<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">  <channel>
    <title>Liveleak.com Rss Feed - </title>
    <link>http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=citizenship</link>
    <description></description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:31:49 -0400</pubDate>
    <atom:link href="http://www.liveleak.com/rss?q=citizenship" rel="self" />
    <generator>Liveleak</generator>
    
              <item>
      <title>Sharia law is seeping slowly into the german judical system</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:10:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c95_1371578836</link>
      <dc:creator>MrSlave</dc:creator>
      <description>German Courts Begin Ruling According to Sharia Law 
An encroachment of Islamic law into the German legal system sets a dangerous precedent in Europe.

An appeals court in northwestern Germany has decided a contentious divorce case based on Islamic Sharia law.

 The ruling is the latest in a    growing number of court cases    in Germany in which judges refer or defer to Islamic law because either the plaintiffs or the defendants are Muslim. 

Critics say the cases -- especially those in which German law has taken a back seat to Sharia law -- reflect a dangerous encroachment of Islamic law into the German legal system.

 In the latest case, the Appeals Court   in Hamm, a city in German state of North Rhine-Westphalia,    ruled on June 2    that whoever marries according to Islamic law in a Muslim country and later seeks a divorce in Germany must abide by the original terms set forth by Sharia law. 

The case involved a 23-year-old Iranian woman who married a 31-year-old Iranian man in Iran according Sharia law in 2009. The couple later immigrated to the German city of Essen, gave birth to a daughter but then separated in 2011. A lower court in Essen granted the woman a divorce in November 2012 and the husband appealed the decision.

The appeals court in Hamm sided with the woman because, according to the German judge, the couple agreed to abide by the principles of Sharia law at the time they were married and thus the case should be decided according to Islamic law, regardless of whether the couple was now living in Germany.

The court ruled that the woman was legally entitled to talaq, an Islamic means of obtaining a divorce by reciting the phrase &quot;I divorce you&quot; three times. The court also said the husband had violated the original terms of the Islamic marriage agreement by failing to provide financial support for his wife for a period of six months.

The ruling has opened another round in a long-running debate about the role of Islam in German jurisprudence.

 Supporters of the decision say it is fair and consistent with    Article 14    of the Introductory Statute to the Civil Code  , which states that the law governing a marriage generally should be the law of the country in which the marriage took place. But critics of the ruling say it should not be the role of German courts to enforce the arcane provisions of Sharia law. 

 In a similar but separate case, the appeals court in Hamm announced in April 2013 that it had    overturned a previous decision    by a lower court in Dortmund and ordered a 33-year-old Iranian man to pay his estranged 29-year-old wife (also an Iranian) the equivalent of 800 gold coins as part of a divorce settlement. 

That case revolved around a couple who were married in Iran in 2001, immigrated to Dortmund and later obtained German citizenship. The couple separated in 2007.

 As part of the marriage agreement, the husband had promised to pay his wife a    dower    of 800 Bahar Azadi   gold coins payable upon demand. The court ordered the husband to pay EUR213,000 ($280,000), the current equivalent value of the coins, in compliance with a marriage contract he signed in accordance with Islamic law, despite the fact that both individuals are now German citizens. 

 In February 2011, Germany's Federal Labor Court   in Erfurt ruled that a    Muslim supermarket employee    was legally entitled to refuse to handle bottles of alcohol on religious grounds. 

The case in question involved a 47-year-old Turkish man who had been employed at a supermarket in the northern German city of Kiel since 1994. The problem had begun in 2003, when the man was assigned to work in the beverages department, but refused to stock the store's shelves with alcoholic drinks, based on the argument that Islam forbade him from any contact with alcohol. In response, the store manager reassigned the employee to stock milk bottles in the dairy department, but the man complained that he was not accustomed to working in a refrigerated environment, so he frequently called in sick. The man was eventually sent back to work in the beverages department, where the conflict over the alcohol bottles intensified. The employee was eventually fired in March 2008.

In a decision that generated considerable controversy in Germany, the court ruled that the supermarket was unjust in firing the employee and was obliged to offer him an alternative position that did not conflict with his religious beliefs. The court rejected the argument set forth by lawyers representing the supermarket that the man should have been able to do his job without a fuss because Sharia law forbids only the drinking of alcohol, not the touching of bottles. The court noted that the employee had become increasingly religious and that any direct or indirect contact with alcohol would have been offensive to him.

 In another case, in March 2007, Christa Datz-Winter, a judge at the Family Court   in Frankfurt,   cited the Koran in a divorce case    involving a 26-year-old German woman of Moroccan origin who had been repeatedly beaten by her Moroccan husband. Although police had ordered the man to stay away from his estranged wife, he continued to abuse her and at one point threatened to kill her. 

While not denying the facts, Judge Datz-Winter nevertheless refused to grant the divorce, arguing that a woman who marries a Muslim man should know what she is getting herself into. In her ruling, the judge quoted   Sura 4, Verse 34    of the Koran, which justifies &quot;both the husband's right to use corporal punishment against a disobedient wife and the establishment of the husband's superiority over the wife.&quot; 

The ruling generated so much outrage that the judge was removed from the case.

In Kassel, the Federal Social Court   approved the claim of a second wife for half of her dead Moroccan husband's pension payments, which the man's first wife wanted to keep all to herself. Although polygamy is illegal in Germany, the judge ruled that according to Sharia law, the two wives must share the pension.

In Koblenz, the Administrative Appeals Court   granted the second wife of an Iraqi living in Germany the right to remain permanently in the country. The court ruled that after five years of a polygamous marriage in Germany, it would be unfair to expect her to return to Iraq.

In D&quot;usseldorf, an Appeals Court   ordered a Turkish man to repay a EUR30,000 ($40,000) dowry to his former daughter-in-law, in accordance with Sharia law. In Cologne, a judge ruled that an Iranian man must repay his ex-wife's dowry of 600 gold coins, based on the Sharia law followed in Iran.

In Munich, a Local Court   decided that a German widow was entitled to only one-quarter of the estate left by her deceased husband, who was born in Iran. The other three-quarters of the inheritance should go to relatives in Tehran. The court ruled that because the man did not have German citizenship, Sharia law applies to the division of the inheritance.

A growing number of German legal experts are now sounding the alarm about the rise of a parallel Islamic justice system in Germany.

 In an interview with the German newspaper    Die Welt   , Mathias Rohe, an expert in Sharia law at the University of Erlangen, discusses the rapid spread of Islamic law in German jurisprudence. He describes Sharia law as a &quot;highly complex system of Islamic religious and legal norms&quot; and warns, &quot;We must be careful that we are not creating parallel   structures.&quot; 

According to Joachim Wagner, a German legal expert and former investigative journalist for ARD German public television, Sharia law in Germany is far more widespread than most people realize, and that this &quot;parallel justice system&quot; is undermining the rule of law in Germany.

 In a 236-page book entitled &quot;   Judges Without Law: Islamic Parallel Justice Endangers Our Constitutional State   ,&quot; Wagner writes that, in addition to the use of Sharia law in German courts, Muslims are also establishing a shadow justice system, with Islamic Sharia courts now operating in all major German cities. 

Wagner writes that Muslim jurists often seek to settle criminal cases out of court -- without the involvement of German prosecutors or lawyers -- before law enforcement can bring the cases to a German court.

Settlements reached by the Muslim mediators often mean perpetrators are able to avoid long prison sentences, while victims receive compensation in line with Sharia law. When cases are tried in German courts, victims are often pressured to make sure their testimony in court does not lead to a conviction, according to Wagner.

