http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=joe Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:13:50 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=joe Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:03:08 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c0c_1371639459 LostRothschild Doesn't Obama have bigger issues? Why is he still trying to stick it to firearm owners and the second amendment? Oh yeah... Gotta head off that prism thing! "responsible gun ownership" = "you can have what I say you can have. And if I don't like it, you can't have it." I'm sure his Idea of this is: turn them all in to the government "responsibly" =============================================================== The White House says President Obama is close to completing a series of executive actions to address gun violence, but they are not a substitute for congressional legislation. In a report issued Tuesday, the administration has "completed or made significant progress" on 21 of 23 executive actions that Obama outlined Jan. 16 as part of a major gun-control initiative. "But Congress must also act," the report says. "Passing common-sense gun safety legislation, including expanding background checks and making gun trafficking a federal crime, remains the single most important step we could take to reduce gun violence." With Obama in Northern Ireland for the G-8 summit, Vice President Biden will discuss the report in a speech Tuesday afternoon. The Senate blocked a background check bill in April, thanks mostly to the votes of Republicans. Obama administration officials and Senate Democrats are trying to revive the bill by pressuring senators who voted against it to reconsider. Gun-control opponents say the proposals are ineffective, and undermine the Second Amendment rights to gun ownership. The Obama administration began pushing for new gun legislation after the Dec. 14 shooting at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn., that killed 20 students and six educators. The new White House report listed the executive actions on guns taken by the administration. Among them: Ending a freeze on federal research into the causes of gun violence, reducing barriers that prevent states from submitting certain records to the existing background check system, and easing the ways in which federal law enforcement agencies can trace guns recovered in investigations. The report did not mention two other legislative proposals backed by gun-control supporters: A new ban on assault weapons, and restrictions on the size of ammunition magazines. Neither proposal has sufficient support in Congress as of yet. The White House report says the president's executive actions are designed to address several goals, including improvements to the existing background check system, law enforcement, and school safety, as well as promote responsible gun ownership. Source: http://www.usatoday.com/story/theova...rders/2432423/ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c0c_1371639459 LostRothschild White House cites progress on gun control 2, 2nd, second, amendment, gun, firearm, rights, constitution, tyranny, freedom Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:32:17 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c9a_1371096724 Luke 22 36 Joe Biden as Senator tells why we shouldn't be wiretapping private citizens __________________________________ Internet's 'Front Page' Calls Out Obama on Spying Hypocrisy http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/06/07/internets-front-page-calls-out-obama-on-spying-hypocrisy/ ________________________________________ NSA Whistleblowers' Startling Claims: Records on 3 Billion Calls Collected Per Day - And It's Not Just Verizon http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/06/06/nsa-whistleblowers-startling-claims-records-on-3-billion-calls-collected-per-day-and-its-not-just-verizon/ ______________________________________________ Is Jimmy Carter the Latest Democrat Politician to Undermine Obama? Wait Until You Read His Latest Op-Ed http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/06/25/is-jimmy-carter-the-latest-democrat-politician-to-undermine-obama-wait-until-you-read-his-latest-op-ed/ ______________________________________________ New Details on NSA's 'Spy Center' and Secrets From Domestic Eavesdropping Operation 'Stellar Wind http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/03/16/new-details-on-nsas-new-spy-center-and-secrets-from-domestic-eavesdropping-operation-stellar-wind/ ______________________________________________ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c9a_1371096724 Luke 22 36 The Black Sphere: Vice President <span class="highlight">Joe</span> Bidens short attention span The Black Sphere, Joe Biden, Obama, wiretapping, spying, private citizens, socialism, Nazism, Liberalism. Sun, 16 Jun 2013 17:31:07 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=be9_1371418125 The_Illuminati If you're Racist and Evil you're probably a Conservative http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=be9_1371418125 The_Illuminati Sheriff <span class="highlight">Joe</span> Supporter Pulls Gun on Day Laborers Sheriff Joe Supporter Pulls Gun on Day Laborers Sun, 16 Jun 2013 08:21:28 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e6d_1371384786 mrdrawingguy http://www.facebook.com/enemiesdomestic The satirical stop-motion animation web series Enemies Domestic is back with another short, this time lampooning President Obama's wide array of scandals. It features animated, custom-designed action figures representing President Obama, Republican House Speaker John Boehner, Vice President Joe Biden, US Senator Rand Paul, and former congressman Ron Paul. Issues covered include recent efforts to restrict gun rights, the IRS and AP scandals, Benghazi, and more. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e6d_1371384786 mrdrawingguy A Constellation Of Scandals Barack Obama, Rand Paul, Joe Biden, scandal, Ron Paul, animation, funny, John Boehner, Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:37:30 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6be_1371220317 cajunmojo Joe pags take on the NSA tracking all calls for Verizon customers and the idea that it's okay because it saved us from terrorism. Pags http://www.facebook.com/joetalkshow http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6be_1371220317 cajunmojo Pags NSA Rant Joe Pags, NSA , Verizon Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:19:58 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e6c_1371575763 Jroadstein Katherine Boyle's awkwardness is almost unbearable. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e6c_1371575763 Jroadstein Russell Brand V. Morning <span class="highlight">Joe</span> awkward, MSNBC,Russell Brand Sat, 15 Jun 2013 19:37:18 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d7e_1371339319 RustyNail Stick your Islam up your ass. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d7e_1371339319 RustyNail EDL - 'I am the Infidel' (<span class="highlight">Joe</span> Dan Gorman) EDL,england,britain,UK Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:20:34 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d78_1371561329 j3fk Not a huge fan of the parts he gets cast in or the people he has writing on his show but god damn is this guy actually brilliant! http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d78_1371561329 j3fk Russel Brand destroying the MSNBC morning crew and warning the American people russel brand, msnbc, morning joe, educating, warning, funny Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:22:01 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bf2_1371305478 AngryAryan Ron Paul questions the chairman of the FED on inflation and monetary policy. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bf2_1371305478 AngryAryan Ron Paul's last Committee meeting with the Chairman of the FED Ben Bernanke America, Europe, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Middle East, Syria, Afghanistan, Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama, Obama, Barrack, Ron Paul, Ron, Paul, Rand Paul, Rand, Paul, Joe Biden, Biden, Joe, Congress, Senate, corruption, currency, dollar, markets, war, Ron Paul Sat, 15 Jun 2013 08:49:55 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e12_1371299969 dfaugust ~......for the children. You may not be able to tour the White House because of the spending increase slowdown from sequestration, but the Obama family can tour Africa for the small sum of $60 or $100 million. President Barack Obama will hold bilateral meetings with leaders in Senegal, South Africa, and Tanzania between June 26 and July 3, and the wife and kids are going along for the ride. The Obama family vacation will include air transportation for 56 vehicles, among them 14 parade limousines, trucks carrying bulletproof glass to install at hotels, and two ambulances: one for dealing with biological and chemical contaminants, one with x-ray equipment. Adding to the costs are 100 Secret Service Agents for the first three cities on the itinerary, 65 agents at the fourth, and 80 to 100 more to guard the Obama family 24/7. Further, a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier functioning as a hospital comes with the package, and fighter jets will patrol the area 24/7. The White House had planned a safari with 35 more security agents. Why so many? The Washington Post , which saw those plans nixed once it asked questions about the cost of the Africa trip, said the 35 agents were "the president's special counter-assault team to carry sniper rifles with high-caliber rounds that could neutralize cheetahs, lions or other animals if they became a threat, according to the planning document." Obama's deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes explained the trip's cost are so high because it is the first substantial presidential delegation to sub-Saharan Africa. He added, "The infrastructure that accompanies the president's travels is beyond our control. The security requirements are not White House-driven, they are Secret Service-driven... Part of this is the nature of making sure we travel to emerging areas in Southeast Asia, Latin America and Africa. They are not as designed to facilitate the footprint of the United States president." http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/06/13/Report-Obama-Family-s-Africa-trip-Will-Cost-60-To-100-million http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e12_1371299969 dfaugust Report: Obama Family's Africa Trip Will Cost $60 to $100 Million obama, clinton, kerry, joe biden, pelosi, reid, bohener, liars, thieves Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:09:07 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=951_1371590933 greasy_eyetie Billy Bob, Billy Ray and Bobby Joe prove just how manly they are by handling a woman in front of her children because she allegedly stole some kiddies Lunchables. If it was a black man they wouldn't have done a thing. