http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=huminski Sat, 25 May 2013 21:39:52 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=huminski Sat, 26 May 2012 10:36:10 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=589_1338042218 sheriff_joe_arpaio The Justice Department has not opposed the intervention of a 2nd Plaintiff in the USA v. ARPAIO civil rights lawsuit, United States of American v. Maricopa County, et al., United States District Court (Arizona). The deadline for this filing is due on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. Intervenor-Plaintiff, Scott Huminski, has filed two sworn documents in the case detailing extreme misconduct concerning Arpaio and other Maricopa County government entities rising to the level of federal civil rights crimes. The sworn court documents set forth vast constitutional violations perpetrated by Gilbert, AZ, Surprise, AZ, Maricopa County and many officials within the aforementioned agencies. Fed Court Issues order in USA v. Arpaio, http://www.scribd.com/doc/94058989/Fed-Court-Issues-Order-in-USA-DOJ-v-ARPAIO-Arizona This regards the controversial motion filed by an Intervenor-Plaintiff which, under oath, swears to evidence of First Amendment retaliation by MCSO/Sheriff Arpaio. Original Motion to Intervene at, http://www.scribd.com/jarpaio_1/d/93245267-USA-DOJ-v-Arpaio-2nd-Plaintiff-files http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=589_1338042218 sheriff_joe_arpaio USA v. Arpaio, Justice Department Court Position, re:Intervention Arpaio, United States, Maricopa, huminski, civil rights, racist, profiling, first amendment, Gilbert, surprise, arizona Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:53:58 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ed0_1267127229 jz12345 Los Angeles Human Rights activist Dr Joseph Zernik filed today repeat request with the United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, in New York City, for copies of the November 5, 2004, Summary Order in Scott Huminski v Town of Bennington, Vermont, et al (03-7036), which were previously denied by the same office. Such Order, issued in the names of three circuit judges, including today Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, was unsigned, and was previously claimed by Dr Zernik as fraud on both Scott Huminski - Appellant in the case, and also on the US Senate - since then Circuit Judge Sotomayor listed it in her statement to the Senate's Judiciary Committee as one of her decisions. In fact, Dr Zernik claimed that such paper could never be an honest, valid, and effectual decision of the court, and could never be a Summary Order as falsely represented, since it lacked affirmation by the circuit judges, moreover, the attestation by the clerk, if any ever existed, was concealed from public access. Links: February 25, 2010 Request for 2nd Circuit court records in Huminski v Town of Bennington, Vermont (03-7036) http://www.scribd.com/doc/27471018/10-02-25-Huminski-v-Town-of-Bennington-Vermont-et-al-03-7036-Repeat-request-to-access-2nd-Circuit-court-records-s November 5, 2004 Summary Order in Huminski v Town of Bennington, Vermont (03-7036), unsigned, and lacking attestation by Clerk of the Court. http://www.scribd.com/doc/27383122/04-11-05-Huminski-v-Bennington-03-7036-US-App-Ct-2nd-Unsigned-Order-Judgment-Affirming-Vermont-Court-Judgment June 10, 2009 Appendix to then Circuit Judge Sotomayor statement to the US Senate Judiciary Committee as part of her nomination hearings as Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court. The Summary Order in Huminski v Town of Bennington Vermont (03-7036) was listed on page 97. http://www.scribd.com/doc/27382924/09-06-04-US-Senate-Judiciary-Committee-then-Circuit-Judge-Sotomayor-s-Questionnaire-Appendix Alleged fraud on Scott Huminski and on US Senate by today Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor http://www.scribd.com/doc/27386331/10-02-24-Humainski-v-Town-of-Bennington-Vermont-Alleged-Fraud-by-Justice-Sotomayor-s http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ed0_1267127229 jz12345 10-02-25 US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, requested to provide copies of order by US Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor, alleged as fraud. Sotomayor, fraud, huminski, NEFs Sat, 19 May 2012 12:24:57 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f23_1337444291 sheriff_joe_arpaio The entire music channel of Scott X and the Constitution Commandos is dedicated to fighting the corruption and unconstitutional conduct of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Fed Court Issues order in USA v. Arpaio, http://www.scribd.com/doc/94058989/Fed-Court-Issues-Order-in-USA-DOJ-v-ARPAIO-Arizona This regards the controversial motion filed by an Intervenor-Plaintiff which, under oath, swears to evidence of First Amendment retaliation by MCSO/Sheriff Arpaio. Original Motion to Intervene at, http://www.scribd.com/jarpaio_1/d/93245267-USA-DOJ-v-Arpaio-2nd-Plaintiff-files http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f23_1337444291 sheriff_joe_arpaio USA v. ARPAIO, 2nd Plaintiff's Video Sheriff,joe,arpaio,justice,department,rights,constitution,civil rights,immigration,illegal,immigrants,mcso,arizona,maricopa,huminski,scott x,commandos Thu, 17 May 2012 15:09:57 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=27f_1337281385 sheriff_joe_arpaio Court filing of 2nd plaintiff in USA-DOJ v. ARPAIO. http://www.scribd.com/jarpaio_1/d/93245267-USA-DOJ-v-Arpaio-2nd-Plaintiff-files http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=27f_1337281385 sheriff_joe_arpaio Justice Department v. Arpaio - 2nd plaintiff files arpaio,justice department,doj,sheriff,huminski,civil rights,lawsuit Fri, 15 Feb 2013 04:44:22 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cdc_1360921039 scottxl Catholic torture of a political activist now before U.S. high court. Huminski v. Mercy Gilbert Mecical Center. Court papers reveal an unholy alliance between Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, Federal Judge Frederick Martone (both life-long Catholics) and a Catholic Church hospital network, Dignity Health, and their efforts to silence a critic of the racist sheriff with an attempted murder and torture at a Catholic hospital, Mercy Gilbert Medical Center, Gilbert, Arizona. 12.0pt">Court papers are at, Filing in the U.S. Supreme Court of a case, according to undisputed court papers, of torture of a critic of life-long Catholic Sheriff Joe Arpaio by the Catholic Church affiliated hospital network, Dignity Health. Undisputed allegations in court papers allege forced drugging, forced nudity, forced unnatural restraint, conduct akin to water-boarding, forced irradiation and assault & battery. Life-long catholic federal judge Frederick J. Martone, U.S. District Judge (Arizona), refused to enjoin the torture and dismissed the case. According to court papers, the video surveillance data at Mercy Gilbert Medical Center in Gilbert Arizona that captured the events was destroyed by the Catholic Church. Court papers allege a pattern and custom of conduct by the Catholic Church and Dignity Health to cover-up criminal conduct in a manner consistent with the church's handling of child sex abuse cases. