http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=trouble Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:57:27 -0400 Liveleak http://edge.liveleak.com/80281E/u/u/ll2/logo.gif http://www.liveleak.com/browse?q=trouble Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:42:07 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ac4_1371625583 Vulpine This Yoursays point?been alot debate bout public filming,moron take offense at me filming,hassling me on street,at end of vid you see pub securityman walk over to me tells me to stop filming,you hear me tell the securityman that its a public street,uploaded this vid to illustrate my point that we film wherever we want, when we want,we are citizen journos, nobody has the right to tell us to stop filming on a public street.Bigern666 had a similar problem in his last Yoursay with some cops telling him to go away as he was filming and he rightly tells them he can film. What's your opinion on people filming other people in public?. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=ac4_1371625583 Vulpine this Yoursay is about filming people in public,I say we can,securityman tells me stop filming on public street,I tell him its a public place,props to told stop filming by securityman on public street,I tell him its a public place,citizens right to document/ film, free country, trouble began how?=hassled by moron outside an Auckland pub offended at me filming,I threaten to call police on the moron, secu Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:41:17 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=866_1371490823 FB-RAMBO crazy dispute http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=866_1371490823 FB-RAMBO <span class="highlight">Trouble</span> At the Subway Russian sub Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:31:19 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=98b_1371407179 TheAnswer Big girl making a fool of her self in downtown Chicago. Just watch, this is a perfect example of trash in Downtown Chicago. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=98b_1371407179 TheAnswer Ignorant Girl Making <span class="highlight">Trouble</span> in Humbolt Park, Chicago Chicago, Trash, big girl, Trash, Humbolt Park, Drunk, Anger Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:41:27 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f3c_1371354009 omniradar By Naomi Wolf Global Research, June 15, 2013 NaomiWolf.org Region: USA Theme: Intelligence , Police State &amp; Civil Rights I hate to do this but I feel obligated to share, as the story unfolds, my creeping concern that the NSA leaker is not who he purports to be, and that the motivations involved in the story may be more complex than they appear to be. This is in no way to detract from the great courage of Glenn Greenwald in reporting the story, and the gutsiness of the Guardian in showcasing this kind of reporting, which is a service to America that US media is not performing at all. It is just to raise some cautions as the story unfolds, and to raise some questions about how it is unfolding, based on my experience with high-level political messaging. Some of Snowden's emphases seem to serve an intelligence/police state objective, rather than to challenge them. a) He is super-organized, for a whistleblower, in terms of what candidates, the White House, the State Dept. et al call 'message discipline.' He insisted on publishing a power point in the newspapers that ran his initial revelations. I gather that he arranged for a talented filmmaker to shoot the Greenwald interview. These two steps - which are evidence of great media training, really 'PR 101' - are virtually never done (to my great distress) by other whistleblowers, or by progressive activists involved in breaking news, or by real courageous people who are under stress and getting the word out. They are always done, though, by high-level political surrogates. b) In the Greenwald video interview, I was concerned about the way Snowden conveys his message. He is not struggling for words, or thinking hard, as even bright, articulate whistleblowers under stress will do. Rather he appears to be transmitting whole paragraphs smoothly, without stumbling. To me this reads as someone who has learned his talking points - again the way that political campaigns train surrogates to transmit talking points. c) He keeps saying things like, "If you are a journalist and they think you are the transmission point of this info, they will certainly kill you." Or: "I fully expect to be prosecuted under the Espionage Act." He also keeps stressing what he will lose: his $200,000 salary, his girlfriend, his house in Hawaii. These are the kinds of messages that the police state would LIKE journalists to take away; a real whistleblower also does not put out potential legal penalties as options, and almost always by this point has a lawyer by his/her side who would PROHIBIT him/her from saying, 'come get me under the Espionage Act." Finally in my experience, real whistleblowers are completely focused on their act of public service and trying to manage the jeopardy to themselves and their loved ones; they don't tend ever to call attention to their own self-sacrifice. That is why they are heroes, among other reasons. But a police state would like us all to think about everything we would lose by standing up against it. d) It is actually in the Police State's