http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=Qaeda Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:39:27 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=Qaeda Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:43:55 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e4c_1371512068 CyrustheGreat 'Al Qaeda, a puppet for western covert operations within ME' http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e4c_1371512068 CyrustheGreat American analyst 'Al <span class="highlight">Qaeda</span>, a puppet for western covert operations within ME' 'Al Qaeda, a puppet for western covert operations within ME' Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:53:07 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=29e_1371566871 heroic SAA It confirms some testimonies saying that they take people in hostage http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=872_1371299076 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=29e_1371566871 heroic SAA Sneaky Al <span class="highlight">Qaeda</span> want to infiltrate in residential areas Syria, sneaky Al Qaeda, infiltration, hidden weapons, SAA capture weapons Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:43:17 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8e4_1371566418 sholom For the better part of 40 years, the Syrian border has been the quietest of Israel's frontiers. Notwithstanding Israel's 1973 capture and subsequent annexation of Syrian territory in the Golan and Bashar Assad's ongoing support for terrorist organizations targeting the Jewish state, the border has been tranquil since the signing of the 1974 armistice. Indeed, the boundary with Syria-a state officially still at war with Israel-has proven even more secure than Israel's lengthy borders with its nominal peace partners Egypt and Jordan. But two years into the popular armed revolt against the Assad regime, this de facto peace along the Israeli-Syrian border seems to be in grave danger. Just consider the past few weeks: On March 2, three Syrian mortars landed outside Moshav Ramat Magshimim in the southern Golan Heights. Then on March 6, Syrian rebels kidnapped 21 U.N. peacekeepers patrolling the Golan Heights; they were held for a week prior to their release. On Monday, Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Lt. Benny Gantz said that "the threat of the situation in Syria spiraling out if control is quite high." He added: "What we have here is a strategic detonator that could blow up at any moment." Reports from Syria over the past months have indicated that foreign fighters-from Libya to Jordan to Iraq-have been participating in the rebellion against the Assad regime. Now comes word that Saudi jihadis are joining the rebels' ranks as well. The presence of so many jihadis, many of whom are reportedly affiliated with al-Qaida and are threatening to continue fighting against Israel after Assad is vanquished, further increases the possibility of a flare-up in the Syrian-Israeli frontier. All of which explains why, in recent days, Israel has increased its military presence along the Golan border. Today, Syria-not Lebanon or Egypt-is likely to be the next flash point for conflict with the Jewish state. *** As the Assad regime has teetered, it has lost control of large swaths of Syrian territory, including areas in the south adjacent to Israel that as of February 2013 had purportedly fallen to the largely secular Free Syrian Army. At least in part, however, the power vacuum has been filled by militant Islamists and foreign fighters affiliated with al-Qaida. Last month, one of these groups, Jebhat al Nusra, attacked a Syrian military intelligence post near Quneitra in the Syrian Golan Heights. And in the coming weeks and months, the increasing flow of foreign fighters into Syria will likely see even more al-Qaida affiliates operating in the border region. At present, Islamist militias within Syria are narrowly focused on toppling the Assad regime, but some have begun to articulate a more ambitious longer-term agenda. As one Aleppo-based Islamist fighter said in a December 2012 video posted by MEMRI: When Assad is dispatched "we won't stop there. We will continue to the Shebaa Farms and Kafr Shuba, and we will pass through the Golan Heights all the way to Jerusalem." Another video posted this weekend features another rebel proclaiming: "For 40 years, not a single gunshot has been fired on this land. For 40 years, not a single gunshot has been fired toward Israel. We will free the Golan and it will return to the free Syrian people, with the help of Allah." Given the relative strength of the IDF, this goal is obviously more aspirational than realistic. Still, Syria is awash in heavy weapons, and anti-Assad militias-secular and Islamist alike-are capturing more advanced military materiel, including missiles. And even after Assad is gone, Al Nusra, the al-Qaida-affiliated "Victory Front" that has emerged as the leading rebel fighting force, will be loath to disarm. Absent a functioning central government and security apparatus, and with post-Assad Syria likely embroiled in protracted civil war, these well-equipped and battle-hardened Islamist militias could fast become very dangerous for Israel. Of more immediate concern is that Assad will goad Israel into the conflict in an effort to muddy the waters and distract the opposition. To that end, in May 2011 shortly after the uprising began, Syrian authorities dispatched 40 busloads of Palestinians to the border fence, precipitating a violent clash with the IDF that left four Palestinians dead. Then, in November 2012, the regime deployed three tanks in the Golan demilitarized zone, prompting the IDF to raise its alert status on the frontier. Damascus' attempt last month to transfer game-changing surface-to-air weapons to Hezbollah likewise seemed