by Rick Moran
Original Link: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/09/the_rogue_even_the_new_york_times_hates_it.html
The review absolutely skewers author Joel McGinnis whose book on Sarah Palin is mercilessly panned by reviewer Janet Maslin.
A sample:
Mr. McGinniss explains that he was shocked, just shocked, at the angry response his presence in Wasilla provoked. But "The Rogue" makes the Palins' widely publicized anger understandable, even to readers who might have defended his right to set up shop in their neighborhood and soak up the local color. Although most of "The Rogue" is dated, petty and easily available to anyone with Internet access, Mr. McGinniss used his time in Alaska to chase caustic, unsubstantiated gossip about the Palins, often from unnamed sources like "one resident" and "a friend."
And these stories need not be consistent. "The Rogue" suggests that Todd Palin and the young Sarah Heath took drugs. It also says that she lacked boyfriends and was a racist. And it includes this: "A friend says, 'Sarah and her sisters had a fetish for black guys for a while.' " Mr. McGinniss did in 2011 make a phone call to the former N.B.A. basketball player Glen Rice, who is black, and prompted him to acknowledge having fond memories of Sarah Heath. While Mr. Rice avoids specifics and uses the words "respectful" and "a sweetheart," Mr. McGinniss eggs him on with the kind of flagrantly leading question he seems to have habitually asked. In Mr. Rice's case: "So you never had the feeling she felt bad about having sex with a black guy?"
So much for the soft sell. Soon Mr. McGinniss is settling in to enjoy the fuss his mere presence has created. "Normally, for a news story to continue beyond the first 24-hour news cycle, something newsworthy must occur," he writes loftily, but "The Rogue" is filled with proof to the contrary. What was his hate mail like? He quotes it. What did Glenn Beck call him? That's here too. Who took umbrage at this venom and chose to help him? One man offered him a hideout, despite Mr. McGinniss's slight skepticism about his motives. "But you don't know me," Mr. McGinnis protested.
"Hell, I've even got an AK-47 you might like," the man volunteered.
McGinnis was once considered a great writer. His Alaska book, "Going to Extremes" was beautifully written and compellingly told. But he has since become a narcissistic scold whose obsession with Sarah Palin reveals a kind of insanity not unknown on the left when it comes to anything having to do with the former governor.
Nice to see the Times call him out for his sloppy, self-promoting idiocy.
By: copperdog3
In: Politics
Tags: Palin, Rogue, NY Times, New York Times, McGinnis, Heath, Scott, Maslin
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 6661 | Comments: 17 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
New York Times Caught Fracking Lying
-
NY Times columnist Thomas Friedman attacked with pies during energy speech
-
CNN: New York Times admits Ron Paul Neo-Nazi story was false
-
Is the New York Times Guilty of Treason?
-
There's No Bias at the New York Times - Noooooooooo wayyyyyyy
-
The New York Times publishs what it calls it the new sectarian map of Baghdad areas
-
Even the New York Times Is Praising Progress In Iraq
-
Third Man Climbs NY Times Building to Get Attention for al Qaeda Website
-
New York Times won't publich the ClimateGate emails
-
NY Times Square Closed After Blast.
-
The Ignorance of Islam and the Inaccurate and Negligent New York Times
-
Times Square bomb suspect arrested in New York




McGinniss is insane and a genuine asshole. I'm surprised the NY Times agrees with me for once.
Posted Sep-15-2011 ByNagold (192.98) 
Nagold View Channel Send Message
(5)
So the guy stalks the Palin family, and then he writes a book. Psycho, deranged, mouth foaming liberal. Another proud moment in liberal human relations.
Posted Sep-15-2011 Byyorba (1021.48) yorba View Channel Send Message
(5)
Even if it is all proven a lie, it is another successful character assassination by the media. People are now distancing themselves from Palin even though they know the accusations are bs.
Posted Sep-15-2011 Byjohn1054 (5163.94)

john1054 View Channel Send Message
(3)
@john1054 really? BS! totally the opposite. she is third in the polls for president and isn't even in the race. i wouldn't call that distancing LOL
Posted Sep-15-2011 Bystar53 (32499.80) 
star53 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Yes, I saw this scmuck on the Today Show this morning. Within a few soundbytes it was easy to see right through him. He didn't like being an outcast in the area, so he made it his mission to do as much damage as possible. Question is: What has HE done in service or contribution to the country? Not a goddam thing. Hope his book is a flop.
Posted Sep-15-2011 ByApples01 (559.46) 
Apples01 View Channel Send Message
(2)
Can Sarah Palin supporters even read?
Posted Sep-15-2011 ByGeorgeBush (154.60) 
GeorgeBush View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@mikersey
Meanwhile, you just challenged copperdog on the contents of a newspaper story you either hadn't bothered to read or completely misread and he made you look silly because of it.
Posted Sep-15-2011 Byjohn1054 (5163.94)

john1054 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@mikersey
Not bull.
From the same NY Times review:
---
“The Rogue” is too busy being nasty to be lucid. Mr. McGinniss suggests both that Ms. Palin is committed to stealth religious control of government, and that she is not sufficiently devout.
---
With the same imprecise aim he cites conspiracy theories that Ms. Palin may not be the mother of her youngest son, Trig... But then he comes to an indefensibly reckless conclusion [regarding Trig's birth].
---
There is one area, and only one, More..
Posted Sep-15-2011 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@mikersey
Ummm, the link was in your post. I figured most folks on LL could read. Perhaps that expectation is a bit too high. But, since you clearly didn't read your own comment, here you go:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/books/joe-mcginnisss-the-rogue-on-sarah-palin-review.html?_r=1&ref=books
Now go... read.
Oh, and just what point is it that I am supposed to have proven?
Posted Sep-15-2011 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@mikersey
That is the third or fourth time (depending on how you count) that you have suggested that I have misrepresented the book review.
LL mods, if they are doing their job, won't allow a NY Times article in its entirety to be posted because of copyright issues.
So, following is the damn link, AGAIN:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/books/joe-mcginnisss-the-rogue-on-sarah-palin-review.html?_r=1&ref=books
Please, everybody go read the review and form your own opinion.
In the meanti More..
Posted Sep-15-2011 Bycopperdog3 (1040.04) 
copperdog3 View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@scubasteve075 I see total irrelevance.
Posted Sep-15-2011 Byyorba (1021.48) yorba View Channel Send Message
(1)
@scubasteve075
I see it actually making Palin a much more sympathetic character to a lot of Americans, because it's such a cheap, nasty, partisan attack.
What scares the left so much about Palin is that every day Americans can relate to Palin much more than the elitist liberal hags that populate the Democrat establishment.
This hatchet job will probably serve to knock a lot of fence sitters over to Palin's side simply because it's so over the top and and obvious smear.
Posted Sep-15-2011 Byvicsemprini (1257.48) vicsemprini View Channel Send Message
(0)