<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">  <channel>
    <title>Liveleak.com Rss Feed - </title>
    <link>http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=Obama%5C%5C%5C's+Pocket</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <atom:link href="http://www.liveleak.com/rss?q=Obama%5C%5C%5C's+Pocket" rel="self" />
    <generator>Liveleak</generator>
    
              <item>
      <title>NSA Turns Surveillance Apparatus Against The U.S. Citizens On A MASSIVE SCALE</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:18:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=063_1370279095</link>
      <dc:creator>star53</dc:creator>
      <description>Do you use on line Cloud services? If you do...You may want to reconsider using them. Adobe's Cloud was tied to the Obama Administration through Vivek Kundra, an Obama appointee who is still working under Obama despite the FBI raid on the Technology Office back in 2009. Page 5 of a court document shows that Acar (who was arrested with Kundra) was still funneling tax payer money from the Obama administration back to Kenya. Kundra and Acar are still working for Obama and promoting the Cloud in which all of our documents and information are controlled by servers outside of our control.

&quot;Unless the people, through unified action, arise and take charge of their government, they will find that their government has taken charge of them.  Independence and liberty will be gone, and the general public will find itself in a condition of servitude to an aggregation of organized and selfish interest.&quot; Calvin Coolidge


Under construction by contractors with top-secret clearances, the blandly named Utah Data Center is being built for the National Security Agency. A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world's communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails-parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital &quot;pocket litter.&quot; It is, in some measure, the realization of the &quot;total information awareness&quot; program created during the first term of the Bush administration-an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans' privacy.

But &quot;this is more than just a data center,&quot; says one senior intelligence official who until recently was involved with the program. The mammoth Bluffdale center will have another important and far more secret role that until now has gone unrevealed. It is also critical, he says, for breaking codes. And code-breaking is crucial, because much of the data that the center will handle-financial information, stock transactions, business deals, foreign military and diplomatic secrets, legal documents, confidential personal communications-will be heavily encrypted. According to another top official also involved with the program, the NSA made an enormous breakthrough several years ago in its ability to cryptanalyze, or break, unfathomably complex encryption systems employed by not only governments around the world but also many average computer users in the US. The upshot, according to this official: &quot;Everybody's a target; everybody with communication is a target.&quot;

For the NSA, overflowing with tens of billions of dollars in post-9/11 budget awards, the cryptanalysis breakthrough came at a time of explosive growth, in size as well as in power. Established as an arm of the Department of Defense following Pearl Harbor, with the primary purpose of preventing another surprise assault, the NSA suffered a series of humiliations in the post-Cold War years. Caught off guard by an escalating series of terrorist attacks-the first World Trade Center bombing, the blowing up of US embassies in East Africa, the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, and finally the devastation of 9/11-some began questioning the agency's very reason for being. In response, the NSA has quietly been reborn. And while there is little indication that its actual effectiveness has improved-after all, despite numerous pieces of evidence and intelligence-gathering opportunities, it missed the near-disastrous attempted attacks by the underwear bomber on a flight to Detroit in 2009 and by the car bomber in Times Square in 2010-there is no doubt that it has transformed itself into the largest, most covert, and potentially most intrusive intelligence agency ever created.

In the process-and for the first time since Watergate and the other scandals of the Nixon administration-the NSA has turned its surveillance apparatus on the US and its citizens. It has established listening posts throughout the nation to collect and sift through billions of email messages and phone calls, whether they originate within the country or overseas. It has created a supercomputer of almost unimaginable speed to look for patterns and unscramble codes. Finally, the agency has begun building a place to store all the trillions of words and thoughts and whispers captured in its electronic net. And, of course, it's all being done in secret. To those on the inside, the old adage that NSA stands for Never Say Anything applies more than ever.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/1</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=063_1370279095</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/063_1370279095" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/063_1370279095" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">star53</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Jun/3/d673a30148c4_thumb_7.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>NSA Turns Surveillance Apparatus Against The U.S. Citizens On A MASSIVE SCALE</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Tyrannicle government,Obama Regime,NSA,Surveillance Apparatus,privacy</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>As written to the President of the United States</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 18:19:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=55a_1365891425</link>
      <dc:creator>OpenMinds2012org</dc:creator>
      <description>Good Morning Mr. President, 



   



 This is a short
statement / question.

   



 I am a man, Mr.
Nicholas D Johnson, that has had a sorted past yet I have attended college(s);
am a veteran of the USCG; am a veteran of the Department of Defense
specializing in weapons systems (NMCI) as well as having owned viable businesses.

   



 I was convicted of a
3rd DUI on 11 Apr 11 and denied early release from probation a second time on 8
Apr 13'. All court required programs &amp;amp; directives had been completed.

   



 A was also placed on
SSI at that time of the charge for a chemical imbalance which has been argued
was the cause of my drinking. The proper following of a medication regiment
seems to indicate this to be truth.

   



 Never the less, I sit
here on probation in Brevard Co, FL. Cape
 Marina, Port Canaveral aboard an
antique yacht that the tax payer has afforded me.

   



 I filed indigent
status and the tax payer paid for my divorce. I'm on EBT so once again, it's at
the tax payer's expense. Add to this that tax payer provides the funding for my
probation, part B Medicare as well as the original court case costs through
bankruptcy.

   



 The tax payers have
another 3.5 years to pay for my life 100% with my paying No taxes.

   



 This wouldn't be
unreasonable if it weren't for the fact that I'm a stationary electrical
engineer - systems class III / published author &amp;amp; chef with several
attainable contracts for employment. I do Not have to be a burden on the system.

   



 I had the opportunity
to work for Raytheon yet I could Not fill out an electronic security personnel
questionnaire under my status.

   



 I began Open Minds
2012 / http://www.OpenMinds2012.org over 2 years ago to assist individuals to get on
their feet by becoming sustainable within their &quot;Thought&quot; &amp;amp;
efforts.

 DUNS, CCR, EIN, etc.
and received absolutely No assistance; I continue to pay for this site out of
pocket.

   



 I recently formed
&quot;Trueque&quot; where as I would primarily fix boats / yachts. This was to
include structural, electrical, pumps, systems etc with contracts offered from
Robert Carmody; Tom Zabrodsky and even a contract in Dubai
with endorsements.

   



 Mr. President, I am
Not looking for a job, I am creating a viable means to work with the very real
possibility of hiring workers.

 Seems the system in
place would rather me be a leech.

   



 Does every man have

to fight this diligently to work? Mind you I didn't say, &quot;Look for a job&quot;,
I said, &quot;Work&quot;.

