
Admiral Sir John "Sandy" Woodward also said that America now had little interest in supporting Britain in any conflict as a stable Argentina was more important to the State Department.
In a letter to The Daily Telegraph, Adml Woodward said Washington was pushing for negotiations over sovereignty and "significantly the islands are already being called the Malvinas by the US".
With the end of the Cold War and emergence of Asian powers Nato and Britain were not as important to Washington which in 1982 played a significant part in providing satellite intelligence and missiles to British forces.
"We can no longer rely on the Pentagon to support us in helping the islanders in their wish to remain essentially British sovereign territory," he wrote.
If as is likely significant oil reserves are found around the islands then pressure from Argentina will be immense to share in the riches.
President Barack Obama's administration also made clear in early 2010 that it would endorse calls for talks over the islands when it adopted the Organisation of American States useage of Malvinas instead of Falklands.
Adml Woodward said with the Armed Forces already "over-committed" in Afghanistan and Libya and the Navy drastically weakened following last year's defence review "the answer appears to be that we can do precisely nothing other than accede to US pressure".
The 79-year-old admiral led a substantial task force of two aircraft carriers, a dozen frigates and destroyers, four submarines and a total of 100 surface ships along with 25,000 servicemen were to retake the Falklands in 1982.
But the Royal Navy no longer has aircraft carriers, has lost its force of Harrier jump jets and seen its warship fleet cut in half over the last decade.
The islands are currently protected by a force of more than 1,000 troops with a reinforced company of infantry and four Typhoon fighters and a single frigate. However the Typhoons have no anti-ship or anti-submarine capability.
In a letter obtained by The Daily Telegraph last year Liam Fox, the Defence Secretary, warned the Prime Minister that the island's defences would become fragile in light of the looming cuts in the Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR).
He said axing the Nimrod MRA4 maritime reconnaissance aircraft would "limit our ability to deploy maritime forces rapidly into high-threat areas, and delete one element of our Falklands reinforcement plan".
The last of the £3.6 billion Nimrods was destroyed in March following the defence review.
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: "Claims that the Falkland Islands could be taken without a fight are completely without substance. The current garrison in the Falkland Islands is much larger in scale and has a greater capability than in 1982 and this together with our ability to reinforce rapidly by air has been maintained. "
By Thomas Harding, Defence Correspondent
9:00PM BST 12 Jun 2011
Telegraph.co.uk
By: dannydandan
In: World News, Politics
Tags: UK, Falklands, BackStabbers, US, Obama, War
Marked as: approved
Views: 6365 | Comments: 85 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Wars sending US into ruin
-
Al Qaeda being helped and possibly armed by the US in Libya Michael Scheuer
-
Wars sending US into ruin Pt..2
-
Congressman Brad Sherman Operation Odyssey Dawn
-
Rove: Bush didn't 'lie us into war'
-
Sec. Gates Forced to Admit Bombing Libya is and Act Of War
-
US Global war on terror
-
How will Japan disaster affect us?/Obama approves drilling in Gulf for Soros/
-
Obama: “I want to end the mindset that got us into war in the first place”
-
UK: Falklands tests the UK's special relationship with US
-
Lugar: U.S. not declaring war on Libya




With this disgraceful behaviour going on i believe that we should withdraw all troops from any conflict in which we blindly went in to support the US. And show a strong military presence on the Falklands to show that it will not be given up.
Or maybe thats me just getting angry over this article however Cameron needs to tell Obama to politly Fuck Off.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydannydandan (177.96) 
dannydandan View Channel Send Message
(5)
@dannydandan totally agree. get out while the getting is good. don't forget to kick muslims out of Britain first.
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByAmusing (5213.38) Amusing View Channel Send Message
(2)
@dannydandan No sense throwing the baby out with the bathwater. America is more than this tawdry backstabbing administration.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(3)
@dannydandan
Not one of the conflicts to which you refer are of benefit to the American people. Whatever your position on Israel may be, I hope Cameron takes the same posture with Obama as did Netanyahu. It's difficult to believe anything anymore about what we're told our governments are doing.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bymotaloca (226.14) 
motaloca Send Message
(2)
this is bullshit the falklands belong to the brits
Posted Jun-13-2011 Byriznod (18.98) 
riznod View Channel Send Message
(4)
we need get the fuk out of Afghanistan and leave em to it...Obama just stabbing us in the back all the time with his inbred hatred of great britain...short memories given we have stood firmly with them when the going gets tough..he rewards us by telling us to effectively fuk off...so we must reiterate the gesture and concentrate on our own business...given the soldiers that never came back from the Falklands we can never allow it to change hands ever.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Byramsas (20.34) ramsas View Channel Send Message
(4)
@bullcanada Ah, the random incomprehensible nonsense approach to debate. You're onto something there.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@bullcanada Spoken like a truly ignorant hick with no clue where the Ascension Islands are or how important the UK's permission for the US to operate a refueling base from there is.