interest to let everyone know that everything you write or say everywhere is being surveilled, and that awful things happen to people who challenge this. Which is why I am not surprised that now he is on UK no-fly lists - I assume the end of this story is that we will all have a lesson in terrible things that happen to whistleblowers. That could be because he is a real guy who gets in trouble; but it would be as useful to the police state if he is a fake guy who gets in 'trouble.' e) In stories that intelligence services are advancing (I would call the prostitutes-with-the-secret-service such a story), there are great sexy or sex-related mediagenic visuals that keep being dropped in, to keep media focus on the issue. That very pretty pole-dancing Facebooking girlfriend who appeared for, well, no reason in the media coverage...and who keeps leaking commentary, so her picture can be recycled in the press... really, she happens to pole-dance? Dan Ellsberg's wife was and is very beautiful and doubtless a good dancer but somehow she took a statelier role as his news story unfolded... f) Snowden is in Hong Kong, which has close ties to the UK, which has done the US's bidding with other famous leakers such as Assange. So really there are MANY other countries that he would be less likely to be handed over from... g) Media reports said he had vanished at one point to 'an undisclosed location' or 'a safe house.' Come on. There is no such thing. Unless you are with the one organization that can still get off the surveillance grid, because that org created it. h) I was at dinner last night to celebrate the brave and heroic Michael Ratner of the Center for Constitutional Rights. Several of Assange's also brave and talented legal team were there, and I remembered them from when I had met with Assange. These attorneys are present at every moment when Assange meets the press - when I met with him off the record last Fall in the Ecuadoran embassy, his counsel was present the whole time, listening and stepping in when necessary. Seeing these diligent attentive free-speech attorneys for another whisleblower reinforced my growing anxiety: WHERE IS SNOWDEN'S LAWYER as the world's media meet with him? A whistleblower talking to media has his/her counsel advising him/her at all times, if not actually being present at the interview, because anything he/she says can affect the legal danger the whistleblower may be in . It is very, very odd to me that a lawyer has not appeared, to my knowledge, to stand at Snowden's side and keep him from further jeopardy in interviews. Again I hate to cast any skepticism on what seems to be a great story of a brave spy coming in from the cold in the service of American freedom. And I would never raise such questions in public if I had not been told by a very senior official in the intelligence world that indeed, there are some news stories that they create and drive - even in America (where propagandizing Americans is now legal). But do consider that in Eastern Germany, for instance, it was the fear of a machine of surveillance that people believed watched them at all times - rather than the machine itself - that drove compliance and passivity. From the standpoint of the police state and its interests - why have a giant Big Brother apparatus spying on us at all times - unless we know about it? http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f3c_1371354009 omniradar My Creeping Concern that the NSA Leaker Edward Snowden is not who he Purports to be... USA Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:45:39 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6d0_1371303650 ttj1776 The most recent NBC News/Wall Street contained plenty of revealing numbers -- on President Obama, the health-care law, immigration, even affirmative action. But lost in those numbers and headlines is a noteworthy finding: The American public is extremely hesitant to intervene directly in Syria's civil war. Asked to pick a response to stop the killing of civilians in Syria, just 15 percent in the poll say they favor U.S. military action, and only 11 percent want to provide arms to the opposition. By comparison, a plurality of respondents -- 42 percent -- prefer to provide only humanitarian assistance, and 24 percent believe the U.S. shouldn't take any action. Perhaps more significantly, those attitudes cut across party lines and almost all demographic groups. "Whether you voted for Romney or Obama, they have the same opinion on Syria," said Republican pollster Bill McInturff, who conducted the survey with the Democratic firm Hart Research. "It explains the great reticence of the American public," McInturff added. These numbers come as calls for U.S. intervention in Syria -- after the Syrian opposition's recent losses on the battlefield -- have once again increased. The New York Times: So far President Obama has steadfastly resisted even a modest involvement in the conflict, and there was no sign on Monday that a decision to use American force was imminent. But Hezbollah's large-scale entry into the fight in recent weeks and the Assad government's firepower has tilted the battlefield in favor of the Syrian government. "I think the rebels are in trouble," said Jeffrey White, a former Middle East analyst with the Defense Intelligence Agency who is now a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. "Speed is of the essence. The regime's momentum