Safe Mode: On
McCain, Rogers: Obama’s policy of 'disengagement' led to attack on U.S. posts

Capitol Hill Republican leaders said Sunday the Obama
administration’s foreign policy of “disengagement” in the Middle East
led to the attacks on U.S. posts in the region.

Michigan Rep. Mike Rogers and Arizona Sen. John McCain, the ranking
Republican on the Senate Committee on Armed Services, suggested
President Obama pulling troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq, while
offering less than total support for Israel’s effort to stop Iran from
acquiring nuclear weapons, has left an exploitable void in the region.

“The Middle East believes there is a disengagement policy with the
U.S.,” Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said on
“Fox News Sunday."

He argued Obama has made no significant foreign policy speech since
the one in Cairo, Egypt, in 2009 and acknowledged the region poses
“difficult” problems -- including the absence of stabilized, democratic
governments to replace the recently deposed dictatorships.

“But you cannot solve (the problems) by stepping back,” Rogers said.
“It has to be a combination of showing strength and showing up.”

He also questioned why the United States appears to be in an “open
fight” with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about how far the
country will go to help stop Iran from achieving nuclear capability.

“Shouldn't we be telling Iranians that there are lines they can't cross?” he asked.



The campaign for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said
the administration faced serious questions Sunday about its record of
leadership in the world.

Campaign spokesman Ryan Williams said those questions include
concerns about "America’s waning influence abroad, and the failure of
its outreach efforts in the Middle East and North Africa."

McCain said he had "no doubt" the attacks last week on roughly 20
U.S. Middle East posts -- including the fatal one Libya -- were the
result of America's shift in foreign policy to one of "disengagement."

"Prior to 9/11, we had a policy of containment,” McCain said on CBS’
“Face the Nation.” “Then after 9/11, it was a confrontation with the
terrorists and Al Qaeda. Now it's disengagement. We're leaving Iraq.
We're leaving Afghanistan. We're leaving the area. The people in the
area are having to adjust. And they believe the United States is weak,
and they are taking appropriate action."

McCain argued members of the Obama administration and others who
right now think the attacks were sparked by an anti-Muslim video on the
Internet are “ignoring the facts.”

"Most people don't bring rocket-propelled grenades and heavy weapons
to a demonstration,” he said. “That was an act of terror. And for anyone
to disagree with that fundamental fact, I think, is really ignoring the
facts. … And they used pretty good tactics: indirect fire, direct fire,
and obviously they were successful."

McCain said the real underlying cause is the struggle within the Arab world between the Islamists and the forces of moderation.



“And they want America disengaged," he said.


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/09/16/mccain-rogers-obamas-policy-disengagement-led-to-attack-on-us-posts/


Added: Sep-16-2012 Occurred On: Sep-16-2012
By: AllahforReal
In:
Politics
Tags: obama, libya, obama, failuredesengagement
Marked as: approved
Views: 1472 | Comments: 43 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Interventionalism is the only word neocons truly understand. Their political careers revolve around sticking their noses in other countrys' affairs.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (6)

  • John McCain and his daddy are stooges for Israel. This is why McCain defends Israel's murder of the Sailors aboard the USS Liberty and why his father, Admiral McCain, who led the investigation into Israel's attack on the USS Liberty an accident.

    An accident with 10 hours of surveillance before the attack. An accident with helicopter gunships coming in to strafe the sailors as they deployed life boats. An accident they just happened to jam all US radio frequencies. An accident they launched 5 to More..

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (5)

  • Comment of user 'BubbaSmash' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'wormhole' has been deleted by author!
  • All of this is a set up.
    Politicians taking advantage of a crisis and turning it into an opportunity for them.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (2)

  • "Most people don't bring rocket-propelled grenades and heavy weapons
    to a demonstration,” YOU'RE DAMN RIGHT !
    The movie had NOTHING to do with the attacks on our embassy's as they have been proven so far to be pre-planned. SO...unless they got their hands on a sneak preview as you knucklehead believers who WANT....WANT to believe it was the movie are simply blind !
    The Libyan government even stated today that it was a pre-planned attack.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @Gulf Flyer THANK YOU! Fuck, I've been waiting for somebody to be honest about what's going on. The fact that everybody seems to believe the media narrative makes me think they just deserve all the shit that's coming to them for having their heads that far up their own asses.

      Posted Sep-17-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Jgizzy Indeed...too many people are focused on the war in Afghanistan and are wearing blinders....Muslims HATE westerns PERIOD !!

      Posted Sep-17-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Gulf Flyer can we just say pre-planned and spontaneous and be done with it? such a waste of time. Libyan government? is there any such thing yet?

      Posted Sep-17-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @BUDBEAR NO...that's a cop out...it goes much deeper than that.

      Posted Sep-17-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Warmongering by Republic'nts OWNED by the military contractors in their states.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Of course this old fool want's more war, his stock portfolio is probably plugged with defense contractor stocks he needs for retirement. McCain is like the lowest fossil on a Republican archeological dig, so that qualifies him for a leadership position. Disengagement!!!? Obama has the US in so many wars in the middle east you would have difficulty listing them all. In McCains case older doesn't mean wiser.

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • I lean conservative but John McCain is a guy who's been advocating war like crazy across the middle east. You figure a guy who was a PWO for 5 years would be a strident peace activist but he's the most hawkish guy in gov't. He needs to chill the fuck out. This guy supports engagement with just about every country on that side of the globe. I agree that Iran is a country that needs to be dealt with urgently and it needs to be discussed and acted on but this dude is just ready to load the bombs an More..

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Won't McCain ever go away?

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (1)

  • We need MORE disengagement. Leave these nuts alone and mind our own business. For those who want to kill a few thousand more civilians, further angering these militants, grab a rifle and book a flight. Let Israel fight her own battles.

    Posted Sep-17-2012 By 

    (0)

  • would we all be better off with McCain?. all this guy talks about is confrontation and provacation. we would be in an unending perpetual state of war if had been president.

    Posted Sep-17-2012 By 

    (0)

  • the u.s has a very big ego here. we brits had an empire stretching to most part of the world, have been in afghanistan for centuries and had very little trouble. Made/broke alliances with many countries and used to have respect amongst even the most brain washed psycho muslim. This is not a hollywood film. U.s are not some world governor, most countrys were here well before the u.s was born. Down thumb me all you want but the u.s really is not as important as some think. People will fight for th More..

    Posted Sep-17-2012 By 

    (0)

  • John McCain should retire already and stop helping to f*ck up this country.

    Posted Sep-17-2012 By 

    (0)

  • WGAS what this blithering old fool has to say. Anyone that would pick Sarah Palin as his running mate loses ALL credibility with me. He's obviously still butt hurt over the ass whooping he took in the election. He needs someone to call him a wwwwaaaaaaaaaaambulance!

    Posted Sep-16-2012 By 

    (0)