http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=smear Wed, 22 May 2013 10:12:41 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=smear Mon, 20 May 2013 13:29:57 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3f1_1369070887 cajunmojo The Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General published a new report Monday that confirms former U.S. Attorney for Arizona Dennis Burke leaked a document intended to smear Operation Fast and Furious scandal whistleblower John Dodson.The DOJ IG said it found "Burke's conduct in disclosing the Dodson memorandum to be inappropriate for a Department employee and wholly unbefitting a U.S. Attorney." "We are referring to OPR our finding that Burke violated Department policy in disclosing the Dodson memorandum to a member of the media for a determination of whether Burke's conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct for the state bars in which Burke is a member," the IG wrote. Burke resigned from his post as U.S. Attorney over the incident in August 2011, the first major Department of Justice official to leave his or her post in the Fast and Furious scandal. He said after the fact, in interviews with congressional investigators, that he now views leaking the document as a "mistake." In addition to Burke's involvement in leaking the document, emails the IG uncovered show senior officials at the Department of Justice discussed smearing Dodson. One of those was Tracy Schmaler, the Director of the Department's Office of Public Affairs, who resigned her position at the DOJ after emails uncovered through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request showed that she worked with leftwing advocacy group Media Matters for America to smear whistleblowers and members of Congress and the media who sought to investigate DOJ scandals under Attorney General Eric Holder. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3f1_1369070887 cajunmojo DOJ LEAKED DOCS TO <span class="highlight">SMEAR</span> FAST &amp; FURIOUS WHISTLEBLOWER, SAYS IG DOJ, Eric Holder. Fast and Furious, democrats, liberals, left wing Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:42:48 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=517_1366817826 joe prole Another asinine statement by the senile, er, senior senator from Nevada. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=517_1366817826 joe prole Democrat Harry Reid Continues To <span class="highlight">Smear</span> Tea Party Harry Reid, Democratic Bullcrap Sun, 12 May 2013 12:31:49 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f1c_1368375848 Detroit Iron by BEN SHAPIRO 10 May 2013 In the White House's latest efforts at transparency, the administration announced to reporters that it would brief reporters on the latest shocking developments about the Benghazi situation ... behind closed doors. Politico reports that the meeting started at approximately 12:45 PM ET, and that it moved the normal press briefing to 1:45 PM ET. Jay Carney, White House press secretary, did not comment on whether the meeting took place. Politico reports : The off-the-record session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi. The administration routinely exerts pressure on reporters it feels are not kind enough in their coverage. Reporters like Cheryl Attkisson of CBS News have felt the hand of their bosses for "wading dangerously close to advocacy" with regard to Benghazi. No doubt this "off-the-record" meeting was designed to get all the president's horses and all the president's men to put the Benghazi humpty dumpty together again. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f1c_1368375848 Detroit Iron WHITE HOUSE MEETS PRIVATELY WITH PRESS TO DISCUSS BENGHAZI obama, benghazi Sat, 11 May 2013 13:11:20 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ae6_1368290881 Marcux By David Barret I never met Malcolm Shabazz, the outspoken activist whose grandfather, Malcolm X, was the most influential African-American of the 20th century. Now I will never meet him. According to reports, Malcolm Shabazz was recently murdered in Mexico. I had been hoping to get to know Malcolm Shabazz at last February's Hollywoodism Conference in Tehran. But the US National Security State had other ideas. While trying to catch his flight to Tehran, Malcolm was arrested by the FBI. No explanation for the arrest was ever provided. Why did US authorities prevent Malcolm from traveling to Iran? The arrest was almost certainly politically-motivated. Malcolm Shabazz's presence at the Hollywoodism Conference would have brought the event invaluable publicity - especially in the black community and among Muslims, anti-Zionists, and anti-imperialists worldwide. And that publicity would have fueled Malcolm's impending rise to superstar-dissident status. Make no mistake: Malcolm Shabazz, like his grandfather, posed a serious, "actionable" long-term threat to the powers-that-be. Malcolm had converted to Shi'a Islam and become a spokesman for the "axis of resistance" - not just anti-Zionist forces in the Middle East, but anti-empire forces around the world. Like his grandfather, he had had some brushes with the law when he was young. And like his grandfather, he was on the road to putting his past behind him and becoming a charismatic spokesman for the world's dispossessed. I do not know whether the usual suspects - the "asteroids" who assassinate the enemies of empire on behalf of the CIA, the World Bank, and related entities, according to author John Perkins - killed Malcolm Shabazz. But I am 100% certain that they were thinking about it. How can I be so sure? I have been studying these assassinations for many years. My conclusion is that the empire's assassins profile their potential enemies, and decide which ones present an "actionable threat." Charismatic leaders with access to the media are among the most actionable threats. President John F. Kennedy was murdered because he was so charismatic and media-savvy that he was capable of pushing through policies that the guardians of empire deemed unacceptable: Nuclear disarmament, rapprochement with Cuba, d'etente with Russia, withdrawal from Vietnam, a new deal for the Third World. This story has been beautifully told by James Douglass, one of America's leading peace activists, in his book JFK and the Unspeakable. JFK's brother Robert Kennedy also presented an actionable threat to the powers-that-be. RFK would have been elected president in 1968 had he not been gunned down by CIA assassins. Robert wanted to be president, so he could prosecute his brother's murderers and continue his brother's policies. But the "asteroids" - and their bankster masters - had other ideas. Martin Luther King was also an "actionable threat." MLK had turned against the Vietnam War and the whole military-industrial complex, even as the FBI was trying to drive him crazy and make him commit