   



 In the past 2 years,
I was invited to Mensa and personally asked by Ms. Meadows to open a chapter of
the Venus Project.

   



 I work / study 12 to
14 hours a day, 365 days a year endeavoring in any legal act to afford my
existence and life.

 Now, I sit here
before my monthly tax paid monthly probation visit and ask myself, &quot;What
more can I do for myself&quot;?

   



 All I wish to do is
be autonomous, nothing else, and yet I'm stymied at every turn. Have I not been
made docile enough by fluoride?

 If fractional reserve
banking weren't enough; the current system negates the 145 / 155 IQ that's
endeavors to be an asset.

   



 Is this your intended
effort in rebuilding a nation. Could the Prepper groups, anti Obama rhetoric be
correct in feeling that the country is simply being thrown away within your
current system.

   



 I will seek the
proper protocol to present this to the media and tax payers of Brevard
 County and the United
  States; the tax payers should know.

   



   



   



   



 Thank You Mr. President 



   



           Be Blessed 



   



    Nicholas D. Johnson 



   



   



 http://www.OpenMinds2012.org 



   



         321-427-8769</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=55a_1365891425</guid>
            <media:content>
                <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">OpenMinds2012org</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/nopreview.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>As written to the President of the United States</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Jobs, economy, recovery, corruption</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Aged Eight, Wearing A Mickey Mouse Sweatshirt, And Placed In Israeli Custody With No Lawyer Or Access To Parents</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:20:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fe9_1365014922</link>
      <dc:creator>OnlyLiarsBlock</dc:creator>
      <description>His friend, Abdel Rahim, who was arrested with him, is only 7, and in first grade.

The fact that 18 of the children were under the age of 12, the age of criminal responsibility according to the 1971 Israeli Youth Law (Adjudication, Punishment and Methods of Treatment ), was apparently of no interest to the IDF
27 Palestinian children never made it to school this week; IDF troops lay in ambush for them on the streets of Hebron.By  Gideon Levy 	 and  Alex Levac 	
 09:59 29.03.13 
  77
We couldn't help ourselves: The sight of the young, newly released detainee drove us into a paroxysm of laughter. But the laughter quickly morphed into sad embarrassment. The detainee was a boy of 8, in second grade. When we met him this week, on the streets of Hebron, he was on his way to his grandfather's home. He wore a red sweatshirt emblazoned with an image of Mickey Mouse, and he had a shy smile. His mom had sent him to take something to Grandpa. Eight-year-old Ahmed Abu Rimaileh was not the youngest of the children, schoolbags on their backs, that Israel Defense Forces soldiers took into custody early on Wednesday, last week: His friend, Abdel Rahim, who was arrested with him, is only 7, and in first grade.

Twenty-seven Palestinian children never made it to school on that particular day. IDF troops lay in ambush for them from the early morning hours on the streets of the Hebron neighborhoods that are under the army's control, and arrested them indiscriminately. Only after they were in custody did the Israeli security forces examine the video footage they had in their possession, to see which of the youngsters had thrown stones at Checkpoint No. 160 earlier that morning, which separates their neighborhood from the settlers' quarter of the city. It was here, a few weeks ago, that IDF soldiers shot and killed a teenager, Mohammed Suleima, who was holding a pistol-shaped lighter.

Most of the young children were released within a few hours. The older ones were kept in detention for a few days, before being released on bail. One adult, who tried forcefully to prevent the arrest of a colleague's son, was brought to trial this week.

The fact that 18 of the children were under the age of 12, the age of criminal responsibility according to the 1971 Israeli Youth Law (Adjudication, Punishment and Methods of Treatment ), was apparently of no interest to the IDF, the Israel Police or the Border Police. Nor was the severe report issued just two weeks earlier by the United Nations Children's Fund, which condemned Israel for arresting some 7,000 Palestinian children in the past decade.

&quot;Ill-treatment of Palestinian children in the Israeli military detention system appears to be widespread, systematic and institutionalized,&quot; the UNICEF report stated, and added, &quot;In no other country are children systematically tried by juvenile military courts.&quot;

The Youth Law forbids the arrest of children under the age of 12. It also appears that the provision stipulating that older children must not be interrogated without the presence of their parents and their lawyer does not apply to Palestinian children.

A volunteer from the International Solidarity Movement, a pro-Palestinian activist group, who documented with a video camera the operation in which the children were arrested, forwarded the footage to B'Tselem: The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories, and B'Tselem gave it to us. (The video can be viewed on the B'Tselem website and on YouTube.) One soldier is seen spitting crudely on the ground, another actually carries the schoolbag of his little detainee - as though he were a babysitter who had come to escort the child home from school. The amateur photographer from the ISM was deported from Israel that same day, after she also had the temerity to take part in a demonstration in Hebron against the visit of President Barack Obama.

Indeed, the mass arrest of the youngsters took place on March 20, the day Obama arrived in Israel, and the day before he made his remarks about Palestinian children in Jerusalem. &quot;Put yourselves in the Palestinians' shoes,&quot; the president told the Israelis.

From early that same morning, Palestinian residents of Hebron noticed dozens of Israeli soldiers taking up positions in the streets and on rooftops in the neighborhood. One frightened resident called B'Tselem fieldworker Manal al-Jaabari, to ask what was going on.

 Divided by age 

For his part, Ahmed Abu Rimaileh woke up at 7 that morning and, with the NIS 2 he received from his mother as pocket money, set out for school; sometimes he gets NIS 1.5, sometimes 2. He attends the Hadija Elementary School down the street. Adjacent to it are three other schools that are part of an educational complex, which is located a few hundred meters from the checkpoint.

His father, Yakub, is a construction worker. His mother, Hala, is now sitting with us in their home. On the way to school, Ahmed says he stopped at the corner grocery store and bought a packet of cookies for NIS 1, and kept the other shekel for recess. As he was about to leave the store, he relates, seven or eight other children suddenly came running in, some his age, some older. Hard on their heels were soldiers, who arrested all the children in the store.

One soldier ordered Ahmed to put the cookies in his schoolbag before grabbing him by the shoulder and hauling him toward the checkpoint. Ahmed says he was very scared. He also admits that he cried, though only a little. At the checkpoint, he and all the other detained youngsters were thrust into an army vehicle - 27 children in one vehicle, some sitting, some standing, according to Ahmed's description.

There were three soldiers with them in the vehicle. Some of the children were crying, and the soldiers told them to be quiet. One child was hit, Ahmed says. They were all taken to the nearby Israeli police station, next to the Tomb of the Patriarchs, where they were told to sit on the ground, in a closed courtyard. The children above age 12 were separated from the younger ones and taken to the police station in Kiryat Arba and afterward to Ofer Prison, north of Jerusalem.