needs to be brought to a halt." The NBC/WSJ poll was conducted May 30 to June 2 of 1,000 adults (including 300 cell phone-only respondents), and it has an overall margin of error of plus-minus 3.1 percentage points. http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/11/18905791-nbcwsj-poll-americans-oppose-intervention-in-syria?lite http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6d0_1371303650 ttj1776 NBC Poll: Only 11% of Americans Support Insansity of Arming Syrian Rebels syria, fsa, saa, rebels, arms, weapons Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:29:20 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e4a_1371241020 limabean June 13th, S~ao Paulo, Brazil.The first video shows a group of protesters singing and shouting "No Violence" when the Riot Police comes, forms a line, and starts shooting rubber bullets and tear gas grenades at them. The second video shows a police officer breaking his own vehicle's window in attempt to later claim that it was damaged by the protesters. The protests started on Monday (10th) in S~ao Paulo, when the government decided to raise the bus fare once again. It happened in other states as well, and people came out and protested and it worked; the fare was readjusted in not much longer than a week. However, things are starting to look bad and get uglier each day that goes by in S~ao Paulo. Sure there were, there are, and there will always be a group of people who are not really there to win the cause - sometimes they're not even aware of what the cause is - but just to depredate and vandalize public property, but these empty-minded-low-life individuals usually consist in very small groups, when compared to the rest of the protesters who are there to make a change. I only uploaded a couple of short videos because my internet connection does not cooperate, but I can assure you that there are dozens of them circulating YouTube and Facebook showing other kinds of outrageous behavior coming from the police. There are also lots of pictures of victims (some were children and elderly people who did not have anything to do with the protests; they were just trying to go home) who suffered injuries caused by rubber bullets, batons, and tear gas grenades used by the Riot Police. People got shot in the face. I know one photographer (takes pictures of my concerts) who got shot in the eye and will probably lose his sight and may not be able to exercise his profession again. This is police brutality at its finest. Many reporters, journalists, and photographers were injured and even arrested for carrying vinegar (for those who don't know, vinegar is a pretty effective substance used to minimize the effects of tear gas) in their backpacks. The mainstream Brazilian media was hiding and manipulating the news regarding these occurrences until they couldn't do it anymore; too many videos, pictures, and statements were being posted on the internet by the protesters themselves or by people who live near the areas with a big concentration of people/police. There is one particular video, for example, that shows a person filming everything from the 7th floor of an apartment when the police suddenly shoot a tear gas round into the apartment. I feel obliged to say that this is not just about the 20 cent fare raise. That was just the last drop of abuse and injustice we could take from our corrupt government. It started as a peaceful manifestation and it still is and it will still be until the end, as long as we keep it that way. I don't think we are living a much different situation than the Turkish people. - In fact, they have advised us to stick to a peaceful behavior and not retaliate - The truculent and abusive police are always the ones who start the violence and the real riot (I never believed that until I saw it for myself) and they're just making this worse every single bullet or grenade they shoot. I hope that now that the people have finally awakened, our governors will have some trouble sleeping. Thank you for watching/reading and sorry about the long post and personal opinions, but this really feels right. I'll try to post some pictures and a couple of more videos later. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e4a_1371241020 limabean Peaceful protesters get shot by police in Brazil protest,riot,police,brutality,sao paulo,brazil Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:49:14 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=337_1371181318 omniradar I,m sick of these bastards presuming this is good for all citizens !!!! Senior politicians from across the political divide have united to call for UK security services to be given greater internet monitoring powers. In a letter to The Times newspaper three former Labour home secretaries, three senior Tories and one Liberal Democrat urge changes. They say "coalition niceties" must not hinder counter terror efforts. A bill allowing the monitoring of all UK citizens' internet use was dropped after Liberal Democrat opposition. However, following the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich there have been calls for the Communications Data Bill, dubbed the "snoopers' charter" by opponents, which was shelved in May to be revived. Quote from letter issued by Jack Straw, David Blunkett, Alan Johnson, Lord Baker, Lord King, and Lord Carlile The letter was signed by former Labour home secretaries Jack Straw, David Blunkett and