suicide. Far from committing suicide, MLK was planning to lead a half-million people to occupy Washington DC and stay there until the war and poverty were both ended. So - as a jury verdict legally established in 1999 - the US Army, FBI, and CIA worked together to murder Dr. King. The full story is in William Pepper's book Act of State. Other "actionable threats" in recent history include JFK Jr., who was murdered in 1999 for pursuing the killers of his father and uncle; Senator Paul Wellstone, murdered in 2003 for planning to investigate 9/11 and prevent the US from invading Iraq; and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, killed with a cancer weapon for the crime of having enough charisma to almost single-handedly lead Latin America out from under the US empire. Malcolm Shabazz's grandfather, Malcolm X, was also an "actionable threat" when the CIA orchestrated his assassination in 1965. Malcolm X was forging an anti-empire alliance consisting of Muslims and other non-Western victims of imperialism, along with poor and middle-class American whites and blacks...the same alliance Dr. King was assembling when he was killed three years later. And now, Malcolm Shabazz - who was forging an updated version of the same anti-empire alliance - is murdered in Mexico. Coincidence? Maybe. But look at it from the point of view of his likely murderers. From their perspective, Malcolm Shabazz seemed to be following in his grandfather's footsteps. If they waited much longer to kill him, and let him establish his growing reputation as a respected activist, it would be a lot harder to stage an assassination and then spread the media propaganda line, based on the ancient history of his alleged teenage misdeeds, that he was "just a thug." If they waited until his book was finished and published, killing him would look suspicious...and sell his book. And if they waited until he got as famous and influential as his grandfather, they might have wound up with a major problem on their hands. So, apparently, they decided to take pre-emptive action. Kill him while he's only a decade or so past his "troubled" phase. Do it in a way that reinforces the "troubled young man with a criminal history" Operation Mockingbird mantra. Spread that mantra through all of the controlled-media outlets. Whatever happened to Malcolm Shabazz, it is abundantly obvious that the intelligence agency assets infiltrating US mainstream media are conducting a scripted posthumous character-assassination designed to obscure Malcolm's role as an up-and-coming activist and long-term threat to the Empire. If you search the CIA-Mossad-linked Google for "Malcolm Shabazz," the first result is a story published by the CIA propaganda front, the Huffington Post. The story is a smear designed to drag Malcolm's name through the mud. Huffington Post: "In his youth, he set a fire that caused the death of his grandmother." Reality: Malcolm Shabazz denied having set that fire as a child; he was forced to plead guilty in the same way that virtually all defendants, especially African-American ones, are forced to plead guilty in plea bargains to avoid facing long prison terms for crimes they may or may not have committed. Huffington Post: "Shabazz continued to have trouble with the law throughout his life." Reality: His last conviction was in 2002, more than a decade ago; the only "trouble" the character-assassins could find since then was an arrest, with no conviction, meaning he was and remains legally innocent. In other words, he was legally deemed innocent of allegedly "punching a hole in a store window" in 2006 (seven years ago!) In the USA, where Obama's presidency has not decriminalized "Driving While Black," practically all young black men have "trouble with the law." Actually, it isn't that they have trouble with the law. It's that the law has trouble with them. Being young, black, and male means being guilty until proven innocent. The imperial propagandists at the New York Times, Huffington Post, and similar outlets are working overtime smearing Malcolm Shabazz. This apparently pre-orchestrated smear smells like an intelligence operation. It is strong circumstantial evidence that Malcolm Shabazz was yet another political assassination victim. Malcolm Shabazz's real "crime," like that of his famous grandfather, was joining the axis of resistance, standing up to Zionism and the US empire, and speaking the truth. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ae6_1368290881 Marcux Did CIA kill Malcolm X's grandson? Did CIA kill Malcolm X's grandson? Sat, 11 May 2013 10:19:18 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aed_1368281820 omniradar Did CIA kill Malcolm X's grandson? 13 By Dr. Kevin BarrettMalcolm Shabazz had converted to Shi'a Islam and become a spokesman for the "axis of resistance" - not just anti-Zionist forces in the Middle East, but anti-empire forces around the world. I never met Malcolm Shabazz, the outspoken activist whose grandfather, Malcolm X, was the most influential African-American of the 20th century. Now I will never meet him. According to reports, Malcolm Shabazz was recently murdered in Mexico. I had been hoping to get to know Malcolm Shabazz at last February's Hollywoodism Conference in Tehran. But the US National Security State had other ideas. While trying to catch his flight to Tehran, Malcolm was arrested by the FBI. No explanation for the arrest was ever provided. Why did US authorities prevent Malcolm from traveling to Iran? The arrest was almost certainly politically-motivated. Malcolm Shabazz's presence at the Hollywoodism Conference would have brought the event invaluable publicity - especially in the black community and among Muslims, anti-Zionists, and anti-imperialists worldwide. And that publicity would have fueled Malcolm's impending rise to superstar-dissident status. Make no mistake: Malcolm Shabazz, like his grandfather, posed a serious, "actionable" long-term threat to the powers-that-be. Malcolm had converted to Shi'a Islam and become a spokesman for the "axis of resistance" - not just anti-Zionist forces in the Middle East, but anti-empire forces around the world. Like his grandfather, he had had some brushes with the law when he was young. And like his grandfather, he was on the road to putting his past behind him and becoming a charismatic spokesman for the world's dispossessed. I do not know whether the usual suspects - the "asteroids" who assassinate the enemies of empire on behalf of the CIA, the World Bank, and related entities, according to author John Perkins - killed Malcolm Shabazz. But I am 100% certain that they were thinking about it. How can I be so sure? I have been studying these assassinations for many years. My conclusion is that the empire's assassins profile their potential enemies, and decide which ones present an "actionable threat." Charismatic leaders with