Safe Mode: On
Court in Saudi considers paralysis punishment

The Religeon of Peace at it again......


A SAUDI court may ask doctors to deliberately sever a criminal's spinal cord as a gruesome punishment for leaving another man crippled.

The court, in the northwestern province of Tabuk, has apparently sought medical advice on whether it is possible to surgically paralyse the defendant, who has not been named, Emirates 24/7 reported overnight.

He has admitted attacking a man with a meat cleaver two years ago, leaving him crippled, the news website said, citing reports in the Arabic language newspaper Okaz.

In Saudi Arabia, the criminal justice system has been known to dish out barbaric sentences in accordance with the ancient Babylonian code of Hammurabi, which advocates "an eye for an eye".

The victim, Abdul Aziz Al Mutairi, 22, demanded that his attacker suffer the same injury. And he told Okaz that at least one hospital had agreed the chilling procedure was medically feasible.

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
Related Coverage

* Court battle: Dad kills diabetic son

End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
make your own news service on igoogle

A judge at Tabuk General Court is reportedly waiting on responses from surgeons before issuing his sentence.

Human rights groups have routinely attacked Saudi courts for falling below international standards and imposing brutal punishments, such as cutting off the hands of thieves.


Click to view image: '4dfc30694cae-579709wheelchair.jpg'

Added: Aug-19-2010 
By: biggles9
In:
News, Middle East
Tags: Court, considers, paralysis, punishment
Marked as: approved
Views: 12495 | Comments: 72 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • A Back for a Back.

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (5)

  • Disgusting that anyone in the medical profession would consider carrying out such a punishment. Sounds like the "doctors" of Nazi Germany.

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (4)

    • Comment of user '' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Comment of user 'mphatik' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Wow if you are typical no wonder Arabs are so fucking useless to the planet. You are an ignoramus. I guessyou agree that Israel is doing great research too by seeing how phosphorus works on human skin? Again, MULSIMS HAVE DONE NOTHING - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING - for humanit in teh past 200 years. You are a prime example as to why that is.

      Posted Aug-20-2010 By 

      (0)

    • Sorry...2000 YEARS, not 200. USELESS TO THE PLANET!

      Posted Aug-20-2010 By 

      (-3)

    • Comment of user 'mphatik' has been deleted by moderator!
  • I like it!!

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (3)

  • Hammurabi still rules.

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (3)

  • And they complained about waterboarding. Hipocrites.

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (3)

  • savages

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (3)

    • Comment of user 'mphatik' has been deleted by moderator!
    • The death penalty in the US has been implemented already. It just depends on which state you live in.

      Problem is: Innocent people being convicted by false/erroneous eyewitness testimony. Corrupt judges/cops. Etc.

      It's not so simple as you make it out to be.

      State sanctioned murders can also be carried out for racial/political reasons. That's the biggest reason for why they SHOULDN'T be carried out.

      Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

      (-1)

    • Death penalty in the US is a joke.Trials take literally decades to conclude,at a point were the case itself becomes muddled through contaminated evidence and the passage of time.

      Speaking of the Saudi court process though,the executions that I have heard of being done are usually 100% certain situations.Like the scum that was openly boasting of raping little boys(beheaded and crucified).Or the maniac that randomly cut a kid's throat in a crowded supermarket(really no doubt as to who did it ther More..

      Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

      (0)

    • So Israelis can blow up Palestinans at pizza restaurants then? COOOOOOL.

      Americans can fly planes into Saudi Arabian buildings now too...fantastic.

      Gonna be an exciting world.

      Posted Aug-20-2010 By 

      (1)

    • The Israelis ALREADY have blown up Palestinian restaurants.Not to mention homes,hospitals,schools,and places of worship.

      Your second sentence is laughable in it's idiocy.

      Your attempts at making a point literally made me lol.

      Posted Aug-20-2010 By 

      (0)

  • Comment of user 'Ezel89' has been deleted by moderator!
  • the thought of punishment rarely deter insane, criminal and rash behaviors.
    Most problems with people occur because they simply cannot sit still for 5 minutes and think.
    a little more patience works.

    Posted Aug-20-2010 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user '2daloo' has been deleted by author!
  • As much as it can make one happy, at the end of the day its just two people who have to deal with major problems and a much harder life, I find it barbaric in a modern society, I thought Humans where more further developed than that.

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (2)

    • And its got cost the state money in terms of services etc.

      Or maybe Saudi's one of those countries where cripples crawl along the roadsides begging with no help...

      Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

      (0)

  • Comment of user 'gregory_peckory' has been deleted by author!
  • It's ok there, because the doctors there all take the hypocritic oath.

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user '' has been deleted by moderator!
  • sounds fair..he wont be able to leave anybody else crippled.

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (1)

  • Sounds like a good punishment to me if the person actually committed the crime.

    Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

    (1)

    • emphasis on the word "if"

      because if the courts convict the wrong person (as they always do, because no court is perfect) the courts are also guilty of a heinous crime

      Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

      (-6)

    • Comment of user 'knowsmuslims' has been deleted by author!
    • The courts, or the jury that convicted them........

      Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

      (1)

    • Sure, but that goes for any sentence handed out by a court

      Posted Aug-19-2010 By 

      (0)

    • In that case there shouldn't be any punishments for any crime since there is an outside chance the person might be innocent. Better safe than sorry right?

      Posted Aug-20-2010 By 

      (0)