http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=Plantation Sat, 18 May 2013 16:05:19 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=Plantation Sat, 04 May 2013 15:02:22 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aed_1367692029 nomorecocktails With the special election between Mark Sanford and Stephen Colbert's sister for the SC1 Congressional seat coming up on Tuesday, state Democratic Party Chairman Dick Harpootlian promised to send Sanford "back to the plantation." A Democratic fundraiser was held Friday night which Joe Biden headlined. At the party, Dick promised to send Sanford back to the plantation. "We're not the fools you think we are," Harpootlian said, "and we're gonna send Mark Sanford back to the plantation, or Argentina or wherever the hell he hangs out." http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aed_1367692029 nomorecocktails SC Democratic Party chair Dick Harpootlian promises to send Mark Sanford 'back to the <span class="highlight">plantation</span>' Mark Sanford, Dick Harpootlian Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:09:13 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fba_1362751408 kingb33r Soldiers of the Royal Dutch Army conducted a search of the woodlands around Zeist this Friday, where police found an underground cannabis plantation on thusday. The police does not rule out the nursery under the ground is much larger than is determined untill now, said a spokesman. The Royal Dutch Army uses special equipment to scan the forest floor. The police received a tip about the nursery near the Erikaweg. There was a tunnel of about 30 meters long which led to four rooms which in total held about 2,000 cannabis plants. An unknown man was arrested. Source: Nu.nl http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fba_1362751408 kingb33r Underground Cannabis <span class="highlight">Plantation</span> Cannabis, underground, zeist, netherlands, sneaky, weed, pot, fun times over Sun, 07 Apr 2013 02:16:52 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2e2_1365315253 ConspiracyTardLL Democrats are lying about their past and overwhelmingly winning minority voters, and a prominent black conservative says they will keep winning until conservatives learn how to win the propaganda war and champion the story of slave-turned-abolitionist Frederick Douglass as an outreach to black voters. K. Carl Smith is a rising star among black conservatives. He recently addressed the 2013 Conservative Political Action Conference and is author of "Frederick Douglass Republicans: The Movement to Re-Ignite America's Passion for Liberty." He told WND conservatives have the right message, but their approach to voters is deeply lacking. "The Republican Party has done a horrendous job of talking about a message that unites people. They don't talk about liberty enough, and that's the all-encompassing message that you want to put out there. That's not happening. It's not being done in a very effective way," Smith said. "We're so badly losing the propaganda battle. Whenever we try to express our conservative values, we have already been discredited, so our message falls on deaf ears. I contend that the No. 1 problem facing the GOP and the conservative movement is not the problem of messaging per se, but this whole idea about winning a propaganda battle so your message will connect with people and resonate with people. So when you talk about conservatism, they don't see you as a sellout. They don't see you as a racist or that you don't care about the poor. We've got to start winning that propaganda battle first, and that's what we're not doing a very good job of," Smith said. He said Democrats are very effective in the propaganda battles, largely because their message to black voters and other solidly Democratic voting blocs is built on a glaring lie. "They have massively co-opted the history of the Republican Party. If you go to the Democratic Party's website right now, go to the 'About Us.' Go to the link that says 'Our History.' On that page, the first sentence says for the past 200 years, the Democratic Party's been the leader of civil rights . That's not true!," Smith exclaimed. "Two hundred years, that's what, 1813? The slave masters were Democrats. The Democratic Party started the KKK to suppress black votes. So they're co-opting the history of the Republican Party and have gotten away with it," he said. "The way we have to counter this is we have to speak the truth. We have to get in the trenches. We've got to let people know in a very non-condescending and non-confrontational manner, the true history of both parties and let them know that we need people in both political parties with a Frederick Douglass perspective," Smith said. So why does Smith hold up the brilliant 19th century orator and writer Frederick Douglass as the key to rekindling Americans' passion for liberty among all races? The best way to understand what conservatism is and how it improves your quality of life, you've got to bring Frederick Douglass into the equation," he said. "Nobody can out-victimize Frederick Douglass. You've just got to elevate his life. He was a man who was born below poverty and rose to be very prosperous. He had $300,000 in the bank, which is the equivalent of $25 million today. So when you think about it, being on the plantation as a slave and depending on the master to take care of him, Douglass was a 47-percenter. But upon discovering his God-given gifts and talents and becoming an entrepreneur, he became a one-percenter." Smith said clothing the conservative message in the success of Frederick Douglass will take the steam out of accusations that conservatives look down on people of other races or the poor. "With Frederick Douglass, that's off the table," he said. "You can't call a Frederick Douglass Republican a sell-out. What we're saying is, we believe, and we are in lock-step, with the values of Frederick Douglass, who respected the Constitution and respected the Founding Fathers." Smith said he grew up in a Democratic household and only later discovered that his core beliefs actually lined up with the conservative movement. He said conservatives must patiently