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=cdc_1360921039 scottxl Catholic Church Torture case in U.S. Supreme Court - Pope Resigns pope resigns, catholic, torture, supreme, court Sun, 11 Mar 2012 16:27:25 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e7a_1331497091 HumanRightsAlert Ex Parte Receivership over the Person and Property of Defendant Jeffrey Baron - racketeering in the US District Court in Texas is patronized by the US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit In a litigation, which was commenced with the issuance of fraudulent, invalid summons, Judge ROYAL FERGUSON is presiding since May 2009 with no Assignment Order. Following dispute over attorneys fees, ROYAL FERGUSON purported to establish in November 2010 an http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e7a_1331497091 HumanRightsAlert Racketeering in the US District Court in Texas is patronized by the US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit CORRUPTION, JUDGE ROYAL FERGUSON Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:55:01 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=035_1331383942 HumanRightsAlert The docket of the case made it evident all along that the case in the US District Court, Central District of California under Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS and Clerk TERRY NAFISI, amounted to Fraud on the Court. Now, Freedom of Information response by the US Department of Justice provides the definitive evidence - a simulated summons and a simulated authentication record of the October 2010 Judgment. Such Fraud on the US Courts from coast to coast has been typically reserved for cases, where the Civil Rights of individuals are abused to benefit banks, large corporations, and corrupt government officials. Apparently, Log Cabin Republicans got wealthy and influential enough to purchase Fraud on the Court through the services of a large banking law firm - CASE & WHITE, LLP. The case of Log Cabin Republicans is the first to document Fraud on the Court for the protection of Civil Rights... View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/84809130/ "Apparently, Log Cabin Republicans got wealthy and influential enough to purchase Fraud on the Court through the services of a large banking law firm - Case & White, LLP.," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "Now we have the definitive proof, thanks to the Freedom of Information response by the US Department of Justice." Today, Human Rights Alert published its reply on the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response by the US Department of Justice. The FOIA response was substandard, yet it provided the definitive evidence of the conduct of simulated litigation in the US District Court, Southern District of California: A simulated summons record, missing the seal of the court, required by US law. A simulated, invalid authentication record (NEF) for the October 2010 Judgment by Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS, missing the Electronic Document Stamp, required by the General Order 08-02 of the US District Court, Central District of California. A simulated, invalid authentication record for the October 2010 Notice of Appeal. Clerk of the District Court TERRY NAFISI had previously denied access to these records, in patent disregard of First Amendment and Common Law rights to access court records. The FOIA response was also notable in the records that it failed to provide: Assignment Order for Judge GEORGE CHIAVELLI Assignment Order for Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPS Authentication records (NEFs) for various Minutes and Orders by either Judges. Human Rights Alert has previously published extensive documentation of the Fraud on the Court in the litigation of the case in the US District Court, based on the docket records themselves: US Judges GEORGE SCHIAVELLI and VIRGINIA PHILLIPS appeared as Presiding Judges in the case, both with no Assignment Orders. Absent Assignment Order in a specific case, a US judge has no authority to adjudicate in the matter. In 2004 Judge GEORGE SCHIAVELLI issued a judgment in the case, in favor of the United States. The judgment was listed in the PACER docket as http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=035_1331383942 HumanRightsAlert Log Cabin Republicans - protecting Civil Rights through bankers' Fraud on the Court corruption, US courts Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:03:59 -0500 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=408_1331304930 HumanRightsAlert With the introduction of electronic records (PACER and CM/ECF), the US courts have ambiguated the authentication of court records to the point that even experienced attorneys cannot distinguish between valid and simulated records, while the US courts from coast to coast engage in the large-scale publication of fraudulent records. The US legal profession, as a class is more loyal to the guild than to the US Constitution. It is unlikely that the US would emerge from the current financial and constitutional crisis, unless corruption of the US courts is addressed. "Some experienced US attorneys have repeatedly disputed or doubted my opinion regarding the large-scale fraud in the US courts," says Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "Now we have the US court provide the definitive evidence." Today, Human Rights Alert published a docket from the US District Court, Central District of California, where Chief Judge AUDREY COLLINS in fact admitted that a simulated, invalid court order had been published by the court. Dr Zernik has previously published and presented evidence of the large-scale fraud in the US courts records in an international computer science conference and in the 2010 World Criminology Congress. Dr Zernik has also created an online archive of such fraudulent US court records from coast to coast. Additional evidence was independently discovered by PROPUBLICA and published both by PROPUBLICA and the NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL. Similar evidence was produced by Dr Zernik, pertaining to large-scale fraud in SUSTAIN, the case management system developed by the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, now implemented in 11 states. The evidence regarding large-scale fraud in the records of the California courts was part of the evidence presented by Human Rights Alert in its 2010 submission to the United Nations. The United Nations consequently noted in its official report "corruption of the courts and the legal