Investigation related to LaserAway aka Laser Away conducted by Darren Chaker. A laser hair removal salon, LaserAway.net , with locations in Southern California, appear to make a practice of distributing narcotics to people who want to remove unwanted hair. The industry standard is to rub numbing cream on an area prior to hair removal, NOT provide narcotics by a nurse who decides when to give out narcotics.

The two employee who answered Darren Chaker's questions and appear to confirm suspicions. While listening to the tape recording, listen for:

1. Although doctor's own the hair removal chain, employees appear to confirm a new patient need NOT see a doctor prior to being provided Vicodin/Xanex.

2. The nurse who performs the procedure appears she would distribute Vicodin/Xanex; according to the licensing agency for nurses in the State of California, a nurse is not allowed to independently distribute narcotics. Nurses follow what doctors advise when it comes to controlled narcotics, here doctors need not be present per the employees which appears to be against the law.

3. The Vicodin/Xanex appears it would be provided WITHOUT any review of medical records, which may have deadly consequences since the interaction may conflict with the patient.

4. The Vicodin/Xanex appears to be located in a general use area, and NOT bottled for a particular patient.
Kim Kardashian endorses LaserAway and sincerely hope she reconsiders who she does business with, see right side of http://www.laseraway.net/

Roy S. Winston, M.D. Plastic & Cosmetic Surgery, appears to be one of the doctors who run LaserAway--- it goes to show you, despite education and prestige, anyone can be a drug dealer.

The recording was taken in a public reception area with other members of the public present, therefore tape recording in a public setting is not a confidential communication and is thus not illegal. The statute applies to "confidential communications" -- i.e., conversations in which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening in or overhearing the conversation. See Flanagan v. Flanagan, 41 P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-82 (Cal. 2002). Subdivision (c) of section 632 addresses the term confidential communication. It states: "The term confidential communication includes any communication carried on in circumstances as may reasonably indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties ***576 thereto, but excludes a communication made in a public gathering or in any legislative, judicial, executive or administrative proceeding open to the public, or in any other circumstance in which the parties to the communication may reasonably expect that the communication may be overheard or recorded." ( Ibid.)

Disclaimer: The entire post above ('post') made here reflect the personal opinion of the author unless otherwise mentioned and should/must not be held against anyone else. This posting is not sponsored or associated with any of the people/business listed here. This posting is intended to make the public aware of potential hazards and potential unethical & unlawful practices of LaserAway aka Laser Away and its employees/owners. The above posting is not to be taken as fact nor absolute. Verify the above information prior to relying on it. Last, the post and its audio content are subject to copyright and may not be used or reposted in any capacity absent written consent from the author.

keywords: LaserAway.net, LaserAway, Brock Heckmann, Scott Heckman, Kim Kardashian