reach out to those who have been convinced Republicans are responsible for the ills they suffer. "I could care less about a person's political affiliation. What I've learned matters most is not the party that you're in but the way in which you vote. The way in which you vote doesn't show your love and your faithfulness to the God that you say you serve. Once you make it a values thing and not a party affiliation thing and you can express that in a non-confrontational way, when people realize that they have been lied to and betrayed, that when they change how they vote," said Smith, who detailed the pain of discovering how he had been politically deceived. "When I grew up in Alabama, I thought George Wallace was a Republican. I thought Bull Connor was a Republican. I believed the people that bombed the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Ala., were part of the Republican Party. All that was not true. When I realized this was not true, I went through a period of depression because all of the things I believed to be true I found it was a lie." SOURCE: http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/democratic-party-lying-about-racist-roots/#ZD1mrRdDTPAF0BR2.99 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2e2_1365315253 ConspiracyTardLL DEMOCRATIC PARTY LYING ABOUT RACIST ROOTS Democrats, Republicans, GOP, DNC Fri, 05 Apr 2013 21:31:52 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9da_1365207996 mrgod2u William Hyde Rice: Last governor of Kaua'i by Hank Soboleski Special to The Garden Island William Hyde Rice was born in 1846 at Punahou, O'ahu and moved with his missionary family to Kaua'i in 1854. Willy, as he was called then, grew up playing with Hawaiian children and speaking Hawaiian, buthe also learned the language from older Hawaiians who chanted while he listenedsilently. In these ways, he became thoroughly fluent in Hawaiian and was, infact, more at ease speaking it than English; in later years he said that untilhe was twenty he never thought in English and had to mentally translate fromHawaiian to English to express himself. He also learned much of the history and folklore of Kaua'i from his good friend, Governor Paul Kanoa(Governor of Kaua'i from 1846 to 1877 and a Hawaiian scholar), during longtalks at the governor's home at Nawiliwili Bay. And, it was Governor Kanoa whotaught Rice obscure meanings of the Hawaiian language, as well as its morecomplicated grammatical constructions and variations in pronunciation.The Governor's help was invaluable when Rice wrote the manuscripts of hisHawaiian legends. A few were translated by him into English in 1923 andpublished as Hawaiian Legends, which is available at local public libraries andis considered to be the book of legends closest to the original Hawaiian inflavor, phrasing and rhythm. William Hyde Rice was not a scholar by profession, however; he was a rancher who got his first job in 1867 taking careof cattle on the Lihue Plantation Ranch for Manager Paul Isenberg at $25 amonth. An expert horseman, he could pick a silver dollar off the ground onhorseback while on the move and he was very much at home with the Hawaiianpaniolos. His career as a rancher continued when he purchased a large makai section of the Kalapaki ahupuaa from Princess Ruth Keelikolani in 1879and ran Lihue Ranch on it. By 1881, he'd sold most of this land to LihuePlantation and bought Kipukai and Kipu from Princess Ruth, where he raisedcattle and fine horses and grew sugarcane on Kipu Plantation.When Queen Liliuokalani visited Kaua'i in 1891, she was the honored guest of Rice and hiswife, Mary. After she came ashore at Nawiliwili, a horse-drawn carriage tookher to Rice's home, Hale Nani, in Lihue. There, hundreds of children passedbefore her and a great luau was served. Later, in the evening, the Royal Bandperformed for her. During her visit, Rice also drove her to Haena in his carriage pulled by a span of magnificent white stallions. And, at a farewellluau in her honor that was attended by 2000 people at Kalapaki, Rice's home onNawiliwili Bay, Rice sent for drinking water for her from a spring in Kipukaithat was sacred to the Hawaiian gods and royalty. In the same year, 1891, Queen Liliuokalani appointed Rice to be the Governor of Kaua'i, a position heheld until after the revolution of 1893. Mr. Rice was the last Governor ofKaua'i and he'd served the Kingdom in the Hawaiian Legislature for many yearsas a Representative from Kaua'i. It's also noted that Rice, George N. Wilcox and Dr. Smith of Koloa were, in the 1870's, the first people on Kaua'ito install telephones in their homes. And, King Kalakaua and Rice gave theaddresses in Hawaiian at the dedication ceremonies of the Kamehameha Schools in1887. William Hyde Rice married Mary Waterhouse in 1872 and they hadeight children. He passed away on June 15, 1924 and his monument on Kipu Roadnears rows of great, old Norfolk pines was "Erected In Loving Memory ByHis Japanese Friends" on June 15, 1925. Hank Soboleski is a history buff and part-time writer. On the first anniversary of his death, this monument to William Hyde Rice was erected "in loving memory by hisJapanese friends" on Kipu Road near a stand of Norfolk pines. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9da_1365207996 mrgod2u Visit the William Hyde Rice Memorial Monument Your Say, Other Items from LiveLeakers, WTF, Yawn,, Other News, Creative, Other Entertainment, Nature, Kauai, Hawaii Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:56:21 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8c6_1365121115 RealityChecker Ted Olson shown above being &quot;intimate&quot; with another man. Since the homophile media is not reporting the truth as usual, it is not the right to marry that homosexual bigots are demanding, since no State prohibits such, it is that society must RECOGNIZE their sham perverse unions as equal to heterosexual marriage. Supreme Court Justice and neoliberal Sotomayor posed this question to the homosexist bigot Olson who was arguing in favor of crushing the democratic process and allowing homosexuals to destroy marriage; &quot;Mr. Olson, the bottom line that you're being asked -- and -- and it is one that I'm interested in the answer: If you say that marriage is a fundamental right, what State restrictions could ever exist? Meaning, what State restrictions with respect to the number of people, with respect to -- that could get married -- the incest laws, the mother and the child, assuming they are of age -- I can -- I can accept that the State has probably an overbearing interest on -- on protecting the a child until they're of age to marry, but what's left?