Romney in 2011: Shut down FEMA, let the states handle it. In June 2011, Mitt Romney said in a Republican primary debate that he "absolutely" thinks FEMA should be shut down, and disaster relief moved to the states.
CNN's John King asked Romney if he thinks disaster relief would be better handled by the states. "Absolutely," Romney said. "Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that's the right direction. And if you can go even further, and send it back to the private sector, that's even better."
"Including disaster relief, though?" King asked.
"We cannot — we cannot afford to do those things without jeopardizing the future for our kids," Romney said. "It is simply immoral, in my view, for us to continue to rack up larger and larger debts and pass them on to our kids, knowing full well that we'll all be dead and gone before it's paid off. It makes no sense at all."
By: gregsto
In: Politics
Tags: Mitt Romney, FEMA, disaster relief
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1094 | Comments: 58 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 109 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Mitt Romney Tears Up On Meet The Press
-
Mitt Romney's New Radio Ad 'Exceptional'
-
Mitt Romney Reveals His Special Waffle Recipe
-
Mitt Romney Supporters Get Caught Buying Election in Florida Straw Poll
-
Mitt Romney Confronted About 'Obama Osama' Sign
-
Romney: Federal Disaster Relief Spending Is 'Immoral'
-
Rebulican Mitt Romney on Terrorist and Democrats
-
Mitt Romney Saves the Auto Industry
-
Marco Rubio endorses Mitt Romney for President
-
Mitt Romney - "Small Rodent Hunter"
-
Mitt Romney Talks To Disgruntled Patron
-
Mitt Romney to Buy Clear Channel Communications




The title of this video is misleading and the description even admits to it being misleading. Mitt Romney did not say disaster relief is immoral, he said the result of it is. Not saying I agree or have any opinion or concern on this matter, or statement, just pointing out some idiocy.
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bylucidx1 (989.60) 
lucidx1 View Channel Send Message
(6)
Romney stands against government federal waste, clearly you advocate for it. Romney wants the states to have the money, not the Feds. Clearly this concept is too advanced for you to comprehend. It matters not, your messiah is history.
Posted Oct-31-2012 ByCannabinolKid (251.40) 
CannabinolKid Send Message
(5)
@CannabinolKid NOPE...he does not want the money to exist at all. Are you stupid?
Posted Nov-1-2012 Bygregsto (2482.08) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(0)
@gregsto
No, I am not shitstain. Are you blind and deaf you zionist worm ?
Posted Nov-1-2012 ByCannabinolKid (251.40) 
CannabinolKid Send Message
(0)
@CannabinolKid Zionist worm ...HA HA HA HA HA..what a dumbfuck you are.
Posted Nov-4-2012 Bygregsto (2482.08) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(0)
What Romney really says. It's not whether aid will come from the Feds, it's how it's done. Right now the system is full of inefficiencies that Romney want to fix.
"I believe that FEMA plays a key role in working with states and localities to prepare for and respond to natural disasters," Romney said in a statement supplied by his campaign Wednesday. "As president, I will ensure FEMA has the funding it needs to fulfill its mission, while directing maximum resources to the first More..
Posted Oct-31-2012 Byonepercent (758.10) 
onepercent View Channel Send Message
(4)
@onepercent That's not what he said. That's what you wanted to hear.
Posted Oct-31-2012 Byggppgg (942.40) 
ggppgg View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@ggppgg no that's actually what he said. try again.
Posted Oct-31-2012 ByWalmartyr (233.80) 
Walmartyr Send Message
(1)
@onepercent Which is COMPLETELY different from what he said a year ago. Of course we had not just had a natural disaster.
Posted Nov-1-2012 Bygregsto (2482.08) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(0)
Can't say I disagree with Mitt.
A big bloated federal government is rarely the right approach.
FEMA never existed before 1979, and if you read the scary shit that its prepared to do going forward, its a bit over the top, and scary if you are the paranoid type.
So, Yeah, I'm kind of with Mitt on this.
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bywharris (2348.42) 
wharris View Channel Send Message
(3)
It is....because what quantifies as a disaster for a town might not qualify you for the Fed. Leave it to the individual states, like it fuckin should be.
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bymperkins813 (85.60) 
mperkins813 View Channel Send Message
(3)
If facts don't work in your favor, twist, lie, and manipulate. Obama handbook, page 3.
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bycicc2422 (151.40) 
cicc2422 View Channel Send Message
(3)
Yeah because we've seen how well FEMA does with major disasters now haven't we?
