Safe Mode: On
How aware was Obama of the Benghazi attack?

A lot of people gave Bush a lot of problems about these 7 minutes. I assume a lot of that criticism came from the same people who don't see any problem with Obama saying he basically wasn't even there. That he needs to have an "investigation" to figure out what went wrong because he really doesn't know what happened.

Just so people understand, embassies are American soil and an ambassador is a 4 star general. *Any* attack on American soil goes right up to the top, just like you see happen here with Bush. I know its not dramatic or like you see in movies, but as you can see during 9/11, no matter where you are or what you are doing as president, the watch command will send the message up the chain until somebody *physically* walks up and delivers the message to the president. Even if they are in the middle of something and the Chief of Staff has to whisper it in the Presidents ear. That happens 24/7/365 unless the president is physically or mentally incapacitated. Anywhere and everywhere.

So this is something to remember as you hear this story about an investigation and who knew what and when. The only thing that makes any sense whatsoever is that Obama ordered a stand-down. But why was that order issued? And now that we know there was a drone there sending footage back to the situation room people were monitoring real time. Where did the excuse about the demonstration resulting from a hateful video come from?


Added: Oct-31-2012 
By: jeru
In:
Politics
Tags: obama, benghazi, libya, bush, 911, notified, whisper
Marked as: approved
Views: 632 | Comments: 25 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • I can understand Bush not wanting to frighten the children. He did the right thing and not run out of the classroom screaming like a banshee.

    Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Puff the magic dragon was ready to rain hell..

    Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Comment of user 'RomeoTango1' has been deleted by author!
  • Very good point Jeru. regardless of what the truth is, perception counts more these days.

    Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

    (1)

  • There is a slight difference bethween benghazi or 9/11 FUCKING ASSHOLE UPLOADER, disrespecting the fallen much by this? fuck yeah.

    Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @Nazel_Hut The the real issue is that many Americans both liberal and conservative believe that The Obama administrations response to the Benghazi incident was poor. There are many apologists for the administration that are trying to deflect any questions regarding how this incident was handled. I would like straight answers from administration but there is nothing coming out of the White House and State Department but minions running interference for the President. Leaders make mistakes all the More..

      Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

      (5)

    • @cruefan I know, And it is very normal in your culture to 'make a buck out of anything.' (not literally) For me it is sickening.

      Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Nazel_Hut That's true... Exploitation is used in the media and by our elected officials on a regular basis. I just want answers about what happened on September 11th 2012 that's all. I don't care about Obama's politics I would just like some accountability from this President.

      Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @cruefan I sensed that attitude earlier ;) I like that, you sound very reasonable. My country is too small to exploit things like these. it is seen as inappropiate. Again, I do understand you. not the tone of the message from the uploader.

      Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @Nazel_Hut yeah....we know exactly what Bush did and when after the attacks, step by step... Obama...not so much.

      Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

      (3)

  • Obama should be impeached for this treason!

    Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @Freejay

      Impeached for this treason? Or the treason of not invading Iran and committing the western world to WW3 like you jews have been pushing to him to do.

      Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @lanmonkey
      That too...he is allowing Americas enemies to get nukes!
      Regarding WW3...well thats just bullshit fear mongering.

      Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

      (1)

  • I think President Bush was reading along with the class.

    Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

    (-1)

  • 7 MINUTES = 2 WEEKS?

    Keep grasping, libs.

    Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

    (-2)

  • So then, is the real question: "will the GOP hold Obama accountable?"

    What bothers me is that question, to the GOP, is based on a condition: "does the GOP have the power to hold Obama accountable?"

    An effort must be tried and the American people must learn of the consequences.

    Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

    (-2)

    • @RomeoTango1 Why is it the GOP's responsibility? Shouldn't it be the American people's responsibility?

      Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @huey2323 - that's a good question, but truth be told, we live in a republic and not a true democracy. "We the People" elect representatives to do our bidding. And if the government and representatives will not serve us then there is tyranny. This situation is addressed by our Declaration of Independence with the following "But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their ri More..

      Posted Oct-31-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @RomeoTango1 Is that statement differ from person-to-person? "to throw off such government"

      Does that mean to "overthrow" a government or to elect different people? I am trying to understand the dialect as it was spoken in the 1700's

      Posted Nov-1-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @huey2323 - "to throw off" as in reject. The method of rejection is left open. Taking our history into consideration it can mean anything from voting to right out revolution with blood shed. The words prior implies that already peaceful means were taken, and for serious autrocities - serious consideration must be made before applying the ultimate sacrafice.

      I think we are now where close to that extreme, but people are justly outraged.

      Posted Nov-2-2012 By 

      (1)