Drones Causing Mass Psych Trauma Among Civilians
A new study has found that the narrative of the Pentagon and US media that the drone strikes are precise and collateral damage minimal, is false; that in the NorthWest territories of Pakistan where the CIA flies most of the drones, the population living under constant threat of annihilation is severely traumatized. Who is the terrorist? inquiring minds wish to know.
Loading the player ...
Added: Sep-26-2012
By: khamomil
In: World News, Afghanistan
Tags: Pakistan, terror, drones, missile stike, civilian casualties, collateral damage, khamomil,
Location: Federally Administered Tribal Areas, Pakistan (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 3972 | Comments: 167 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 37 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
By: khamomil
In: World News, Afghanistan
Tags: Pakistan, terror, drones, missile stike, civilian casualties, collateral damage, khamomil,
Location: Federally Administered Tribal Areas, Pakistan (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 3972 | Comments: 167 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 37 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
Items
-
Pakistan al-Qaeda Leaders Killed
-
Official:Response of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan to Banki Moon Assertions About Civilian Casualties in Afghanistan
-
Iraq - "Wrongful death" - accidental civilian casualties (Part 1/2) (Aug.2007)
-
collateral damage
-
Afghanistan: Collateral damage
-
Rethink Afghanistan; part 4: CIVILIAN CASUALTIES
-
Iraq - "Wrongful death" - accidental civilian casualties (Part 2/2) (Aug.2007)
-
Pakistan Fires Nuke Missile
-
U.N. Report Shows Taliban Responsible For 76% Of Afghan Civilian Casualties - 2 Vids
-
Predator Strikes Keeping Civilian Casualties Low, High Value Targets Nervous
-
Analysis of Civilian Casualties in WikiLeaks Afghan File Reveals Media Bias
-
Afghan Civilian Casualties
Advertisers




okay now let me have a good look in here.........nope, nothing there. Hang on let have a look here...........................nah nothing..ooh hang on let me just check there......................no sorry
NO FUCKS AVAILABLE
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByBillyBangcock (501.20) 
BillyBangcock View Channel Send Message
(6)
@BillyBangcock
expand the drones to Islamabad,cut of the head of the snake that is the failed pakistani state. we know the real bad guys are hiding in the urban areas, don't you guys forget OBL was found next to pakistan's "West point" in a major city.
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByMisterPatel (101.10) 
MisterPatel View Channel Send Message
(2)
And I forget: What do you think these pakistan people are going to do? Cherish democracy or following the taliban? This is simple to answer...
Posted Sep-26-2012 Byblue-navigator (122.66) 
blue-navigator View Channel Send Message
(5)
pakistan supported the taliban and al qaida, pakistan help them to kill coalition soldiers. a pakistani minister offers $100,000 to kill maker of anti-Islamic film. i don“t give a fuck for this fucked up country.
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByMrK (8.10) 
MrK View Channel Send Message
(5)
@MrK im 100% with you man!! 100%!!!
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByMuhammad_is_a_pedo (406.80)

Muhammad_is_a_pedo View Channel Send Message
(0)
Stop harboring terrorists like you did with OBL. Problem solved. Give them aid and comfort, and suffer the consequences. Your choice. Tell the cave-nazis they're not welcome, and the drones will follow them out. But you won't do that though, because the cave-nazis are welcome.
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByST0N3PONY (5219.72) 
ST0N3PONY View Channel Send Message
(4)
@The angry misanthropist Funny how the Gov't OF Pakistan doesn't seem to think that..
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bynexus1961 (442.94) 
nexus1961 View Channel Send Message
(0)
As long as they allow the taliban who support, train, house and protect the enemies of the West in western Pakistan's safe havens the terror will continue. These elements plan attacks on Western troops in Afghanistan and prior to the drones they were untouchable, now the west can apply presure in protected zones, pressure to have the people expel the enemies of the west.
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bymcgrande (138.40) 
mcgrande View Channel Send Message
(4)
@mcgrande Well said!
Posted Sep-26-2012 Byfotoman4u2 (3691.50) 
fotoman4u2 View Channel Send Message
(3)
@mcgrande "they allow"? Most of the people living there are small people who make a living farming and trading locally, without any political knowledge nor any power to influence what goes on around them. How would they deny the Taliban the use of the region? Even the regular Paki army is unable to dislodge them for good. It's like whack-a-mole, they reappear somewhere else every time they are dislodged from their current spot. Many Pakis in these mountains never heard of Amrika and do More..
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bykhamomil (1612.24) 
khamomil View Channel Send Message
(0)
@khamomil
Although much of what you say is true, the only way to force a peace deal is to maintain the pressure, truely the "small people"
are victims as they have always been.
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bymcgrande (138.40) 
mcgrande View Channel Send Message
(0)
@mcgrande You can't force peace. Only negotiation and give-and-take freely consented achieve lasting peace, but the USA doesn't want the "give" of give-and-take.
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bykhamomil (1612.24) 
khamomil View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@khamomil Yeah we will continue to try and force it because we do not fucking negotiate with terrorists and I do believe you are giving them alot more credit than they deserve, and "most" of the people there are perfect recruiting material because of their unknowingness. You would think after even the first month of drones they would know not to go near a impact zone cause that is a bad guy there and more destruction is to come. Again, Pakistan does a great job at fighting the militan More..
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bysnipingangel (311.50) 
snipingangel View Channel Send Message
(0)
In WW1, the enemy complained that american shotguns were inhumane, so we made more. In WW2, entire cities were destroyed to get rid of a target. We are hurting the enemy with this technology, while minimizing innocent losses. It is better to kill them there than here. Make more drones.
Oh and one more thing, I LOVE how whenever some murderer gets killed, the family claims he was a good boy and never did anything bad.
Posted Sep-26-2012 Byjugatinus (46.50) jugatinus View Channel Send Message
(4)
@jugatinus
true.
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bycatthirteen (166.66) catthirteen View Channel Send Message
(0)
@jugatinus
So your saying that if a terrorist is found in your area or is travelling towards your area without you even knowing it the drones have the right to level the entire town just to kill that one bastard ?
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByFuria (127.70) 
Furia View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@Furia
That's the exact opposite of what he's saying. And no drones have ever leveled an entire town.
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByJoe 788 (350.32) Joe 788 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Furia no he said entire towns were leveled during ww2! Pay attention
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByMuhammad_is_a_pedo (406.80)