In an interview with the German newsmagazine  Der Spiegel,  Wagner describes the Islamic shadow justice system in Germany as &quot;very foreign, and for a German lawyer, completely incomprehensible at first. It follows its own rules. The Islamic arbitrators aren't interested in evidence when they deliver a judgment, and unlike in German criminal law, the question of who is at fault doesn't play much of a role.&quot;

When Der Spiegel asked why it was wrong for two parties to try to resolve a dispute among themselves, Wagner replied: &quot;The problem starts when the arbitrators force the justice system out of the picture, especially in the case of criminal offenses. At that point they undermine the state monopoly on violence. Islamic conflict resolution in particular, as I've experienced it, is often achieved through violence and threats. It's often a dictate of power on the part of the stronger family.&quot;

 Wagner says political correctness is contributing to the rise of Sharia law in Germany. In an interview with the German broadcaster Deutsche Welle,  Wager states: &quot;I've studied 16 recent crime cases here with Muslim citizens involved. In almost 90% of all cases where Muslim arbitrators were commissioned, the perpetrators were acquitted by German courts or the cases were dropped altogether by the prosecution for lack of evidence. It's an alarming finding, and it throws a bad light on our courts.&quot;


Source:  http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/german-courts-ruling-according-sharia-law 




Here is the report of the newspaper ' Die Welt ' in german  http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article13845521/Scharia-haelt-Einzug-in-deutsche-Gerichtssaele.html 




Thanks to EP33</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c95_1371578836</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/c95_1371578836" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/c95_1371578836" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">MrSlave</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Jun/18/c6522cbf9068_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Sharia law is seeping slowly into the german judical system</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Islam, Muslims, Sharia, religious fascism, parasites, exploitation of hospitality</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Israel Rabbi Preaches &amp;quot;slaughter&amp;quot; of Gentile Babies</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:51:57 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0a8_1371523503</link>
      <dc:creator>Sheeny Hymie Ikey-Mo</dc:creator>
      <description>Israeli Rabbi Preaches &quot;Slaughter&quot; of Gentile Babies
							
by JONATHAN COOK

	
			
Nazareth


A rabbi from one of the most violent settlements in 
the West Bank was questioned on suspicion of incitement last week as 
Israeli police stepped up their investigation into a book in which he 
sanctions the killing of non-Jews, including children and babies. 
Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira is one of the leading ideologues
 of the most extreme wing of the religious settler movement. He is known
 to be a champion of the &quot;price-tag&quot; policy of reprisal attacks on 
Palestinians, including punishing them for attempts by officials to 
enforce Israeli law against the settlements. 
So far the policy has chiefly involved violent 
harassment of Palestinians, with settlers inflicting beatings, attacking
 homes, throwing stones, burning fields, killing livestock and poisoning
 wells. 
It is feared, however, that Shapira's book The King's 
Torah, published last year, is intended to offer ideological 
justifications for widening the scope of such attacks to include killing
 Palestinians, even children. 
Although Shapira was released a few hours after his 
questioning last Monday, dozens of rabbis, as well as several members of
 parliament, rallied to his side, condemning the arrest. 
 Shlomo Aviner, one of the settlement movement's leaders, defended the book's arguments as a &quot;legitimate stance&quot; and one that should be taught in Jewish seminaries.  


But in a sign of mounting official unease at Shapira's
 influence on the settlement movement, the Israeli military authorities 
also threatened last week to enforce a decade-old demolition order on 
Yitzhar's seminary, which was built without a permit. 
Dror Etkes, a Tel Aviv-based expert on the 
settlements, said the order was unlikely to be carried out but was a way
 to pressure Yitzhar's 500 inhabitants to rein in their more violent 
attacks. 
He said the authorities had begun taking a harder line
 against Yitzhar only since Shapira and several of his students were 
suspected of torching a mosque in the neighboring village of Yasuf last 
December. 
&quot;Shapira is trying to redefine the conflict with the 
Palestinians, turning it from a national conflict into a religious one. 
That frightens Israel. It doesn't want to look as though it is fighting 
the whole Islamic world,&quot; Etkes said. 
He added that the rabbi and his supporters were 
closely associated with Kach, a movement founded by the late Rabbi Meir 
Kahane that demands the expulsion of all Palestinians from a &quot;Greater 
Israel&quot;. Despite Kach being banned, officials have largely turned a 
blind eye as its ideology has flourished in the settlements. 
&quot;It may be illegal to call oneself Kach but the 
authorities are more than tolerant of settlers who hold such views and 
carry out violent attacks. In fact, what Kahane was doing in the 1980s 
seems like child's play compared with today's settlers.&quot; 
In the 230-page book, Shapira and his co-author, Rabbi
 Yosef Elitzur, also from Yitzhar, argue that Jewish law permits the 
killing of non-Jews in a wide variety of circumstances. The terms 
&quot;gentiles&quot; and &quot;non-Jews&quot; in the book are widely understood as 
references to Palestinians. 

They write that Jews have the right to kill gentiles 
in any situation in which &quot;a non-Jew's presence endangers Jewish lives&quot; 
even if the gentile is &quot;not at all guilty for the situation that has 
been created&quot;. 
The book sanctions the killing of non-Jewish children 
and babies: &quot;There is justification for killing babies if it is clear 
that they will grow up to harm us, and in such a situation they may be 
harmed deliberately, and not only during combat with adults.&quot; 
The rabbis suggest that harming the children of 
non-Jewish leaders is justified if it is likely to bring pressure to 
bear on them to change policy. 
The authors also advocate committing &quot;cruel deeds to 
create the proper balance of terror&quot; and treating all members of an 
&quot;enemy nation&quot; as targets for retaliation, even if they are not directly
 participating in hostile activities. 


The rabbis appear to be offering justifications in 
Jewish law for collective punishment and other war crimes of the kind 
committed by the Israeli army in its attack on Gaza in the winter of 
2008. 
Pamphlets similarly calling on soldiers to &quot;show no 
mercy&quot; were distributed by the army's rabbinate as troops prepared for 
the Gaza operation, in which 1,400 Palestinians, the majority of them 
civilians, were killed. Religious settlers have come to dominate many 
combat units. 
An investigation last year by Yesh Din, an Israeli 
human rights group, found Shapira's seminary had received government 
funds worth at least $300,000 in recent years. American and British 
groups have also contributed tens of thousands of dollars in 
tax-deductible donations. 
According to the Jerusalem Post newspaper, the Yitzhar
 settlers have responded to the demolition order against their seminary 
by threatening to publish documents showing that the housing and 
transport ministries were closely involved in the project too. 
The settlers have repeatedly rampaged through nearby 
Palestinian villages, most notoriously in September 2008, when they were
 filmed shooting at homes in Assira al-Kabaliya, smashing properties and
 daubing Stars of David on homes. Ehud Olmert, the prime minister of the
 time, termed the settlers' actions a &quot;pogrom&quot;. 
The same year a religious student from Yitzhar was arrested for firing home-made rockets at Palestinian villages close by. 


In April, Yitzhar's settlers marched through the 
village of Huwara and pelted a Palestinian family's home with stones in 
&quot;reprisal&quot; for the arrest of 11 of their number. 
A settler from Yitzhar was questioned last month over 
the fatal shooting of a 16-year-old Palestinian, Aysar Zaban, in May, 
reportedly after stones were thrown at the settler's car. The teenager 
was shot in the back. 
Last week, the settlers attacked Burin, shooting at villagers and burning fields. 


In most of these cases, the settlers who were arrested
 were released a short time later either by the police or the courts. In
 January, a Jerusalem judge freed Rabbi Shapira for lack of evidence in 
the arson attack on the mosque. 
Yitzhak Ginsburg, an authority on Jewish law and a 
mentor to Shapira, was questioned by police last Thursday over his 
endorsement of the book. In the past Ginsburg has praised Baruch 
Goldstein, a settler who opened fire in Hebron's Ibrahimi mosque in 
1994, killing 29 Palestinian worshippers. 
In 2003 Ginsburg was accused of incitement for 
publishing a book that called for the expulsion of Palestinians from 
Israel and the occupied territories, but the charges were dropped after 
he issued a &quot;clarification statement&quot;. 
A group calling itself &quot;Students of Yitzhak Ginsburg&quot; 
recently distributed a leaflet urging Israeli soldiers to &quot;spare your 
lives and the lives of your friends and show no concern for a population
 that surrounds us and harms us&quot;. 
Kach was founded in 1971 by the late Meir Kahane, an 
American rabbi who immigrated to Israel. He won a seat in the Israeli 
parliament in 1984 on a platform of expelling all Palestinians from 
Israel and the occupied territories. As an MP, he drafted legislation to
 revoke the Israeli citizenship of non-Jews and ban sexual relations 
between Jews and gentiles. 
The political party was banned from running for the 
Israeli parliament in 1988 and the movement was outlawed six years 
later. Although the group is considered a terrorist organization in the 
United States and most of Europe, its ideology has been allowed to 
thrive in the settlements. 
Today, dozens of rabbis espouse an interpretation of Jewish religious law identical to or worse than Kahane's. 