Ahmed Burkan, 13, was not released until the evening. Malik Srahana, also 13, was held in custody for three days at Ofer Prison before being released on NIS 2,000 bail. B'Tselem fieldworker Musa Abu Hashhash, who met with him immediately after his release, says the teenager showed signs of trauma.

According to a report transmitted by the International Red Cross to B'Tselem, 18 of the detained children were under the age of 12. They were kept in the courtyard, with a policeman guarding them for almost two hours. No one offered them food or water.

Children asked to go to the bathroom but were forbidden to do so, Ahmed recalls. The policeman asked who among them had thrown stones, but no one confessed. He then asked if they knew which children had thrown the stones and they named two of the older ones, who had been arrested and separated from them.

After a time, three jeeps arrived and took the younger group to Checkpoint 56, next to the settler neighborhood of Tel Rumeida. There the children were met by three Palestinian police &quot;security coordination&quot; jeeps, which took them to their police station. The Palestinian police gave them food and asked all those who had thrown stones to raise their hand. All the hands went up.

The parents were called to come to the station to collect the children. Ahmed's parents and those of four other youngsters did not show up. Those five children were driven home in a car of the Palestinian Ministry of Education. Their worried parents were waiting for them.

Hala says she is not angry at her son. She only asked him not to cry the next time he is arrested by soldiers. &quot;We are used to it,&quot; she says, adding that her son had a dream about the arrest that night.

The IDF Spokesman's Office provided the following statement in response to a query from Haaretz: &quot;Last Wednesday, March 20, 2013, Palestinian minors threw stones at a force that was manning the checkpoint in Hebron. An IDF force that waited in ambush close to the site caught the stone-throwers in action. The Palestinian minors were detained on the spot, and seven of them, who are above the age of 12, were taken for interrogation by the Israel Police. As the Israel Police interrogated the minors, the question about the non-presence of a parent/lawyer during the interrogation should be addressed to them.&quot;

The day after the incident, Ahmed did not want to go to school, but was persuaded by his parents to do so. For one day he was a hero among the children: Ahmed, the released detainee. He did not enter the classroom that day, staying instead in the principal's office. He wants to be a doctor when he grows up, like a few others in his extended family, he tells us. His mother says he is a good student and a good boy.

Ahmed has seven brothers and sisters. The five boys sleep in one room, on two beds and on mattresses on the floor. There is an old computer in the room, which is turned off; they do not have an Internet connection. Out in the street a young peddler, of the same age as Ahmed, can be heard hawking his wares. After school the boy sells halabi, a sweet homemade pastry oozing with oil, for half a shekel.




 http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/twilight-zone/aged-eight-wearing-a-mickey-mouse-sweatshirt-and-placed-in-israeli-custody.premium-1.512461</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fe9_1365014922</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/fe9_1365014922" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/fe9_1365014922" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">OnlyLiarsBlock</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Apr/3/9c65e35b5661_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Aged Eight, Wearing A Mickey Mouse Sweatshirt, And Placed In Israeli Custody With No Lawyer Or Access To Parents</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">israel, palestine, children, detained, </media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Media Bias Doesn't Exist. The Media is Not Liberal. The Media is Not in Obama's Pocket: Reporters Caught on Open Mic Attacking Sarah Palin</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:19:47 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=22b_1277587030</link>
      <dc:creator>ObamaTheLeftistAnimal</dc:creator>
      <description>Media Bias Doesn't Exist. The Media is Not Liberal. The Media is Not in Obama's Pocket: Reporters Caught on Open Mic Attacking Sarah Palin

Following a live feed of Sarah Palin's speech at Cal State Stanislaus on Friday  , reporters were caught openly trashing the former Vice Presidential candidate. The audio went out on the live feed supplied by local television networks.</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=22b_1277587030</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/22b_1277587030" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/22b_1277587030" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">ObamaTheLeftistAnimal</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2010/Jun/26/699d1f348da6_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Media Bias Doesn't Exist. The Media is Not Liberal. The Media is Not in Obama's Pocket: Reporters Caught on Open Mic Attacking Sarah Palin</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Media Bias, Doesn't Exist, The Media, Liberal, Obama's Pocket, Sarah Palin</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>SOLYNDRA SOLAR Scandal may be Obama's Downfall</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:20:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bc1_1316570441</link>
      <dc:creator>amy2x</dc:creator>
      <description>

In the Obama White House, just as it was in the Bush White House, money buys influence, and more importantly, money also buys business opportunities. Apparently, when Solyndra first applied for its green subsidies, auditors at the Department of Energy (DOE) had serious doubts about the company's financial strength, yet, they were still fast-tracked for one the biggest green subsidies in US history. Jonathan Silver is executive director of the Loan Programs Office, and is the man who signed off on Solyndra's loan. Will he thrown under the bus later, if the investigation reaches Congressional hearings? The plot thickens.

The $500 million question is why this firm was allowed to win such a large handout if its fundamentals did not pass grade? The answer to that question is a man by the name of George Kaiser, an Oklahoma billionaire and a major investor in Solyndra, who also happened to be... a key fundraiser for Obama's 2008 election campaign. But it gets worse.

When Solyndra when down under Chapter 11 bankruptcy last week, you would think that the US taxpayer would be first in line as a creditor who hoped to recoup its $500 million loss. Not so. First in line was... George Kaiser, who managed to pocket his initial $75 million investment before anyone else got to the butchers table. -Patrick Henningsen Infowars.com
 http://www.infowars.com/solargate-obamas-big-green-scandal-that-wont-go-away/ 
_____________________________________________
Hear Carl Gallups LIVE on Freedom Fridays - Every Friday afternoon from 4-6pm CST on 1330 WEBY - streaming live over the net. Broadcasting to four states on the Gulf Coast and to the world by internet.  http://www.carlgallups.com  OR HERE  http://www.hickoryhammockbaptist.org/radio 
_________________________________________
The Light of the World,Movie(Full Length)
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWO_peGaGvg</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bc1_1316570441</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/bc1_1316570441" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/bc1_1316570441" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">amy2x</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2011/Sep/20/ae64225f1217_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>SOLYNDRA SOLAR Scandal may be Obama's Downfall</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">amy2x,Solargate,Barack Obama,Solar Scandal,political,corruption,ppsimons,carl gallups,solar energy firm,solar company ,whitehouse,alex jones,infowars news,prisonplanet,Loan Programs Office,investor in Solyndra,Whitehouse,Scandal,Barack Obama's Investments</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Barry The Dope Dealer; one reason Obama's school files are SEALED. </title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:26:07 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d48_1346210589</link>
      <dc:creator>GraveMatter-</dc:creator>
      <description>Barry was quite the accomplished marijuana addicted enthusiast back in high school and college. Excerpts from David Maraniss' Barack Obama: The Story &quot;Barry the Dope dealer&quot; with the elaborate drug culture surrounding the president when he attended Punahou School in Honolulu and Occidental College in Los Angeles . He definitely inhaled, a hell of a lot of smoke.

