact, there is serious inequality in Sweden, but the divide is not so much between the rich and the poor as between those with jobs and those without. And frequently this is an ethnic divide. As the author Fredrik Segerfeldt points out in a new study, Sweden has the largest employment gap between natives and foreign-born of all the rich countries where data is available. Only 6.4 per cent of native Swedes are unemployed, but almost 16 per cent of the immigrants are. In Stockholm, as in Paris, this problem is concentrated in the suburbs. In Husby, where the riots started, 38 per cent of those under 26 neither study nor work. So what's to blame? The aspect of the Swedish social model that the government has not dared to touch: strong employment protection. By law, the last person to be hired must be the first person to be sacked. And if you employ someone longer than six months, the contract is automatically made permanent. A system intended to protect the workers has condemned the young to a succession of short-term contracts. Sweden's high de facto minimum wage - around 70 per cent of the average wage - renders unemployed those whose skills are worth less than that. Sweden has the fewest low-wage, entry-level jobs in Europe. Just 2.5 per cent of Swedish jobs are on this level, compared to a European average of 17 per cent. Those with poor education, experience or language skills have found that Sweden is not such a utopia after all. If you never get your first job, you never get the skills and experiences that would give you the second and third job. All that labour 'protection' has created a society of insiders and outsiders. Sweden has generously welcomed immigrants into its borders. But there is another border - around its jobs market - and it is heavily fortified. The result? Young men with nothing to do and nothing to lose, standing on the outside, looking in, with a sense of worthlessness, humiliation and boredom. It's not the first time that such a situation has ended in violence. When this happens in Sweden it shocks the left, because it shows that money isn't everything. A government can supply you with goods and services, but not with self-worth and the respect of others. A government can fulfil all your material needs, but it can't give you the sense that you accomplished this yourself. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=06b_1370789334 gemini Why Sweden has riots swedish riots