profession... in California." Regardless, all US law professors or computing experts, which were asked, refused to opine on the matter, including, but not limited to Harvard law Dean MARTHA MINOW, Yale law Dean ROBERT POST, and Harvard law professors YOCHAI BENKLER and RICHARD FALLON. Likewise, no scholarly journal in the US, to which papers on the matter were submitted, agreed to subject them to peer-review for publication. The evidence of fraud in the US courts records was also filed with the US COURT OF APPEALS, 9TH CIRCUIT, and the US SUPREME COURT. Both refused to rule on the matter, while continuing in litigation of cases, based on fraudulent records from the US district courts. "The legal profession in the United States, including judges, as a class, is primarily loyal to guild, not to the US Constitution," says Dr Zernik. More recently, OCCUPY THE COURTS has focused on the role of the US courts in corruption of the US government and banking system under the current crisis. "I doubt that even the Occupiers realize how central the courts are to the current crisis," adds Dr Zernik,"The evidence suggests widespread bribing of state and US judges by the banks." A series of California and US judges have refused to answer on requests to disclose financial benefits to them, if any, by BANK OF AMERICA, while continuing to engage in Fraud on the Court in cases involving BANK OF AMERICA. Similar conditions prevailed in the US courts a century ago, during the notorious Robber Baron Era, which led to the Great Depression. At that time, the US courts were described by the US Congress as "a burlesque". Consequently, laws were enacted by Congress to reform of the US courts. Both then and now, corruption of the offices of the Clerks of the Courts, who hold the duty to safeguard the integrity of the US courts' records, was central to the corruption. "It is unlikely that the US would emerge from the current financial and constitutional crisis, unless corruption of the US courts is addressed," concludes Dr Zernik. ### Joseph Zernik, PhD ____ LINKS: 12-01-11 In RE: R G (2:11-mc-00284) in the US District Court, Central District of California - minutes, orders, judgments issued with invalid NEFs are invalid court records http://www.scribd.com/doc/84376206/ "Simulated litigation", "simulated decisions", "simulated service" here refer to conduct defined in the Texas Criminal Code as follows: Texas Penal Code http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=408_1331304930 HumanRightsAlert The US Courts Engage in Large-scale Fraud on the People Fraud, Corruption, Occupy the Courts, US courts, electronic records Wed, 07 Apr 2010 21:52:40 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=19e_1270691482 jz12345 Los Angeles, April 7 - Dr Joseph Zernik, founder of Human Rights Alert, a Los Angeles-based NGO, who has been actively producing a Human Rights report for the 2010 review of the United States by the United Nations, was requested to appear for an "interview" by the US Marshal Service at the "earliest convenience" (attached below). The request was related to notices filed by Dr Zernik with Chief Judge Audrey Collins, of US District Court, Los Angeles, to reliably inform her regarding alleged fraud in court records and procedures related to (a) the falsely hospitalized Richard Fine, and (b) individuals involved in litigations against financial institutions. The request for "interview" by the US Marshal Service was perceived as an unveiled threat against Dr Zernik's conduct in exposing corruption of the courts and the justice system, in noticing those responsible, and in asking for responses - for incorporation in his report, and for corrective actions, pursuant to the Code of Conduct of US Judges. LINKS: April 7, 2010 Draft report by Human Rights Alert and Dr Joseph Zernik for the United Nations review of the United States. http://www.scribd.com/doc/29564374/10-04-07-Revised-Draft-Human-Rights-Alert-UPR-Submission-s April 7, 2010 request for "interview" of Dr Joseph Zernik by the US Marshal Service, and Dr Zernik's response. http://www.scribd.com/doc/29570298 Notice filed by Dr Zernik with Chief Judge Audrey Collins, of US District Court, Los Angeles, regarding alleged fraud in court records and procedures related to the falsely hospitalized Richard Fine http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6e1_1269561980 Notice filed by Dr Zernik with Chief Judge Audrey Collins, of US District Court, Los Angeles, regarding alleged fraud in court records and procedures related to litigations of individuals against financial institutions. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=102_1269679897 ATTACHED: Human Rights Alert PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750 Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net Blog: http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert 10-04-07 Request for "Interview" of Dr Joseph Zernik by US Marshal Service and Response. At 02:03 PM 4/7/2010, Deputy Marshall Smith wrote: Mr. Zernik, I would very much like to conduct an interview with you regarding your emails to Chief US District Court Judge Audrey Collins, please contact me at your earliest convenience. Deputy Darcy M Smith District Threat Investigator US Marshal Service Los Angeles, CA 213-494-0377 At 05:49 PM 4/7/2010, Dr Joseph Zernik wrote: Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:49:37 -0700 To: "Smith, Darcy \(USMS\)" From: joseph zernik Subject: Request by US Marshal Service for an "interview", and response by Dr Joseph Zernik - founder of Human Rights Alert. April 7, 2010 Dear Deputy Marshal Smith: Thank you for your written request for an "interview", copied below. 1) Please inform me of the legal foundation for such request for "interview". 2) Please be informed that our communications are copied to the United Nations, as an attempt to intimidate a person who is preparing a report for the first ever, Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights record of the United States. 