Muhammad_is_a_pedo View Channel Send Message
(1)
The UN (mainly US) is cleaning THEIR mess! Its a war going out there at the moment. Of course civilians will get hurt. They need to get the hell out of there and stay away from the targets. THEY KNOW who the targets are, THEY KNOW they will get killed if they stay there, THEY KNOW that if they give refuge to terrorist they will get blown up. They need to get the hell out of there.
If not, then they should brace for impact b/c the drones are not going anywhere.
I don't feel a pinch of sympathy fo More..
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByDarkSim (113.40) 
DarkSim View Channel Send Message
(4)
@DarkSim 'Get the hell out of there' - Where to???
How would you like to be told to get out of your really comfy house (Because I bet you live very luxuriously) and find refuge somewhere else. I bet you wouldn't be too pleased then.....
Posted Sep-26-2012 BymAxiecAm (46.00) 
mAxiecAm View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@mAxiecAm
Beats death.
Posted Sep-26-2012 Byhamburger (562.80) 
hamburger View Channel Send Message
(1)
@hamburger Maybe - but I bet you wouldn't go without putting up some sort of resistance.
Posted Sep-26-2012 BymAxiecAm (46.00) 
mAxiecAm View Channel Send Message
(0)
@mAxiecAm just move 4 caves over
Posted Sep-26-2012 Byoutsidelooknn (1130.40) 
outsidelooknn View Channel Send Message
(2)
@mAxiecAm Excuse me? You think I'd put my life and the life of my family in danger because I won't leave 'my comfy house'? Are you serious?
No... you can't be.
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByDarkSim (113.40) 
DarkSim View Channel Send Message
(0)
Don't harbour terrorists and you won't have drones overhead.
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bybs2502 (306.80) 
bs2502 View Channel Send Message
(4)
But a beheading is not as traumatic to witness right Pakistanis? We watched over 3,000 people die on Sept. 11th. MANY of those operatives were living and hiding in Pakistan. Perhaps if the Pakistani population had joined together to condemn and catch the terrorists they wouldn't have to live under these drone conditions today.
Posted Sep-26-2012 Byhamburger (562.80) 
hamburger View Channel Send Message
(4)
@hamburger thats a good point.
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByMatchill (163.80) 
Matchill View Channel Send Message
(0)
Good, the US is terrorizing the terrorists. If you are innocent, then stay away from the bad guys. It's so simple even a monkey can understand.
Posted Sep-26-2012 Byplokiju (1035.30) 
plokiju View Channel Send Message
(4)
dont side with terrorists and expect no collateral damage
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bykabuto (54.70) 
kabuto View Channel Send Message
(4)
@biopixels
>>> BREAKING THE LAW! <<<
No it isn't.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_water
Posted Sep-26-2012 BybadMother (3765.24) badMother View Channel Send Message
(0)
@biopixels
Life is all about chemistry...
I love you.
:-)
Posted Sep-27-2012 BybadMother (3765.24) badMother View Channel Send Message
(1)
"the population living under constant threat of annihilation is severely traumatized."
LOL. Constant thread of annihilation. They are in more danger from Taliban IEDs than drone attacks. Terrorists in Pakistan have killed more Pakistanis than US drones have.
Propaganda fail.
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByJoe 788 (350.32) Joe 788 View Channel Send Message
(3)
@The angry misanthropist Name one thing he said that was factually Inaccurate.. Oh wait, you can't because EVERY bit of it is verifiably TRUE!!
Posted Sep-26-2012 Bynexus1961 (442.94) 
nexus1961 View Channel Send Message
(0)
=Just think, all of that BS could have been avoided if they had just grown the balls themselves to wipe out the Taliban and other violent jihadists....
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByZipperneck1321 (1038.24) 
Zipperneck1321 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Zipperneck1321 Thank You.
Posted Sep-26-2012 ByRedRum2012 (229.00) 
RedRum2012 View Channel Send Message
(0)