Safe Mode: On
White House and CIA told DEA to Ignore Afghan Drug Trade
 Part of channel(s): Afghanistan (current event)

It has long been proven that the drug trade is one of the primary
motivating factors behind western military intervention in Afghanistan.
Last winter an Anonymous hack of the security firm Stratfor revealed more information supporting this fact, but since there were almost 3,000 emails to sift through, this information has not come to light until recently when wikileaks released the emails to a wider audience.


In these emails, Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s brother, Ahmed Wali
Karzai was implicated in drug trafficking operations, but the DEA was
told by the White House and CIA to back off.
This is important because President Hamid Karzai was appointed by the
western military industrial complex and has been mostly cooperative
with the US and NATO during his time in power, except of course for when
hes pandering to the public who want the foreign occupation to end.
One of the Stratfor emails that highlights this clandestine
relationship is titled “RE: Humint – Afghanistan – Karzai (Strictly
Protect – Confidential)” and says:
The brother of President Karzai of Afghanistan is under investigation by DEA as a major narcotics trafficker.


For political reasons, DEA has been told to backoff by the White
House and CIA. DEA is seeing a direct nexus between terrorism and
narcotics in Afghanistan with narcotics sales being used to fund
jihadist operations.
As we saw with the recent gun running operations that the government has cleared themselves of
any responsibility in, it is common practice for them to ship weapons
and ammunition to people who are presented as their enemies in the
mainstream media dialogue.
Many of the terrorist groups that are creating unrest around the
world are directly funded and armed by the CIA and other front
organizations.
Control and distribution of various natural resources are one of the
primary reasons why governments go to war, and drugs are a very
important and very profitable natural resource, just one that is dealt
with more covertly than oil or mineral resources.

Keeping this involvement a secret is so important that the military
has even killed members of their own organization to keep a lid on the
details, as we saw years ago in the case of Pat Tillman.
As I discussed in my hardback book Alchemy of the Modern Renaissance even
judging by the establishments very own statistics it is obvious that
NATO and the US military are involved in drug smuggling.
From the book: “According to the United Nations Office of Drugs and
Crime, after the US invasion in 2001 opium production in Afghanistan
rose from 7,606 hectares in 2001 to 193,000 hectares in 2007.
That is a 96% increase of opium production since the US has occupied
the country. Now that the CIA has control of Afghanistan 93% of the
world’s heroin comes from inside its borders. It is certainly no
coincidence that in recent history we have seen a surge of drug
exportation from war torn countries that were being occupied by western
nations.
During the Vietnam War the area surrounding Vietnam was known as “The Golden Triangle”, a hotbed for heroin production.


Now the Golden Triangle has taken a back seat to the “Golden
Crescent”, which refers to the area in and around Afghanistan of
course.”http://theintelhub.com/2012/09/20/white-house-and-cia-told-dea-to-ignore-afghan-drug-trade/


Added: Sep-22-2012 Occurred On: Sep-20-2012
By: 104JebackaBrigada
In:
Afghanistan
Tags: White House, and CIA told DEA to, Ignore Afghan, Drug Trade
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 2199 | Comments: 51 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Old news. This has been going on for a very long time.

    I love my country but hate the government that is ruining it.

    Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

    (7)

  • well hell look at all the pot and opium fields there are in Afghanistan if there was a real war on drugs why didn't the destroy them? it's called big business pharmaceutical companies with many governments in their bed.

    Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

    (4)

  • Government meddling in all kinds of nasty shit has been going on since the 50's. They put those fascists Pinochet and Shah of Iran in power.

    Are you guys just now paying attention?

    Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

    (3)

  • The CIA was involved with drug running heroin in south east Asia during the Vietnam war, cocaine during the 80s and 90s in Latin America, and now this in Afghanistan. Not to mention the alleged involvement in the drug war in Mexico right now.

    Our government is filled with drug peddling criminals, LOCK THEM UP!

    Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @Syntax_Attack
      They have to bring money in for the black projects the U.S government sets up, I dont think they have enough money rolling in to pay for what they need, the tax department isnt working hard enough to pay for those gold plated toilet seats.

      Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

      (5)

    • Comment of user 'BeerBasher' has been deleted by author!
  • I don't understand why we dont just buy up all the opium there and use it to make the planets morphine supply.

    Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @zindo

      why do you think american soldiers are guarding poppy fields in afghanistan

      Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @LostSomewhereInSpace

      We are?

      Have you been there to see this yourself or are you just another bullshitting liberal making shit up?

      Before you reply, take a hard look at my avatar.

      Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

      (-3)

    • @Martyr_Machine

      sorry to tell you but you got taken advantage of

      www.youtube.com/watch?v=56XpRyNkf6w

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZErSD4rlRDs

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1ZPteiIUbg

      http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12707

      Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Martyr_Machine
      I am a vet myself man, sorry to break it to you but you, and all my brothers in arms are being lied to by our criminal government.

      You think bringing democracy and freedom is on the radar for ANY of our wars?

      Look at Afgan elections
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Afghanistan

      If a non-puppet politician looks like he may have a shot at winning he is disqualified or the vote is rigged.

      Our great allies in the middle east; Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, UAE, the More..

      Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

      (5)

    • Comment of user 'PimeTaradox' has been deleted by author!
  • lol says me leprechaun

    Posted Sep-23-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'BeerBasher' has been deleted by author!
  • Yeah,...so, this article wants to say that the US government of appeared conflict of interest regarding of issue of Afghan narcotics, wow...I was speechless ...so, DEA wants to investigate narcotics brother of Karzai wich represents a threat to US national security and the CIA together with White House administration tells DEA to forget and to see to their own, motherfuckers...and this bitch Karzai, out in public and demands that foreign military occupation to end ...and when there, what to see More..

    Posted Sep-23-2012 By 

    (0)

  • "It has long been proven that the drug trade is one of the primary
    motivating factors behind western military intervention in Afghanistan"

    LOL

    Long proven by who, tin foil hat liberals?

    Posted Sep-22-2012 By 

    (-2)