Alan Johnson, along with former Conservative home secretary Lord Baker and defence secretary Lord King, and Liberal Democrat Lord Carlile, who until 2011 was the independent reviewer of government anti-terror laws. In issuing the letter Mr Straw teamed up with Ben Wallace, the MP for Wyre and Preston North and parliamentary aide to minister without portfolio Ken Clarke. As a parliamentary aide Mr Wallace must not differ from the government position. The letter, which was passed to Newsnight and which will be published in The Times on Friday, puts renewed pressure on the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, whose party claimed a month ago they would not allow the bill to become law while the Liberal Democrats were in government. It also shows support amongst backers of the bill is undiminished, despite claims British security services used information gathered on UK citizens by Prism - the US secret intelligence programme revealed last week. Instead, referring to the recent murder of Drummer Rigby, they write: "When such a threat reveals itself, government has a duty to ensure they can do all they can to counter it." Without Liberal Democrat support in parliament, the Conservatives alone could not get the bill on to the statute book, but this letter is the first sign that Labour politicians are prepared to combine in principle with the Conservative party to help ensure the security services are given the new powers. In an attack on Liberal Democrat opposition, they write: "Coalition niceties and party politics must not get in the way of giving our security services the capabilities they need to stay one step ahead of those that seek to destroy our society." They also accuse the Liberal Democrats of siding with the interests of large communications companies, writing: "We find it odd that many critics of the Bill prefer to champion the rights of corporations over democratically accountable law enforcement agencies." Speculation is mounting in Westminster that to avoid complicated votes in parliament, measures will be brought forward by Home Secretary Theresa May that are not presented in a formal bill, but instead use other means of achieving the same ends. The Communications Data Bill would have given police and security services access, without a warrant, to details of all online communication in the UK - such as the time, duration, originator and recipient, and the location of the device from which it was made. It would also give access to some details of Britons' web browsing history and details of messages sent on social media. The police would have to get a warrant from the home secretary to be able to access the actual content of conversations and messages. In April, Mr Clegg told his weekly LBC radio phone-in: "What people have dubbed the snoopers' charter - I have to be clear with you, that's not going to happen." "In other words the idea that the government will pass a law which means there will be a record kept of every website you visit, who you communicate with on social media sites, that's not going to happen. It's certainly not going to happen with Liberal Democrats in government." "We all committed ourselves at the beginning of this coalition to learn the lessons from the past, when Labour overdid it, trying to constantly keep tabs on everyone. We have a commitment in this Coalition Agreement to end the storage of internet information unless there is a very good reason to do so." But in the letter the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat grandees say: "Far from being a 'snoopers' charter', as critics allege, the draft bill, seeks to match our crime fighting capabilities to the advances in technologies. "The proposed Communications Data Bill does not want access to the content of our communications but does want to ensure that enough data is available in the aftermath of an attack to help investigators establish 'who, where and when' were involved in planning or supporting it."rjs2662 13th June 2013 - 19:42 If you value security over freedom you will end up losing both +62 Comment number 24. Welsh Ben 13th June 2013 - 19:55 And the terrorists have almost won... They've pushed the UK to the point where we are more in fear of state snooping on our private lives than we are of the potential terrorist acts. +59 Comment number 18. jay 13th June 2013 - 19:53 "However, following the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby in Woolwich" Not only would police/local authorities monitoring all UK internet use without a warrant due to one terrorist attack be grossly disproportionate, but I haven't heard a single objective, evidenced-based argument for how these powers would have prevented Woolwich. Cynical, manipulative and dangerous. Go through the courts. +49 Comment number 3. BikerAndy 13th June 2013 - 19:44 disgusting invasion of privacy. together with the current trend of net censorship, it just goes to show that all the major political parties have no interest in what the public actually want. big brother gone mad. i for one will be voting pirate party in the next elections to make my feelings clear to the next government. +49 Comment number 6. vin 13th June 2013 - 19:46 They already monitor everything. They are just trying to legalise it. +46 Comment number 4. oOLJCOo 13th June 2013 - 19:46 Any one think that people who do not wish to be monitored will just go back to pens and paper? This isn't for "terror", it's for policing of the population incase we ever decide to turn off Big Brother or Downton Abbey and head down to the Capital to remove the fat cat bankers and their MP henchmen who have robbed and stole from the common person. +46 Comment number 109. yournext 13th June 2013 - 20:31 First they came for the communists, I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the trade unionists, I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew. When they came for the Catholics, I didn't speak out. Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak for me. +40 Comment number 68. ePug 13th June 2013 - 20:14 What? I must be dreaming. More surveillance? More scrutiny? Terror? What terror? This is insane. +37 Comment number 85. Tony 13th June 2013 - 20:23 Jack Straw is a creep.. a power freak who was behind the British ID card system.. oh how that man loves the idea of Big Brother. +34 Comment number 12. beesaman 13th June 2013 - 19:50 This will make both Labour and Conservative unelectable in the next election. +34 Comment number 13. Mooker 13th June 2013 - 19:50 We are doomed if we do not unite and take a stand against this NOW! +33 Comment number 38. BeesAreTrendy 13th June 2013 - 20:02 It's funny how Governments want its citizen's business out in the open for it to see, but it does not want its own business out in the open for its citizen's to see. Yes, funny that. +33 Comment number 45. Dragonwight 13th June 2013 - 20:04 Lee Rigby would not have been saved by new powers so any mention of him is just political opportunism and an insult to his family. This lot should just learn to go away gracefully they had their time in office. Given the number of MP`s who seem to have trouble with basic morality like not stealing from the public purse I certainly wouldn't trust them with a complex issue like privacy. +31 Comment number 67. Big John the Red 13th June 2013 - 20:14 Why not "chip" us all like dogs and have done with it? Oh, and in the UK, you are around 50 times more like to die of an allergic reaction to a cat than in a terrorist attack! +31 Comment number 29. TQ 13th June 2013 - 19:56 "if you are not guilty of anything then what is there to fear?" let me give you a list... corrupt politicians (for examples see the last decade of UK politics), corrupt police (for examples see last 30 years of Police history), hackers, corrupt civil servants, corrupt judges... the list goes on but when too much power is centralised then abuse of that power isn't far behind (See the Prism scandal) +28 Comment number 51. GodsSon83 13th June 2013 - 20:07 The nazis may of lost the battle but they def won the War Welcome to Soviet United kingdom of Europe where your "security" is our top priority. Whilst the "Terrorists" are about we will have to remove your rights and spy on you without probably cause or due process I AM SICK OF THIS NONSENSE Where are they going to draw the line on this "security" which there pretty useless at! +27 Comment number 65. Citizen Too 13th June 2013 - 20:13 It has taken a thousand years for us to win the level of freedom of speech and action that we now enjoy so we should be prepared to accept risks and dangers in order to maintain it and not be browbeaten into accepting any further curtailment. +27 Comment number 87. JoJoDeathunter 13th June 2013 - 20:24 Politicians take note... we the British people don't want this! We're the people who survived the bombs of the Blitz and the collapse of the largest empire the world has ever seen, only to come out stronger than ever, a few lousy terrorists can't faze us. For once listen to your people rather than trying to grab as much power as you think you can get away with. +26 Comment number 66. blogitusmaximus 13th June 2013 - 20:13 Show me where in the snoopers charter they have developed the technology to crack encrypted tunnelled traffic. Any idiot with a VPN renders this legislation pointless. It is a gross oversight to allow those in power to acquire snooping powers that once in place cant be recinded easily. Beware future not-so-benevolent power hungry governments. +25 Comment number 46. Sane or not 13th June 2013 - 20:04 To give police and security services the right to monitor all communication data is a recipie for a civil liberties /privacy disaster. It's impossible to guarantee that it will only be used to deal with terrorism and serious organised crime. Usage of the anti-terrorism bill has not been confined to war on terror. What stops any officialy body snooping on people who oppose their policies. Page 1 of 23 Newer 1 2 3 4 5 ... 23 Older Sign in with your BBC iD, or Register to comment and rate comments All posts are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules . Share this page 709 Share Facebook Twitter Email Print Top Stories US: Syria 'used chemical weapons' Cuts could be dangerous - army chief Man charged over Queen painting Alcohol liver disease care 'lacking' Pensioners' incomes 'rising fastest' Features Launch time The plane that Airbus did not want to build All change Is tipping so unfair it should be banned? Cost of war The Afghan soldiers paying the price for taking on the Taliban Cinema saviour Watch The man bringing Britain's art deco picture houses back to life Most Popular Shared 1: Secret life of the cat: What do our feline companions get up to? 2: 'Ugly prostitute' reported to police 3: Angler pulled into lake by huge fish 4: US Supreme Court bans DNA patents 5: Mussolini's gay island Read 1: Police warn on Big Brother entrant 2: 'Ugly prostitute' reported to police 3: Should tips be banned in restaurants? 