access to the media are among the most actionable threats. President John F. Kennedy was murdered because he was so charismatic and media-savvy that he was capable of pushing through policies that the guardians of empire deemed unacceptable: Nuclear disarmament, rapprochement with Cuba, d'etente with Russia, withdrawal from Vietnam, a new deal for the Third World. This story has been beautifully told by James Douglass, one of America's leading peace activists, in his book JFK and the Unspeakable. JFK's brother Robert Kennedy also presented an actionable threat to the powers-that-be. RFK would have been elected president in 1968 had he not been gunned down by CIA assassins. Robert wanted to be president, so he could prosecute his brother's murderers and continue his brother's policies. But the "asteroids" - and their bankster masters - had other ideas. Martin Luther King was also an "actionable threat." MLK had turned against the Vietnam War and the whole military-industrial complex, even as the FBI was trying to drive him crazy and make him commit suicide. Far from committing suicide, MLK was planning to lead a half-million people to occupy Washington DC and stay there until the war and poverty were both ended. So - as a jury verdict legally established in 1999 - the US Army, FBI, and CIA worked together to murder Dr. King. The full story is in William Pepper's book Act of State. Other "actionable threats" in recent history include JFK Jr., who was murdered in 1999 for pursuing the killers of his father and uncle; Senator Paul Wellstone, murdered in 2003 for planning to investigate 9/11 and prevent the US from invading Iraq; and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, killed with a cancer weapon for the crime of having enough charisma to almost single-handedly lead Latin America out from under the US empire. Malcolm Shabazz's grandfather, Malcolm X, was also an "actionable threat" when the CIA orchestrated his assassination in 1965. Malcolm X was forging an anti-empire alliance consisting of Muslims and other non-Western victims of imperialism, along with poor and middle-class American whites and blacks...the same alliance Dr. King was assembling when he was killed three years later. And now, Malcolm Shabazz - who was forging an updated version of the same anti-empire alliance - is murdered in Mexico. Coincidence? Maybe. But look at it from the point of view of his likely murderers. From their perspective, Malcolm Shabazz seemed to be following in his grandfather's footsteps. If they waited much longer to kill him, and let him establish his growing reputation as a respected activist, it would be a lot harder to stage an assassination and then spread the media propaganda line, based on the ancient history of his alleged teenage misdeeds, that he was "just a thug." If they waited until his book was finished and published, killing him would look suspicious...and sell his book. And if they waited until he got as famous and influential as his grandfather, they might have wound up with a major problem on their hands. So, apparently, they decided to take pre-emptive action. Kill him while he's only a decade or so past his "troubled" phase. Do it in a way that reinforces the "troubled young man with a criminal history" Operation Mockingbird mantra. Spread that mantra through all of the controlled-media outlets. Whatever happened to Malcolm Shabazz, it is abundantly obvious that the intelligence agency assets infiltrating US mainstream media are conducting a scripted posthumous character-assassination designed to obscure Malcolm's role as an up-and-coming activist and long-term threat to the Empire. If you search the CIA-Mossad-linked Google for "Malcolm Shabazz," the first result is a story published by the CIA propaganda front, the Huffington Post. The story is a smear designed to drag Malcolm's name through the mud. Huffington Post: "In his youth, he set a fire that caused the death of his grandmother." Reality: Malcolm Shabazz denied having set that fire as a child; he was forced to plead guilty in the same way that virtually all defendants, especially African-American ones, are forced to plead guilty in plea bargains to avoid facing long prison terms for crimes they may or may not have committed. Huffington Post: "Shabazz continued to have trouble with the law throughout his life." Reality: His last conviction was in 2002, more than a decade ago; the only "trouble" the character-assassins could find since then was an arrest, with no conviction, meaning he was and remains legally innocent. In other words, he was legally deemed innocent of allegedly "punching a hole in a store window" in 2006 (seven years ago!) In the USA, where Obama's presidency has not decriminalized "Driving While Black," practically all young black men have "trouble with the law." Actually, it isn't that they have trouble with the law. It's that the law has trouble with them. Being young, black, and male means being guilty until proven innocent. The imperial propagandists at the New York Times, Huffington Post, and similar outlets are working overtime smearing Malcolm Shabazz. This apparently pre-orchestrated smear smells like an intelligence operation. It is strong circumstantial evidence that Malcolm Shabazz was yet another political assassination victim. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aed_1368281820 omniradar Did CIA kill Malcolm X's grandson? C.I.A Wed, 08 May 2013 13:44:22 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=762_1368034931 Detroit Iron by Matt Wilstein 12:40 pm, May 8th, 2013 Rep. Elijah Cummings was the first Democratic member of Congress to speak during Wednesday's hearing on last year's attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Cummings did not waste any time before going after Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), for what he believes was the congressman using the Benghazi attack for his own political gain. Cummings began by thanking the witness, former diplomat Gregory Hicks for his service and offering condolences for the loss of his colleagues in the attack. "If I had been in your place," Cummings said, "hearing Ambassador Stevens' voice on the phone and wanting to do everything possible to help him, I would have had the same questions you had: where's the military, where are the special forces, where are the fighter jets to rescue my colleagues? These are legitimate questions." But from there, Cummings proceeded challenged a series of theories about how the U.S. could have saved the four men who died in the attack; claiming that official sources have confirmed to him that under the circumstances, it would not have been possible for military help to arrive in time. "I have seen nothing to make me question the truthfulness of our nation's military commanders," Cummings said. And while he said the oversight committee has a duty to hear