 

1. The Choom Gang

A self-selected group of boys at Punahou School who loved basketball and good times called themselves the Choom Gang. Choom is a verb, meaning &quot;to smoke marijuana.&quot;

 

2. Total Absorption

As a member of the Choom Gang, Barry Obama was known for starting a few pot-smoking trends. The first was called &quot;TA,&quot; short for &quot;total absorption.&quot; To place this in the physical and political context of another young man who would grow up to be president, TA was the antithesis of Bill Clinton's claim that as a Rhodes scholar at Oxford he smoked dope but never inhaled.

 

3. Roof Hits

Along with TA, Barry popularized the concept of &quot;roof hits&quot;: when they were chooming in the car all the windows had to be rolled up so no smoke blew out and went to waste; when the pot was gone, they tilted their heads back and sucked in the last bit of smoke from the ceiling.


 

4. Penalties

When you were with Barry and his pals, if you exhaled precious pakalolo (Hawaiian slang for marijuana, meaning &quot;numbing tobacco&quot;) instead of absorbing it fully into your lungs, you were assessed a penalty and your turn was skipped the next time the joint came around. &quot;Wasting good bud smoke was not tolerated,&quot; explained one member of the Choom Gang, Tom Topolinski, the Chinese-looking kid with a Polish name who answered to Topo.

 

5. The Choomwagon

  Mark Bendix's Volkswagen bus, also known as the Choomwagon. ... The other members considered Mark Bendix the glue, he was funny, creative, and uninhibited, with a penchant for Marvel Comics. He also had that VW bus and a house with a pool, a bong, and a Nerf basketball, all enticements for them to slip off midday for a few unauthorized hours of recreation...


 

6. Interceptions

Barry also had a knack for interceptions. When a joint was making the rounds, he often elbowed his way in, out of turn, shouted &quot;Intercepted!,&quot; and took an extra hit. No one seemed to mind.

 

7. Slippers

Choom Gang members often made their way to Aku Ponds at the end of Manoa Stream, where they slipped past the liliko'i vines and the KAPU (keep out) signs, waded into waist-high cool mountain water, stood near the rock where water rushed overhead, and held up a slipper (what flip-flops are called in Hawaii) to create an air pocket canopy. It was a natural high, they said, stoned or not.

 

8. Ray The Dealer

He was a long-haired haole hippie who worked at the Mama Mia Pizza Parlor not far from Punahou and lived in a dilapidated bus in an abandoned warehouse. ... According to Topolinski, Ray the dealer was &quot;freakin' scary.&quot; Many years later they learned that he had been killed with a ball-peen hammer by a scorned gay lover. But at the time he was useful because of his ability to &quot;score quality weed.&quot;
...
In another section of the   yearbook, students were given a block of space to express thanks and define their high school experience. ... Nestled below   photographs was one odd line of gratitude: &quot;Thanks Tut, Gramps, Choom Gang, and Ray for all the good times.&quot; ... A hippie drug-dealer made his acknowledgments; his own mother did not.

 

9. Pumping Stations

Their favorite hangout was a place they called Pumping Stations, a lush hideaway off an unmarked, roughly paved road partway up Mount Tantalus . They parked single file on the grassy edge, turned up their stereos playing Aerosmith, Blue Oyster Cult, and Stevie Wonder, lit up some &quot;sweet-sticky Hawaiian buds&quot; and washed it down with &quot;green bottle beer&quot; (the Choom Gang preferred Heineken, Becks, and St. Pauli Girl).

 

10. Veto

One of the favorite words in their subculture revealed their democratic nature. The word was veto. Whenever an idea was broached, someone could hold up his hand in the V sign (a backward peace sign of that era) and indicate that the motion wash not approved. They later shortened the process so that you could just shout &quot;V&quot; to get the point across.. In the Choom Gang, all V's were created equal.

 

11. Maui Wowie, Kauai Electric, Puna Bud And Kona Gold:

In the Honolulu of Barry's teenage years marijuana was flourishing up in the hills, out in the countryside, in covert greenhouses everywhere. It was sold and smoked right there in front of your nose; Maui Wowie, Kauai Electric, Puna Bud, Kona Gold, and other local variations of pakololo were readily available.

 


12. The Barf Couch

The Barf Couch earned its name early in the first trimester when a freshman across the hall from Obama   drank himself into a stupor and threw up all over himself and the couch. In the manner of pallbearers hoisting a coffin, a line of Annexers lifted the tainted sofa with the freshman aboard and toted it out the back door and down four steps to the first concrete landing on the way to the parking lot. A day later, the couch remained outside in the sun, resting on its side with cushions off (someone had hosed it clean), and soon it was back in the hallway nook.

 

13. The Annex Olympics

(The main hallway at Haines Hall was called the Annex,) home to the impromptu Annex Olympics: long-jumping onto a pile of mattresses, wrestling in underwear, hacking golf balls down the hallway toward the open back door, boxing while drunk. There were the non-Olympic sports of lighting farts and judging them by color, tipping over the Coke machine, breaking the glass fire extinguisher case, putting out cigarettes on the carpet, falling asleep on the carpet, flinging Frisbees at the ceiling-mounted alarm bell, tasting pizza boxes to the floor, and smoking pot from a three-foot crimson opaque bong, a two-man event involving the smoker and an accomplice standing ready to respond to the order &quot;Hey, dude, light the bowl!