Michael Ben Ari, a former Kach leader, was elected as 
an MP last year for the far-right National Union party, which holds four
 seats in the 120-member parliament. 
Avigdor Lieberman, who leads the parliament's third 
largest party and is foreign minister, briefly joined the party before 
it was banned. His own party's anti-Arab &quot;No loyalty, no citizenship&quot; 
program includes echoes of Kahane's ideology.


Source: http://www.counterpunch.org/2010/08/02/israeli-rabbi-preaches-quot-slaughter-quot-of-gentile-babies/




The 
controversial edict is backed by numerous rabbis affiliated with the 
so-called national-religious camp as well as the Talmudic seminary in 
West Jerusalem, known as Merkaz Ha'rav - See more at: 
http://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/226-kill-enemy-children-jewish-edict#sthash.DqQLOwsJ.dpuf
 of the seven</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0a8_1371523503</guid>
            <media:content>
                <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">Sheeny Hymie Ikey-Mo</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/nopreview.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Israel Rabbi Preaches &amp;quot;slaughter&amp;quot; of Gentile Babies</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Jews, Murder, Israel</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>There Are Always Two Sides To A Story But The Other Side To This Story Is Very Difficult To Find</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 17:59:51 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5fe_1371418796</link>
      <dc:creator>Thickhanger</dc:creator>
      <description>

It's been  quite an emotional roller coaster of a week for a young elevenold mariachi singer Sebastien De La Cruz, whose performance of the anthem before game 3 of the NBA finals in San Antonio on Tuesday was met with scores of racist comments on Twitter.

People wondered why &quot;this little Mexican kid&quot; was singing the National Anthem; others questioned his citizenship status.

&quot;Is this the American National Anthem or the Mexican Hat Dance? Get this lil kid out of here,&quot; tweeted Steven David (@A1R_STEVEN).

A Twitter hashtag - #GoHome - popped up. Ironic, because Sebastien, hailed as &quot;the boy with the golden voice&quot; last year when he competed on &quot;America's Got Talent,&quot; was born and raised in San Antonio, a self-described &quot;true San Antonio Spurs fan.&quot;


And he was just doing the team a favor

But a week later and surrounded by and totally flanked by the proud Spurs team members, the Heat and Mayor Juli'an Castro, who introduced him, Sebastien received a deafening reception.

The Spurs organization invited the singer back for a repeat performance to send a signal. Game 3 on Tuesday while wearing his charro traje, the traditional garb of mariachi singers.


&quot;It was kind of messed-up,&quot; said 13-year-old Julia Castillo, who came to the game wearing a Mexican sombrero to cheer him on. Once again, the little mariachi nailed it, showing why he was such a hit last year on NBC's &quot;America's Got Talent.&quot;

Spurs coach Gregg Popovich and Miami Heat coach Erik Spoelstra congratulated him afterwards. Players cheered.

Many praised the Spurs and the NBA for bringing him back.
 
 
 


http://www.kansascity.com/2013/06/13/4291546/reports-sebastien-de-la-cruz-to.html#storylink=cpy

http://www.digtriad.com/news/article/288038/1/Sebastian-De-La-Cruz-Unfazed-By-Racist-Comments-Sings-National-Anthem







</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5fe_1371418796</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/5fe_1371418796" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/5fe_1371418796" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">Thickhanger</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Jun/16/04f0f42822e5_thumb_4.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>There Are Always Two Sides To A Story But The Other Side To This Story Is Very Difficult To Find</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">music,song,racisim,hate,immigration,WTF,Thickhanger,</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Sarah Palin courts controversy with claim that Syria conflict 'should be left for Allah to sort out'  </title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:55:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=26c_1371329489</link>
      <dc:creator>Detroit Iron</dc:creator>
      <description>
The former vice presidential nominee was talking at the Faith and Freedom Coalition Conference on Saturday

She rejected calls for an immigration overhaul - including the path to citizenship for immigrants in the country illegally

She warned 'the good old boys' in the GOP leadership that she wouldn't tone down her aggressive conservative rhetoric

She said recent scandals involving the IRS and the NSA make the country feel 'so Orwellian around here, you know, &quot;1984'&quot;
On Monday she starts on 'Fox and Friends' as a commentator

By   DAILY MAIL REPORTER 

 PUBLISHED:  14:39 EST, 15 June 2013  
  UPDATED:  15:35 EST, 15 June 2013

Former vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin has criticized the Obama administration's decision to supply weapons to the rebels in the civil war in Syria, arguing that the U.S. should 'Let Allah sort it out' until there is a stronger leader in the White House.


'Militarily, where is our commander in chief? We're talking now more new interventions. I say until we know what we're doing, until we have a commander and chief who knows what he's doing, well, let these radical Islamic countries who aren't even respecting basic human rights, where both sides are slaughtering each other as they scream over an arbitrary red line, &quot;Allah Akbar,&quot; I say until we have someone who knows what they're doing, I say let Allah sort it out,' Palin said at the Faith and Freedom Coalition Conference on Saturday.


The White House confirmed on Thursday that it had conclusive evidence that Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime has used chemical weapons against rebel forces.

The use of weapons such as the nerve agent sarin crosses what President Barack Obama has called a 'red line' that would trigger greater American involvement in the crisis. 


Obama discussed the civil war in Syria with European leaders in a teleconference on Friday, and the issue is expected to dominate much of the conversation at next week's G-8 Summit in Northern Ireland.

The White House is now considering arming the opposition fighters and enforcing a no-fly zone that could cost an estimated $50 million a day.


The final speaker at the three-day Faith and Freedom Coalition Conference, former Alaska Gov. Palin rejected calls for an immigration overhaul that includes a path to citizenship for immigrants in the country illegally.

Palin, who is rejoining Fox News Channel as an analyst less than half a year after they decided to part ways, also called Washington, D.C. 'one hot mess,' reports  ABC News   .


She also offered a warning to 'the good old boys' in the GOP leadership who are calling for conservative activists to tone down aggressive rhetoric.


'You do not marginalize, you don't discredit and dismiss, every day average hard-working Americans - those who are part of that grass-roots tea party movement,' she said.


'Just let them tell us to sit down and shut up,' Palin said later, 'which I refuse to do.'


She also took a swipe at another speaker at the conservative forum, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who argued Friday that one of the reasons to support the Senate's immigration reform plan is because 'Immigrants are more fertile.'

'I think it's kind of dangerous territory, territory to want to debate this whole one race's fertility rate over another, and I say this from someone who's kind of fertile herself,' Palin said.

'I don't think that's where we want to go in deciding how will we incentivize the hardworking responsible families who want to live in the light, follow the law, become Americans, versus those whose very first act on our soil is to break the law? There are different ways that we can debate this.'


As she warned the conservative crowd of 'tyranny' in government, Palin said that the recent scandals involving the Internal Revenue Service and the National Security Agency make the country feel 'so Orwellian around here, you know, &quot;1984.'&quot;


Palin's first appearance since returning to Fox is scheduled for Monday on the 'Fox &amp;amp; Friends' morning show - on the same day CNN is premiering a morning show to great fanfare.

Fox and Palin parted ways in January after she had worked there for three years as a contributor. 


They had talked about renewing their contract, but it didn't happen.

Money may have been a factor: Palin was signed for a reported $1 million a year when she originally joined Fox less than two years after being John McCain's running mate.