&quot; Here is Olsen utterly avoiding answering the question; &quot;Well, you've said -- you've said in the cases decided by this Court that the polygamy issue, multiple marriages raises questions about exploitation, abuse, patriarchy, issues with respect to taxes, inheritance, child custody, it is an entirely different thing. And if you -- if a State prohibits polygamy, it's prohibiting conduct. If it prohibits gay and lesbian citizens from getting married, it is prohibiting their exercise of a right based upon their status.&quot; Olson's words to the Court suggest that the state somehow "forbids" same-sex marriage today just as it "forbids" polygamy. This is not true, as Adam MacLeod noted on Public Discourse earlier this week . Under current law and Supreme Court precedent, no state has constitutional authority to punish anyone for entering into a same-sex relationship. No state in fact "prohibits" same-sex marriage. If any persons wish to enter into such a relationship and call it a marriage, they are perfectly free to do so. The real issue, the real complaint in the case that Olson represents, is that the state simply refuses to bestow on same-sex unions the same recognition that it gives to heterosexual marriages. In stark contrast, the law in many American jurisdictions not only refuses to recognize polygamous marriages; it actively punishes them. Enter into a same-sex marriage and the government will simply ignore you. Enter into a polygamous marriage and the law permits the government to prosecute you for a crime. Unlike the distinctions Olson raised, this one is real, and it positively undermines his assurance that we can have same-sex marriage while still banning polygamy. Common sense makes it hard to see how this could be done. In Olson's view, the state may not officially prefer heterosexual marriage by a policy so mild that it does nothing other than to leave same-sex couples alone while declining to formally recognize their unions. By what reasoning, then, could it have a right to prefer some definition of marriage by actually punishing those who choose to disregard it? Moreover, in his summary of what the Supreme Court has "said" about polygamy, Olson omitted to mention the single most famous case dealing with this question, Reynolds v. United States (1879). In that case the Court upheld the federal law forbidding polygamy in the territories of the United States, and declined to find that the free exercise clause immunizes those who practice it for religious reasons. Now let's see if the Homosexual Agenda foot soldiers attack Sotomayor like they viciously attacked conservative negro Carson, trying to send him back the Plantation. We know they will attack the post and the poster with the scripted refrain they preach that &quot;all people who don't support homosexual behavior engage in homosexual behavior&quot; logic fail. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8c6_1365121115 RealityChecker Justice Sotomayor Compares HomoMarriage to Incest, Bigamy, Polygamy! Homosexual Attack on Marriage Sun, 31 Mar 2013 02:58:24 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=78a_1364710391 RealityChecker Homosexuals love to drone on an on with their victim script about "how does what we do behind closed doors affect you?!" Maybe its because what homosexual do is not remotely confined to the bedroom, but then again, wolves always cloak themselves in sheeps clothes. Now the Homosexual Agenda psy-ops manifesto script calls for criminalizing all speech that does not conform 100% to the demands of the homosexual extremist hate movement. Till they can finish that accomplishment, for now they are bashing, bullying and engaging in economic terrorism against anyone and anything that stands in the way of their hateful bigotry juggernaut. Carrey Prejean was a perfect example of how homosexual hate mongerer and perennial homosexual bigot Perez Hilton set her up then viscously attacked her because he didn't like her honest answers based upon her moral beliefs and views. Then the homosexual hate movement went into overdrive and ferociously attacked Prejean and her civil rights. This brings us to the latest victim of the Homosexual Agenda extremists who relentlessly attack the civil rights of heterosexuals whose views and opinions they don't like. Ben Carson is a respected neurosurgeon and was asked to be the commencement speaker at the John Hopkins. He is also a conservative and of the negro race, so the radical leftists and their intolerant homosexual allies came unglued. During an interview with the media over the SCOTUS taking up the case to protect marriage from homosexual debasement attacks , Carson replied: "Marriage is between a man and a woman," Carson said. "It's a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality -- it doesn't matter what they are, they don't get to change the definition." Supreme Court justice Sonia Sotomayor who asked Ted Olson this question: "If you say that marriage is a fundamental right, what State restrictions could ever exist?" That is the question, and Olson did not have any decent answer, and that is what Carson was pointing out. Radial homosexual extremists and their radical leftist allies don't want to hear it nor do they want heterosexuals to have the civil right to speak it. Carson being an intelligent, educated, well spoken person who happened to be of the negro race was a double threat to the radical leftists and their homosexual foot soldiers because it threatens their narrow minded narrative so homosexuals are now trying to relegate Carson back onto the political reeducation gulag of the leftist Plantation. The homosexual students now attacking Carson have bleated that the commencement address is a non-partisan event. So