The Most Accurate World Temperature Trend Visualisation to Date
Here are some links by the lead author of the study putting it in context
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDMGw0_9nbE&;feature=endscreen&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&;feature=endscreen&v=zu4hwTo_hRE
Added: Feb-5-2012 Occurred On: Feb-5-2012
By: Clivenio
In: Science and Technology
Tags: Science
Marked as: approved
Views: 1140 | Comments: 82 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
By: Clivenio
In: Science and Technology
Tags: Science
Marked as: approved
Views: 1140 | Comments: 82 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
Items
-
Science of Superman 01
-
What is Dark Matter? - 60 Second Science
-
Hamza Yusuf on "Science Delusion"
-
Daily Dose Of Junk Science:Human Species Will Split Into Two Species
-
MAGIC TRICKS - SCIENCE FACTS
-
Science of Superman 02
-
Alternative Science Fiction Double Feature
-
Not Just Science Fiction: 'Electromagnetic Wormhole' Possible, Say Mathematicians
-
magic and science come together
-
Chico Science e Nação Zumbi - Manguetown
-
Science of Superman 03
-
MADD SCIENCE - LIQUID LIBIDO commercial
Advertisers
Nothing makes my day better than watching 2 minutes of graphs. This is LiveLeak, right?
We need to add Bullshit to the Report: Repost, Spam and TOS violation.
I wonder if Bullshit is a TOS violation.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByFlashovr (1882.70) 
Flashovr View Channel Send Message
(5)
@Clivenio
The Liberals would love litterally make me pay (taxes) for global warming.
I'll keep my money, thanks.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByFlashovr (1882.70) 
Flashovr View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Clivenio
My position on Global Warming follows this template:
1) It's a Good thing (warmer is better)
2) Man does not cause it
3) Man can not stop it
4) There is a lot of money to be made in trying. This attracts unscrupulus people.
5) Scientist need grant money (or else they would have to get real jobs), so a few of them publish and Peer-review each other to support the people who want to sell things that 'reduce' global warming.
It's a big money circle jerk between some scientist (very few More..
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByFlashovr (1882.70) 
Flashovr View Channel Send Message
(1)
Totally unrealistic.
I can say for certain that rainfall in Western Australia was way higher from about 1912 to 1970ish It had nothing to do with minute variations in annual temperature.
Worse. This chart is probably made from faulty records by University of East Anglia that make global estimates based in a very small sample size that has been 'averaged' and 'adjusted' by extremely dodgy processes based on a very small sample size.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByDEADBEEF (4149.96) 
DEADBEEF View Channel Send Message
(4)
@Clivenio 39,000 stations that match their hypothesis. They left out 75% of data from Russia, ánd the 25% they used were the only measurements that matched their hypothesis, the overwhelming majority did not. Or so I heard.
Posted Feb-5-2012 Bywellybub (346.98) 
wellybub View Channel Send Message
(2)
If I'm reading it correctly, It starts with 50 measuring stations and by the end, has 18,000+. If the other 17,950 stations are put somewhere that is generally warmer, than this will show a warming trend, even if the trend doesnt actually relate to observed natural phenomenon.
Posted Feb-5-2012 Bymcphuk (228.28) 
mcphuk View Channel Send Message
(4)
@mcphuk
You are getting it very wrong.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByLolling (259.90) 
Lolling View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@Lolling
How so? could you elaborate any further?
Posted Feb-5-2012 Bymcphuk (228.28) 
mcphuk View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Clivenio
I just read through the pdf and saw no evidence to suggest that my statement might be incorrect. There was nothing to support it being true though either.
What I was trying to suggest is that the video started in 1800 with 41.3 weather stations and showed 15,345 station by 2009. If more of these station are put in warmer areas than colder areas, then the statistical median temperature will rise and this would be indication of an event that never took place in the real world. The oppo More..
Posted Feb-5-2012 Bymcphuk (228.28) 
mcphuk View Channel Send Message
(0)
Ah yes, proof by computer graphics. I fail to see how the surface temperatures can mean anything without looking at the oceans and the atmosphere as well.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByZerja (17.08) Zerja View Channel Send Message
(3)
I'll simply go to Vancouver and start a banana farming.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByLolling (259.90) 
Lolling View Channel Send Message
(3)
So, we have a trend graph running from the 19th century till 2009. Only data and no context. Warmists believe this would prove that the world is indeed warming due to human activity. Perhaps a graph of solar intensity along with this would be a little more contextual.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByNebel057 (14.10) Nebel057 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Nebel057 well said, but a graph showing solar activity along that would show that the sun is not the causing factor.
The trouble is, the graph would raise more intense if we won't pollute the atmosphere with particles shielding sunlight.