Fox News chief Roger Ailes said in a statement: 'I've had several conversations with Governor Palin in the past few weeks about her rejoining FOX News as a contributor.

'I have great confidence in her and am pleased that she will once again add her commentary to our programming.

'I hope she continues to speak her mind.'

Palin also hit headlines this week for blasting comedian Bill Maher on Twitter Wednesday, saying she hopes his 'lily white a**' gets flattened, after he reportedly made a joke directed at her 5-year-old special needs son. 


Palin learned of the alleged joke from a conservative writer for Breitbart News, who attended Maher's stand-up show in The Pearl concert venue at The Palms Hotel in Las Vegas on Saturday. 


The writer, Ron Futrell, wrote in a blog that he attended the show with friends and became inflamed when Maher made a comment referring to Palin's son Trig, who has Downs Syndrome, as 'retarded.'

Read more:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2342307/Sarah-Palin-courts-controversy-claim-Syria-conflict-left-Allah-sort-out.html#ixzz2WJumjakw  
Follow us:  @MailOnline on Twitter  
  DailyMail on Facebook</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=26c_1371329489</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/26c_1371329489" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/26c_1371329489" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">Detroit Iron</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Jun/15/21bcb0c62175_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Sarah Palin courts controversy with claim that Syria conflict 'should be left for Allah to sort out'  </media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Sarah Palin, Obama administration, Allah, Syrian President Bashar Assad</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>NATION SHOULD WELCOME DARKENING DEMOGRAPHIC</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 06:50:18 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6dd_1371293276</link>
      <dc:creator>Detroit Iron</dc:creator>
      <description>



By Cynthia Tucker 
 Cynthia Tucker


Norman Rockwell is dead. So is his America.



If you find that declaration sad, or possibly slanderous, you probably have fond memories of &quot;the way we were&quot; during a supposedly kinder and gentler time before the civil rights movement, women's lib and cellphones. If you don't shed tears over that America, you may have grown up as I did -- oppressed by the strictures of a social and political system that didn't show much respect to those who were not white male Christians.



Either way, the overwhelmingly white nation that Rockwell depicted in his sentimental paintings is gone. (I intend no disrespect to Rockwell, whose portrait of 6-year-old Ruby Bridges integrating a New Orleans school stands out in civil rights iconography.) Just last week, new data from the U.S. Census Bureau confirmed a trend long in evidence: The nation continues, inexorably, to grow darker.



For the year ending July 1, 2012, deaths among non-Hispanic whites exceeded births, the Census Bureau reported. The majority of births in this country are now to blacks, Asians and Latinas.



That trend helps to explain the discomfort among older conservative voters with immigration, which has been the driver of the nation's increasing diversity. They see the country in which they grew up, in which they held the political, social and economic power, slipping away, becoming a place with which they are unfamiliar. Their anxiety boils down to a misplaced fear that they will be strangers in their own land.



Their misapprehensions are stoked and amplified by the right-wing media axis, which has spent years defining undocumented workers as barbarians at the gate and all people of color as suspect. Even as support grows in mainstream America for legalizing undocumented immigrants, the pit bulls of the right continue to denounce any attempt at comprehensive immigration reform as an unjustified &quot;amnesty&quot; to lawbreakers.



Rich Lowry, editor of National Review, the magazine founded by William Buckley, says so. So does former South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint, now head of the conservative Heritage Foundation.



Rush Limbaugh, as usual, doesn't attempt subtlety as he argues that conservative voters would lose all political clout if undocumented immigrants gain citizenship: &quot;There are legitimate fears that ... Republicans/conservatives are gonna end up ... outnumbered.&quot;

If Limbaugh conflates conservatives with his listeners, he's right. But they are dwindling, anyway. The Limbaugh audience, like the GOP primary voter, skews older. Looking toward voting patterns 10 to 20 years from now, Republican strategists have fretted over the party's failure to appeal to younger voters.



One of the ways in which the GOP alienates younger Americans is with its harsh rhetoric and unwelcoming policies toward those who crossed the border illegally. According to a 2009 Washington Post/ABC News poll, 73 percent of Americans ages 18 to 29 support giving them a path toward legal status.



Younger Americans have grown up in a more diverse nation, so they are far less likely to see those with darker skin and different accents as a threat. But there are good reasons for older white Americans to welcome immigrants, too -- whether or not they entered the country with legal documents.



Without them, the United States would be doomed to the kind of demographic &quot;bust&quot; that countries from Japan to Russia are experiencing, with birthrates so low that the population is not reproducing itself. That has all sorts of dire economic consequences.



For one thing, there aren't enough younger workers to support all the retirees. Japan's long-running economic malaise has several causes, but its aging population -- exacerbated by its hostility to immigrants -- is surely one of them.



Whatever the long-term problems with our Social Security and Medicare programs, they'd be far worse without the Latinos, Asians and Africans who have revitalized rundown neighborhoods, invigorated popular culture and shared in the American Dream. As Brookings Institution demographer William Frey told The New York Times, the new census figures make &quot;more vivid than ever the fact that we will be reliant on younger minorities and immigrants for our future demographic and economic growth.&quot;

Their vitality ought to be welcomed.



 http://news.yahoo.com/nation-welcome-darkening-demographic-050119341.html</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6dd_1371293276</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/6dd_1371293276" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/6dd_1371293276" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">Detroit Iron</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Jun/15/bde5f8eed67c_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>NATION SHOULD WELCOME DARKENING DEMOGRAPHIC</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">America</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>BBC Bullshit &amp;amp; Comments from Brits that needs a thoughtful &amp;quot;EAR&amp;quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:49:14 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=337_1371181318</link>
      <dc:creator>omniradar</dc:creator>
      <description>I,m sick of these bastards presuming this is good for all citizens !!!! 





Senior
 politicians from across the political divide have united to call for UK
 security services to be given greater internet monitoring powers.
        In a letter to The Times newspaper three former Labour home 
secretaries, three senior Tories and one Liberal Democrat urge changes.
        They say &quot;coalition niceties&quot; must not hinder counter terror efforts.


        A bill allowing the monitoring of all UK citizens' internet use was dropped after Liberal Democrat opposition.


        However, following the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby in 
Woolwich there have been calls for the Communications Data Bill, dubbed 
the &quot;snoopers' charter&quot; by opponents, which was shelved in May to be 
revived.
  Quote from letter issued by Jack Straw, David Blunkett, Alan Johnson, Lord Baker, Lord King, and Lord Carlile
	

		      The letter was signed by former Labour home secretaries
 Jack Straw, David Blunkett and Alan Johnson, along with former 
Conservative home secretary Lord Baker and defence secretary Lord King, 
and Liberal Democrat Lord Carlile, who until 2011 was the independent 
reviewer of government anti-terror laws. 
        In issuing the letter Mr Straw teamed up with Ben Wallace, 
the MP for Wyre and Preston North and parliamentary aide to minister 
without portfolio Ken Clarke. As a parliamentary aide Mr Wallace must 
not differ from the government position. 
        The letter, which was passed to Newsnight and which will be 
published in The Times on Friday, puts renewed pressure on the deputy 
prime minister, Nick Clegg, whose party claimed a month ago they would 
not allow the bill to become law while the Liberal Democrats were in 
government. 
        It also shows support amongst backers of the bill is 
undiminished, despite claims British security services used information 
gathered on UK citizens by Prism - the US secret intelligence programme 
revealed last week.
        Instead, referring to the recent murder of Drummer Rigby, 
they write: &quot;When such a threat reveals itself, government has a duty to
 ensure they can do all they can to counter it.&quot; 
        Without Liberal Democrat support in parliament, the 
Conservatives alone could not get the bill on to the statute book, but 
this letter is the first sign that Labour politicians are prepared to 
combine in principle with the Conservative party to help ensure the 
security services are given the new powers.
        In an attack on Liberal Democrat opposition, they write: 
&quot;Coalition niceties and party politics must not get in the way of giving
 our security services the capabilities they need to stay one step ahead
 of those that seek to destroy our society.&quot;
        They also accuse the Liberal Democrats of siding with the 
interests of large communications companies, writing: &quot;We find it odd 
that many critics of the Bill prefer to champion the rights of 
corporations over democratically accountable law enforcement agencies.&quot; 
 
        Speculation is mounting in Westminster that to avoid 
complicated votes in parliament, measures will be brought forward by 
Home Secretary Theresa May that are not presented in a formal bill, but 
instead use other means of achieving the same ends. 
  