3) To correct the record - I never emailed directly to Chief Judge Audrey Collins, instead I emailed to the Clerk - to reliably inform the Chief Judge of alleged fraud in US District Court records and in litigations related to (a) the falsely hospitalized Richard Fine, and (b) other individuals who are involved in litigations against financial institutions. Such notices were filed with the Chief Judge, in order to seek initiation of corrective actions, pursuant to the Code of Conduct of US Judges. , 4) In case my calls for restoration of integrity of the courts and the justice system are deemed as worthy of "interviews" by the US Marshal Service, I suggest that you read the entire body of my writing, at the web sites listed below. You should "interview" me at the same time regarding the following persons and institutions: a) Mr Alejandro Mayorkas - then US Attorney for the Central District of California, today Director of the US Immigration and Citizenship Services - regarding requests that I emailed to him to explain his conduct vis a vis the Rampart corruption scandal (1998-2000) of the Los Angeles justice system, and the ongoing confinement of thousands of Rampart-FIPs (Falsely Imprisoned Persons). b) Sheriff Department of Los Angeles County and Sheriff Lee Baca- for exposing the alleged fraud in the case management system of the Los Angeles jails, and demonstrating how it was used to deprive of thousands of Liberty, including, but not limited to the falsely hospitalized Richard Fine, and complaints which I forwarded to the Sheriff's Department in this regard. c) US district court system - in particular - Magistrate Carla Woehrle, Judge John Walter, Judge Richard Leon, Judge Virginia Phillips, for alleged large scale fraud in PACER and CM/ECF, which I have documented - and which allows the deprivation of Liberty and the Right for Possession of many, and email notices in that regard which I forwarded to the US Administrative Office of the Courts, and papers I forwarded to these judges in this regard. d) US court of appeals system, in particular - Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Alex Kozinski - for exposing alleged large scale fraud in the computer systems of the 9th Circuit, and fraud in orders issued in the name of judges of the 9th Circuit to deprive Richard Fine of Liberty. e) US Supreme Court - for alleged lack of integrity in the case management system of the highest court of the land, and notices which I forwarded in that regard. - Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy - regarding purported March 12, 2010 order denying application by the falsely hospitalized Richard Fine. - Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor - regarding alleged fraud in litigation of Huminski v Town of Bennington, Vermont, and also - alleged fraud in listing such false and deliberately misleading court papers as part of her judicial records for review by the Senate's Judiciary Committee. f)Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Chief Judge Charles McCoy and Clerk of the Court - John A Clarke - for allegations of large scale fraud in Sustain - its case management system, which as I documented was used to deprive of Liberty and the Right for Possession, and notices in that regard which I forwarded in this regard. g) California Court of Appeals, 2nd District - its Clerk of the Court Joseph Lane, and Justice James A Richman - Court of Appeals 1st District - for alleged fraud in their conduct through various case management systems, and notices which I forwarded in this regard. h) California Judicial Council and California Chief Justice - Ronald George - since I have documented the fraud in their conduct relative to retaining counsel to falsely represent judges in litigations - to deprive Richard Fine of Liberty, and forwarded notices to them in this regard. Moreover, I repeatedly requested Chief Justice George's comments, in registered letters, regarding Sustain the case management system, which according to his official biography was installed at a time that he served in leadership positions at the Los Angeles Court. I repeatedly claimed that the system is the enabling tool for racketeering by the judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court. i) Mr Kenneth Melson - then Director of US Department of Justice Office of United States Attorneys, and Mr Kenneth Kaiser -Assistant Director of FBI - since in complaint I filed with US Department of Justice Inspector General, I documented their fraud on US Congress, in responses that they filed with US Senator Dianne Feinstein and US Congresswoman Diane Watson. The latter two elected officials filed Congressional Inquiries on my behalf: Why FBI and US Department of Justice would respond on my request to provide equal protection in Los Angeles County, California, against alleged racketeering by judges? j) Angelo Mozilo and Sandor Samuels, of the former Countrywide Financial Corporation (CFC)- since I have documented starting with my January 2007 filing with FBI the large scale fraud in EDGE - CFC's underwriting monitoring system. k) Bank of America Corporation and Brian Moynihan, President - since I have documented fraud in Mr Moynihan's conduct starting December 10, 2008 - the date of his appointment as General Counsel to replace the ousted Mr Timothy Mayopoulos, and continuing to this date. I sent Mr Moynihan and Bank of America numerous notices in this regard. 4) I request that you also review the opinion by highly decorated FBI veteran and fraud expert James Wedick regarding real estate fraud perpetrated against me, and that you "interview" me at the same time on such matter as well. In November 2007 I was forced to leave my home and my property under the threat of force, unlawful by credible. My property was forcibly entered by Attorney David Pasternak, who claimed to take possession of it, albeit, with no valid legal foundation. He later conducted the fraud in conveyance of title, as opined by Mr Wedick. My property was taken for private use, and to this date I have never received a penny in compensation. My equity in the property amounted to close to $1 million. No local, state, or US agency has been willing to provide equal protection against such criminalities. I request that the US Marshal Service immediately return my lawful property at 320 South Peck Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90212, to my possession. Please notice: This case, which was opined as fraud involved no bankruptcy, no foreclosure, and no mortgage default of any kind. It was and is a case of willful criminality. There simply is no way to explain the conduct of those named above in this matter within the law of California, or the United States. 6) Please accept this notice as a request for Equal Protection under the law by the US Marshall Service against alleged abuse of my Constitutional, Civil, and Human Rights through ongoing pattern of racketeering activity by collusion of judges of the Los Angeles Superior Court, Attorney David Pasternak, the law firm of Bryan Cave, LLP, the former Countrywide Financial Corporation, Bank of America Corporation, and Mr Brian Moynihan. Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert CC: 1) United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights, Switzerland 2) Basel Accords Committee on international banking, Basel, Switzerland Attached: 1) Opinion letter of highly decorated FBI veteran, fraud expert James Wedick LINKS Notice to Chief Judge Audrey Collins regarding lack of integrity in US District Court litigations involving financial institutions, initiate corrections. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=102_1269679897 Richard Fine: "Smoking Gun" Discovered, Notice Filed to Inform Chief Judge Collins, Request to Initiate Corrections http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6e1_1269561980 Web sites carrying writings by Dr Joseph Zernik (partial list) http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner http://inproperinla.com/ Fraud expert - highly decorated FBI veteran James Wedick opinion letter: http://inproperinla.com/07-12-17-grant-deeds-wedick-s-opinion-s.pdf At 06:03 PM 4/7/2010, Dr Joseph Zernik wrote: Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:03:54 -0700 To: "Smith, Darcy \(USMS\)" From: joseph zernik Subject: Request by US Marshal Service for an "interview", and response by Dr Joseph Zernik - founder of Human Rights Alert. April 7, 2010 Dear Deputy Marshal Smith: I forgot to mention in my previous notice: l) California Attorney General and gubernatorial aspirant Jerry Brown - I wrote to him a number of times regarding (a) failure to provide equal protection to the 10 million residents of Los Angeles County against racketeering by judges, and (b) his failure to make any pronouncement regarding the fraudulent "retroactive immunities" (pardons) signed into California law on February 20, 2009 for all judges who took "not permitted" payments (bribes). I also called him "unfit to hold any public office". I insinuated that he was a hypocrite or lying when stating that he was "appalled by corruption", and that he had "never seen anything like that" (the San Bernardino corruption scandal). m) Circuit Judge Richard Posner, US Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit - I wrote to him a number of times, and asked that he seek the immediate resignation of his good friend, Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, for alleged fraud, perversion of justice, and collusion in racketeering by the latter in depriving Richard Fine of Liberty. There are still surely some that I forgot to enter on this list. If I remember them, I will send you supplements. Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=19e_1270691482 jz12345 Threat by US Marshals Service - Attempt to Muzzle US Human Rights Report to the United Nation for Upcoming Review Judicial Corruption, Los Angeles County, California Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:19:39 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=20a_1270657084 jz12345 Los Angeles, April 7 - in letter to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOC) Human Rights Alert - a Los Angeles-based NGO and Dr Joseph Zernik requested the AOC's comments/responses on allegations of large-scale shell game fraud in design and operations of the United States courts computer systems. The case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems were implemented at the courts in a massive project, overseen by the AOC, which lasted over a decade, at estimated cost of hundreds of millions of dollars. Response of the AOC was requested for inclusion in a report scheduled for submission by Human Rights Alert to the United Nations, as part of the first ever Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights record of the United States. The case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems of the US courts are alleged by Human Rights Alert as key to the precipitous deterioration of court integrity in the US in recent decades, and as the largest Shell Game Fraud in the history of mankind. The April 7 letter to AOC, copied below, made the following four specific claims: 1) Implementation of PACER and CM/ECF amounted to a sea change in court procedures. However, in no case that was examined, did the court comply with Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC SS2071-7. In all cases that were examined the courts failed to establish their new practices and procedure in Local Rules of Courts, as required by law. 2) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by concerted efforts to deny the public the Right to Access Court Records - to inspect and to copy. Such denial of access was most clearly seen in relationship to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) at the US district courts, and the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) at the US courts of appeals. The denial of the Right to Access Court Records was most blatant when applied to parties in litigations, who were pro se filers. 3) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by denial of the Right to Service and Notice - a cornerstone of Due Process Rights. Such denial of Service and Notice was directed in a discriminatory fashion against pro se filers. 4) In all cases that were examined, features were found in PACER and CM/ECF, which upon review by competent panels of jurisdiction, must be deemed as fraud both by design of the systems and in their current mode of operations. Such alleged fraud on the people was perpetrated in a concerted fashion by the United States judiciary as a class, enabling perversion of justice and denial of access to national tribunals for protection of rights. Review of the Human Rights record of the United States by the United Nations is due November 2010. Human Rights Alert claims in its report that the states and US courts are central to abuse of the Human Rights of the people in the United States. Attached: April 7, 2010 letter by Human Rights Alert to AOC 10-04-07 Requesting Comments, Responses by US Administrative Office of the Courts. April 7, 2010 Public Affairs Office Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts One Columbus Circle NE Washington, D.C. 20544 By email at http://www.uscourts.gov/comment.html By fax: 202.502.2633@metrofax.com The favor of response within 10 days is requested. Time is of the essence! RE: PACER and CM/ECF Dear Sir/Madam: Human Rights Alert, a Los Angeles-based NGO, is in final stages of preparing a report for submission to the United Nations as part of the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights record of the United States. Your comments and responses are requested regarding a series of papers, - where the nature of the case management/electronic case filing (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems of the United States courts were explored. The papers were mostly based on the systems as implemented at the US District Court, Central District of California, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit. However, additional district courts and one additional court of appeal were examined as well. The outcome of such examination can be summed as follows: 1) Implementation of PACER and CM/ECF amounted to a sea change in court procedures. However, in no case that was examined, did the court comply with Rule Making Enabling Act 28 USC SS2071-7. In all cases that were examined the courts failed to establish their new practices and procedure in Local Rules of Courts, as required by law. 2) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by concerted efforts to deny the public the Right to Access Court Records - to inspect and to copy. Such denial of access was most clearly seen in relationship to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) at the US district courts, and the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity) at the US courts of appeals. The denial of the Right to Access Court Records was most blatant when applied to parties in litigations, who were pro se filers. 