By ubdumb | 14 Comments
351 Views | 0 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: 6 days ago
By ubdumb | 65 Comments
699 Views | 0 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: 7 days ago
By ubdumb | 16 Comments
302 Views | 0 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: 7 days ago
By ubdumb | 53 Comments
1095 Views | 4 Votes | 1 Recommendation
Leaked: 7 days ago
By ubdumb | 12 Comments
310 Views | 0 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: 7 days ago
By ubdumb | 10 Comments
289 Views | 0 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: 7 days ago
By ubdumb | 24 Comments
369 Views | 0 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: 8 days ago
By ubdumb | 6 Comments
374 Views | 1 Vote | 1 Recommendation
Leaked: 8 days ago
By ubdumb | 9 Comments
357 Views | 0 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: 8 days ago
By ubdumb | 2 Comments
419 Views | 0 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: Mar-4-2010
By ubdumb | 17 Comments
3171 Views | 2 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: Mar-4-2010
By ubdumb | 3 Comments
424 Views | 0 Votes | 0 Recommendations
Leaked: Mar-4-2010
Comments - sort by newest to oldest
Can you tell me what a common ant was before it evolved? Where did the chicken come from? Which came first the chickeh or the egg.
Atheists claim evolution and it can be proven that what we have been taught is wrong. With DNA the skulls of those suppose ancesters of ours have been proven to be 100% ape.
I owe you no answers. You post what you believe.
From Wiki:
Evolution
Main article: Evolution
Evolution states that species change over time via mutation and selection. Since DNA can be modified only before birth, a mutation must have taken place at conception or within an egg such that an animal similar to a chicken, but not a chicken, laid the first chicken egg.[7][8] In this light, both the egg and the chicken evolved simultaneously from birds who weren't chickens and didn't lay chicken eggs but gradually became more and more like chickens over time.
However, a mutation in one individual is not normally considered a new species. A speciation event involves the separation of one population from its parent population, so that interbreeding ceases; this is the process whereby domesticated animals are genetically separated from their wild forebears. The whole separated group can then be recognized as a new species.
The modern chicken was believed to have descended from another closely related species of birds, the red junglefowl, but recently discovered genetic evidence suggests that the modern domestic chicken is a hybrid descendant of both the red junglefowl and the grey junglefowl.[9] Assuming the evidence bears out, a hybrid is a compelling scenario that the chicken egg, based on the second definition, came before the chicken.
The key words that stick out to me is" was believed to" there you have it in your own post. Faith
Not interested and the fact you looked up such a thing does not impress me.
Just like saying believing in a creator. You need to attend more atheist services.
I have more religious posts keep coming to my page I will upload more. I am tired of athesist pushing there beliefs.
Posted Mar-3-2010 by "ubdumb" (R)
Can you tell me what a common ant was before it evolved? Where did the chicken come from? Which came first the chickeh or the egg.
Atheists claim evolution and it can be proven that what we have been taught is wrong. With DNA the skulls of those suppose ancesters of ours have been proven to be 100% ape.
I owe you no answers. You post what you believe.
From Wiki:
Evolution
Main article: Evolution
Evolution states that species change over time via mutation and selection. Since DNA can be modified only before birth, a mutation must have taken place at conception or within an egg such that an animal similar to a chicken, but not a chicken, laid the first chicken egg.[7][8] In this light, both the egg and the chicken evolved simultaneously from birds who weren't chickens and didn't lay chicken eggs but gradually became more and more like chickens over time.
However, a mutation in one individual is not normally considered a new species. A speciation event involves the separation of one population from its parent population, so that interbreeding ceases; this is the process whereby domesticated animals are genetically separated from their wild forebears. The whole separated group can then be recognized as a new species.
The modern chicken was believed to have descended from another closely related species of birds, the red junglefowl, but recently discovered genetic evidence suggests that the modern domestic chicken is a hybrid descendant of both the red junglefowl and the grey junglefowl.[9] Assuming the evidence bears out, a hybrid is a compelling scenario that the chicken egg, based on the second definition, came before the chicken.
More of public school teachings.
Posted Mar-3-2010 by "ubdumb" (R)
Can you tell me what a common ant was before it evolved? Where did the chicken come from? Which came first the chickeh or the egg.
Atheists claim evolution and it can be proven that what we have been taught is wrong. With DNA the skulls of those suppose ancesters of ours have been proven to be 100% ape.
I owe you no answers. You post what you believe.