      The Communications Data Bill would have given police and 
security services access, without a warrant, to details of all online 
communication in the UK - such as the time, duration, originator and 
recipient, and the location of the device from which it was made.
        It would also give access to some details of Britons' web 
browsing history and details of messages sent on social media. The 
police would have to get a warrant from the home secretary to be able to
 access the actual content of conversations and messages.
        In April, Mr Clegg told his weekly LBC radio phone-in: &quot;What 
people have dubbed the snoopers' charter - I have to be clear with you, 
that's not going to happen.&quot;
        &quot;In other words the idea that the government will pass a law 
which means there will be a record kept of every website you visit, who 
you communicate with on social media sites, that's not going to happen. 
It's certainly not going to happen with Liberal Democrats in 
government.&quot;
        &quot;We all committed ourselves at the beginning of this 
coalition to learn the lessons from the past, when Labour overdid it, 
trying to constantly keep tabs on everyone. We have a commitment in this
 Coalition Agreement to end the storage of internet information unless 
there is a very good reason to do so.&quot;
        But in the letter the Conservative, Labour and Liberal 
Democrat grandees say: &quot;Far from being a 'snoopers' charter', as critics
 allege, the draft bill, seeks to match our crime fighting capabilities 
to the advances in technologies.   
        &quot;The proposed Communications Data Bill does not want access 
to the content of our communications but does want to ensure that enough
 data is available in the aftermath of an attack to help investigators 
establish 'who, where and when' were involved in planning or supporting 
it.&quot;rjs2662 
  13th June 2013 - 19:42    If you value security over freedom you will end up losing both

         

   

              
          +62    Comment number 24.  Welsh Ben 
  13th June 2013 - 19:55    And the terrorists have almost won...

They've
 pushed the UK to the point where we are more in fear of state snooping 
on our private lives than we are of the potential terrorist acts.         

   

              
          +59    Comment number 18.  jay 
  13th June 2013 - 19:53    &quot;However, following the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich&quot;

Not
 only would police/local authorities monitoring all UK internet use 
without a warrant due to one terrorist attack be grossly 
disproportionate, but I haven't heard a single objective, 
evidenced-based argument for how these powers would have prevented 
Woolwich. 

Cynical, manipulative and dangerous. Go through the courts.         

   

              
          +49    Comment number 3.  BikerAndy 
  13th June 2013 - 19:44    disgusting
 invasion of privacy. together with the current trend of net censorship,
 it just goes to show that all the major political parties have no 
interest in what the public actually want. big brother gone mad. i for 
one will be voting pirate party in the next elections to make my 
feelings clear to the next government.         

   

              
          +49    Comment number 6.  vin 
  13th June 2013 - 19:46    They already monitor everything. They are just trying to legalise it.

         

   

              
          +46    Comment number 4.  oOLJCOo 
  13th June 2013 - 19:46    Any
 one think that people who do not wish to be monitored will just go back
 to pens and paper? This isn't for &quot;terror&quot;, it's for policing of the 
population incase we ever decide to turn off Big Brother or Downton 
Abbey and head down to the Capital to remove the fat cat bankers and 
their MP henchmen who have robbed and stole from the common person.         

   

              
          +46    Comment number 109.  yournext 
  13th June 2013 - 20:31    First they came for the communists,
I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

When they came for the Catholics,
 I didn't speak out.

Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.

         

   

              
          +40    Comment number 68.  ePug 
  13th June 2013 - 20:14    What? I must be dreaming. More surveillance? More scrutiny? Terror? What terror? This is insane.

         

   

              
          +37    Comment number 85.  Tony  
  13th June 2013 - 20:23    Jack Straw is a creep.. a power freak who was behind the British ID card system.. oh how that man loves the idea of Big Brother.

         

   

              
          +34    Comment number 12.  beesaman 
  13th June 2013 - 19:50    This will make both Labour and Conservative unelectable in the next election.

         

   

              
          +34    Comment number 13.  Mooker 
  13th June 2013 - 19:50    We are doomed if we do not unite and take a stand against this NOW!

         

   

              
          +33    Comment number 38.  BeesAreTrendy 
  13th June 2013 - 20:02    It's
 funny how Governments want its citizen's business out in the open for 
it to see, but it does not want its own business out in the open for its
 citizen's to see.

Yes, funny that.         

   

              
          +33    Comment number 45.  Dragonwight 
  13th June 2013 - 20:04    Lee
 Rigby would not have been saved by new powers so any mention of him is 
just political opportunism and an insult to his family. This lot should 
just learn to go away gracefully they had their time in office. Given 
the number of MP`s who seem to have trouble with basic morality like not
 stealing from the public purse I certainly wouldn't trust them with a 
complex issue like privacy.         

   

              
          +31    Comment number 67.  Big John the Red 
  13th June 2013 - 20:14    Why not &quot;chip&quot; us all like dogs and have done with it?

Oh, and in the UK, you are around 50 times more like to die of an allergic reaction to a cat than in a terrorist attack!

         

   

              
          +31    Comment number 29.  TQ 
  13th June 2013 - 19:56    &quot;if
 you are not guilty of anything then what is there to fear?&quot; let me give
 you a list... corrupt politicians (for examples see the last decade of 
UK politics), corrupt police (for examples see last 30 years of Police 
history), hackers, corrupt civil servants, corrupt judges... the list 
goes on but when too much power is centralised then abuse of that power 
isn't far behind (See the Prism scandal)         

   

              
          +28    Comment number 51.  GodsSon83 
  13th June 2013 - 20:07    The nazis may of lost the battle but they def won the War

Welcome to Soviet United kingdom of Europe where your &quot;security&quot; is our top priority.   

Whilst the &quot;Terrorists&quot; are about we will have to remove your rights and spy on you without probably cause or due process     

I AM SICK OF THIS NONSENSE 

Where are they going to draw the line on this &quot;security&quot; which there pretty useless at!

         

   

              
          +27    Comment number 65.  Citizen Too 
  13th June 2013 - 20:13    It
 has taken a thousand years for us to win the level of freedom of speech
 and action that we now enjoy so we should be prepared to accept risks 
and dangers in order to maintain it and not be browbeaten into accepting
 any further curtailment.         

   

              
          +27    Comment number 87.  JoJoDeathunter 
  13th June 2013 - 20:24    Politicians
 take note... we the British people don't want this! We're the people 
who survived the bombs of the Blitz and the collapse of the largest 
empire the world has ever seen, only to come out stronger than ever, a 
few lousy terrorists can't faze us. For once listen to your people 
rather than trying to grab as much power as you think you can get away 
with.         

   

              
          +26    Comment number 66.  blogitusmaximus 
  13th June 2013 - 20:13    Show
 me where in the snoopers charter they have developed the technology to 
crack encrypted tunnelled traffic. Any idiot with a VPN renders this 
legislation pointless.

It is a gross oversight to allow those in 
power to acquire snooping powers that once in place cant be recinded 
easily. Beware future not-so-benevolent power hungry governments.         

   

              
          +25    Comment number 46.  Sane or not 
  13th June 2013 - 20:04    To
 give police and security services the right to monitor all 
communication data is a recipie for a civil liberties /privacy disaster.
 It's impossible to guarantee that it will only be used to deal with 
terrorism and serious organised crime. Usage of the anti-terrorism bill 
has not been confined to war on terror.
What stops any officialy body snooping on people who oppose their policies.         

   

             Page 1 of 23

  Newer 1  2   3   4   5  ...  23   Older                   Sign in  with your BBC iD, or  Register  to comment and rate comments

                                             All posts are  reactively-moderated   and must obey the  house rules . 