4: Spielberg predicts film 'meltdown' 5: Airbus A350 prepares for take-off 6: Man charged over Queen painting 7: Coldstream Guard laid to rest after 200 years 8: Hen party crash driver arrested 9: US: Syria 'used chemical weapons' 10: Airbus A350 set for maiden flight Video/Audio 1: Angler pulled into lake by huge fish Watch 2: 'Gasps' as PS4 price unveiled Watch 3: BBC News Channel Watch 4: How did this man learn 11 languages? Watch 5: Man survives three days trapped under sea Watch 6: Snowden in hiding after China claims Watch 7: Henry Cavill brings Superman home Watch 8: Art deco cinemas saved from demolition Watch 9: Will.i.am tries UK citizenship test Watch 10: E-cigarettes face new restrictions Watch http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=337_1371181318 omniradar BBC Bullshit &amp; Comments from Brits that needs a thoughtful &quot;EAR&quot; wtf Fri, 24 May 2013 16:11:01 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=542_1369425710 jasonbosh333 Naughty Squirrel looks for trouble with Snake http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=542_1369425710 jasonbosh333 Naughty Squirrel looks for <span class="highlight">trouble</span> with Snake Squirrel Snake Sat, 01 Jun 2013 20:08:41 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=596_1370131232 KarlJaspers This happend in a ghetto in Gothenburg Sweden. If you knew Swedish you would understand that the asshole who's filming is shouting "excessive force" with a broad immigrant Swedish. The Ghetto is called L"ovg"ardet and it used to be a safe place but now.. you don't want to be there at night.. especially not if you are a girl... or a goat. lol http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=596_1370131232 KarlJaspers Swedish police are having a little <span class="highlight">trouble</span> taking a guy down sweden immigrant muslim police fight islam assholes ghetto Sat, 01 Jun 2013 16:02:17 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=133_1370116645 nonad You can hear the off duty cop racing to the scene smash into a car in the background. Tried to clean up the aspect ratio... it was much worse. Must have been filmed vertically. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=133_1370116645 nonad Police having a little <span class="highlight">trouble</span> taking a guy down. police, chaos, he's down brah Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:45:59 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9d7_1370344059 PORK-CHOP The guy must have been on drugs, that 1 cop had no chance taking that guy down and arresting him ffs http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=9d7_1370344059 PORK-CHOP Cop Needs Help To Take This Guy Down cop, arrest, trouble, fight Sun, 02 Jun 2013 20:26:30 -0400 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=02d_1370219032 JustinTime Leon County police officers found their equal in a 7-year-old llama named Scooter, after the animal escaped from his owner's Tallahassee home. Scooter's owner Jack Conrad wasn't sure when the llama went missing, but checked in on the llama late Friday night and couldn't find him. 'We looked for him late into the night, and word eventually got out,' Conrad told the Tallahassee Democrat. 'About eleven o'clock, we started getting calls about a llama running through Kellearn Lakes and on Bannerman road,' Deputy Tony Drzewiecki of the Leon County Sheriff's Office told WCTV reporters. 'There was some sightings, but we were never able to get out hands on it,' Deputy Drzewiecki said. It wasn't until the following morning, with the aid of light, that police officers finally spotted the six-foot-tall animal. In order to wrangle the beast, police officers shut down traffic on Bannerman Road and then proceeded to corner the six foot animal. "Our main concern was that he was going to get hit by a car and either get hurt or injure someone else," Drzewiecki told NBC Miami. The llama wasn't having any of it, and resisted the entire time officers tried to force the animal into a trailer. Scooter even spat in Deputy Drzewiecki's face. 'I've been doing this 20 years and they said there is going to be a lot of excitement in this job, but no one ever told me I would get spit in the face by a llama and trampled by one,' said Deputy Drzewiecki. Finally, the officers had to resort to tasing the animal in order to move it into the trailer and return the llama to its owner. 'It was apparent that he was going to cause an accident,' Sgt. Dawn Dennis told the Democrat. 'We had to tase it. If it's a hazard - which it was - we try our best to capture it until the owner can come and get it.' Drzewieki told NBC Miami that Scooter was unharmed from the tasing. Scooter calmed considerably after his capture. 'He was eating his favorite snacks, Triscuits, shorty thereafter,' Drzewiecki said. 'I didn't believe it until I saw it and I was like wow, where did that thing come from,' Tallahassee resident Julie McDaniel told WCTV Eyewitness News. His owner, Jack Conrad, faces no citations or fines for losing his pet. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=02d_1370219032 JustinTime Escaped Llama Tasered By Cops After It Spat And Trampled Officer Escaped, Llama, Tasered, Cops, Spat, Trampled, Trouble