intended to provoke an Israeli military reaction. While Israel's limited airstrike on the Hezbollah convoy generated a lot of grumbling among the opposition, most of the criticism was focused on Assad's non-response to the enemy violation of Syrian airspace. Should Assad endeavor to transfer some of its chemical-weapons stockpiles to Hezbollah, however, the Israeli response would all but certainly be more decisive and-for the opposition, perhaps-divisive. Further threatening the tenuous status quo, according to The Washington Post, Iran is currently in the process of establishing its own 50,000-man militia called Jaysh al Shaab, said to be modeled after the Iranian Revolutionary Guard's Basij corps, in Syria. While little is known about this nascent paramilitary force, given Tehran's antipathy toward Israel, in addition to targeting Assad regime opponents, it's a safe bet that Jaysh al Shaab will also pursue subversive activities against the Jewish state. Not all the news along the frontier is bad. In early February, Israeli soldiers reportedly provided medical assistance to Syrian rebel troops near the border, transporting five wounded to a Safed hospital. (Alas, the same week, IDF troops fired on another Syrian approaching the fence.) However, not all Israelis see the news as ominous for Israel. According to former head of IDF military intelligence Amos Yadlin, the war in Assad's Syria has "depleted strength, readiness, and morale," diminishing the threat posed by Israel's most capable adversary. In any event, Yadlin said, Assad was "much more dangerous than some Jebhat al Nusra activity in the Golan." Regardless of who succeeds Assad, he added, Israel is "quite efficient in coping" with the cross-border threat and will establish "a similar deterrence" to what the state achieved vis-`a-vis Assad, Hezbollah, and Hamas. Steven Simon, who served as senior director for the Middle East in the National Security Council during the first Obama Administration, concurs. While the IDF may have to contend with some jihadist activity, the deterioration and the potential collapse of the Assad regime does not undermine Israel's security. "Of course," Simon says, chemical weapons transfer to Hezbollah, "would be a different matter." Still, for Washington, which has been preoccupied over the past two years with trying to cauterize the bleeding in Syria and insulate neighboring Arab states from the destabilizing effects of the revolt, the trend line should be of concern. Today, the reverberations of the war in Syria are shaking Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq. If the United States doesn't take steps now to more quickly topple Assad and end the war, the next state to feel the impact of spillover from Syria may be Israel. Bashar defended our nation for decades but Al Qaeda no thanks. http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/126975/israels-next-front-syria#undefined http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=8e4_1371566418 sholom We really want Bashar Assad to stay instead of Al <span class="highlight">Qaeda</span> jihadist to take over Syria Syria, Israel Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:07:59 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b51_1371575025 Arabi Souri In case you still wonder why Al Qaeda never carried out a single attack against Israel, watch this and you'll learn more: . . . . Wahhabism is an offshoot of Zionism. .Israel Rushes to rescue Al Qaeda in Syria: http://www.syrianews.cc/israel-rushes-rescue-qaeda-terrorists-syria/ . Arabi Souri : http://www.syrianews.cc http://www.youtube.com/user/3arabiSouri https://twitter.com/3arabiSouri http://www.facebook.com/Amazing.Syria http://www.liveleak.com/c/Arabi_Souri http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b51_1371575025 Arabi Souri FSA Works for Zionist Entity Syria, Israel, Wahhabism, Al Qaeda, FSA, Nusra Front Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:03:27 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ccd_1371571152 Christian IX Syrian Army near idlib area, under attack by al qaeda. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ccd_1371571152 Christian IX SAA in action near idlib - North storm operation Syria al qaeda SAA idlib FSA tank fight north storm Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:12:14 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=96e_1371513806 helle as above http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=96e_1371513806 helle Al-<span class="highlight">Qaeda</span> Pays Visit To Jarusalem To Take Video Shoots About Syria syria,war,assad,nusrah, Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:33:21 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c71_1371583621 BekasKhan guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 18 June 2013 'Peace and reconciliation' milestone comes after US drops request for formal rejection of al-Qaida as precondition to talks Nato soldiers stand with US flag after a security handover ceremony at a military academy outside Kabul on Tuesday. Photograph: Omar Sobhani/ReutersThe US is to open direct talks with Taliban leaders within days, it was revealed on Tuesday, after Washington agreed to drop a series of preconditions that have previously held back negotiations over the future of Afghanistan. In a major milestone in the 12-year-old war, political representatives of the Taliban will shortly meet Afghan and US officials in Doha, the capital of Qatar, to discuss an agenda for what US officials called "peace and reconciliation" before further talks take place with Afghan government representatives soon after. The Taliban, in a statement announcing their plans for peace talks and an office in Qatar, said they would not allow anyone to threaten or harm other countries from Afghan soil - a move senior US