            
      
      
       
  
	
  Share this page
709 Share   Facebook   Twitter   
   
      Email
     
      Print
      

  



 
    
        	
  	


	
			




		     
	       	         
	       	         





			Top Stories
		
		
									
				
				
	 
	US: Syria 'used chemical weapons'

		  
	Cuts could be dangerous - army chief

		  
	Man charged over Queen painting

		  
	Alcohol liver disease care 'lacking'

		  
	Pensioners' incomes 'rising fastest'

		  

		 
	


      	

	       	         
	       	         

	

			Features
		
	

			




	


		





	Launch time

		

			
							The plane that Airbus did not want to build 	
				  
			
							
					 

			




	


		





	All change

		

			
							Is tipping so unfair it should be banned? 	
				  
			
							
					 

			




	


		





	Cost of war

		

			
							The Afghan soldiers paying the price for taking on the Taliban 	
				  
			
							
					 

			




		


		





	Cinema saviour Watch

		

			
							The man bringing Britain's art deco picture houses back to life  	
				  
			
							
					  
	
	 


	       	         

	
			Most Popular
	
					
					 Shared 
		
		
      		 
  
    1: Secret life of the cat: What do our feline companions get up to?
 
  
    2: 'Ugly prostitute' reported to police
 
  
    3: Angler pulled into lake by huge fish
 
  
    4: US Supreme Court bans DNA patents
 
  
    5: Mussolini's gay island
  
      	
							
					 Read 
		
		
      		 
  
    1: Police warn on Big Brother entrant
 
  
    2: 'Ugly prostitute' reported to police
 
  
    3: Should tips be banned in restaurants?
 
  
    4: Spielberg predicts film 'meltdown'
 
  
    5: Airbus A350 prepares for take-off
 
  
    6: Man charged over Queen painting
 
  
    7: Coldstream Guard laid to rest after 200 years
 
  
    8: Hen party crash driver arrested
 
  
    9: US: Syria 'used chemical weapons'
 
  
    10: Airbus A350 set for maiden flight
  
      	
					
					 Video/Audio 
		
		
      		 
  
    1: Angler pulled into lake by huge fish Watch
 
  
    2: 'Gasps' as PS4 price unveiled Watch
 
  
    3: BBC News Channel Watch
 
  
    4: How did this man learn 11 languages? Watch
 
  
    5: Man survives three days trapped under sea Watch
 
  
    6: Snowden in hiding after China claims Watch
 
  
    7: Henry Cavill brings Superman home Watch
 
  
    8: Art deco cinemas saved from demolition Watch
 
  
    9: Will.i.am tries UK citizenship test  Watch
 
  
    10: E-cigarettes face new restrictions Watch</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=337_1371181318</guid>
            <media:content>
                <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">omniradar</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/nopreview.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>BBC Bullshit &amp;amp; Comments from Brits that needs a thoughtful &amp;quot;EAR&amp;quot;</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">wtf</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Qatar's Role in Igniting a Sunni-Shia Strife in Entire Mideast for Israel's Benefit</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:07:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=4da_1371074760</link>
      <dc:creator>Eretz_Zen2</dc:creator>
      <description>Since the beginning of the Syrian crisis, Qatar has played a leading role in the supply of weapons and terrorists into Syria to topple the secular Syrian government in order to replace it by a hardline Wahhabi state, similar to those in Saudi Arabia &amp;amp; Qatar, the &quot;beacons of democracy&quot;.

This war's sectarian nature has been nurtured by calls for Jihad made by Qatar-backed religious clerics such as al-Qaradawi, who is based in Qatar and holds Qatari citizenship, even though he is of Egyptian origin.

Recent events show massacres of Shiites (Shia Muslims) and Alawites in Syria committed by Wahhabi Qatar-backed rebels based only on sectarian motives, following calls by al-Qaradawi for Sunnis to go fight Shiites in Syria.</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=4da_1371074760</guid>
            <media:content>
                <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">Eretz_Zen2</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/s/s/20/media20/2013/Jun/12/4f4ad591695f_embed_thumbnail_1371074846.jpg?d5e8cc8eccfb6039332f41f6249e92b06c91b4db65f5e99818bad0974b42d3d342b1&amp;ec_rate=200" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Qatar's Role in Igniting a Sunni-Shia Strife in Entire Mideast for Israel's Benefit</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">syria, qatar, fsa, free, syrian, army, saa, arab, gulf, states, wahhabis, salafis, salafists, jihadists, jihadis, sunnis, shiites, shias, divide, war, strife, israel, nato, turkey, saudi, arabia, hezbollah</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>ENG Subs | 50 000 Ukrainian And Russian Veterans Ask Bashar Assad For &lt;span class=&quot;highlight&quot;&gt;Citizenship&lt;/span&gt; To Fight FSA </title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 00:26:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c50_1370751956</link>
      <dc:creator>helle</dc:creator>
      <description>ENG Subs 
 50 000 Ukrainian And Russian Veterans Ask Bashar Assad For Citizenship To Fight FSA</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c50_1370751956</guid>
            <media:content>
                <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">helle</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/s/s/20/media20/2013/Jun/9/9eabe3401887_embed_thumbnail_1370751957.jpg?d5e8cc8eccfb6039332f41f6249e92b06c91b4db65f5e99818bad0974b42d3d342b1&amp;ec_rate=200" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>ENG Subs | 50 000 Ukrainian And Russian Veterans Ask Bashar Assad For &lt;span class=&quot;highlight&quot;&gt;Citizenship&lt;/span&gt; To Fight FSA </media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">syria, fsa, saa</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Opinions on Race</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 06:52:34 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5eb_1370169322</link>
      <dc:creator>piruly</dc:creator>
      <description>Pi NOTES: On Race and Cultures   (Pt. 1 of a series)

Attempts at clarifying differences between race, culture, and citizenship.

  Length: 6:57  

All responses welcomed.</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5eb_1370169322</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/5eb_1370169322" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/5eb_1370169322" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">piruly</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Jun/2/08f91717b08d_thumb_2.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Opinions on Race</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Race, Culture, YourSay, Public Opinions, Nationality, Citizenship</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Bilderberg 2013: The Official Attendees List</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:40:36 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=62d_1370899751</link>
      <dc:creator>CaptainJamaicanNinja</dc:creator>
      <description>The annual Bilderberg conference, a secretive meeting reuniting some of the world's most powerful politicians, bankers, media moguls, CEOs and policy makers (in other words, the elite) is taking place from June 6 to June 9th. As usual, there's a media blackout surrounding the event - except for some British papers as the meeting is taking place in Watford, UK.

This is one of the meetings where REAL decisions are taken and were policies are agreed upon. Elected politicians basically take orders from these types of elite circles.

Thanks to &quot;conspiracy theorists&quot;, the meetings get a little more attention every year. However, the few media sources that attempt to access the 5-star Grove Hotel won't be able to see much. In fact, a &quot;Great Wall of Watford&quot; has been erected around the premises of the hotel.

Some notable attendees at this year's conference are Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde and former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger (he's a regular at all these kinds of meetings). Here's the complete list.