I bet you that clown Obama and the moron Clinton have never heard of the Ascension Islands either.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(1)
@bullcanada Spoken like a true friend. You know you disgrace yourself and your country with every post. As for being butt hurt, we thought we had a friend, but in future more in the UK will see it as a better option to align more closely with Europes response to American global desires after seeing how fickle and unappreciative you backstabbers have been. By the way how did your new ally Argentina react to your Iraq invasions, did they send troops to fight alongside you? I have the numbers, and More..
Posted Jun-14-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(0)
just pull our troops out of america's shitty wars - simple, re-deploy - answer.
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByTHOMMO (39.94) 
THOMMO View Channel Send Message
(4)
@THOMMO Yeah, good idea, piss off your greatest ally in your conflict with Argentina. The United States might retaliate by siding with Argentina and enforcing the "Monroe Doctrine", an American foreign policy opposing interference in the western hemisphere from outside powers. The UK is past its prime, whereas the United States is a superpower, economically and militarily.
Posted Mar-17-2012 ByWrangler (0.90) 
Wrangler View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Wrangler
couldnt give a fuck, id rather be like the netherlands or australia power wise and not see our troops die for your shit wars.
wow my dads bigger than your dad.
by the way we saw of the argies by ourselves last time, i didnt see your lot helping.
Posted Mar-17-2012 ByTHOMMO (39.94) 
THOMMO View Channel Send Message
(0)
@THOMMO Thanks for not challenging my assertion that USA is militarily and economically superior to your dying empire. Doing so would have been futile. It is pathetic how you brits have been reduced to feuding with a third-world country over a remote lands full of sheep and expats.
Please allow me to suggest a new nickname for you. Remove the first T from your nickname. Then proceed to remove the fourth M. The resulting word should be preceded by the word "British". I believe that wou More..
Posted Mar-17-2012 ByWrangler (0.90) 
Wrangler View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@Wrangler
remove your "r" and "g and l" replace the "g and l" with a "k" jobs a good one.
Posted Mar-17-2012 ByTHOMMO (39.94) 
THOMMO View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Wrangler You dont seem to realise America is proberbly one of the most hated country's through out the world. If you declared war on a medium power you would have a lot of countries declaring a coalition with that country.
Posted May-19-2012 ByPantiesniffier (33.60) 
Pantiesniffier View Channel Send Message
(0)
Once Zero is out of office the Brits will have their ally back. He is a national embaressment.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Byicr12 (197.70) 
icr12 View Channel Send Message
(4)
@icr12 Thank you for giving a shit. It's easy to swing between appreciation for many Americans who recognize the problem, contempt for an utterly incompetent administration and disgust at the ignorant stupidity of some Americans like Jingo Rex on here.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(2)
Britain will be an Islamic state within 20 years unless the Brit's WAKE THE FUCK UP.
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByDave556 (1947.76) 
Dave556 View Channel Send Message
(3)
Alarmist posturing from a cold war relic, accomplished and respected commander that he may be. Trying to scare Jo public and politicians alike into securing more £ for the Navy.
Taking one look at the Argintine forces will tell you they couldn't take the Falklands if they tried.
1 astute, 1 type 45 and a squadron of Typhoons would prevent any landings in the first place.
Any build up would be more than noticeable and the UK just doesn't rely on the US for intel. After 1982 they wouldn't be c More..
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByLamphard (26.10) 
Lamphard View Channel Send Message
(3)
@Lamphard
Well, I know you rely on us for spy planes!
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByRope_Run (228.70) 
Rope_Run View Channel Send Message
(-3)
@Rope_Run....
no we dont.. we are just saving our own.. and conserving fuel..
Posted Jun-20-2012 Bystorm_seal (268.60) 
storm_seal View Channel Send Message
(-1)
America will act in whats best for america and thats who lets them have the oil under the cheapest .
Britain is a busted flush.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Byvax2002 (102.20) 
vax2002 View Channel Send Message
(2)
@vax2002 This is not best for America, it's Obama's ignorance and naivete shining through again. As for Clinton, she's never found a principle worth clinging to.
These fools should look at the demographics and history of the Falklands.
If they want to start looking at maps then there are a hell of a lot of territories they need to start examining closer.
Guantanamo Bay would be top of the list. Geeze you'd think these clowns would consider the rammifications of such reckless disregard for his More..
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(0)
@vax2002 Libyan oil for the Pan Am Bomber...you get what you deserve.
;)
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByJingo Rex (174.10) Jingo Rex Send Message
(-3)
@Jingo Rex
You really are a scumbag with no appreciation for your allies. Shut up and stop disgracing your country you dumb hick.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(3)
@Jingo Rex
You're stabbing an ally in the back to cozy up to south American administrations. Let's see how much love that generates for you.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(1)
@dorbie
Well, the US got karma on 9/11 for supporting and financing IRA terrorism in the UK.