3) In all cases that were examined, without exception, the installation of CM/ECF and PACER was also accompanied by denial of the Right to Service and Notice - a cornerstone of Due Process Rights. Such denial of Service and Notice was directed in a discriminatory fashion against pro se filers. 4) In all cases that were examined, features were found in PACER and CM/ECF, which upon review by competent panels of jurisdiction, must be deemed as fraud both by design of the systems and in their current mode of operations. Such alleged fraud on the people was perpetrated in a concerted fashion by the United States judiciary as a class, enabling perversion of justice and denial of access to national tribunals for protection of rights. IN SHORT: The case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems of the US courts are alleged key to the precipitous deterioration of court integrity in the US in recent decades, and as the largest Shell Game Fraud in the history of mankind. Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGO http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert LINKS: http://www.scribd.com/doc/24732941/10-01-03-Notice-of-Electronic-Filing-NEF-First-Amendment-CMSs-Review http://www.scribd.com/doc/29525744/10-03-25-Request-for-Experts-Opinions-RE-CM-ECF-case-management-system-of-the-US-Dist-Court-Los-Angeles-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/29525890/10-03-27-Addendum-1-to-Request-for-Opinions-Re-CM-ECF-case-management-system-of-the-US-Court-of-Appeals-9th-Circuit-as-reviewed-in-orders-in-Fine http://www.scribd.com/doc/29527583/10-04-05-Addendum-2-to-Request-for-Experts-Opinions-RE-Case-management-system-NDAs-US-Court-of-Appeals-9th-Circuit-s-Us-Court-Appeals-9th-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/28938859/10-03-25-Richard-Fine-Smoking-Gun-Discovered-Notice-Filed-with-Chief-Judge-Audrey-Collins-Request-for-Corrective-Actions http://www.scribd.com/doc/28932321/10-03-25-Declaration-of-Joseph-Zernik-in-re-Visit-to-US-Dist-Crt-Los-Angeles-and-Opinion-re-Integrity-of-Operations-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/28866417/10-03-16-Clerk-Terry-Nafisi-US-District-Court-Los-Angeles-Response-to-Zernik-s-Request-for-Clarifications-re-NEFs-and-Complaints-re-Tampering-wit http://www.scribd.com/doc/25983655/10-01-28-Alleged-large-scale-fraud-in-NEFs-of-the-United-States-courts-and-application-in-Richard-Fine-Case-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/24681397/Zernik-v-Connor-2-08-cv-01550-CM-ECF-10-01-01-Table-Summary-of-NEFs-in-Zernik-v-Connor-based-on-copies-provided-by-Clerk-on-December-29-2009 http://www.scribd.com/doc/24731943/Zernik-v-Connor-2-09-cv-01550-Served-by-Court-10-01-02-Table-Summary-of-NEFs-based-on-records-served-by-the-court http://www.scribd.com/doc/24730966/Zernik-v-Connor-2-09-cv-01550-Served-by-US-District-Court-10-01-02-Minutes-Orders-Judgment-as-served-on-Plaintiff-during-the-purported-litigat http://www.scribd.com/doc/25112472/10-01-12-Letter-to-Prof-Fallon-Harvard-Law-in-re-Two-false-Huminski-NEFs-a-Kozinski-Fraud-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/28875174/10-03-24-Richard-Fine-Request-Clarifications-by-Clerk-Nafis-RE-Denial-of-Access-Integrity-of-Court-Records-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/27386331/10-02-24-Humainski-v-Town-of-Bennington-Vermont-Alleged-Fraud-by-Justice-Sotomayor-s http://www.scribd.com/doc/27382924/09-06-04-US-Senate-Judiciary-Committee-then-Circuit-Judge-Sotomayor-s-Questionnaire-Appendix http://www.scribd.com/doc/28725286/10-03-21-Richard-Fine-Quest-for-NEFs-of-the-Habeas-Corpus-Insights-from-bankruptcy-court-Forms http://www.scribd.com/doc/28272626/10-03-12-Richard-Fine-Renewed-Call-for-Resignation-of-Alex-Kozinski-Chief-Judge-of-the-US-Court-of-Appeals-9th-Circuit http://www.scribd.com/doc/26652709/10-02-09-Zernik-v-Connor-et-al-2-08-cv-01550-English-y-Castellano-Request-Refund-From-US-District-Court-Los-Angeles-for-Failure-to-Provide-Hones http://www.scribd.com/doc/25971398/09-12-01-What-is-Kozinksi-Fraud-Kozinski-Culture-s http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=20a_1270657084 jz12345 Large-Scale Shell Game Fraud Alleged in Computers of the US Courts - AOC Comments Requested Judicial Corruption Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:30:00 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=707_1268958458 jz12345 Los Angeles, March 18 - following his claims of perpetration of fraud in PACER and CM/ECF in the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine at the US District Court, Los Angeles, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, Dr Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles, California, resident, published in various online outlets letters seeking volunteers throughout the US to help in producing a comprehensive review of the practices and procedures of the United States courts and courts of appeals relative to their computerized systems: PACER - the public access system, and CM/ECF - the case management/electronic filing system. Specific help was requested in a two-fold manner: First - comprehensive examination of the local rules, general orders, and CM/ECF manuals of the district and appellate courts, to identify mention, if any of the practice of NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) bearing RSA- encrypted digital signatures as the replacement for the stamps and hand-signatures of the clerks of the courts in the former paper-based certification/authentication; Second - examples of alleged fraud by US District courts and US courts of appeals through the issuance of court orders and judgments with invalid NEFs - bearing no RSA-encrypted digital signatures, or no NEFs at all. In his letters, Dr Zernik compared the practice to the signing of an instrument by an individual, and acknowledgment of such individual's signature on the instrument by a notary public, based on the notary's hand endorsement and stamp, which the notary was required to keep possession of at all times. Furthermore, Dr Zernik stated: "In other words, the public access system (PACER) permitted the inspection and the copying of the instruments alone (and even then - not always the signatures on the instruments), but the NEFs - the equivalent of notary public acknowledgements - were uniformly eliminated from the PACER records. Therefore, there was no way that the public could distinguish through PACER between court records that were honest, valid, and effectual, and the multitude of false and deliberately misleading records that