testimony from Hicks and his fellow whistleblowers, "we also have a duty to thoroughly investigate these claims before we make public accusations." Cummings decried the "full-scale media campaign" unleashed over the last few weeks "that is not designed to investigate what happened in a responsible and bipartisan way, but rather to launch unfounded accusations to smear public officials." Cummings made it clear that he was "not questioning the motifs of our witnesses," but rather "questioning the motives of those who want to use their statements for political purposes." Cummings continued, directing his attacks squarely at Rep. Issa, and accusing him of blaming the Obama administration for the attacks "for political reasons." He read a laundry list of allegations Issa has made against President Obama , Hillary Clinton , Susan Rice and others and explained why they are simply "untrue." http://www.mediaite.com/tv/dem-rep-cummings-tears-into-gop-rep-issa-for-politicizing-benghazi-during-congressional-hearing/ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=762_1368034931 Detroit Iron Dem Rep. Cummings Tears Into GOP Rep. Issa For 'Politicizing' Benghazi During Congressional Hearing Rep. Elijah Cummings, President Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice Wed, 01 May 2013 22:35:25 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=154_1367461674 Detroit Iron Posted 07:24 PM ET PC Amok: A congressman asks why emails describe supporters of traditional marriage as members of hate groups while the Pentagon vets a religious tolerance guide with a group that compares Christian evangelism to "rape." When Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel recently appeared before Congress, he was grilled by Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., about an email sent by an officer at Fort Campbell, Ky., to three dozen subordinates, warning them to be on the lookout for soldiers connected with "domestic hate groups." Among the groups listed in the 14-page email by Lt. Col. Frank Rich, the Second Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment Commander at Fort Campbell, were Christian organizations such as the American Family Association and Family Research Council (FRC), immigration reform groups such as the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), and Atlas Shrugs, run by Pamela Geller and monitoring global jihadist activity. Officers are advised to look for uniformed members of these groups, described as anti-gay, anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim. The email listed the groups alongside actual extremist and hate groups such as neo-Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan and other supremacist gangs. The list of "hate" groups in the email appears to be based on one compiled by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Ironically, it was used by one Floyd Corkins, who, on Aug. 15, 2012, tried to go on a mass-shooting spree at FRC headquarters in Washington, D.C. Geller, of Atlas Shrugs, told Fox News that the Army's email was a smear and intellectually dishonest. Her group, she says, is anti-jihad and anti-Shariah. "I don't promote hate," she said. "I expose hate speech. The purpose of Atlas Shrugs is to report under-reported stories on daily acts of jihad across the world." "It's very disturbing to see where the Obama administration is taking the military and using it as a laboratory for social experimentation - and also as an instrument to fundamentally change the culture," said FRC President Tony Perkins. "The message is very clear - if you are a Christian who believes in the Bible, who believes in transcendent truth, there is no place for you in the military." Agreeing with Lt. Col. Rich is Mikey Weinstein, founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation. He has been hired by the Pentagon as a consultant to help shape policy on - we are not making this up - religious tolerance. Weinstein and others from his organization met privately with Pentagon officials on April 23. He said U.S. troops who proselytize are guilty of sedition and treason and should be punished - by the hundreds if necessary - to stave off what he called a "tidal wave of fundamentalists." Share your faith, and you should be court-martialed. Weinstein told the Washington Post's Sally Quinn that "there is systematic misogyny, anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in the military" and that it is "a national security threat. What is happening (aside from sexual assault) is spiritual rape. And what the Pentagon needs to understand is that it is sedition and treason. It should be punished." Of course, in all these warnings of Christian hate permeating the military there is no mention of Hasan, the Army major who worked his way up the ranks amid politically correct indifference to kill 13 people, including a pregnant soldier, and shoot 32 others in a Nov. 5, 2009, rampage at the base in Killeen, Texas. Before opening fire on U.S. soldiers, he shouted "Allahu Akbar." Avert your eyes, for to be on the lookout for such people would be profiling and to warn about them is hate speech. Read More At Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/050113-654364-army-looks-for-christian-hate-group-members.htm#ixzz2S6BgUGtd Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=154_1367461674 Detroit Iron Military Scours Ranks For Christian 'Haters' Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., Lt. Col. Frank Rich, Sat, 27 Apr 2013 11:01:30 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=da0_1367074782 AlexanderSigal Former presidential candidate Ron Paul has come under a vicious smear attack for his formation of an institute dedicated to cleansing America of foreign control, ending the power of the Federal Reserve and stopping the deluge of false flag terrorism that has been unleashed on America. Paul's organization has drawn upon the few public figures in America that have stood against the "Zionist machine." It hasn't taken long for the first attacks. It began today, in the Daily Beast, an online version ofNewsweek, owned by Jane Harman, long a Mossad asset. In 2011, Harman resigned from congress in disgrace after years of allegation against her for espionage on behalf of Israel. From Wikipedia: "In October 2006, Time magazine, quoting anonymous sources, asserted that an FBI and US Department of Justice investigation of Harman was underway. The magazine alleged that Harman had agreed to lobby the Department of Justice to reduce espionage charges against Steve J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, two officials at the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In exchange, Time said there was a quid pro quo in which AIPAC would lobby then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to appoint Harman as chair of the House Intelligence Committee if the Democrats