non-partisan that past speakers have included far left wingnuts like Al "I invented the Internet" Gore, Michael "Nanny" Bloomberg, and Nancy "Marches with NAMBLA Founder Harry Hays" Pelosi. Non-partisan...right! Carsons comparisons were quite the accurate, as homosexuals are at the forefront of feverishly eliminating all age of consent laws so they can rape your children with impunity, and if you try to protect your children from that, Kirk and Madsen instructs them to employ The Homosexual Agenda psyps manifesto and sue heterosexual parents for "discrimination". Homosexuals admit they have a child molestation epidemic, and they've publicly referred to homosexual child molesters as their "prophets". All of the Carson quoted mental disorders are sexual perversions as is homosexuality, so the comparison was quite a accurate. Now the homosexual hate movement is in full attack mode on the civil rights of Carson as they are now demanding that he be silenced for his conservative views that don't agree 100% with the Homosexual Agenda. THIS is how what homosexuals do affects people! http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=78a_1364710391 RealityChecker Homosexuals Terrorizing Hetero Free Speech Civil Rights-AGAIN! homosexuals attack Carson, homosexual intolerance, homosexuals bullying heterosexuals, heterophobia, heterophobes Sun, 03 Mar 2013 18:01:01 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=231_1362351197 Nuclear Fire Video: U.S. Underground City, Roadway SystemSunday, March 3, 2013 7:01 A video (below) posted by Awakened Warrior of Truth alleges to show the entrance to an underground roadway system stretching some 1500 miles to Maine. In the video, semi-trailers, including one marked Sam's Club, are seen entering the tunnel. One driver is interviewed. IntelHub has more information on DUMBs , Deep Undergound Military Bases, along with secret, highly secure elevators that go down into them. http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/03/video-u-s-underground-city-roadway-system-2581740.html Where Are All the Deep Underground Military Bases? (Part 2) By Dr. Richard Sauder With Commentary By Shepard Ambellas &amp; Alex Thomas theintelhub.com April 17, 2012 (This is Part 2 of an ongoing and exclusive underground base series with excerpts from the book Hidden in Plain Sight provided to theintelhub.com by the publisher, including commentary by Shepard Ambellas and Alex Thomas.) Read part 1,"Nazi Engineers, Secret U.S. Military Bases, and Elevators To The Subterranean and Submarine Depths." In the continental USA there are numerous underground bases. I will briefly list just some of the bases that my research has uncovered over the last 17 years. There are assuredly many more than those listed here. Maryland http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=231_1362351197 Nuclear Fire Video: U.S. Underground City, Roadway System DUMBs, Dep Underground Military Bases, Illuminati, nuclear war preparations Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:55:49 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7fe_1362235801 Detroit Iron By MARK STEYN Syndicated columnist letters@ocregister.com A few weeks ago, Ann Coulter announced that she was bored of American politics and spending her days watching Turner Classic Movies. I confess that, when it comes to Beltway melodrama, I, too, am fighting vainly the old ennui, and minded to plump up the pillows and settle back with a bucket of bonbons and a beribboned Shih-tzu for an all-night Norma Shearer marathon. At least, unlike Washington, there's a chance you may catch something you haven't already seen a hundred times before. For example, I've a yen to see "Roberta" (RKO, 1935), in which Irene Dunne sings: "Yesterdays Yesterdays Days I knew as happy sweet sequester'd days..." I believe that was the last known use of this blameless and mellifluous word until it was conscripted by the political class for this month's dreary Mayan Apocalypse of the Month thrill ride. Say what you like about those Mayan guys, but they only schedule an apocalypse once every 5,126 years. Only Washington would try to pull it off every six weeks. If I understand correctly, by the time you read this, the planes will be dropping from the skies; the drip-feeds in every emergency room will be dry; every creature on the endangered species list will have broken free from our pristine federally manned national parks to be left for roadkill in the potholed asphalt of America's crumbling interstates; you'll turn on your bathroom faucet only to find the town reservoir choked with fecal coliform; the ebola virus will be rampant across Ohio, Florida, New Hampshire and other swing states, where it will nevertheless enjoy higher approval ratings than Marco Rubio and every other prospective GOP nominee. The sequester supposedly cuts $44 billion from the federal budget - or from the rate of growth of the federal budget. Whatever. $44 billion is about what the United States government borrows every nine days, so it's not a lot. But it's apparently responsible for everything that matters in American life. That being so, maybe it would be easier to reinstate this critical $44 billion and cut the other $3.8 trillion, which is apparently responsible for nothing other than Harry Reid's beloved federally funded cowboy poetry festival and the cost of the dress uniforms for the military detachment accompanying the First Lady at her Oscars appearance. Congresswoman Maxine Waters, ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee, warned of "over 170 million jobs that could be lost" thanks to the sequester. There are only 135 million jobs in America, but the sequester gods are so powerful they can eliminate every job in Canada, Britain and Germany, too. Why, because of this weekend's looming Mayan Apocalypse, President Obama declined to deploy a carrier to the Persian Gulf, concerned that it might be left on the other side of the planet, completely sequestered with no fuel to limp back home and insufficient stores in the mess hall larder to cook up federally compliant slop. So, when the mullahs go nuclear and drop the big one on Tel Aviv, it will be the fault of the