Safe Mode: On
Truther: An Oxymoron

Truthers feel they're on higher ground because of their pure and unbiased search for truth. Why would they have any reason to deceive?



It's important to understand that the makers of "Loose Change" didn't just simply overlook the mistake in this clip. Had they innocently overlooked the mistake, they would have shown the clip in its entirety. Instead, they realized their mistake and moved forward with the claim anyway, deliberately editing the video to hide the truth.

Please leave your debates about what did or did not happen on 911 on other posts. The point of this post is to simply show that truthers certainly are not immune from twisting the truth.

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 1179 (Embed: 0)

Added: Oct-11-2011 Occurred On: Oct-11-2011
By: khartoba
In:
Conspiracy
Tags: 911, Truther, WTC, WTC 7, Twin, Towers, September 11th, Loose Change
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, United States (load item map)
Views: 1699 | Comments: 40 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • ...not only that, but that "debris" they said was "knocked off the side of the building" was likely a jumper.

    Posted Oct-11-2011 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Anyone that uses a name like Truther or Righteous or Choosen or any other ABSOLUTE is unable to understand the views of someone that disagrees. It's best not to talk with them. period.

    Posted Oct-12-2011 By 

    (3) | Report

  • What's the difference between truthers and normal, rational people?

    Normal people don't need to convince you to believe what they believe and they really don't give a fuck if you agree with them or not...

    Posted Oct-11-2011 By 

    (2) | Report

  • The truther movement is moving into a realm currently occupied by global warming.

    Both are religions, you just need to have faith.

    Facts and common sense have no place there.

    Posted Oct-11-2011 By 

    (2) | Report

  • I take my beliefs of 911 from the interviews of firemen. And there are alot of them all say the same thing , large blasts from basement followed by detonations above right before building fell . An few commented on the smell of explosive smoke . Its shows what you think of the men who died trying to save the people in those buildings .

    Posted Oct-12-2011 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Comment of user 'Eva_Destruction' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @Eva_Destruction
      Whoa there little fella. Back the fuck up. What has happened AFTER 911 has NOTHING to do with WHO initiated the attacks of 911. See what you did??
      You employ the typical adolescent intellectually void response to the subject matter. You are a Truther. You admit you are a Truther. You have stated many times that the Government did 911, not Islamic terrorists.
      So what do you do? You dodge the subject matter. You deflect. You avoid. You run away like a little girl who just got h More..

      Posted Oct-12-2011 By 

      (2) | Report

    • Comment of user 'Eva_Destruction' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Damn thats going to ruffle some feathers.

    Loose Change started as a fictional movie, they will even tell you themselves. Also, look at all the times they had to re-edit Loose Change because they got called out on their BS. They just got tired of editing and this is what you get, Loose Change: The Final Cut.

    Posted Oct-12-2011 By 

    (0) | Report

  • It is ironic to present a conspiracy about a conspiracy while condemning conspiracies is it not.

    Posted Oct-11-2011 By 

    (-1) | Report

  • Not to mention these douchebags refered to a person jumping to their death as a "piece of DEBRIS"

    Fucking scumbags.

    Posted Oct-11-2011 By 

    (-1) | Report

  • You need two words in order to have an oxymoron.

    Posted Oct-11-2011 By 

    (-3) | Report

    • @EventHorizon2012

      Yeah Ron Paul.

      There ya go, two words.

      Posted Oct-11-2011 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @EventHorizon2012

      Typically it is two words, but the term oxymoron simply implies a contradiction in the term(s).

      For example, driveway, parkway, ambivalent, briefing, Geenland, sleepwalking, abbreviation, inflamable.

      Some would argue "chili" is an oxymoron as a play on words. Chilly is cold, but chili sauce is hot (spicey).

      Also, the word "off" can be an oxymoron depending on how it is used. If the alarm clock is going "off", it actually means the alarm is More..

      Posted Oct-11-2011 By 

      (4) | Report

    • @brittmo

      Sorry, but none of the examples you've given is a true oxymoron. Most of them are simply puns or wordplay which juxtapose seemingly (but not truly) incongruous concepts for humorous purposes.

      Oxymorons, by their very nature MUST contain two words in order to provide a self-contradictory paradox.

      Even those generally accepted single-word oxymorons, such as "pianoforte" (literally, soft-loud) are always compound words because an oxymoron requires TWO contradictory concepts More..

      Posted Oct-12-2011 By 

      (-2) | Report

    • @DOWNPLANE

      Still not an oxymoron, dipshit.

      Posted Oct-12-2011 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @EventHorizon2012

      I guess that's your opinion. Point me to any credible source that states an oxymoron MUST contain two words. (“Must” is the key word here.)

      ox•y•mo•ron:
      noun, plural ox•y•mo•ra, ox•y•mor•ons

      a figure of speech by which a word, phrase or expression produces an incongruous, seemingly self-contradictory effect.

      No, the words are not puns as they are unique by having an underlying contradiction. Pun simply suggests two or more meanings, but does not r More..

      Posted Oct-12-2011 By 

      (2) | Report

  • Comment of user 'Nizaris' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!