Resources:

1.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/the-choom-gang-president-obamas-pot-smoking-high-school-days-detailed-in-maraniss-book/2012/05/25/gJQAwFqEqU_blog.HTML 

2.  http://www.unitedliberty.org/articles/10218-for-choom-the-bell-tolls 

3.  http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/politics-raising-children/2012/may/29/lessons-choom-gang-dont-air-your-dirty-laundry/ 

4.  http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/obama-and-his-pot-smoking-choom-gang/ 

5.  http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2012/05/27/the_choom_gang_obama039s_pot-smoking_days_280927.html 

6.  http://theweek.com/article/index/228490/the-choom-gang-9-juiciest-details-from-barack-obamas-days-as-a-pothead 

7.  http://www.theblaze.com/stories/the-top-headlines-about-barack-obamas-pot-smoking-high-school-choom-gang/ 

8.  http://www.buzzfeed.com/gavon/a-users-guide-to-smoking-pot-with-barack-obama 



  WHY WASN'T THIS ALL ON THE NEWS IN 2008 WHEN HE WAS RUNNING FOR OFFICE ?????  

 and  



 WHY ISN'T THE NEWS TALKING ABOUT IT TODAY ?????</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d48_1346210589</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/d48_1346210589" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/d48_1346210589" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">GraveMatter-</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2012/Aug/28/ccdc6bbced87_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Barry The Dope Dealer; one reason Obama's school files are SEALED. </media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Obamma, drugs, dope, marajuna, Obama is an idiot</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Disillusioned Yet? Krauthammer on Obama's Health Care Strategy</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:46:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=47c_1267861425</link>
      <dc:creator>vicsemprini</dc:creator>
      <description>WASHINGTON -- So the yearlong production, set to close after Massachusetts' devastatingly negative Jan. 19 review, saw the curtain raised one last time. Obamacare lives.

 

After 34 speeches, three sharp electoral rebukes (Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts) and a seven-hour seminar, the president announced Wednesday his determination to make one last push to pass his health care reform.

The final act was carefully choreographed. The rollout began a week earlier with a couple of shows of bipartisanship: a Feb. 25 Blair House &quot;summit&quot; with Republicans, followed five days later with a few concessions tossed the Republicans' way.

Show is the operative noun. Among the few Republican suggestions President Obama pretended to incorporate was tort reform. What did he suggest to address the plague of defensive medicine that a Massachusetts Medical Society study showed leads to about 25 percent of doctor referrals, tests and procedures being done for no medical reason? A few ridiculously insignificant demonstration projects amounting to one-half of one-hundredth of 1 percent of the cost of Obama's health care bill.

As for the Blair House seminar, its theatrical quality was obvious even before it began. The Democrats had already decided to go for a purely partisan bill. Obama signaled precisely that intent at the end of the summit show -- then dramatically spelled it out just six days later in his 35th health care speech: He is going for the party-line vote.

Unfortunately for Democrats, that seven-hour televised exercise had the unintended consequence of showing the Republicans to be not only highly informed on the subject, but also, as even Obama was forced to admit, possessed of principled objections -- contradicting the ubiquitous Democratic/media meme that Republican opposition was nothing but nihilistic partisanship.

Republicans did so well, in fact, that in his summation, Obama was reduced to suggesting that his health care reform was indeed popular because when you ask people about individual items (for example, eliminating exclusions for pre-existing conditions or capping individual out-of-pocket payments) they are in favor.

Yet mystifyingly they oppose the whole package. How can that be?

Allow me to demystify. Imagine a bill granting every American a free federally delivered ice cream every Sunday morning. Provision 2: steak on Monday, also home delivered. Provision 3: A dozen red roses every Tuesday. You get the idea. Would each individual provision be popular in the polls? Of course.

However (life is a vale of howevers), suppose these provisions were bundled into a bill that also spelled out how the goodies are to be paid for and managed -- say, half a trillion dollars in new taxes, half a trillion in Medicare cuts (cuts not to keep Medicare solvent but to pay for the ice cream, steak and flowers), 118 new boards and commissions to administer the bounty-giving, and government regulation dictating, for example, how your steak was to be cooked. How do you think this would poll?

Perhaps something like 3-1 against, which is what the latest CNN poll shows is the citizenry's feeling about the current Democratic health care bills.

Late last year, Democrats were marveling at how close they were to historic health care reform, noting how much agreement had been achieved among so many factions. The only remaining detail was how to pay for it.

Well, yes. That has generally been the problem with democratic governance: cost. The disagreeable absence of a free lunch.

Which is what drove even strong Obama supporter Warren Buffett to go public with his judgment that the current Senate bill, while better than nothing, is a failure because the country desperately needs to bend the cost curve down and the bill doesn't do it. Buffett's advice would be to start over and get it right.

Obama has chosen differently, however. The time for debate is over, declared the nation's seminar leader in chief. The man who vowed to undo Washington's wicked ways has directed the Congress to ram Obamacare through, by one vote if necessary, under the parliamentary device of &quot;budget reconciliation.&quot; The man who ran as a post-partisan is determined to remake a sixth of the U.S. economy despite the absence of support from a single Republican in either house, the first time anything of this size and scope has been enacted by pure party-line vote.

Surprised? You can only be disillusioned if you were once illusioned.</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=47c_1267861425</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/47c_1267861425" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/47c_1267861425" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">vicsemprini</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2010/Mar/6/038ce19f5e87_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Disillusioned Yet? Krauthammer on Obama's Health Care Strategy</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Obama, Democrats, health care reform, reconciliation, unpopular legislation, health care summit</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>The Reducing Barack Obama's Unsustainable Deficit Act of 2009 - &amp;quot;Buda&amp;quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:28:08 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8f9_1247181906</link>
      <dc:creator>HydrogenEconomy</dc:creator>
      <description>http://rsc.tomprice.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Reducing_Baracks_Unsustainable_Deficit.pdf

http://www.redstate.com/congressman_tom_price/2009/07/09/the-reducing-barack-obamas-unsustainable-deficit-act/


Posted by Congressman Tom Price (Profile)

Thursday, July 9th at 3:30PM EDT
4 Comments

Jobs are being lost everyday, the deficit continues to explode and the American people are angry.

It's now been six months since President Obama moved into the White House and in that short time, we have seen all his economic policies fall flat on their face. The unemployment rate has skyrocketed to 9.5%, and the stimulus package has been defined by delays, fraud, and poor management.

Every day, I talk to Americans who are terrified about the path the country is going - the spending, the borrowing, the government intervention. That's why we have introduced a bill that attempts to save the country from economic and fiscal disaster. It's called the &quot;Reducing Barack Obama's Unsustainable Deficit Act&quot; and it makes a much needed turn in the direction of fiscal responsibility.

On May 14th of this year, the President said, &quot;The long-term deficit and debt that we have accumulated is unsustainable. We can't keep on just borrowing from China, or borrowing from other countries...At some point they're just going to get tired of buying our debt.&quot;

While true, I think the American people are also getting tired of buying the President's empty rhetoric.

To actually match word to deed, we have offered legislation to give Americans their money back. The first step is to cancel the spending portion of the stimulus package and recall the $460 billion that has not yet been spent. The money hasn't gone out the door and we can still get it back.