Republicans for failing to agree to a prudent, balanced, fiscally responsible plan - like the Senate's latest deficit reduction proposal, which, as is traditional, increases the deficit (by $7 billion). It's not just the U.S. fleet and air traffic control and clean water that have been swept into the garbage can of history by Sequestageddon, but even the most venerable Beltway colossus. In time the Rockies may crumble, Gibraltar may tumble, but surely Bob Woodward is here to stay - or so we thought until he ventured some very mild criticism of the president's negotiating technique, which appears to be a cross between a suicide-bomber and Cleavon Little taking himself hostage in "Blazing Saddles." In a flash, Woodward's four decades of loyal service were forgotten, and the court eunuchs of the Obama media turned on their own: He's about one news cycle away from being revealed as on the take from the Koch brothers and the real father of Trig Palin. Speaking of the First Lady's Academy Awards appearance, I see she gave the Oscar for Best Film to Ben Affleck's movie "Argo." If you haven't seen the picture, it's about a group of government operatives whose ingenious plan to achieve their objectives depends on creating a fake movie as a cover story. Obama seems to have taken this inspiring tale to heart. In the Affleck version, the fake movie is a space opera for which John Goodman rustles up a few cheesy costume designs for some generic aliens. They make a promotional brochure, take out an ad in Variety and hold a well-attended press conference, awash in cocktails and canap'es. But there is no movie. And so it goes with Obama's monthly cliffhangers. The White House press corps show up for the reception, and they all excitedly report the intriguing teasers about the white-knuckle thriller coming soon to your town: This weekend, "Les Sequesterables," starring Maxine "I Dreamed A Dream" Waters and a cast of hundreds of millions of downtrodden laid-off extras; next week, "Zero Debt Thirty," in which Paul Ryan proposes cutting $30 from the federal budget, and all civilized life comes to an end; next month, "Django Short-Changed," in which a retired bounty hunter discovers his Social Security check is a buck seventy-three lower than usual because cruel plantation owners like Mitt Romney aren't willing to pay their fair share; and, coming soon, "No Silver Linings Playbook," in which Barack Obama warns yet again that total societal collapse is just around the corner but at the 11th hour manages to avert it by swooping in with a daring, last-minute tax increase. Government-by-fake-disaster-movie seems to be going swimmingly for Obama. Every Republican attempt at fiscal discipline now ends with both higher spending and more taxes: that's the way it went with the Christmas blockbuster "Fiscal Cliff," and that's the way to bet with "Les Sequesterables," too. Even the IRS can't keep up: "tax season" is upon us, and yet they're not accepting tax returns from millions of Americans because the IRS hasn't yet managed to process the tax changes passed in the dead of night at New Year. American government is a joke - and, sadly, not one of those jokes that everybody takes seriously and kicks up a fuss about, like Seth MacFarlane's "We Saw Your Boobs" song that the New Yorker attacked for its "hostility to women in the workplace," or Joan Rivers' joke about Heidi Klum's Oscars gown that Abraham Foxman's Anti-Defamation League is busy issuing stern denunciations of. No, in an America in which every throwaway gag is a hate crime, Obama's fake disaster movie of the month is the only joke we all go along with, even though he's insulting our intelligence far more than Seth and the Los Angeles Gay Men's Chorus singing "We Saw Your Boobs" to Anne Hathaway and Halle Berry. Can you pierce the mists of time and go back all the way to the year 2007? Back then, federal spending was 40 percent lower than it is today. In a mere half-decade, has all that 40 percent gravy become so indispensable to the general welfare that not even a teensy-weensy sliver of it can be cut? If you really believe that, then America is going to die, and a gullible citizenry willing to give this laughable charade the time of day will bear ultimate responsibility. We have seen the boobs, and they are us. (c) MARK STEYN http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7fe_1362235801 Detroit Iron Mark Steyn: Government-by-fake-disaster-movie Harry Reid, Maxine Waters, Bob Woodward Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:01:56 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=26d_1362152869 Fine_Just_Fine by Bill Buppert "You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them But when you've robbed a man of everything, he's no longer in your power - he's free again." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Sometime back there was a brief flash in the pan to make contemporary taxpayers pay for the slavery imposed on blacks until the passage of the Constitutional amendment granting their freedom from chattel slavery but not releasing them from the tax and regulation plantation that is America. The reparations movement sought to redistribute current wealth to any Americans who could prove their ancestors were in chains and they would be granted reparations or a payment for restoration into the original condition they were seeking. I am always unsympathetic to any forcible wealth transfer and especially one that would be fraught with the peril of fraud and the creation of yet another nightmarish bureaucracy charged with imposing tolls on living and breathing human beings to be vacuumed out of their wallets and tucked into others' coffers after the government takes its usual sizeable "maintenance fee" to administer such a program. There was one laudatory effect of such a proposal though; nothing focuses people's attention more than the potential hijacking of their wealth or rights for specious political reasons such as the latest economic illiteracy and fiscal cliff diving that characterized the recent wholesale takeover of healthcare by the government. The reparations movement did the same thing, nothing would have focused the national race