FRACastries, Henri deChairman and CEO, AXA GroupDEUAchleitner, Paul M.Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AGDEUAckermann, JosefChairman of the Board, Zurich Insurance Group LtdGBRAgius, MarcusFormer Chairman, Barclays plcGBRAlexander, HelenChairman, UBM plcUSAAltman, Roger C.Executive Chairman, Evercore PartnersFINApunen, MattiDirector, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVAUSAAthey, SusanProfessor of Economics, Stanford Graduate School of BusinessTURAydintasbas, AsliColumnist, Milliyet NewspaperTURBabacan, AliDeputy Prime Minister for Economic and Financial AffairsGBRBalls, Edward M.Shadow Chancellor of the ExchequerPRTBalsem~ao, Francisco PintoChairman and CEO, IMPRESAFRABarr'e, NicolasManaging Editor, Les EchosINTBarroso, Jos'e M. Dur~aoPresident, European CommissionFRABaverez, NicolasPartner, Gibson, Dunn &amp;amp; Crutcher LLPFRABavinchove, Olivier deCommander, EurocorpsGBRBell, JohnRegius Professor of Medicine, University of OxfordITABernab`e, FrancoChairman and CEO, Telecom Italia S.p.A.USABezos, JeffFounder and CEO, Amazon.comSWEBildt, CarlMinister for Foreign AffairsSWEBorg, AndersMinister for FinanceNLDBoxmeer, Jean Francois vanChairman of the Executive Board and CEO, Heineken N.V.NORBrandtzaeg, Svein RichardPresident and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASAAUTBronner, OscarPublisher, Der Standard MedienweltGBRCarrington, PeterFormer Honorary Chairman, Bilderberg MeetingsESPCebri'an, Juan LuisExecutive Chairman, Grupo PRISACANClark, W. EdmundPresident and CEO, TD Bank GroupGBRClarke, KennethMember of ParliamentDNKCorydon, BjarneMinister of FinanceGBRCowper-Coles, SherardBusiness Development Director, International, BAE Systems plcITACucchiani, Enrico TommasoCEO, Intesa Sanpaolo SpABELDavignon, EtienneMinister of State; Former Chairman, Bilderberg MeetingsGBRDavis, IanSenior Partner Emeritus, McKinsey &amp;amp; CompanyNLDDijkgraaf, Robbert H.Director and Leon Levy Professor, Institute for Advanced StudyTURDincer, HalukPresident, Retail and Insurance Group, Sabanci Holding A.S.GBRDudley, RobertGroup Chief Executive, BP plcUSAEberstadt, Nicholas N.Henry Wendt Chair in Political Economy, American Enterprise InstituteNOREide, Espen BarthMinister of Foreign AffairsSWEEkholm, B&quot;orjePresident and CEO, Investor ABDEUEnders, ThomasCEO, EADSUSAEvans, J. MichaelVice Chairman, Goldman Sachs &amp;amp; Co.DNKFederspiel, UlrikExecutive Vice President, Haldor Topsoe A/SUSAFeldstein, Martin S.Professor of Economics, Harvard University; President Emeritus, NBERFRAFillon, FrancoisFormer Prime MinisterUSAFishman, Mark C.President, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical ResearchGBRFlint, Douglas J.Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plcIRLGallagher, PaulSenior CounselUSAGeithner, Timothy F.Former Secretary of the TreasuryUSAGfoeller, MichaelPolitical ConsultantUSAGraham, Donald E.Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post CompanyDEUGrillo, UlrichCEO, Grillo-Werke AGITAGruber, LilliJournalist - Anchorwoman, La 7 TVESPGuindos, Luis deMinister of Economy and CompetitivenessGBRGulliver, StuartGroup Chief Executive, HSBC Holdings plcCHEGutzwiller, FelixMember of the Swiss Council of StatesNLDHalberstadt, VictorProfessor of Economics, Leiden University; Former Honorary Secretary  General of Bilderberg MeetingsFINHeinonen, OlliSenior Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School of GovernmentGBRHenry, SimonCFO, Royal Dutch Shell plcFRAHermelin, PaulChairman and CEO, Capgemini GroupESPIsla, PabloChairman and CEO, Inditex GroupUSAJacobs, Kenneth M.Chairman and CEO, LazardUSAJohnson, James A.Chairman, Johnson Capital PartnersCHEJordan, Thomas J.Chairman of the Governing Board, Swiss National BankUSAJordan, Jr., Vernon E.Managing Director, Lazard Freres &amp;amp; Co. LLCUSAKaplan, Robert D.Chief Geopolitical Analyst, StratforUSAKarp, AlexFounder and CEO, Palantir TechnologiesGBRKerr, JohnIndependent Member, House of LordsUSAKissinger, Henry A.Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.USAKleinfeld, KlausChairman and CEO, AlcoaNLDKnot, Klaas H.W.President, De Nederlandsche BankTURKoc, Mustafa V.Chairman, Koc Holding A.S.DEUKoch, RolandCEO, Bilfinger SEUSAKravis, Henry R.Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp;amp; Co.USAKravis, Marie-Jos'eeSenior Fellow and Vice Chair, Hudson InstituteCHEKudelski, Andr'eChairman and CEO, Kudelski GroupGRCKyriacopoulos, UlyssesChairman, S&amp;amp;B Industrial Minerals S.A.INTLagarde, ChristineManaging Director, International Monetary FundDEULauk, Kurt J.Chairman of the Economic Council to the CDU, BerlinUSALessig, LawrenceRoy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard Law School; Director, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard UniversityBELLeysen, ThomasChairman of the Board of Directors, KBC GroupDEULindner, ChristianParty Leader, Free Democratic Party (FDP NRW)SWEL&quot;ofven, StefanParty Leader, Social Democratic Party (SAP)DEUL&quot;oscher, PeterPresident and CEO, Siemens AGGBRMandelson, PeterChairman, Global Counsel; Chairman, Lazard InternationalUSAMathews, Jessica T.President, Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceCANMcKenna, FrankChair, Brookfield Asset ManagementGBRMicklethwait, JohnEditor-in-Chief, The EconomistFRAMontbrial, Thierry dePresident, French Institute for International RelationsITAMonti, MarioFormer Prime MinisterUSAMundie, Craig J.Senior Advisor to the CEO, Microsoft CorporationITANagel, AlbertoCEO, MediobancaNLDNetherlands, H.R.H. Princess Beatrix of TheUSANg, Andrew Y.Co-Founder, CourseraFINOllila, JormaChairman, Royal Dutch Shell, plcGBROmand, DavidVisiting Professor, King's College LondonGBROsborne, GeorgeChancellor of the ExchequerUSAOttolenghi, EmanueleSenior Fellow, Foundation for Defense of DemocraciesTUR&quot;Ozel, SoliSenior Lecturer, Kadir Has University; Columnist, Habert&quot;urk NewspaperGRCPapahelas, AlexisExecutive Editor, Kathimerini NewspaperTURPavey, SafakMember of Parliament (CHP)FRAP'ecresse, Val'erieMember of Parliament (UMP)USAPerle, Richard N.Resident Fellow, American Enterprise InstituteUSAPetraeus, David H.General, U.S. Army (Retired)PRTPortas, PauloMinister of State and Foreign AffairsCANPrichard, J. Robert S.Chair, Torys LLPINTReding, VivianeVice President and Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, European CommissionCANReisman, Heather M.CEO, Indigo Books &amp;amp; Music Inc.FRARey, H'el`eneProfessor of Economics, London Business SchoolGBRRobertson, SimonPartner, Robertson Robey Associates LLP; Deputy Chairman, HSBC HoldingsITARocca, GianfeliceChairman,Techint GroupPOLRostowski, JacekMinister of Finance and Deputy Prime MinisterUSARubin, Robert E.Co-Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations; Former Secretary of the TreasuryNLDRutte, MarkPrime MinisterAUTSchieder, AndreasState Secretary of FinanceUSASchmidt, Eric E.Executive Chairman, Google Inc.AUTScholten, RudolfMember of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AGPRTSeguro, Ant'onio Jos'eSecretary General, Socialist PartyFRASenard, Jean-DominiqueCEO, Michelin GroupNORSkogen Lund, KristinDirector General, Confederation of Norwegian EnterpriseUSASlaughter, Anne-MarieBert G. Kerstetter '66 University Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton UniversityIRLSutherland, Peter D.Chairman, Goldman Sachs InternationalGBRTaylor, MartinFormer Chairman, Syngenta AGINTThiam, TidjaneGroup CEO, Prudential plcUSAThiel, Peter A.President, Thiel CapitalUSAThompson, Craig B.President and CEO, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterDNKTopsoe, Jakob HaldorPartner, AMBROX Capital A/SFINUrpilainen, JuttaMinister of FinanceCHEVasella, Daniel L.Honorary Chairman, Novartis AGGBRVoser, Peter R.CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plcCANWall, BradPremier of SaskatchewanSWEWallenberg, JacobChairman, Investor ABUSAWarsh, KevinDistinguished Visiting Fellow, The Hoover Institution, Stanford UniversityCANWeston, Galen G.Executive Chairman, Loblaw Companies LimitedGBRWilliams of Crosby, ShirleyMember, House of LordsGBRWolf, Martin H.Chief Economics Commentator, The Financial TimesUSAWolfensohn, James D.Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn and CompanyGBRWright, DavidVice Chairman, Barclays plcINTZoellick, Robert B.Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Peterson Institute for International Economics