Plus you're citing MSNBC as some sort of legitimate unbiased news source pfffttt....
Posted Oct-31-2012 ByBurkaBurka (155.00) 
BurkaBurka View Channel Send Message
(2)
@BurkaBurka better than nothing. BTW FEMA was being lead by that ass clown "Brownie" under W... Another GOP disaster.
Posted Oct-31-2012 Byggppgg (942.40) 
ggppgg View Channel Send Message
(-3)
@BurkaBurka
Uh huh, our Governments idea of disaster relief is, "Send 'em in guns blazing and steal private property, then hand out some water or something, I guess."
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bylucidx1 (989.60) 
lucidx1 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@ggppgg
Actually, its not better than nothing.
Expecting and getting nothing from the fed is preferable.
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bywharris (2348.42) 
wharris View Channel Send Message
(0)
@BurkaBurka The reason FEMA failed at Katrina was because Bush had changed the operations of the agency to deal with terrorism and civil unrest insted of disaster relief. They had forgotten what they are for, so they did not have procedures in place to deal with a disaster. That is why they went around consfiscating weapons. Their priorities were all screwed up. They could help, if they were just prepared to.
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bywellybub (354.08) 
wellybub View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@wellybub Even more reason for disaster relief to be placed in the states hands instead of the giant bureaucracy known as the United Stated Federal Government.
Posted Oct-31-2012 ByBurkaBurka (155.00) 
BurkaBurka View Channel Send Message
(0)
"Mitt Romney Says Federal Disaster Relief Is Immoral"
Not quite what he said if you read it.
Propaganda fail!
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bythe_MEK (724.30) 
the_MEK View Channel Send Message
(2)
gregsto is obviously a typical demotarded docuhebag.
"Truth? What's that?", wonders the douchebag.
"Facts? What are they?", wonders the douchebag.
Posted Oct-31-2012 ByRousing Sermon (178.90) 
Rousing Sermon Send Message
(2)
That's why Romney was so quiet today. Politically, Romney is so full of crap and he knows it.
Romney seems like a great family man and provider to his family. He should stick to that and leave America alone.
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bysinister283 (113.44) sinister283 View Channel Send Message
(1)
Wanting relief efforts to be handled by the state doesn't mean Romney wants to do away with aid all together. He's advocated state-run programs and organizations throughout his entire campaign, and for good reason to. What a dumb fucking title.
Posted Oct-31-2012 ByWalmartyr (233.80) 
Walmartyr Send Message
(1)
@Walmartyr
So many states can't even fucking balance their own state budgets. What makes you think they can properly handle disaster relief funding?
Posted Nov-1-2012 ByJohn_Matrix (648.54) 
John_Matrix View Channel Send Message
(0)
@John_Matrix They haven't even been given the chance to. The FED has and we've seen the downside of allowing that to occur (Katrina 05')I can't guarantee it will be better, but you can't guarantee it would be worse.
Why not try it? We TRIED a black guy in office and now look...
Give someone else a shot. Someone who has never known failure in his life, unlike other Repubs.
Posted Nov-1-2012 ByWalmartyr (233.80) 
Walmartyr Send Message
(0)
@TimBuckTwo If he does nothing will get done for 4 years but pretty speeches and turd tapper weddings
Posted Oct-31-2012 Byubdumb (9070.56) ubdumb View Channel Send Message
(0)
As I commented yesterday:
"Not sure if it's immoral, but consider this:
Less than one month after Hurricane Katrina, private donations surpassed the $1 billion mark, most of which went to private organizations who quickly provided relief.
FEMA gave out $6.3 billion in taxpayer money, with nearly a quarter of the money going to scammers.
FEMA:
-gave money to prison inmates
-sent money to people who said they LIVED in cemeteries of Post Office Boxes
-reimbursed people for rent even tho More..
Posted Oct-31-2012 Bycswartz (1163.80) 
cswartz View Channel Send Message
(0)
FEMA is a joke anyway we had $40,000 in damage and got $150 from FEMA the last storm
Posted Oct-31-2012 Byubdumb (9070.56) ubdumb View Channel Send Message
(0)
@ubdumb They are not an insurance company.
Posted Nov-1-2012 Bygregsto (2482.08) 
gregsto View Channel Send Message
(0)
Why are liberal men so androgynous
Posted Oct-31-2012 By_Byron_ (947.70) 
_Byron_ View Channel Send Message
(0)