captured the House after the 2006 elections. Harman, the FBI, the Justice Department and Pelosi's office have all denied knowledge of or involvement with any investigation." Harman's organization was chosen to smear Paul and the Ron Paul institute is easy to understand. Paul "played nice" during his failed attempt at the presidency, keeping silent about his views on Israeli influence and, especially, on 9/11. Back in 2010, the extremely popular television host, Judge Napolitano, on the Murdoch-owned Fox network, exposed 9/11 as a false flag conspiracy. Not only is Napolitano highly respected but was, at the time, employed by the most pro-Israeli news organization in America, a nation where news organizations fall over themselves to "kiss Israel's behind." Soon after shows exposing 9/11, Napolitano was taken off the air and put on "consultant" status. Since that time, there has been no reporting of 9/11 allowed in the United States other than smears against any that speak out, including family members of the victims who have, for years, petitioned every court and bought billboards along America's highways demanding a real investigation. The Mossad/Harman attack on Ron Paul, published today in the Daily Beast, is typical of Zionist/ADL/AIPAC/SPLC smear campaigns against any "America first" group. From today's article by Israeli "smear-master," James Kirchick of the Mossad based news outlet, Haaretz: "...the list of Paul Institute board members are the 9/11 conspiracy theorists. Most prominent among them is Judge Andrew Napolitano, a legal analyst for Fox News who has said that "It's hard for me to believe that came down by itself" and that the 9/11 attacks "couldn't possibly have been done the way the government told us." He is joined by Eric Margolis, who, despite an apparent lack of a Ph.D. or appointment at an institution of higher learning, is listed as a member of the organization's "academic board." Margolis says "conclusive proof still lacks" connecting Osama bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks and has speculated that the events could have been "a plot by America's far right or by Israel or a giant cover-up." Southwestern Law School professor Butler Shaffer, in an article for Rockwell's site titled, "9/11 Was a Conspiracy," asks, "In light of the lies, forgeries, cover-ups, and other deceptions leading to a 'war' in Iraq, how can any intellectually honest person categorically deny the possibility of the involvement of American political interests in 9/11?" Also on Paul's board are prominent former government officials who claim that American Jews constitute a "fifth column" aimed at subverting American foreign policy in the interests of Israel. Michael Scheuer, a former CIA intelligence officer, has used this precise phrase, alleging that a long list of individuals, organizations, and publications are "intent on involving 300 million Americans in other people's religious wars." Kirchick calls Ron Paul, who polled as an easy winner were he to have secured nomination during the last election, as an "anti-Semite" along with those with him. A key issue is the continued use of smear tactics against any who push for a legitimate investigation into 9/11 as "Jew haters." It doesn't take a genius to see the solid link between the smear tactics used and clear complicity in 9/11 by the Mossad. Were there no other evidence, and there is vast other evidence, the vicious and hateful reaction of Zionists and their Neocon underlings is more than adequate proof, not just that 9/11 is an "inside job" but a Tel Aviv-based "outside job" as well. With the current divisions in America, the aftermath of the Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon incidents, both broadly accepted, even by the US military as "false flag" terrorism, the return of Ron Paul and his "populist" platform which had excited millions of Americans sick of Washington's "business as usual" corruption, has threatened Israeli control over America. Thus, "Israel Firsters" like Harmon, are receiving "marching orders" to destroy Paul and any that side with him, even to the point of labeling political independents and reform minded groups as terrorist organizations. In fact, those lists have long been prepared by the ADL and SPLC and have been distributed among American security agencies and the "secret police." Calling the amalgamation of "alphabet soup" agencies, DHS, FBI, DEA, CIA, DIA, SEC, DVA, NRO, NSA, ICE, ATF and so many others anything but "secret police" is a waste of time. The story behind Jane Harman, one of the agent provocateurs of the Israel lobby, goes much further than simply protecting Israeli spies. From Wikipedia, clear accusations of involvement in espionage: "In April 2009, CQ Politics, also quoting anonymous sources, said Harman had been captured on a National Security Agency wiretap prior to the 2006 elections, telling an "Israeli agent" that she would "waddle into" lobbying the Department of Justice on the AIPAC case. Harman ended the phone call, according to CQ, by saying, "This conversation doesn't exist." According to CQ, then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales pressed Central Intelligence Agency Director Porter Goss to drop the agency's investigation of Harman because he wanted Harman's support during the NSA warrantless surveillance controversy about to break in the New York Times . Harman called the New York Times and urged them not to publish details on the program. Gonzales and Goss declined to comment." With Americans pushed to the breaking point, threats of gun confiscation and an acceptance that all or part of their own government is willing to sacrifice American lives in staged terror incidents, Ron Paul's message, one he failed to convey during the election, may well be a powerful uniting force to move America onto an independent path. The first stage, the smear campaign has started. The next step, millions of dollars, drug money, casino "skim" or Koch brothers' oil speculation profiteering cash, money to buy off those around Paul, can be expected. If that fails, other methods will be used, just as they were against Senator Paul Wellstone and his family. Ron Paul and those of his institute, some with considerable experience in national security, are probably already aware. In the last fifty years, no prominent American has stood up against Israel without dying in a plane wreck, mysterious car crash, committing suicide, often by shooting themselves several times at up to 20 feet away or ending up in prison. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=da0_1367074782 AlexanderSigal 9/11: Not just an inside job, but a Tel Aviv-based outside job Israel, corrupt, illegal, crime, terrorist, 9/11 Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:03:36 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1d0_1366966843 doitdontdoit Former presidential candidate Ron Paul has come under a vicious smear attack for his formation of an institute dedicated to cleansing America of foreign control, ending the power of the Federal Reserve and stopping the deluge of false flag terrorism that has been unleashed on America. Paul's organization has drawn upon the few public figures in America that have stood against the "Zionist machine." It hasn't taken long for the first attacks. It began today, in the Daily Beast, an online version of Newsweek , owned by Jane Harman, long a Mossad asset. In 2011, Harman resigned from congress in disgrace after years of allegation against her for espionage on behalf of Israel. From Wikipedia: "In October 2006, Time magazine, quoting anonymous sources, asserted that an FBI and US Department of Justice investigation of Harman was underway. The magazine alleged that Harman had agreed to lobby the Department of Justice to reduce espionage charges against Steve J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, two officials at the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In exchange, Time said there was a quid pro quo in which AIPAC would lobby then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to appoint Harman as chair of the House Intelligence Committee if the Democrats captured the House after the 2006 elections. Harman, the FBI, the Justice Department and Pelosi's office have all denied knowledge of or involvement with any investigation." Harman's organization was chosen to smear Paul and the Ron Paul institute is easy to understand. Paul "played nice" during his failed attempt at the presidency, keeping silent about his views on Israeli influence and, especially, on 9/11. Back in 2010, the extremely popular television host, Judge Napolitano, on the Murdoch-owned Fox network, exposed 9/11 as a false flag conspiracy. Not only is Napolitano highly respected but was, at the time, employed by the most pro-Israeli news organization in America, a nation where news organizations fall over themselves to "kiss Israel's behind." Soon after shows exposing 9/11, Napolitano was taken off the air and put on "consultant" status. Since that time, there has been no reporting of 9/11 allowed in the United States other than smears against any that speak out, including family members of the victims who have, for years, petitioned every court and bought billboards along America's highways demanding a real investigation. The Mossad/Harman attack on Ron Paul, published today in the Daily Beast, is typical of Zionist/ADL/AIPAC/SPLC smear campaigns against any "America first" group. From today's article by Israeli "smear-master," James Kirchick of the Mossad based news outlet, Haaretz : "...the list of Paul Institute board members are the 9/11 conspiracy theorists. Most prominent among them is Judge Andrew Napolitano, a legal analyst for Fox News who has said that "It's hard for me to believe that came down by itself" and that the 9/11 attacks "couldn't possibly have been done the way the government told us." He is joined by Eric Margolis, who, despite an apparent lack of a Ph.D. or appointment at an institution of higher learning, is listed as a member of the organization's "academic board." Margolis says "conclusive proof still lacks" connecting Osama bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks and has speculated that the events could have been "a plot by America's far right or by Israel or a giant cover-up." Southwestern Law School professor Butler Shaffer, in an article for Rockwell's site titled, "9/11 Was a Conspiracy," asks, "In light of the lies, forgeries, cover-ups, and other deceptions leading to a 'war' in Iraq, how can any intellectually honest person categorically deny the possibility of the involvement of American political interests in 9/11?" Also on Paul's board are prominent former government officials who claim that American Jews constitute a "fifth column" aimed at subverting American foreign policy in the interests of Israel. Michael Scheuer, a former CIA intelligence officer, has used this precise phrase, alleging that a long list of individuals, organizations, and publications are "intent on involving 300 million Americans in other people's religious wars." Kirchick calls Ron Paul, who polled as an easy winner were he to have secured nomination during the last election, as an "anti-Semite" along with those with him. A key issue is the continued use of smear tactics against any who push for a legitimate investigation into 9/11 as "Jew haters." It doesn't take a genius to see the solid link between the smear tactics used and clear complicity in 9/11 by the Mossad. Were there no other evidence, and there is vast other evidence, the vicious and hateful reaction of Zionists and their Neocon underlings is more than adequate proof, not just that 9/11 is an "inside job" but a Tel Aviv-based "outside job" as well. With the current divisions in America, the aftermath of the Sandy Hook and Boston Marathon incidents, both broadly accepted, even by the US military as "false flag" terrorism, the return of Ron Paul and his "populist" platform which had excited millions of Americans sick of Washington's "business as usual" corruption, has threatened Israeli control over America. Thus, "Israel Firsters" like Harmon, are receiving "marching orders" to destroy Paul and any that side with him, even to the point of labeling political independents and reform minded groups as terrorist organizations. In fact, those lists have long been prepared by the ADL and SPLC and have been distributed among American security agencies and the "secret police." Calling the amalgamation of "alphabet soup" agencies, DHS, FBI, DEA, CIA, DIA, SEC, DVA, NRO, NSA, ICE, ATF and so many others anything but "secret police" is a waste of time. The story behind Jane Harman, one of the agent provocateurs of the Israel lobby, goes much further than simply protecting Israeli spies. From Wikipedia, clear accusations of involvement in espionage: "In April 2009, CQ Politics, also quoting anonymous sources, said Harman had been captured on a National Security Agency wiretap prior to the 2006 elections, telling an "Israeli agent" that she would "waddle into" lobbying the Department of Justice on the AIPAC case. Harman ended the phone call, according to CQ, by saying, "This conversation doesn't exist." According to CQ, then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales pressed Central Intelligence Agency Director Porter Goss to drop the agency's investigation of Harman because he wanted Harman's support during the NSA warrantless surveillance controversy about to break in the New York Times . Harman called the New York Times and urged them not to publish details on the program. Gonzales and Goss declined to comment." With Americans pushed to the breaking point, threats of gun confiscation and an acceptance that all or part of their own government is willing to sacrifice American lives in staged terror incidents, Ron Paul's message, one he failed to convey during the election, may well be a powerful uniting force to move America onto an independent path. The first stage, the smear campaign has started. The next step, millions of dollars, drug money, casino "skim" or Koch brothers' oil speculation profiteering cash, money to buy off those around Paul, can be expected. If that fails, other methods will be used, just as they were against Senator Paul Wellstone and his family. Ron Paul and those of his institute, some with considerable experience in national security, are probably already aware. In the last fifty years, no prominent American has stood up against Israel without dying in a plane wreck, mysterious car crash, committing suicide, often by shooting themselves several times at up to 20 feet away or ending up in prison. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today. His career has included extensive experience in international banking along with such diverse areas as consulting on counter insurgency, defense technologies or acting as diplomatic representative for UN humanitarian and economic development efforts. Gordon Duff has traveled to over 80 nations. His articles are published around the world and translated into a number of languages. He is regularly on TV and radio, a popular and sometimes controversial guest. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1d0_1366966843 doitdontdoit 9/11: Not just an inside job, but a Tel Aviv-based outside job 9/11: Not just an inside job, but a Tel Aviv-based outside job Wed, 10 Apr 2013 07:33:33 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3ae_1365593371 newsallianceuk After exposing institutionalised corruption in Nottinghamshire Police, investigative journalist Simon Tomlin has been threatened by the corrupt cops he exposed. In a manner so typical of their corruption, desperation drives them to threaten the man who exposed them. But it's a pointless exercise on their part because tens of thousands of people now know about the corruption and it is well documented. PC Richard Reynolds who instigated the threats against Simon Tomlin is now looking at the end of his career as he faces even deeper investigation.... http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3ae_1365593371 newsallianceuk Corrupt police officers threaten investigative journalist who exposed their corruption MI5, Police Corruption, Nottinghamshire Police, IPCC, Police Complaints, Bribery, Murder, Threats, Operation Strikeback, Smear Campaign, Home Office, PC Richard Reynolds, Misconduct Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:49:34 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a6a_1366242305 dfaugust Exclusive: Lord Monckton rips uncivilized Londoners celebrating Thatcher's death PARAPARAUMU, New Zealand - In the West, if not necessarily elsewhere, there was once a universally accepted standard of morality. For one thing, one did not - as the gibbering savages of the international hard left have shamefully done in the past week - speak ill of the recently dead. Yet the death of Margaret Thatcher has exposed a new, malevolent streak of unadulterated nastiness on the extreme left. In Trafalgar Square, London, hundreds turned out to chant slogans and sing "Ding, dong, the witch is dead!" a song from the movie "The Wizard of Oz" that seems to have sold more copies in seven days than in the 74 years since it was written. Nowadays, thanks to the economic reforms Margaret Thatcher brought in, even the brainless, unemployable communists (who now prefer to be called "radicals" or "Greens") can afford to throw a party. They drank champagne, no less, to celebrate the demise of the stateswoman who had done more than anyone to defeat their miserable cause - and had also made them wealthy enough to pour champagne into the gutters from which they crawled. They chanted "Iron Lady, rust in peace!" That is what passes for humor among these Neanderthal think-alikes. They wrote vicious blog postings hoping Lady Thatcher would rot in hell. The Marxist media - The Guardian and the BBC prominent among them - eagerly gave them as much exposure as they could. The communist wing in politics and the media can no longer fairly claim to be part of civilization at all. Their mean-spirited, vitriolic, personal attacks on those with whom they disagree are turning the Earth into the Planet of the Apes. Dare to challenge one of their pet projects - "global warming," for instance, which Margaret Thatcher eventually dismissed as the over-hyped nonsense it is - and the hate speech begins. Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT knows more about the atmosphere than anyone alive. However, he does not sing from the left's current hymn-sheet about "global warming." So they have run a vicious campaign against him, saying he denies the link between smoking and lung cancer. He does not, of course, but the left no longer maintain any point of contact with the truth. Professor Niklas M"orner, the world's foremost expert on sea level, dares to state the obvious: that it is not rising. The left smear him by saying he believes he can find water by dowsing with a hazel twig. Why this should render him unfit to be a scientist is unclear (my late beloved father once dowsed to find Roman artifacts - successfully - for the Maltese government). Yet the brutish Bandar-log chatter away, doing their damnedest to destroy professor M"orner's reputation. Professor Fred Singer, the rocket scientist who founded the U.S. Satellite Weather Service, is well into his 80s, yet he has a speaking schedule even busier than mine. Because he, too, is what they nastily call a "denier," they have invented a fiction that he believes in Martians. He doesn't, but that does not stop them. They really, really don't like me. I, too, have given the occasional indication that there may be some doubt about CO2-driven planetary doom. So they have constructed a mountain of lies, which they recycle and regurgitate ad nauseam. They cite one of their political allies, the arrogant and contemptibly ignorant clerk of the Parliaments, to the effect that I am not a member of the House of Lords. But my passport says I am the Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, and a written opinion from a barrister learned in peerage law says that though I have no seat or vote, I remain a member of the House and am fully entitled to say so. They say I got into Cambridge on a choirboy scholarship. No: I cannot sing. They say I have no scientific training, yet mathematics formed part of my Cambridge course in classical architecture. I have lectured on climate sensitivity and mitigation economics at faculty level. I was last year's Nerenberg lecturer in mathematics at the University of Western Ontario. They say ... well, you get