conversation more than the shenanigans I just described. The addition of yet another government theft scheme to rob from Paul to pay Peter. Now we are facing down a lame duck administration and all its apparatchiks in the fight to keep guns in the hands of the private citizens (or subjects depending on your point of view). After a four year silence on the weapons possession question, the rhetorical cavalcade from the Offal Office and its collaborators in the government and media are clamoring to extinguish all such rights in the march toward turning America into a curious amalgam of modern Great Britain, the former USSR and more regrettable aspects of tin-pot dictatorships around the planet that are terminally frightened by well armed citizens. The call for repeal of the Second Amendment is nothing new, a cursory internet search will reveal hundred of opinion-editorials and the usual suspects calling for this to happen; they, of course, hail from the government supremacist viewpoints of the collectivist keening and whining that is the national media voice in America on both Fox and CNN. I am calling for repeal because I think every gun law on the books is wrong without exception and they all need to be eliminated so this appeal is rather lonesome and hails from an individualist perspective that is skeptical of all state power. Those who have read my work in the past know that I am not only a Constitutional skeptic but believe it is the machine to create and expand big government. I happen to think the "Founder's lexicon" has lost all descriptive power such as the term "unconstitutional" and Constitutional, they both mean the same thing in a country that regulates and taxes nearly every form of human transaction without exception. A movement to repeal would reset the entire conversation, bring honesty to the dialog since the stark reality of absolute disarmament would be imminent and possibly lead to revolutionary arborists tending the Tree of Liberty. The recent massacres involving various madmen, big pharma patients and other human detritus have set the usual suspects into a flurry of activity to dust off the old prohibitionist bromides that have worked so well in the past like the banishment of alcohol, drugs, poverty and other such crusades that always exsanguinate the subject populations but enrich and expand the political class and its legions of constabulary. Prohibition is a jobs program for cops. The repeal of the Volstead Amendment prohibiting alcohol in America on December 5th, 1933 briefly took the wind out of the sails of American law enforcement but the creation of the 1930 Federal Bureau of Narcotics and the 1934 National Firearms Act quickly built on the utter failure of the Volstead Act by seeing lightning could strike twice and give a new lease on life to the lifeblood of every nation-state: police employment. "When the present administration took office ten countries had ratified the Geneva Narcotic Limitation Convention. The United States was one of these ten.... It was my privilege, as President, to proclaim, on that day, that this treaty had become effective throughout the jurisdiction of the United States....On Jan. 1, 1933, only nine nations had registered their ratification of the limitation treaty. On Jan. 1, 1935, only nine States had adopted the uniform State statute. As 1933 witnessed ratification of the treaty by thirty-one additional nations, so may 1935 witness the adoption of the uniform drug act by at least thirty-one more states, thereby placing interstate accord abreast of international accord, to the honor of the legislative bodies of our States and for the promotion of the welfare of our people and the peoples of other lands." -Franklin D. Roosevelt, March 1935 in a radio message I would suggest that there is only one way to truly focus the debate on civilian disarmament in the United States. In the larger picture, this is yet another attack by the Federal government and its subsidiary political agents in the states on yet another aspect of self-sufficiency. Whether it is food production such as raw milk, education such as homeschooling or the ability of its subjects to defend themselves, the government will always take a dim view of such behavior. Cops are the tyrant's cattle prod and when the peer weapons competency of citizens starts to amtch (SIC) or exceed that of the praetorians, all governments get very nervous and use every opportunity to strip this capability from their subject popualtions (SIC) in the vast feed lots they administer. So let's stop beating around the bush. If the NRA were serious about firearms freedom, they would spend every last dime dismantling every root and branch of Federal control legislation from the numerous congressional Acts that abridge small arms freedom to the enforcement agencies of these bad laws. But they don't because then they would achieve their objective and close shop. They would be unable to continuing gallivanting around the halls of Congress wining and dining psychopaths and sociopaths of both parties. The NRA wants government control of weapons otherwise they would mount ceaseless attacks on every article of civilian disarmament legislation and legal decisions that emerge. At the Federal level, the only way to end this is to move to repeal the Second Amendment. National Prohibition had been repealed by the Twenty-first Amendment which contains two short but important sentences: Section 1: The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed. Section 2: The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited. For the purposes of the Second Amendment, it will read: Section 1: The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed. Section 2: The transportation, importation, possession and bearing of any firearms into any State, Territory, or Possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of weapons, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited. Nothing will focus the country better than the national debate that would ensue once the civilian disarmament lobby dropped the mask and finally entered into an honest conversation about the actual end-state they seek. Unlike the current divide-and-conquer