The second step is to reclaim all unobligated TARP money so none of the remaining $150 billion can be wasted. The legislation then requires that all TARP money paid back must go directly to paying down the debt.

This simple measure will save taxpayers billions and help reduce this year's projected $1.85 trillion deficit - by far the largest in U.S. history!

A lot of folks out there are saying they want their 'change' back, but the truth is Obama's into us for a lot more than pocket change. And it's clear buyer's remorse has set in across this country. I, for one, think it's time we get our money back.</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8f9_1247181906</guid>
            <media:content>
                <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">HydrogenEconomy</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/nopreview.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>The Reducing Barack Obama's Unsustainable Deficit Act of 2009 - &amp;quot;Buda&amp;quot;</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">reducing,barack,obama,unsustainable,deficit,act,2009,buda</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>The odd choices in Barack Obama's career</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 04:05:03 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d2e_1219478703</link>
      <dc:creator>Hypnojive</dc:creator>
      <description>By J.R. Dunn

It's time to throw my hat in the ring as regards predicting the election results. So here it is: Barack Obama will be defeated. Seriously and convincingly defeated. Not due to racism, not due to the forces of reaction, not even due to Karl Rove sending out mind rays over the national cable system. He will lose for one reason above all, one that has been overlooked in any analysis that I've yet seen. Barack Obama will lose because he is a flake.



I'm using the term in its generally accepted sense. A flake is not only a screwup, but someone who truly excels in making bizarre errors and creating incredibly convoluted disasters. A flake is a &quot;fool with energy&quot;, as the Russian proverb puts it. (&quot;A fool is a terrible thing to have around, but a fool with energy is a nightmare&quot;.)

Barack Obama is a flake, and the American people have begun to see it. The chief characteristic of a flake is that he makes choices that are impossible to either understand or explain. These are not the errors of the poor dope who can't grasp the essentials of a situation, or the neurotic who ruins things out of compulsion, or the man suffering chronic bad luck.

The flake has a genius for discovering solutions at perfect right angles to the ordinary world. It's as if he's the product of a totally different evolutionary chain, in a universe where the laws are slightly but distinctly at variance to ours. When given a choice between left and right, the flake goes up -- if not through the 8th dimension. And although there's plenty of rationalization, there's never a logical reason for any of it. After awhile, people stop asking.

Obama's rise has been widely portrayed as a kind of millennial Horatio Alger story -- young lad from a new state on the outskirts of the American polity, a member of once-despised minority, works his way by slow degrees to within arm's length of the presidency itself. That's all well and good -- we need national myths of exactly that type.

But what has been overlooked is the string of faux pas marking each step of Obama's journey, a series of strange, inexplicable actions, actions bizarre enough to require some effort at explanation, through such efforts have rarely been offered. It's as if the new Horatio made it to the top by stepping into every last manhole and open trapdoor in his path. And we, the onlookers, the voters who are being asked to put this man in the White House, are supposed to take this as the normal career path for a successful chief executive.

What are these incidents? I'm sure many of you are way ahead of me, but let's go to the videotape.

Here's a young man who graduated from Columbia with high marks, with a choice of positions anywhere in the country. He comes from a state generally held to be a close match to Paradise. One, furthermore, that can be characterized as the most successful multiracial society in the world, with harmonious relations not only between whites and blacks, but also Japanese-Americans and native Hawaiians as well. To top it off, a state controlled in large part by a smoothly-functioning Democratic machine. So where does he choose to go?

To Chicago. One of the windiest, coldest, most brutal cities in the country. One that is also infinitely corrupt in a sense that Hawaii is not. One that remains one of the most racist large cities in the U.S. (Cicero, Al Capone's old stomping grounds, a suburb that is effectively part of the city, is completely segregated to this day.) It would be nice to learn which of these aspects most attracted young Obama to the city. But if you'd asked at the beginning of the campaign, you'd still be waiting.

And what does he do when he reaches the city? Why, he joins a cult. Jeremiah Wright's Trinity United Church has been turned inside out since the videotaped sermons appeared early this year, without anyone ever quite explaining exactly what Obama was thinking of when he joined up in the first place. Street cred, so it's claimed. But there are a plethora of black churches that would have provided him that without the taint of demented racism that Wright's church offered. 

Obama apparently had to swear an oath of belief in &quot;black liberation theology&quot; when he joined the church. (It is the little touches of that sort that make it a &quot;cult&quot;, and not simply a &quot;church&quot;.) Did the thought of his career ever cross his mind? Didn't he realize that church would inevitably cause him trouble somewhere down the line? That he'd be required to repudiate it and its ideas eventually? We can ask -- but we won't get an answer.

Back at school, Obama got himself named editor of the Harvard Law Review. This is a signal achievement, no question about it. The kind of thing that would be mentioned about a person for the rest of his life, as has been the case with Obama. But then... he writes nothing for the journal.

Now, let's get this straight: here we have one of the leading university law journals in the country, one widely cited and read. Entire careers in legal analysis and scholarship have been founded on appearances in the Review, including some that have led to the highest courts in the country. Yet here's an individual who, as editor, could easily place his own work in the journal -- standard practice, nothing at all wrong with it. But he fails to do so. And the explanation? There's none that I've heard. We can go even farther than that, to say that there is no explanation that makes the least rational sense. 

We follow Obama down to Springfield, where as a state legislator, he voted &quot;present&quot; over 120 times. What this means, as far as I've been able to discover, is that he voted &quot;present&quot; nearly as much as he voted &quot;yes&quot; or &quot;no&quot;.

Now, statehouses work very simply: a member approaches his colleagues and asks them them to vote for his bill. Some comply, some do not. Some ask, &quot;Is it a good bill?&quot; and some don't. Either way, they customarily, except in unusual circumstances, vote &quot;yes' or &quot;no&quot;. All except for Barack Obama. And how did get away with it? How did mollify his colleagues? How did he square himself with the party bosses? Echo answereth not.

(A good slogan could be made of this: &quot;You can't vote present in the Oval Office.&quot; I hereby commend it to the McCain campaign.)

We turn eagerly to learn what his term in the U.S. Senate will reveal, only to be disappointed. But it's not surprising, really. After all, he was only there for 143 days.

And there lies one of the keys to Obama's rise. David Brooks pointed out in a recent New York Times column that Obama spent too little time in any of his positions to make an impact one way or another. This is what saved him from the normal fate of the flake: he was never around long enough for his errors and strange behavior to catch up with him.

But a presidential campaign is a different matter. A man running for president is under the microscope, and can't duck anything, as many a candidate has had reason to learn. If Obama is a flake in the classic mode, now is when it would come out. And has it?