According to bilderbergmeetings.org, here's the official agenda.
o Can the US and Europe grow faster and create jobs?
o Jobs, entitlement and debt
o How big data is changing almost everything
o Nationalism and populism
o US foreign policy
o Africa's challenges
o Cyber warfare and the proliferation of asymmetric threats
o Major trends in medical research
o Online education: promise and impacts
o Politics of the European Union
o Developments in the Middle East
o Current affairs</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=62d_1370899751</guid>
            <media:content>
                <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">CaptainJamaicanNinja</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/nopreview.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Bilderberg 2013: The Official Attendees List</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">bilderberg, meeting, hang, the, bankers</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Locksmith who became a midwife:&amp;quot; When I saw the legs I had to childbirth wife&amp;quot;</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:42:27 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6c8_1370889261</link>
      <dc:creator>Spookysox</dc:creator>
      <description>- When I saw the baby's feet, I knew I had to childbirth wife. The only thing I was afraid that the child does not choke, because I do not know how to go the whole procedure, but as soon as I turned back, she started crying and I knew then that everything was okay - begins his story Milan Golubovic (29) locksmith from Obrenovca , who yesterday morning I gave birth to his wife Sonja. 

Sonja Golubovic (22) of Obrenovca woke her husband Milan yesterday morning at 15 to five as she felt a pain in his stomach.

 
- I immediately called the owner of the apartment and after I got a referral to the emergency room, about six o'clock we went to Belgrade. Somewhere in the deep, at the entrance to Umka, Sonja water broke. It is all the time talking about how to give birth, he can not resist. As she cried, so Master Stanko brakes instead of revs, and he was traumatized - the story of Milan Golubovic.

The road from Belgrade to Umke Golubovic family seemed like an eternity. 

- We came to town, but Cukarici crowd. I saw that her husband will not izdzati to the maternity ward, and I said to the boss to draw and to park because I have that birth - talk excitedly Milan. 

As soon as the landlord of the apartment in which they live and Sonia Milan stopped the car, giving birth began. First, the feet, and then Milan's wife pressed the stomach and the baby was born. 

- When I saw the baby's feet, I knew I had to childbirth wife. People who were around me asked me if I was okay, because they say that I was completely yellow - recalls the wonderful moment Milan. 

While the labor-time, in the back of the car all the time sitting biennial Mia, the first child of Sonja and Milan. 

- It was quiet all the time, not crying, just sitting and watching what happens. When the baby cried, he just started repeating, &quot;baby, baby, cry!&quot; - Milan says, adding: 

- We will name her Elena,it  does not have any special stories related to that name, It's just kinda nice - said Milan. 

After giving birth successfully, mom and baby to be transferred to hospital. 

- I am infinitely grateful to the people of &quot;Frikom&quot;, which helped to go to the hospital.For ten minutes they arrived in Visegrad, and there were doctors and nurses waited because I had nothing to cut the umbilical cord, so it all had to do it immediately. When you have completed all the examinations, they told me that Elena tough 3,250 grams and is 52 centimeters long - said Milan and added: 

- Both my wife and baby are well, we often call them to hear that, and she keeps asking for Mia, how and what for. 

Sonja and Milan Golubovic live near Belgrade, have been married for two years, and in Milan says they met through Facebook. Milan working as a locksmith, and Sonja unemployed and still did not get Serbian citizenship because she was born in Bosnia.</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6c8_1370889261</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/6c8_1370889261" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/6c8_1370889261" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">Spookysox</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Jun/10/b3906842d24e_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Locksmith who became a midwife:&amp;quot; When I saw the legs I had to childbirth wife&amp;quot;</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">midwife,childbirth</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
                    <item>
      <title>Arabs living in Israel prefer it over any Arab country</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 04:20:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <link>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=929_1370765654</link>
      <dc:creator>aydeo</dc:creator>
      <description>The majority of Arab-Israeli citizens will tell you they have it pretty good, and would prefer living in Israel than in an Arab country.  Moreover, a couple of years ago, when the PA threatened to annex eastern Jerusalem, the Israeli Office of Immigration was flooded with Arabs wanting to apply for Israeli citizenship. What does that tell you? 

By Dan Calic

Once again we hear voices crying out that Israel is a &quot;racist&quot; state. Should we be surprised? Not really. Why is it that every other group of people can have at least one national homeland where they are the clear majority? Yet, if the same privilege is accorded to Jews it's called &quot;racist,&quot; or the other famous term - &quot;apartheid state.&quot;

 
Israel is located in the center of the Middle East. This region is comprised of 22 Arab countries, which cover over five million square miles, with a combined population of more than 350 million people, over 90% of whom are Muslim. The 6+ million Jews who live in Israel make up roughly 1.7% of the region's population, so the Arabs enjoy an overwhelming majority of the regional ethnicity.
The Jews and Israel have been under constant threat of annihilation since the day independence was declared in May 1948. Have the 350 million Arabs lived under such a threat from Israel for the past 65 years?

 
Within Israel itself, slightly over 20% of the population is Arab. They enjoy all the benefits of citizenship. They vote, own homes, businesses, property, serve in the Knesset and Supreme Court. Plus, they are excused from serving in the army. Is there a single Arab country where Jews enjoy these same rights? Not one.

 
The majority of Arab-Israeli citizens will tell you they have it pretty good, and would prefer living in Israel than in an Arab country. Moreover, a couple of years ago, when the PA threatened to annex eastern Jerusalem, the Israeli Office of Immigration was flooded with Arabs wanting to apply for Israeli citizenship. What does that tell you?

 
So why all the talk of racism? Some may say Israel needs to be more &quot;democratic.&quot; Well, in fact, everyone in Israel gets to vote. So why the complaints?

 
It seems the problem is pretty easy to identify. The basis for the complaints can be based on only one thing: Jews are the majority and want to remain the majority.

Danes are the majority in Denmark, Swiss are the majority in Switzerland, Muslims are the majority in 22 countries, but no one is accusing any of these countries of racism. Yet if six million Jews are the majority in a country which is the size of New Jersey this is deemed &quot;racist,&quot; one cannot help but wonder what truly motivates those who make such accusations.

 
Israel is a democracy which among other things allows freedom of speech. Thus, those who voice such complaints are allowed to and are protected under the law. Would Jews be allowed similar privilege as citizens of Arab countries? Hardly.
I think the Arab citizens of Israel who complain don't know or appreciate how good they have it. They should be thankful for the right to speak out without the police banging down their door and dragging them off to a dark jail cell to be held without trial.

 
If Israel is seen as &quot;racist&quot; because it's the only country in the world where Jews are the majority, let the accusations come, and consider the source of the accusers.

If Israel acquiesces, the Jewish nation becomes extinct, which is precisely what the accusers prefer.


 http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4389583,00.html 



First,Last photos: Huda Nakash, Hot Arab model from Israel</description>
      <guid>http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=929_1370765654</guid>
      <enclosure type="application/x-shockwave-flash" url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/929_1370765654" />      <media:content>
        <media:player url="http://www.liveleak.com/e/929_1370765654" />        <media:credit role="author" scheme="http://www.liveleak.com">aydeo</media:credit>
                <media:thumbnail url="http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/thumbs/2013/Jun/9/bf95d7a21de1_thumb_1.jpg" width="120" height="90" />
        <media:title>Arabs living in Israel prefer it over any Arab country</media:title>
        <media:category label="Tags">Arabs,Prefer,Israel,Arab countries</media:category>
      </media:content>
    </item>
              </channel></rss>
	  