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=951_1371590933 greasy_eyetie Black Woman Detained By 3 Redneck Heroes same, old, crackers, always, snitching, Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:34:25 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c84_1371500234 Bucephalus A live-feed chat taken with Edward Snowden on 06/17/2013. The interview proceeds from the bottom to the top. Questions were asked by The Guardian staff, The Guardian readers and twitter users at #AskSnowden 12.43pm ET Final question from Glenn Greenwald: Anything else you'd like to add? Answer: Thanks to everyone for their support, and remember that just because you are not the target of a surveillance program does not make it okay. The US Person / foreigner distinction is not a reasonable substitute for individualized suspicion, and is only applied to improve support for the program. This is the precise reason that NSA provides Congress with a special immunity to its surveillance. 12.41pm ET Question: So far are things going the way you thought they would regarding a public debate? - tikkamasala Answer: Initially I was very encouraged. Unfortunately, the mainstream media now seems far more interested in what I said when I was 17 or what my girlfriend looks like rather than, say, the largest program of suspicionless surveillance in human history. 12.37pm ET Follow-up from the Guardian's Spencer Ackerman : Regarding whether you have secretly given classified information to the Chinese government, some are saying you didn't answer clearly - can you give a flat no? Answer: No. I have had no contact with the Chinese government. Just like with the Guardian and the Washington Post, I only work with journalists. 12.34pm ET Question: Given the enormity of what you are facing now in terms of repercussions, can you describe the exact moment when you knew you absolutely were going to do this, no matter the fallout, and what it now feels like to be living in a post-revelation world? Or was it a series of moments that culminated in action? I think it might help other people contemplating becoming whistleblowers if they knew what the ah-ha moment was like. Again, thanks for your courage and heroism. Answer: I imagine everyone's experience is different, but for me, there was no single moment. It was seeing a continuing litany of lies from senior officials to Congress - and therefore the American people - and the realization that that Congress, specifically the Gang of Eight, wholly supported the lies that compelled me to act. Seeing someone in the position of James Clapper - the Director of National Intelligence - baldly lying to the public without repercussion is the evidence of a subverted democracy. The consent of the governed is not consent if it is not informed. 12.28pm ET Question: What would you say to others who are in a position to leak classified information that could improve public understanding of the intelligence apparatus of the USA and its effect on civil liberties? What evidence do you have that refutes the assertion that the NSA is unable to listen to the content of telephone calls without an explicit and defined court order from FISC? Answer: This country is worth dying for. 12.24pm ET Question: Do you believe that the treatment of Binney, Drake and others influenced your path? Do you feel the "system works" so to speak? Answer: Binney, Drake, Kiriakou, and Manning are all examples of how overly-harsh responses to public-interest whistle-blowing only escalate the scale, scope, and skill involved in future disclosures. Citizens with a conscience are not going to ignore wrong-doing simply because they'll be destroyed for it: the conscience forbids it. Instead, these draconian responses simply build better whistleblowers. If the Obama administration responds with an even harsher hand against me, they can be assured that they'll soon find themselves facing an equally harsh public response. This disclosure provides Obama an opportunity to appeal for a return to sanity, constitutional policy, and the rule of law rather than men. He still has plenty of time to go down in history as the President who looked into the abyss and stepped back, rather than leaping forward into it. I would advise he personally call for a special committee to review these interception programs, repudiate the dangerous "State Secrets" privilege, and, upon preparing to leave office, begin a tradition for all Presidents forthwith to demonstrate their respect for the law by appointing a special investigator to review the policies of their years in office for any wrongdoing. There can be no faith in government if our highest offices are excused from scrutiny - they should be setting the example of transparency. 12.12pm ET Question: Is encrypting my email any good at defeating the NSA survelielance? Id my data protected by standard encryption? Answer: Encryption works. Properly implemented strong crypto systems are one of the few things that you can rely on. Unfortunately, endpoint security is so terrifically weak that NSA can frequently find ways around it. 12.10pm ET Question: US officials say terrorists already altering TTPs because of your leaks, &amp; calling you traitor. Respond? Answer: US officials say this every time there's a public discussion that could limit their authority. US officials also provide misleading or directly false assertions about the value of these programs, as they did just recently with the Zazi case, which court documents clearly show was not unveiled by PRISM. Journalists should ask a specific question: since these programs began operation shortly after September 11th, how many terrorist attacks were prevented SOLELY by information derived from this suspicionless surveillance that could not be gained via any other source? Then ask how many individual communications were ingested to acheive that, and ask yourself if it was worth it. Bathtub falls and police officers kill more Americans than terrorism, yet we've been asked to sacrifice our most sacred rights for fear of falling victim to it. Further, it's important to bear in mind I'm being called a traitor by men like former Vice President Dick Cheney. This is a man who gave us the warrantless wiretapping scheme as a kind of atrocity warm-up on the way to deceitfully engineering a conflict that has killed over 4,400 and maimed nearly 32,000 Americans, as well as leaving over 100,000 Iraqis dead. Being called a traitor by Dick Cheney is the highest honor you can give an American, and the more panicked talk we hear from people like him, Feinstein, and King, the better off we all are. If they had taught a class on how to be the kind of citizen Dick Cheney worries about, I would have finished high school. 