The case could be made. Here we have a campaign with everything going for it -- the opposition party in a shambles, a seriously undervalued president, the media in the candidate's pocket, the candidate himself being worshiped as nothing less than the new messiah. And yet the results have comprised little more than one fumble after another.

First came the Wright affair. Obama apparently thought he was above it all -- a not-uncommon phenomenon with flakes -- and allowed the revelations to take on a life of their own before bothering to respond. Even then, his thoughtful and convincing explanation (that he hadn't been listening for twenty years) did little to settle the crisis, which instead guttered out on its own after nearly crippling his campaign. Even months afterward it threatens to pop back up at any time. The latest word is that Wright -- now a deadly enemy of his onetime prot'eg'e -- has written a book. I can't wait.

Obama learned his lesson, and confronted the next threat immediately, tackling The New Yorker cover with the avidity of a man having discovered zombies in the basement. A development that could have been defused with a chuckle and a quip (the customary method is for the politician to ask the cartoonist for the original) was allowed to explode into a major issue. The campaign's relentless attacks on one of the oldest liberal magazines extant merely perplexed the country at large. After all, any Republican has had to endure far worse.

Almost simultaneously, the birth certificate saga was unfolding. On no reasonable grounds, the campaign blew off requests for a copy of the document, at last releasing it through one of the least reputable sites on the Internet, and so badly copied that literally anything could be read into it -- and was. I'm not one of those who believes that Obama was actually born in Indonesia/Kenya/Moscow/the moon, but I still have plenty in the way of questions, almost all of them arising from how the matter was handled. Well played.

The latest pothole (or one of them, anyway) involves Jerome Corsi's The Obama Nation. Corsi has been given the full New Yorker treatment, with the campaign hoping to avoid John Kerry's &quot;error&quot; in not challenging Corsi's 2004 book, Unfit for Command. What Obama missed was the fact that Kerry's major problem was not with Corsi but with the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, who were disgusted with Kerry's hypocrisy in running as an experienced military veteran, and set out to take him down. Corsi's effort dovetailed with the veteran's campaign and to a large extent was swept up with it. No such campaign is in operation against Obama. The smart method of answering Corsi would have been to allow the media to handle it, instead of drawing attention to the book and raising it to level of an issue. This appears to be a real talent for the Obama campaign. 

We could go on. The victory tour of Europe, and the speech in which Obama declared himself &quot;citizen of the world&quot;, a trope guaranteed to focus the attention of Middle America. His inept handling of Hillary, in which he wound up appearing frightened of the opponent he'd just beaten. Allowing Hillary (and her husband there, what's-his-name) a starring role in the Democratic convention is not a solution any sane individual would be comfortable with -- much less a roll-call vote. This threatens the near-certainty of turning the entire affair into BillandHillarycon, with the nominee winding up as a footnote. But it's all of a piece with the campaign Obama has waged up until now.

We've never had a flake as president. We've had drunks, neurotics, cripples, louts, and fools, but never a career screwup. (I except Jimmy Carter, whose errors arose from sincere, misguided goodwill.) And I don't think we're going to get one now. Another three months of flailing, incompetence, and a collapsing image will do little to assure voters concerned with terrorism, the oil crunch, a gyrating economy, and a bellicose Russia. (Anyone doubting that Obama will go exactly this route can consider the Saddleback church fiasco, which unfolded as this piece was being wrapped up. Evidently, the campaign goaded NBC news personality Andrea Mitchell into all but accusing John McCain of &quot;cheating&quot; by failing to take his place within the &quot;cone of silence&quot; during Obama's part of the program. The grotesque element here is that Obama's people and much of the liberal commentariat -- including Mitchell -- apparently believe that the &quot;cone of silence&quot;, a gag prop for the old Get Smart! comedy series, actually exists and was in use at Saddleback.) 

Many of us have dealt with flakes at one time or another, often in settings involving jobs and careers, and not uncommonly in positions of some authority. We all know of the nephew, the fianc'e, the boyfriend, whose whims must be catered to, whose reputation must be protected, who must be constantly worked around if anything at all is to be accomplished, always at the cost of time, money, efficiency, and personal stress.

In the fullness of time, we will inevitably see such a figure in the White House. But not this year, and not this candidate. Such acts of national flakery occur only when there's no real alternative. In this election, an alternative exists. Whatever his shortcomings, nobody ever called John McCain a flake.


J.R. Dunn is consulting editor of American Thinker.</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d2e_1219478703</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/d2e_1219478703" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/d2e_1219478703" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">Hypnojive</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/s/s/17/media17/2008/Aug/23/LiveLeak-dot-com-217237-ut30g4.jpg?d5e8cc8eccfb6039332f41f6249e92b06c91b4db65f5e99818bad097484dd3dfba83&amp;ec_rate=200" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>The odd choices in Barack Obama's career</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Obama defeat, Obama the myth,Obama the flake,</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>There Should Be No Question About Obama's Past Drug Use</title>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:27:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=43d_1337318711</link>
      <dc:creator>Michael A Human</dc:creator>
      <description>
We all make mistakes in life... However, the Military Prohibits Ex-Drug Users From Serving In The Military. But the (Commander and Chief) Head of the United States Military gets a free Pass! Why is that?

&amp;quot;All applicants are carefully screened concerning drug and alcohol involvement. As a minimum, you can expect the recruiter to ask:&amp;quot;

a. &amp;quot;Have you ever used drugs?&amp;quot;
b. &amp;quot;Have you been charged with or convicted of a drug or drug related offense?&amp;quot;
c. &amp;quot;Have you ever been psychologically or physically dependent upon any drug or alcohol?&amp;quot;
d. &amp;quot;Have you ever trafficked, sold, or traded in illegal drugs for profit?&amp;quot;
If the answer to the last two questions is &amp;quot;yes,&amp;quot; then you can expect to be ineligible for enlistment.&amp;quot;

Reference: http://usmilitary.about.com/od/joiningthemilitary/a/enlstandards2.htm 

&amp;quot;Why Larry Sinclair May be Telling the Truth&amp;quot;:
 http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-bloggers/2077817/posts?page=103 