Global Dimming .. check it out
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByTamaraMJ (70.80) 
TamaraMJ View Channel Send Message
(0)
Clearly the NASA satellite data is more reliable without communist idiots changing it to suit their agenda.
And it says its not warmed enough to care.
Of course they wont show the graph that shows temperature goes up FIRST, then C02, because this dispels the myth that C02 causes such dramatic temperature rises.
This is a scam orchestrated by depopulation agenda, Malthusian communist psychopaths.
They need to be dealt with seriously.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByTheMonkeyOnYourBack (124.70) 
TheMonkeyOnYourBack View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Clivenio lol you people you are fucked in the head honestly.You can prove none of this.There is no such thing as anthropogenic you sick evil person.You want to murder people, you sick sick evil person.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByTheMonkeyOnYourBack (124.70) 
TheMonkeyOnYourBack View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Clivenio
You are just another gravy train shill liar.
http://www.sciencebits.com/IceCoreTruth
Clearly, the correlation and lags unequivocally demonstrate that the temperature drives changes in the atmospheric CO2 content.
http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, report More..
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByTheMonkeyOnYourBack (124.70) 
TheMonkeyOnYourBack View Channel Send Message
(2)
@TheMonkeyOnYourBack
Europe went through a warming period in the middle ages where for about 100 years, it didn't get cold enough to snow in the winter.
Does "global warming" time travel?
The people who are making a buck trying to spread panic gleefully ignore that and any other facts.
clivenio is an asshole.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByJetRanger (514.24) 
JetRanger View Channel Send Message
(0)
Yep...looks like the earth is going through a cycle.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByFlanuva (253.10) 
Flanuva View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Flanuva
We need a global sized tampon then.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByFlash_Back (651.46) Flash_Back View Channel Send Message
(0)
Same old bullshit stuff, contrived BS from climate change assholes fighting like hell to get back to the love they were hugging themselves with before they were caught lying to the public.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByLess1leg (335.36) Less1leg View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Clivenio
has anyone definitively photographed a ghost? Nope, and as long as the sun shines and bombards the earth with energy we will experience trends of tens of thousands of years. And those tens of thousands of years are a blink in the eye of the planet earth. We will be long gone and dead when another trend occurs. But self righteous self appointing eco-liberals need to take credit in taking or raping your wallet now to satisfy their demented version of mankind.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByLess1leg (335.36) Less1leg View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Clivenio
go fuck yourself you self righteous ass.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByLess1leg (335.36) Less1leg View Channel Send Message
(0)
Can't beat data.
Posted Feb-5-2012 Byrumplestiltskin (263.20) rumplestiltskin View Channel Send Message
(1)
I'd say this is pretty good considering we have detonated more then 2000 nukes since 1945.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByXjamesX (448.44) 
XjamesX View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Clivenio CO2 makes up about 0.039% of air, and is great for plant growth. not even a problem... Al Gore is a liar. If you want to blame a chemical blame methane from industrial farming.
Nuclear bombs weaken earths magnetic field and put holes in the ozone layer, this lets more radiation from the sun hit the planet because the buffer is zone is weakened.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByXjamesX (448.44) 
XjamesX View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Clivenio lol ever heard of an EMP? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByXjamesX (448.44) 
XjamesX View Channel Send Message
(0)
the planet is going through a big change whether it's man made or natural something is definately happening.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByBatnBall89 (496.00) 
BatnBall89 View Channel Send Message
(1)
The Earth has been warming since the last Ice Age.
Deal with it.
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByJetRanger (514.24) 
JetRanger View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Clivenio
I don't like your pompous tone especially since you repeat the same demand.
Go hug your trees elsewhere and take your carbon credits and bullshit hydrocarbon taxes with you.
p.s. I expect you to live in a grass shack and not avail yourself of any modern tools, vehicles or utilities since according to dimwits like you, it causes "global warming". That includes cars, bicycles, telephones, computers, water filtration devices and any sort of electricity generating device sinc More..
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByJetRanger (514.24) 
JetRanger View Channel Send Message
(0)
How can you use "anomalies" based on a 1950-1980 mean? Who the fuck says that temps from 1950-1980 are the way earth is supposed to be?
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByStovepipe (298.90) 
Stovepipe View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Clivenio I agree it is getting warmer tho. I mean the winters here are nothing like they were 20 or 30 years ago...
Posted Feb-5-2012 ByStovepipe (298.90) 
Stovepipe View Channel Send Message
(1)
say byby to drinking water from the mountains..
Posted Feb-5-2012 BySlingShoT (21.10) 
SlingShoT View Channel Send Message
(0)