12.04pm ET Question: Edward, there is rampant speculation, outpacing facts, that you have or will provide classified US information to the Chinese or other governments in exchange for asylum. Have/will you? Answer: This is a predictable smear that I anticipated before going public, as the US media has a knee-jerk "RED CHINA!" reaction to anything involving HK or the PRC, and is intended to distract from the issue of US government misconduct. Ask yourself: if I were a Chinese spy, why wouldn't I have flown directly into Beijing? I could be living in a palace petting a phoenix by now. 11.55am ET Question: Ed Snowden, I thank you for your brave service to our country. Some skepticism exists about certain of your claims, including this: I, sitting at my desk, certainly had the authorities to wiretap anyone, from you, or your accountant, to a federal judge, to even the President if I had a personal email. Do you stand by that, and if so, could you elaborate? Answer: Yes, I stand by it. US Persons do enjoy limited policy protections (and again, it's important to understand that policy protection is no protection - policy is a one-way ratchet that only loosens) and one very weak technical protection - a near-the-front-end filter at our ingestion points. The filter is constantly out of date, is set at what is euphemistically referred to as the "widest allowable aperture," and can be stripped out at any time. Even with the filter, US comms get ingested, and even more so as soon as they leave the border. Your protected communications shouldn't stop being protected communications just because of the IP they're tagged with. More fundamentally, the "US Persons" protection in general is a distraction from the power and danger of this system. Suspicionless surveillance does not become okay simply because it's only victimizing 95% of the world instead of 100%. Our founders did not write that "We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all US Persons are created equal." 11.41am ET Question: What are your thoughts on Google's and Facebook's denials? Do you think that they're honestly in the dark about PRISM, or do you think they're compelled to lie? Perhaps this is a better question to a lawyer like Greenwald, but: If you're presented with a secret order that you're forbidding to reveal the existence of, what will they actually do if you simply refuse to comply (without revealing the order)? Answer: Their denials went through several revisions as it become more and more clear they were misleading and included identical, specific language across companies. As a result of these disclosures and the clout of these companies, we're finally beginning to see more transparency and better details about these programs for the first time since their inception. They are legally compelled to comply and maintain their silence in regard to specifics of the program, but that does not comply them from ethical obligation. If for example Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Apple refused to provide this cooperation with the Intelligence Community, what do you think the government would do? Shut them down? 11.40am ET Question: 1) Define in as much detail as you can what "direct access" means. 2) Can analysts listen to content of domestic calls without a warrant? Answer: 2) NSA likes to use "domestic" as a weasel word here for a number of reasons. The reality is that due to the FISA Amendments Act and its section 702 authorities, Americans' communications are collected and viewed on a daily basis on the certification of an analyst rather than a warrant. They excuse this as "incidental" collection, but at the end of the day, someone at NSA still has the content of your communications. Even in the event of "warranted" intercept, it's important to understand the intelligence community doesn't always deal with what you would consider a "real" warrant like a Police department would have to, the "warrant" is more of a templated form they fill out and send to a reliable judge with a rubber stamp. Glenn Greenwald follow up: When you say "someone at NSA still has the content of your communications" - what do you mean? Do you mean they have a record of it, or the actual content? Answer: Both. If I target for example an email address, for example under FAA 702, and that email address sent something to you, Joe America, the analyst gets it. All of it. IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything. And it gets saved for a very long time - and can be extended further with waivers rather than warrants. 11.27am ET Question: 1) Define in as much detail as you can what "direct access" means. 