&amp;quot;Sinclair gave Obama $200. Obama exited the vehicle, was gone for a short while, and then returned. Obama had acquired cocaine for Sinclair, of which he snorted a few lines in the limo, while Obama pulled a pipe out of his pocket and smoked crack cocaine. While the drug activity was going on Sinclair gave Obama oral sex.&amp;quot;</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=43d_1337318711</guid>
            <media:content>
                <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">Michael A Human</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/s/s/19/media19/2012/May/18/84c1fc67a3ef_embed_thumbnail_1337318762.jpg?d5e8cc8eccfb6039332f41f6249e92b06c91b4db65f5e99818bad097484dd3dfba83&amp;ec_rate=200" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>There Should Be No Question About Obama's Past Drug Use</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Obama Admitted He Used Drugs In High School</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Obama's FY2012 Budget: Taxes, Taxes, and More Taxes.</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:33:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ed8_1297719022</link>
      <dc:creator>billegoat</dc:creator>
      <description>From Ryan Ellis on Monday, February 14, 2011 12:00 PM


President Obama released his budget this morning.  Rather than focusing on Washington's over-spending problem, the budget calls for higher taxes on families and small businesses to pay for even more government spending.  Under the Obama budget, tax revenues will grow from 14.4% of GDP in 2011 to 20% of GDP in 2021.  By comparison, the historical average is only 18% of GDP.
Tax hike lowlights include:
Raising the top marginal income tax rate (at which a majority of small business profits face taxation) from 35% to 39.6%.  This is a $709 billion/10 year tax hike
Raising the capital gains and dividends rate from 15% to 20%
Raising the death tax rate from 35% to 45% and lowering the death tax exemption amount from $5 million ($10 million for couples) to $3.5 million.  This is a $98 billion/ten year tax hike
Capping the value of itemized deductions at the 28% bracket rate.  This will effectively cut tax deductions for mortgage interest, charitable contributions, property taxes, state and local income or sales taxes, out-of-pocket medical expenses, and unreimbursed employee business expenses.  A new means-tested phaseout of itemized deductions limits them even more.  This is a $321 billion/ten year tax hike
New bank taxes totaling $33 billion over ten years
New international corporate tax hikes totaling $129 billion over ten years
New life insurance company taxes totaling $14 billion over ten years
Massive new taxes on energy, including LIFO repeal, Superfund, domestic energy manufacturing, and many others totaling $120 billion over ten years
Increasing unemployment payroll taxes by $15 billion over ten years
Taxing management capital gains in an investment partnership (&quot;carried interest&quot;) as ordinary income.  This is a tax hike of $15 billion over ten years
A giveaway to the trial lawyers-not letting companies deduct the cost of punitive damages from a lawsuit settlement.  This is a tax hike of $300 million over ten years
Increasing tax penalties, information reporting, and IRS information sharing.  This is a ten-year tax hike of $20 billion.
Add it all together, and this budget is a ten-year, $1.5 trillion tax hike over present law.  That's $1.5 trillion taken out of the economy and spent on government instead of being used to create jobs.
The &quot;tax relief&quot; in the budget is mostly just an extension of present law, and also some refundable credit outlay spending in the tax code.  There is virtually no new tax relief relative to present law in the President's budget.


Read more: http://www.atr.org/obamas-fy-budgetbr-taxes-more-a5844##ixzz1DyH27iCk</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ed8_1297719022</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/ed8_1297719022" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/ed8_1297719022" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">billegoat</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2011/Feb/14/a4d66e0eb3af_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Obama's FY2012 Budget: Taxes, Taxes, and More Taxes.</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">TAXES, OBAMA, BUDGET</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Obama flies a 747 to Chicago to tout his fuel-saving plan  </title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:32:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=be3_1363447545</link>
      <dc:creator>Detroit Iron</dc:creator>
      <description>

By  Andrew Malcolm   President Obama's weekly remarks  

Hi, everybody. As a nation, our top priority is growing our economy and creating good middle class jobs. That's why this week I'm speaking to you from the Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois, because few areas hold as much promise as what they're focused on right here - harnessing American energy.

You see, after years of talking about it, we're finally poised to take control of our energy future. We produce more oil than we have in 15 years. We import less oil than we have in 20 years. We've doubled the amount of renewable energy we generate from sources like wind and solar - with tens of thousands of good jobs to show for it.

We're producing more natural gas than ever before - with hundreds of thousands of good jobs to show for it. We've supported the first new nuclear power plant since the 1970s. And we're sending less carbon pollution into the environment than we have in nearly 20 years.

So we're making real progress. But over the past few weeks, we got a reminder that we need to do more. We went through another spike in gas prices, just like last year, and the year before that. It happens every year. It's a serious blow to your budget - like getting hit with a new tax coming right out of your pocket.

Over the past four years, as part of our all-of-the-above energy strategy, we've taken steps to soften that blow by making sure our cars use less gas. We've put in place the toughest fuel economy standards in our history so that by the middle of the next decade, our cars will go twice as far on a gallon of gas. Over the life of a new car, the average family will save more than $8,000 at the pump. 

But the only way we're going to break this cycle of spiking gas prices for good is to shift our cars and trucks off of oil for good. That's why, in my State of the Union Address, I called on Congress to set up an Energy Security Trust to fund research into new technologies that will help us reach that goal.

Here's how it would work. Much of our energy is drawn from lands and waters that we, the public, own together. So I'm proposing that we take some of our oil and gas revenues from public lands and put it towards research that will benefit the public, so that we can support American ingenuity without adding a dime to our deficit.


We can support scientists who are designing new engines that are more energy efficient; developing cheaper batteries that go farther on a single charge; and devising new ways to fuel our cars and trucks with new sources of clean energy - like advanced biofuels and natural gas - so drivers can one day go coast-to-coast without using a drop of oil.

Now, this idea isn't mine. It's actually built off a proposal put forward by a non-partisan coalition of CEOs and retired generals and admirals. So let's take their advice and free our families and our businesses from painful spikes in gas prices once and for all.

And in the meantime, let's keep moving forward on an all-of-the-above energy strategy. A strategy where we produce more oil and gas here at home, but also more biofuels and fuel-efficient vehicles; more solar power and wind power.

A strategy where we put more people to work building cars, homes and businesses that waste less energy. We can do this. We're Americans. And when we commit ourselves to something, there's no telling how far we'll go. Thanks and have a great weekend.    ####

 This week's Republican Party remarks are here:    Paul Ryan--Washington should spend only what it takes in, like any family  



Read More At Investor's Business Daily:  http://news.investors.com/politics-andrew-malcolm/031613-648216-obama-weekly-remarks-america-need-to-stop-using-oil-for-fuel.htm#ixzz2NiWJAN31  
Follow us:  @IBDinvestors on Twitter  
  InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=be3_1363447545</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/be3_1363447545" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/be3_1363447545" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">Detroit Iron</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Mar/16/5884bf9e8228_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Obama flies a 747 to Chicago to tout his fuel-saving plan  </media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">President Obama</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
              </channel></rss>
	  