Strangely they are not so keen on terrorism, these days
Posted Jun-13-2011 Byallyssa (861.28) allyssa View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Davison Apparently. What a message to send the world, it's like Obama is trying to maximize the damage he does.
Let's consider the sovreignty of Guantanamo Bay while we're on this subject.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Davison
Not true, Davison. Although I don't consider myself an American, I'm a citizen of the USA and my father is an American. I stand by the UK and the rest of Europe. You'll find the same sentiment throughout the majority of Americans, not the current government.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bymotaloca (226.14) 
motaloca Send Message
(2)
@Davison you mean the ally this just got busted selling out the USA for libyan oil? LMFAO...dont fool yourself, this relationship is lop sided...we dont need you, you couldnt survive without us...
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByJingo Rex (174.10) Jingo Rex Send Message
(-1)
@Jingo Rex
Yes, of course, because America has so many friends in the world it can afford to kick it's closest ally in the nuts. Fools like you will herald the demise of U.S. greatness.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(2)
@JToKKo Of course, but I literally do not think anyone in this White House has the sense to formulate the idea you just did. They're fools playing at government.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(2)
wave goodbye to one of our friends. thank hussein and his liberal friends while you wave.
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByAmusing (5213.38) Amusing View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Amusing No doubt. Obama has been an star asshole towards the UK since getting into office. His agenda and focus lies elsewhere in the world but like most of his thinking it is grounded in ill conceived wishful thinking that he often must reverse when reality seeps through. In many respects the man acts like a naive fool elected to high office.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Amusing
Well, at least you still have Canada. Obama was dumping on us, but has since changed course. You know, "Canada's oilsands are an ecological disaster and should be shut down." has changed to "Canada's oilsands are swell." I don't blame Obama though. Even I didn't know we had so much oil until a couple years ago.
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByCaptain Canuck (1389.42) 
Captain Canuck View Channel Send Message
(0)
Mr Woodward shoudl stop making such foolish public pronouncements.
The US have behaved disgracefully over this for a nation with a base called Guantanamo in Cuba.
Obama and Clinton have truly stabbed Britain in the back.
The Falklands were colonized and are populated by British, not Spaniards or even South Americans.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(1)
@dorbie
Jesus, I almost feel like I need to apologize. Fucking hell! What's become of us? Ain't no way to treat family.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bymigs1955 (912.94) 
migs1955 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@migs1955 All the USA had to do was say NOTHING. Instead they've actively supported Argentinian claims. Calling for negotiations is NOT a neutral position, it implies a change from British sovreignty is required. And for what? To cozy up to sleazy administrations and dictators in South America.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(2)
@dorbie
Don't know why you get thumbs down for a very sensible comment.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bymigs1955 (912.94) 
migs1955 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@migs1955 People are touchy about any talk of giving GTMO back, AND when you have a disagreement with people some of them like to thumb down everything you post to the thread. I'll live, I'm glad you recognize the merits of the posts. That overrides any thumbs down.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(2)
I can think of a thing or two Britain could do, and would have done not that long ago.
They involve bangs and radiation and weepy journalists, so they probably won't be used.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bygovett (909.80) govett View Channel Send Message
(1)
@govett One radiation leak in Cuba with the wind in the right direction would clear Guantanamo bay of all risk-averse shitebags.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydorbie (2527.20) dorbie View Channel Send Message
(1)
OOOppps i think i said something about this last year, too many defense cuts,, no harrier jump jets, 1 aircraft carrier,, we couldn't stop an invasion on the Isle of Wight
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bydantheman49 (40.04) 
dantheman49 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@dantheman49
Isn't there palns to get rid of your last aircraft carrier? Or was that the last one that was decommissioned.
Posted Jun-13-2011 ByRob8729 (832.22) 
Rob8729 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Rob8729 yes, i think HMS Illustrious gets scrapped next year, then we have to wait till 2015 till we get our new aircraft carrier, the 2020 till it get aircraft on it. i hope the argies do attempt to take the falklands again, it may give our goverment a kick up the arse, and realise that our armed forces are the root to our countries recovery, we need to be building ships, and aircraft, and trains, and cars, we have lost all these skills, well we hav'nt lost them yet because people like me stil More..
Posted Jun-17-2011 Bydantheman49 (40.04) 
dantheman49 View Channel Send Message
(0)
@gregory_peckory
Can I call you Greg? This is nothing new, my friend. You recommended a book foe my reading. Warfare has always been about resources, regardless of religion. Religion is a tool for those seeking to saturate the insatiable aspects of the most greedy. That idea may not answer your questions. This is real and taking place. Slavery, however that term came to be, is what it has always been.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bymotaloca (226.14) 
motaloca Send Message
(0)
@gregory_peckory
We find ourselves in the same predicament. I know there is a God, however difficult that may be for you to digest. Beyond that, all I can do is make this event, world, place of residence, easier to accept as another degree to experience a rather simple journey.
Posted Jun-13-2011 Bymotaloca (226.14) 
motaloca Send Message
(0)