2) Can analysts listen to content of domestic calls without a warrant? Answer: 1) More detail on how direct NSA's accesses are is coming, but in general, the reality is this: if an NSA, FBI, CIA, DIA, etc analyst has access to query raw SIGINT databases, they can enter and get results for anything they want. Phone number, email, user id, cell phone handset id (IMEI), and so on - it's all the same. The restrictions against this are policy based, not technically based, and can change at any time. Additionally, audits are cursory, incomplete, and easily fooled by fake justifications. For at least GCHQ, the number of audited queries is only 5% of those performed. 11.23am ET Question: Why did you wait to release the documents if you said you wanted to tell the world about the NSA programs since before Obama became president? Answer: Obama's campaign promises and election gave me faith that he would lead us toward fixing the problems he outlined in his quest for votes. Many Americans felt similarly. Unfortunately, shortly after assuming power, he closed the door on investigating systemic violations of law, deepened and expanded several abusive programs, and refused to spend the political capital to end the kind of human rights violations like we see in Guantanamo, where men still sit without charge. 11.20am ET Question: Did you lie about your salary? What is the issue there? Why did you tell Glenn Greenwald that your salary was $200,000 a year, when it was only $122,000 (according to the firm that fired you.) Answer: I was debriefed by Glenn and his peers over a number of days, and not all of those conversations were recorded. The statement I made about earnings was that $200,000 was my "career high" salary. I had to take pay cuts in the course of pursuing specific work. Booz was not the most I've been paid. 11.17am ET Question: You have said HERE that you admire both Ellsberg and Manning, but have argued that there is one important distinction between yourself and the army private... "I carefully evaluated every single document I disclosed to ensure that each was legitimately in the public interest," he said. "There are all sorts of documents that would have made a big impact that I didn't turn over, because harming people isn't my goal. Transparency is." Are you suggesting that Manning indiscriminately dumped secrets into the hands of Wikileaks and that he intended to harm people? Answer: No, I'm not. Wikileaks is a legitimate journalistic outlet and they carefully redacted all of their releases in accordance with a judgment of public interest. The unredacted release of cables was due to the failure of a partner journalist to control a passphrase. However, I understand that many media outlets used the argument that "documents were dumped" to smear Manning, and want to make it clear that it is not a valid assertion here. 11.13am ET Question: Guardian staff: I should have asked you this when I saw you but never got round to it........Why did you just not fly direct to Iceland if that is your preferred country for asylum? Answer: Leaving the US was an incredible risk, as NSA employees must declare their foreign travel 30 days in advance and are monitored. There was a distinct possibility I would be interdicted en route, so I had to travel with no advance booking to a country with the cultural and legal framework to allow me to work without being immediately detained. Hong Kong provided that. Iceland could be pushed harder, quicker, before the public could have a chance to make their feelings known, and I would not put that past the current US administration. 11.07am ET Question: Guardian staff: Let's begin with these: 1) Why did you choose Hong Kong to go to and then tell them about US hacking on their research facilities and universities? 2) How many sets of the documents you disclosed did you make, and how many different people have them? If anything happens to you, do they still exist? Answer: 1) First, the US Government, just as they did with other whistleblowers, immediately and predictably destroyed any possibility of a fair trial at home, openly declaring me guilty of treason and that the disclosure of secret, criminal, and even unconstitutional acts is an unforgivable crime. That's not justice, and it would be foolish to volunteer yourself to it if you can do more good outside of prison than in it. Second, let's be clear: I did not reveal any US operations against legitimate military targets. I pointed out where the NSA has hacked civilian infrastructure such as universities, hospitals, and private businesses because it is dangerous. These nakedly, aggressively criminal acts are wrong no matter the target. Not only that, when NSA makes a technical mistake during an exploitation operation, critical systems crash. Congress hasn't declared war on the countries - the majority of them are our allies - but without asking for public permission, NSA is running network operations against them that affect millions of innocent people. And for what? So we can have secret access to a computer in a country we're not even fighting? So we can potentially reveal a potential terrorist with the potential to kill fewer Americans than our own Police? No, the public needs to know the kinds of things a government does in its name, or the "consent of the governed" is meaningless. 2) All I can say right now is the US Government is not going to be able to cover this up by jailing or murdering me. Truth is coming, and it cannot be stopped. Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/17/edward-snowden-nsa-files-whistleblower http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c84_1371500234 Bucephalus Edward Snowden online and Twitter-fed Q&amp;A with The Guardian Snowden, NSA, Constitution, Politics, Justice, FBI, NDAA, patriot, U.S. Government, CIA, Secrecy, Privacy, Crime