From Wiki:
Evolution
Main article: Evolution
Evolution states that species change over time via mutation and selection. Since DNA can be modified only before birth, a mutation must have taken place at conception or within an egg such that an animal similar to a chicken, but not a chicken, laid the first chicken egg.[7][8] In this light, both the egg and the chicken evolved simultaneously from birds who weren't chickens and didn't lay chicken eggs but gradually became more and more like chickens over time.
However, a mutation in one individual is not normally considered a new species. A speciation event involves the separation of one population from its parent population, so that interbreeding ceases; this is the process whereby domesticated animals are genetically separated from their wild forebears. The whole separated group can then be recognized as a new species.
The modern chicken was believed to have descended from another closely related species of birds, the red junglefowl, but recently discovered genetic evidence suggests that the modern domestic chicken is a hybrid descendant of both the red junglefowl and the grey junglefowl.[9] Assuming the evidence bears out, a hybrid is a compelling scenario that the chicken egg, based on the second definition, came before the chicken.
Posted Mar-2-2010 by "drivertyler" (R)
Can you tell me what a common ant was before it evolved? Where did the chicken come from? Which came first the chickeh or the egg.
Atheists claim evolution and it can be proven that what we have been taught is wrong. With DNA the skulls of those suppose ancesters of ours have been proven to be 100% ape.
I owe you no answers. You post what you believe.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/
Posted Mar-2-2010 by "drivertyler" (R)
Can you tell me what a common ant was before it evolved? Where did the chicken come from? Which came first the chickeh or the egg.
Atheists claim evolution and it can be proven that what we have been taught is wrong. With DNA the skulls of those suppose ancesters of ours have been proven to be 100% ape.
I owe you no answers. You post what you believe.
Posted Mar-1-2010 by "ubdumb" (R)
You were probbly what was thought to be bird poop on a fence.
Posted Mar-1-2010 by "ubdumb" (R)
So when exactly where we created?
Posted Feb-28-2010 by "drivertyler" (R)
Just goes to show that you are not as smart as you think. If you can not control your mouse I can't help you. I have many hours more. Just hope how soon you guys get tired of preaching your faith so those of us that prefer not to hear it can go back to normal.
Atheism is faithlessness, not a faith, retard.
No more proof than creationism so it is a faith.
When you know you are wrong resort to name calling.
I am going to keep posting and you can keep showing other exactly the kind of person you are, LOL
No, evolution has evidence. It is biological science.
Creaitonism has baseless accusations rooted in scientific illiteracy and supernatural mysticism.
You clearly cannot sort the difference.
Are you talking about the fake skulls from years ago.
I think from this point on I will let you talk to yourself.
You are my encouragement.
When you begin slobbering on yourself I will post again and again. I will not respond to you any more.
Masturbate in a mirror for your enjoyment from this point on.
Posted Feb-27-2010 by "ubdumb" (R)
ok, got to the religious part, not biting, sorry
Posted Feb-27-2010 by "VX-Victim" (R)
another interesting angle from these evolution videos, thanks for posting, always good to see another side.
Posted Feb-27-2010 by "VX-Victim" (R)
Just goes to show that you are not as smart as you think. If you can not control your mouse I can't help you. I have many hours more. Just hope how soon you guys get tired of preaching your faith so those of us that prefer not to hear it can go back to normal.
Atheism is faithlessness, not a faith, retard.
No more proof than creationism so it is a faith.
When you know you are wrong resort to name calling.
I am going to keep posting and you can keep showing other exactly the kind of person you are, LOL
No, evolution has evidence. It is biological science.
Creaitonism has baseless accusations rooted in scientific illiteracy and supernatural mysticism.
You clearly cannot sort the difference.
Posted Feb-27-2010 by "Entinlude" (R)
I gave you the thumbs up for giving me an ideal.
My arse your face.
Posted Feb-27-2010 by "ubdumb" (R)
just wanted to say thanks for all the time and effort,
for your contributions to this site. to post videos that keep LL more fair and balanced. knowing that the close minded fools(darwin wanna be's)the Cliff Clavin know it alls of L.L.are going to try unsuccessfully to attack you with their total lack of knowledge and lack of respect. to be self professed genius's, but lack the basic understanding of what you meant about the inability for them to control their own mouse.how can people like this be so arrogant and stupid at the same time? you have my respect and honor and appreciation
Posted Feb-27-2010 by "star53" (R)
difficult task to lose something you never possessed to begin with
Posted Feb-27-2010 by "star53" (R)
*facepalm*
Posted Feb-27-2010 by "scumsberg" (R)