the idea. Anyone who becomes a serious threat to their tawdry plans for world domination has his reputation destroyed. Saul Alinsky, a "community organizer" (i.e. communist agitator), wrote "Rules for Radicals" (i.e. "A Code for Communists"), telling them how to bring down the West. One of the key rules was never to meet the left's opponents in argument, but to trash their reputations instead. That way, anyone who might otherwise dare to challenge the left will keep his head down. I recently asked an influential Republican congressman why neither he nor his party would do anything at all about Barry Soetero's obviously bogus "birth certificate" on the White House website. He replied: "Look what the left have done to your reputation because you spoke the truth about the non-problem of global warming. We know the president and his 'birth certificate' are fake. But - to put it bluntly - my reputation matters to me. And that goes for all of us." "So Soebarkah is safe in the White House?" "Yes, but just wait until he leaves office. The left will not be able to defend him then." We shall see. I told the congressman I did not propose to hold my breath. Rampant funk on the part of those who ought to know better has heartened the champagne-swilling apes of Trafalgar Square to do their gibbering best to blacken the name of Thatcher even in death. For now, let them have their hate-filled party. Their savagery is a fine advertisement for the necessity of sweeping their brutish, failed totalitarianism off the face of the Earth. They cannot trash Margaret Thatcher's reputation, but they have certainly trashed their own and that of their collapsing cause. http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/ding-dong-the-left-are-savages/ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a6a_1366242305 dfaugust Ding, dong, the left are savages Baroness Margaret Thatcher, UK, communists, &quot;liberals&quot;, &quot;progressives&quot;, leftists,dogs, cowards, idiots Tue, 16 Apr 2013 09:55:07 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b8e_1366119790 HansWerner Syria: Human Rights Watch (HRW) with another Propaganda Stunt The alleged human rights organisation Human Rights Watch (HRW) was not able to identify any military goals in their next biased report on the events in Syria. Human Rights Watch (HRW), which has already been founded for the use as propaganda agency under the cover of a honest human rights organisation unlike amnesty international (ai), which was honest at its beginning but soon has been infiltrated by persons with clear orders, has released another nearly 80-page report about Syria. In this HRW report about Syria, it is stated, inter alia, that the Syrian Arab army would intentionally attack bakeries and hospitals in Syrian cities and villages. HRW mentions a concrete example in its one-sided report about Syria - a "bakery" in the Syrian city of Aleppo (Halab) with location information and a date. A German blogger has tried to perform a search for traces about this case by using the aforementioned clues, given by Human Rights Watch (HRW). This blogger from Germany came to a result and found the Syrian street on the same day which was stated in the alleged concrete example by HRW - and about this human rights organisation said that it is has been no military target, but a civilian bakery. It is about the "Aqyoul Bakery, Aleppo City" as this place in this Syrian street of Aleppo (Halab) is called by Human Rights Watch in their next report about Syria. In terms of the lighting conditions, it might have been an early evening in this video. Although Human Rights Watch (HRW) says that there would not have been any active fighters in this area in Aleppo, every viewer is easily able to see many of these armed opposition members and everybody can hear gunshots, including muffled noise of battles, which are located a little further away. Pic 1. - Armed militias at the "bakery" in Aleppo. HRW was not able to see the armed men? This can`t be. The stores are all equipped with blinds and they are closed. There is no opened bakery in the clips from the same date in the same area and even from the same street in Aleppo. There is also no bread visible in the rubble. The 21.08.2012 was a Tuesday. Stores were closed due to the battles which took place? Screenshots from the following videos show military targets, this also includes anti-Syrian armed forces. The German blogger said in his post about the biased HRW report that he would like to smear the lies on the bread of Human Rights Watch (HRW), but there was and is no bread at this place. Further evidence that this report by HRW is biased again - the alleged human rights organisation HRW did not mention any militias like these in its report about Syria. The screenshot is bad but one can see two machine gun barrels: Pic 2. - Another military target, a pickup truck, equipped with a heavy machine gun. One of the videos shows that armed men were in this street, in a pickup truck with armed militias and a Dushka, a heavy machine gun, which is clearly visible. Please, also note the sound of the video - there are gun shots in close proximity. This is also an evidence that it has been a battle field. Was the former front line in the Syrian city of Aleppo located there? At least, the shops were closed, there was no "bakery" and everybody can see armed militias of the so-called opposition forces - just HRW is not able to. There is an armed "Free Syrian Army" (FSA) fighter, just in front of the house which has a damaged roof. The shown four dead are male, one has a lot of "belt bags"...: The old propaganda reports by Human Rights Watch (HRW), which have been published by HRW a year ago (30/08/2012), and the new reports by HRW (11/04/2013) are contradictory. A year ago, it has been a bomb and a tailor who has searched coverage. According to the new propaganda report by the same organisation, HRW, there were two bombs and a flour supplier who also has been a tailor. A year ago, HRW wanted to construct war crimes by the Syrian government and army in Syria - and nothing has changed. The methods are still the same. As another example, the German blogger mentions the "bread - waiting line/queue" in the province of the Syrian city of Hama - the place was called Halfaya. Also there, there was neither a visible bakery nor any "bread - waiting line". Many of the injured were in uniform; one was also able to see some Dushkas pickups, which drove away. And one was able to see how the foreign-backed opposition forces laid bread, which they had brought along, in the pools of blood - and they filmed it foolishly or fortunately. Source: http://www.syrianews.cc/syria-human-rights-watch-hrw-propaganda-stunt/ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b8e_1366119790 HansWerner Syria: Human Rights Watch (HRW) with another Propaganda Stunt FSA, HRW, False Propaganda,