populated PACER through misconduct of the courts." Such requests were issued as part of an effort to solicit experts' opinions from outside the US regarding integrity of operations of the US courts relative to the practice and procedures of PACER and CM/ECF. Dr Zernik was confident that experts would confirm his claims that PACER and CM/ECF, as implemented by the Administrative Office of the US Courts, were a large-scale Shell Game fraud. LINKS/NOTES: March 18, 2010 Letter by Dr Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles resident, soliciting volunteer reviews of Local Rules, General Orders, and local CM/ECF User's manuals across the US. The links at the end of the letter provided examples of both valid, and invalid NEFs. Hi , Thanks, since it appears that you know all the right people. Maybe you could help me in the most urgent task, relative to PACER in the US courts and US courts of appeals: THE CLAIMS: My basic claims relative to the recent implementation of the public access (PACER) and case management/ electronic filing (CM/ECF) systems at the United States courts is that it was the largest Shell Game fraud in the history of mankind, and that it was executed with no legal authority at all, since there was no way that the public could tell through PACER, which records were honest, valid, and effectual court records, and which were false and deliberately misleading court records. Through many generations of paper-based administration of the courts, fundamental safeguards were established, which required that court orders and judgments be verified by the hand signature of the judge, and certified/authenticated by the stamp/seal of the court and hand endorsement by the clerk of the court. Moreover, the clerk of the court was the only one authorized to hold the seals/stamps of the court. Such basic procedures could be compared to the signing of an instrument by an individual, and acknowledgment of such individual's signature on the instrument by a notary public, based on the notary's hand endorsement and stamp, which the notary was required to keep possession of at all times. The claim is that with the introduction of computer-based administration of the US courts, the certification/authentication by the clerk was implemented as NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings). The hand endorsement of the clerk was replaced by an RSA-encrypted digital signature, which appeared at the bottom of the NEFs as a 3-5 line nonsensical alphanumeric string. However, in coordinated fashion, such newly practiced court procedures were NEVER lawfully established through local rules of courts in any US court or court of appeals that I examined. Furthermore, in devising its dual computerized case management (CM/ECF) and public access (PACER) systems, the US courts deliberately eliminated from public access, and were actively denying public access to the NEFs. The NEFs were simply excluded from PACER. In other words, the public access system (PACER) permitted the inspection and the copying of the instruments alone (and even then - not always the signatures on the instruments), but the NEFs - the equivalent of notary public acknowledgements - were uniformly eliminated from the PACER records. Therefore, there was no way that the public could distinguish through PACER between court records that were honest, valid, and effectual, and the multitude of false and deliberately misleading records that populated PACER through misconduct of the courts. Moreover, the claim is that there was no reasonable explanation for the design of such dual systems that was consistent with the furtherance of justice and honest administration of the courts. CURRENT EVIDENCE/DOCUMENTATION: Ample documentation of the claims above was accumulated from the US District Court in LA and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit (in re: case of Richard Fine), and from the US District Court in Brattleboro, Vermont, and the US Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit (case of Scott Huminski). The alleged fraud in such cases was in the issuance by the US District Court of court orders and judgments with NEFs with no digital signatures, and the service of court orders by the US courts of appeals with no signatures by the judges, and no NEFs at all. WHERE IT STANDS TODAY: I am in the process of seeking prominent expert opinions on the matter from outside the US (no US expert that is prominent, whom I have approached, was willing to issue a written opinion on the matter). I do have non-formal opinion from a prominent US expert, and preliminary formal opinion from a prominent expert from outside he US. REQUEST FOR HELP: I am seeking: A) COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF LOCAL RULES OF COURTS/ GENERAL ORDERS/ USER MANUALS ACROSS THE US: Review of as many US District Courts and Courts of Appeals, to establish whether they documented in their Local Rules of Courts the basis for operation of PACER and CM/ECF, the nature of certification/authentication of records through RSA-encrypted digital signatures in NEFs. The only good reference that I found was often in informal "CM/ECF USER MANUALS", which were not adequate court records at all. What I would expect from those who were willing to help was a short declaration under penalty of perjury such as: 1) On this and that date I inspected the Local Rules of Court of this and that US District Court - as posted by the court at this and that URL, the Standing Orders - as posted by the court at this and that URL, and the local "CM/ECF User's Manual" -as posted by the court at this and that URL. (I would appreciate also a time-date stamped PDF copies of the complete Local Rules of Court, General Orders, and CM/ECF Manuals of each court that was examined) 2) The only mention of PACER and CM/ECF was such and such. 3) The practice and procedure of NEFs and RSA-encrypted digital signatures in the NEFs, as the valid certification/ authentication of court records was/was not mentioned in such Local Rules of Court - Rule #xx; Was/was not mentioned in the local General Orders - General Order #xx-xx; Was/was not mentioned in informal "CM/ECF User's Manual" of the court, pp xx-xx. 2) ADDITIONAL EXAMPLES OF FRAUD ON INDIVIDUALS AT THE US DISTRICT COURTS AND US COURTS OF APPEALS, PARTICULARLY IN MATTERS PERTAINING TO HABEAS CORPUS, CIVIL RIGHTS, AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. I am seeking: a) US District Court orders and judgments that were served with NEFs bearing no RSA-encrypted digital signatures, and/or b) US Courts of Appeals orders that were served with no signatures of the judges and no NEFs at all. Such fraud is typically perpetrated on litigants who are: a) Prisoners filing habeas corpus petitions. b) Individuals filing complaints pertaining to civil rights abuses. c) Individuals filing complaints pertaining to complaints against members of the judiciary. d) Individuals filing complaints pertaining to financial institutions - truth in lending, disability insurance, ERISA, benefits plans, etc. My email for direct communications is: jz12345@earthlink.net. Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhD http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ http://www.scribd.com/Free_the_Rampart_FIPs http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner Please sign our petition - Free Richard Fine:http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine Patriotic pics of Beyonce' Knowles, Sharon Stone, and Charlize Theron, Coming soon- deep house music! LINKS: NEFs - a review with examples of honest and fraudulent NEFs: http://www.scribd.com/doc/24732941/10-01-03-Notice-of-Electronic-Filing-NEF-First-Amendment-CMSs-Review Large Scale Fraud Alleged in PACER http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2010/03/10-03-17-large-scale-fraud-alleged-in.html http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=707_1268958458 jz12345 Richard Fine: Comprehensive Review of PACER & CM/ECF Practices Sought By Volunteers Across the US Judicial Corruption Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:03:32 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=83f_1268888309 jz12345 Allowing more free access to false records is not necessarily an improvement. Los Angeles, March 17 - in response to March 17, 2010 article by Tony Mauro in The National Law Journal titled: "Judicial Conference Moves Federal Courts Toward More Public Access", Dr Joseph Zernik, Los Angeles Resident, posted a comment, alleging large scale fraud on the people in the implementation of PACER and CM/ECF at the US courts, through the concealment and denial of public access to the certification of entry and authentication of US Court records. Therefore, Dr Zernik argued - Allowing more free access to false records was not necessarily an improvement. The article by Tony Mauro in The National Law Journal reported that the U.S. Judicial Conference voted the previous day to increase fourfold the number of free documents that members of the public would be able to retrieve from the federal courts' PACER system. In his comment, Dr Zernik noted that free access to PACER could be an improvement. However, access to PACER alone, in its current form, was worthless or worse - since all NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filings) were deliberately omitted from the system. The NEFs were only accessible through CM/ECF. Dr Zernik noted that the NEFs today served as both the "ENTERED" stamp with the endorsement by the clerk, and also as the verified authentication of court orders and judgments. And concomitantly with the omission of the NEFs from PACER, the clerks of the US Courts refused to certify the PACER dockets as valid court records, moreover - they denied public access to the NEFs in disregard of First Amendment rights. Therefore, those who relied on access to PACER alone, could never know - which of the records that they downloaded from the PACER dockets were honest, valid, and effectual court records, such that required "full faith and credit", and which were just part of the multitude of false and deliberately misleading records that populated PACER through misconduct by the US courts. The practice of alleged fraud on litigants was widespread, claimed Dr Zernik. He provided examples ranging from the US District Court in Los Angeles to the US District Court in Brattleboro, Vermont, and from US District Judges to Chief Judge of the 9th Circuit - Alex Kozinski - aimed to deprive 70 year old former US prosecutor Richard Fine of Liberty, to US Supreme Court Justice - Sonia Sotomayor - then Circuit Judge of the 2nd Circuit, aimed to deprive Scott Huminski of Due Process and Access to the Courts. Moreover, the listing of such unsigned, unauthenticated court order, which was posted in PACER nevertheless, as part of Justice Sotomayor court decisions in her responses to the Senate's Judiciary Committee, were alleged as fraud by Sotomayor on US Congress. In short, Dr Zernik claimed: "PACER & CM/ECF, as implemented by the Administrative Office of the US Courts are the biggest Shell-Game fraud in the history of mankind. The remedy is publicly accountable validation (certified, functional logic verification) of case management systems of the courts." LINKS: March 17, 2010 article by Tony Mauro in National Law Journal "Judicial Conference Moves Federal Courts Toward More Public Access" http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202446305242 NEFs - Notices of Electronic Filings, as implemented in CM/ECF - a review: http://www.scribd.com/doc/24732941/10-01-03-Notice-of-Electronic-Filing-NEF-First-Amendment-CMSs-Review Example of a PACER docket, where the Clerk of the US Court refuses to certify the docket or state that the docket was honest, valid and effectual docket in compliance with the US law, and also denies access to the NEF: Habeas Corpus Petition of Richard Fine - Fine v Sheriff of Los Angeles County (2:09-cv-01914) at the US District Court, Los Angeles: http://www.scribd.com/doc/28342152/10-03-14-Richard-Fine-Repeat-Complaint-Filed-With-Terry-Nafisi-Clerk-of-the-US-Court-Los-Angeles-re-Alleged-Fraud-and-Abuse-in-Records-of-Fine-v-S Example of false and deliberately misleading court order, served with no NEF and no verifications by Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, and Circuit Judges Richard Paez and Richard Tallman in Fine v Sheriff (09-71692) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit: http://www.scribd.com/doc/25971398/09-12-01-What-is-Kozinksi-Fraud-Kozinski-Culture-s Example of court orders filed on party with false and deliberately misleading NEFs - missing the digital signatures - Huminski v Redland Police http://www.scribd.com/doc/25112472/10-01-12-Letter-to-Prof-Fallon-Harvard-Law-in-re-Two-false-Huminski-NEFs-a-Kozinski-Fraud-s Example of alleged fraud by Supreme Court Justice -Sonia Sotomayor - serving on Huminski of unsigned order with no NEF authentication, where the US Court of Appeals, 2nd District denies access to the NEFs: Huminski v Town of Bennington VT (03-7036): http://www.scribd.com/doc/27386331/10-02-24-Humainski-v-Town-of-Bennington-Vermont-Alleged-Fraud-by-Justice-Sotomayor-s Alleged fraud by Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor in her responses to US Senate Nomination hearings - listing as decision the false and deliberately misleading, unsigned and unauthenticated paper from Huminski v Town of Bennington Vermont: http://www.scribd.com/doc/27382924/09-06-04-US-Senate-Judiciary-Committee-then-Circuit-Judge-Sotomayor-s-Questionnaire-Appendix http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=83f_1268888309 jz12345 Large-Scale Fraud Alleged in Case Management Systems of the US Courts Justice Sotomayor, judicial corruption, judicial corruption in Los Angeles, California