strategies that the government leverages within the gun community such as pitting hunters and shot-gunners against black gun aficionados; instead of simmering in the pot as the incremental forces of the gun prohibitionists gain traction inch by inch. The Repeal would bring the entire agenda into crystal clarity and the fight and demarcation lines would no longer be subject to obfuscation, political gamesmanship and dissembling. The agenda would be stark and distilled to its essence: Will a country that strips its citizens of individual armament be as safe and trouble free as the civilian disarmament advocates claim? Can American exceptionalism make it the historical example where liberty and freedom reigns in a country where every peer weapons capability is imbalanced toward a government monopoly on small arms in its police and military? Lastly, can the US government be trusted to do the right thing? Nothing will answer that question more clearly than a movement to repeal the Second Amendment. That national conversation will be revealing and scintillating to say the least. "A system of licensing and registration is the perfect device to deny gun ownership to the bourgeoisie." - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin http://zerogov.com/?p=2958 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=26d_1362152869 Fine_Just_Fine Repeal the Second Amendment (Op-Ed) second amendment, 2A Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:15:28 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2ea_1361833889 ALah007 There is nothing the liberal establishment hates more than members of the minority groups it considers its political chattel who step off the grounds of the progressive plantation. And right now, it is beginning a long-term de-legitimization campaign, with its media overseers fully engaged, because that Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz have dared to forget their place. The liberal establishment is driven not just by anger. It's driven by fear. It's easy to see why the media blew up the story of Marco Rubio's radical decision to take a drink during his state of the union response - he gave a good speech, and we can't have that. While Obama's monologue was a nightmarish death march of progressive nonsense honed through countless focus groups to appeal to the low-info voters who make up the liberal base, Rubio's talk was clear, concise and conservative. The media's problem wasn't that Rubio's speech was bad; the problem was that it was good. Accordingly, the media erupted in a tsunami of blatant hydrationism. Then Ted Cruz showed up in the Senate and dared ask tough questions, like "Why is this guy qualified to be the Secretary of Defense?" and "What the hell are you thinking?" The media, suddenly guardians of Senate civility and tradition, were aghast that Cruz failed to sit silently as Anglo Senators gently stroked the nominee. When John McCain rebuked Cruz for failing to know his place, the media suddenly remembered why it used to love the grizzled maverick in the first place - because McCain lives to slam conservative Republicans. And then Cruz dared to not care! Oh, there was also a Hispanic Democrat senator who was under investigation by the FBI for banging underage hookers in violation of a federal sex tourism law he helped pass and for getting flown to the Dominican Republic for his festivals of pedophilia by the doctor who he helped get a half-billion dollar port security contract. But, more importantly, Marco Rubio got thirsty. What we are seeing is a preemptive strike by the liberal establishment's pet media on two up-and-coming conservative superstars. It will continue. Liberals fear them because of their Latin heritage, but here's the funny part - for conservatives, where their parents came from is just gravy. It's the conservatism, stupid. Sure, Rubio is trying to make something happen with immigration. However, unlike the president and the GOP's shamnesty crowd, he's actually serious when he says he wants to secure the border first. What he will find is that most of the hacks nodding their heads when he talks and pretending to agree with him are not. Watch for Rubio to pull out when he realizes that these frauds have zero intention of securing the border - he already dissed His Majesty's leaked insta-amnesty plan. Rubio, who made immigration reform possible, will be the one to kill it, and the fact that he won't compromise his conservative principles to make it happen will actually strengthen his conservative bonafides . But liberals, projecting their bizarre notions upon the rest of humanity as they are wont to do, think that the Hispanic thing is whole reason Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are so popular with right-wingers. After all, that's how liberals judge people - identity group affiliation. So do some Republicans - witness the post-election Hispanic panic. Of course, these political geniuses - fresh off their latest round of failure last November - are ready to go all-in on a whole new level of defeat trying to appeal to the allegedly growing category of "Hispanic" voters. Except, though, the demographic isn't really growing because birth rates among them are in free fall, dropping to the levels of other Americans. But let's not let facts and data interfere with talking points that make Sunday morning talk show hosts drop their 30-round mags and nod in agreement. No, the big secret of the success of Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz is that these guys are hardcore conservatives. They walk the walk and just happen to hablar the talk. Look at their backstories - these guys are straight from conservative central casting. They had religious, loving, traditional families that gave them great values and taught them that achievement comes from working to attain their goals, not from getting a check from Tio Sam. They look good and, unlike certain other Republicans, they can put a sentence together and not sound like borderline morons. Conservatives can watch them ascend to the podium and not have to worry that they might wander off-topic and start offering their insights into how rape is part of the Lord's plan. They are