administration officials described as an important first step to the Taliban severing ties with al-Qaida. The US has agreed that a formal rejection of al-Qaida by the Taliban leadership would now be a "negotiating aim" rather than a precondition for talks. It will also seek a commitment from the Taliban to end its insurgency in Afghanistan and recognise women's rights in the country. "This is an important first step but it will be a long road," said one senior US official. "We have long said this conflict won't be won on the battlefield, which is why we support the opening of this office." White House officials say they believe the Taliban delegation at the talks represents the movement's leadership, and includes more radical groups such as the Haqqani network. Officials said the US would have a direct role in the talks starting starting this week in Doha, but the substantive negotiations over the future of Afghanistan would then be led by the Afghan government. Speaking later, Ben Rhodes, deputy national security adviser, said: "TheUnited States will be supporting a process that is fundamentally Afghan-led ... We can play a role in talking to the Taliban as well in supporting that peace process - and because we have issues of our own to bring up with them." A Taliban spokesman said the group was opening the Doha office to "reach understanding and initiate talks with countries of the world for the purpose of improving relations with them", and to support a peaceful, political solution to end the "occupation of Afghanistan". The proposal for a Doha office has been on the table since 2011, and several senior Taliban figures have been living in Qatar for many months now, but the group had not publicly embraced plans for peace talks. In Kabul, Afghan president Hamid Karzai said he hoped the opening of the Taliban office would bring the start of talks between the High Peace Council he set up to lead government negotiation efforts, and the insurgents. However the Afghan leader who has long been lukewarm about efforts to set up a Taliban base in Kabul also called for any negotiations to move back to Afghanistan as soon as possible. "We hope that our brothers the Taliban also understand that the process will move to our country soon," he told a news conference in Kabul, although US officials stressed that moving talks to Afghanistan would take time. Karzai also announced that Nato forces had handed official control of nationwide security to Afghan troops on Tuesday. Foreign soldiers will still be fighting on the ground and supporting Afghans with air power, medical evacuation and other key capacities until the end of next year. Barack Obama is understood to have informed G8 leaders of the breakthrough at a dinner at the Northern Ireland summit on Monday night. The deal on talks with the Taliban was partly brokered by Pakistan and the emir of Qatar after "months of diplomatic spadework" also involving Germany, Norway and the UK. In 2011, Hillary Clinton suggested that Taliban leaders would have to renounce violence for a peace process to work. "Over the past two years, we have laid out our unambiguous red lines for reconciliation with the insurgents: they must renounce violence; they must abandon their alliance with al-Qaida; and they must abide by the constitution of Afghanistan," she said. "Those are necessary outcomes of any negotiation. This is the price for reaching a political resolution and bringing an end to the military actions that are targeting their leadership and decimating their ranks." But on Tuesday, that position appeared to have soften somewhat. "We don't expect them to break ties with al-Qaida ," said one of the US officials speaking on an off-the-record conference call. "That is an outcome of the process." He said the expected Taliban statement opposing the use of Afghan soil for foreign attacks was "a first step in distancing them from international terrorism". The Taliban also appeared to have softened on their long-term demand that foreign troops leave before talks can start. Karzai, despite his misgivings about overseas talks and initial opposition to the Qatar office visited the Gulf state twice this year, apparently paving the way for Tuesday's breakthrough. Afghan president Hamid Karzai, who has always said he would prefer talks to take place in Afghanistan, was initially lukewarm about the Qatar plans, but has visited the state twice this year, apparently paving the way for today's breakthrough. Additional reporting by Mokhtar Amiri in Kabul and Spencer Ackerman in Washington http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c71_1371583621 BekasKhan Defeated US to join direct peace talks in Qatar with Taliban over Afghanistan's future Afghanistan Occupation by US NATO Taliban Pakistan terrorist Punjabi ISI Al Qaeda Iran Intel India Haqqani China to Occupy Afghanistan Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:01:22 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d58_1371567261 heroic SAA :-) http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d58_1371567261 heroic SAA Dead wahabits fake muslims, who never helped the palestinians all close with Egypt Dead Al Qaeda, dead wahabits, fake muslims Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:38:52 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ee3_1371504907 Eretz_Zen2 A recent convention in Egypt that was attended by many Wahhabi clerics from around the world made it a "legal duty", from a Wahhabi (Salafi) standpoint, for all followers of their intolerant and bigoted faith to kill infidels, especially Shiites and Alawites in Syria. Recent atrocities where entire families were slaughtered due to their sectarian affiliation have become common practice for Wahhabis, who refer to themselves as Sunnis, while most moderate Sunnis dissociate themselves from them. The world's oldest and most prestigious Islamic school, al-Azhar, has called these calls for Jihad in Syria as completely unlawful. In this video, a footage from Deir Ezzor in eastern Syria shows how a group of Wahhabi rebels influenced by the sectarian preaching of these Wahhabi clerics are going door-to-door searching for Shiite (Shia) families to kill. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ee3_1371504907 Eretz_Zen2 Convention of Wahhabi Clerics Makes Jihad in Syria a Duty &amp; Ends Up in Door-to-Door Shia-Hunting syria, fsa, free, syrian, army, sectarian, jihad, sunni, shia, shiite, muslims, killing, saa, arab, bashar, assad, al, qaeda, jabhat, nusra, front, qatar, saudi, arabia, nato, turkey, salafis, salafists, wahhabis, jihadists, jihadis Tue, 18 Jun 2013 11:11:48 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0af_1371567938 pearlblack The US is to open direct peace talks with the Taliban, senior White House officials have announced. The first meeting is due to take place in the coming days in Doha, Qatar, where the Taliban have just opened their first official overseas office. Afghan President Hamid Karzai said his government is also sending a delegation to Qatar to talk to the Taliban. The announcement came on the day Nato handed over security for the whole of Afghanistan to government forces. US officials said prisoner exchanges would be one topic for discussion with the Taliban, but the first weeks will mainly be used to explore each other's agendas. However, the talks are on condition that the Taliban renounce violence, break ties with al-Qaeda and respect the Afghan constitution - including the rights of women and minorities. US officials told reporters the first formal meeting between US and Taliban representatives was expected to take place in Doha next week, with talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban due a few days after that. The level of trust between the Afghan government and the Taliban was described as &quot;low&quot;. In the past, the Taliban have always refused to meet President Karzai or his government, dismissing them as puppets of Washington. The US officials stressed that this was the first step on a very long road, adding that there was no guarantee of success. On Tuesday, the Taliban issued a statement saying that one of the main aims of their Doha office was &quot;to meet Afghans&quot;. The statement said they would also make contact with UN, regional and international organisations as well as non-governmental institutions. After opening the &quot;political bureau&quot; in Doha alongside Qatari officials, Taliban representative Mohammed Naeem told reporters the group wanted good relations with Afghanistan's neighbouring countries. In Afghanistan itself on Tuesday, Nato handed over security for the whole of the country to the government for the first time since the Taliban were ousted in 2001. At a ceremony in Kabul, President Hamid Karzai said that from Wednesday &quot;our own security and military forces will lead all the security activities&quot;. The ceremony saw the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) hand over control of the last 95 districts in a transition process that began in 2011. International troops are to remain in Afghanistan until the end of 2014, providing military back-up when needed. President Karzai has expressed anger at previous US and Qatari efforts to kick-start the peace process without properly consulting his government, reports the BBC's Bilal Sarwary from Kabul. There is also concern within the presidential palace that the Taliban will use the office in Qatar to raise funds, adds our correspondent. The US has previously tried to negotiate with the Taliban, but never held direct talks. In March 2012 the Taliban said it had suspended preliminary negotiations with Washington, citing US efforts to involve the Afghan government as a key stumbling block. The Taliban set up a diplomatic presence in Qatar in January 2012 and US officials held preliminary discussions there. Source : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22957819 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0af_1371567938 pearlblack US to open direct Taliban talks Afghanistan, war, taliban, talk Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:29:57 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7ae_1371414094 Eretz_Zen2 Western countries are now ready to start directly arming the "Free Syrian Army" (FSA) as opposed to indirect arming that was done since 2011 through their regional proxies Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and Israel. However, the Wahhabi sectarianism of the FSA and the close ties that bind it with al-Qaeda affiliated groups such as Jabhat al-Nusra, Ahrar al-Sham, and countless other brigades that themselves are an integral part of the FSA make it almost impossible to render the whole "arming the rebels" scheme that the West is aggressively pushing for anything different than "arming al-Qaeda". http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=7ae_1371414094 Eretz_Zen2 Is Arming the &quot;Free Syrian Army&quot; the Same as Arming al-<span class="highlight">Qaeda</span>? syria, arming, rebels, fsa, free, syrian, army, saa, assad, arab, al, qaeda, jabhat, nusra, front, nato, g8, turkey, usa, uk, france, qatar, saudi, arabia, israel, jihadists, jihadis, salafis, salafists, wahhabis, militants Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:29:24 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e9a_1371457142 Bashar al-Assad Two civilians were executed, they are the Syria government supporters http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e9a_1371457142 Bashar al-Assad Al <span class="highlight">Qaeda</span> terrorists executed two civilians in Syria Al Qaeda,terrorists,Syria, civilians,executed