popular because they are really, really smart, and they are really, really conservative. The funny thing is, being of Cuban descent; they aren't really, really "Hispanic" in the American liberal sense. Liberals, whose connection with Hispanic America consists of lecturing their nannies about ensuring that little Bayley is raised in a gender neutral environment and doesn't make toy guns out of his Legos, think all Hispanics are the same. These bubble dwellers might want to ask a Hispanic about that, assuming they know any who aren't employed around their house. The fact is that there is no such thing as a Hispanic-American. There are Americans whose families came from places where they speak Spanish or Portuguese. And there is a special name for people like that. It's "Americans." If you call my wife, who escaped from Cuba as an infant, a "Cuban-American," she'll cut you. She's proud of her Cuban heritage, but with a father, brother and husband who are all U.S. Army vets - she watched me deploy for over a year when our daughter was six months old - you better not label her anything but "American." So, how does the GOP appeal to these voters? Well, first it forgets the nonsense we keep hearing about how Hispanics believe in "traditional values" and "family" and all the rest. Some folks lumped under the "Hispanic" heading believe in those things. Some don't. Shockingly, to the Beltway experts on all things Latin, these people are not all the same. And their heritage is varied as well. Those hailing from Spain are different from those coming from Mexico or Argentina or Honduras - each nation has different histories, cultures, political traditions. So stop with the condescending stereotypes and start looking at these people as individuals instead of census categories. Second, we have to be where these folks are. Who are the GOP's go-to guests on Univision and Telemundo's news shows to give the conservative viewpoint? You know the liberals are there. I don't know the answer - I only watch the telenovelas and Sabado Gigante - but it better be somebody. Preferably someone who speaks Spanish, and does so coherently. The reason the liberals should fear Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz is their conservatism, not their heritage. And if they hold their conservative course, leaders like these will drive the liberals to drink something stronger than just water. http://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2013/02/25/attack-of-the-uppity-conservative-hispanics-n1517378/page/full/ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2ea_1361833889 ALah007 &quot;Attack of the Uppity Conservative Hispanics&quot; by Kurt Schlichter. Conservative/liberalism/Ted Cruz/Marco Rubio Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:58:41 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bbf_1361667299 NAUresistance By: NAUNEWZ New World Order Puppet Barack Obama, Does His Best To Convince His Constituents That Trampling Over The Rights And Freedoms Of All Americans Is, 'The Right Thing To Do'. Let's get one thing straight, the 2nd Amendment doesn't exist in their 'One World Government, New World Order' scheme. An agenda that makes each and every one of us their slaves, regardless of our race, skin colour, religion, or ethnic background. In their version of a New World Order, good "Global Citizens" don't own guns! Just like in the past, the slave masters used guns and various other 'big brother' toys of their day to 'protect' their slaves/human resource pool aka, their financial interests. Slaves for obvious reasons, didn't have the right to keep and bear arms. This is why the current slave masters of the global plantation need the 2nd Amendment rendered obsolete, along with the rest of the Constitution. Regardless of how effective or ineffective we may feel our constitutions are at placing legal limitations on our governments and regardless of the fact, politicians and judges feel they can ignore or walk all over it on a daily basis, the constitutions of many remaining sovereign nations still pose a major 'legal pain in the ass' for the globalists. Just as they have been incrementally building their new system up, so too are they incrementally tearing the old one down. For those who are actively advancing this agenda, our constitutions are part of that old system. They would love nothing more than for us to believe they have the power to do whatever they want with it. Sure they can get up on the international stage and say whatever they like but in reality, our constitutions legally stand in their way of fully installing their One World Government, New World Order, World Federation structure. So how are the globalists currently attempting to weaken and destabilize the Constitution of the United States right now? By attacking the 2nd Amendment under the guise of 'keeping the children safe'. Obama- "If there's even one thing we can do to reduce this violence, if there's even http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bbf_1361667299 NAUresistance New World Order Gun Grabbing Hypocrites New World Order, Gun Control, Gun Laws, Obama, Unconstitutional, 2nd Amendment Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:12:52 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=949_1340812971 khamomil Besides the financial issue which is what the clip is about, it's interesting to see the enormity of the plantation, one of many in Malaysia where the tree grows naturally.The vast tract of land used to be a jungle inhabited by thousands of species of fauna and flora. Loss of habitat is one of the primary causes of species extinction. Imagine how many animals have died to make room for these trees? You will notice that nothing grows except the palm oil trees. Not a blade of grass, not a stray weed, and no animals can live in this inhospitable man-made forest.It is also interesting to see the tree up close and how the nuts are harvested. Palm oil is used in almost all processed foods and in cosmetics. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=949_1340812971 khamomil Malaysian Palm Oil - a Look at the <span class="highlight">Plantation</span> Malaysia, palm plantation, palm oil, khamomil,