WMD attack in Iraq
This item updates item 'Weapons of mass destruction?..... U.S. Deaths Confirmed By The DoD: 3875 '
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3722855.stm
The Americans say that a 155mm artillery shell containing two constituents of sarin was used by insurgents in Iraq as part of an improvised explosive device
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3722255.stm
An artillery shell containing a small amount of the nerve gas sarin has exploded in Iraq.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3635381.stm Al-Qaeda-linked terrorists planned a chemical attack on Jordan's spy headquarters that could have killed 20,000 people
Loading the player ...
Added: Nov-26-2007
By: Dat1111
In: Iraq, Middle East
Tags: WMD, iraq, kurds, genocide, murder, war crimes, Saddam hussein, 1441, UN, sanctions, nuclear, biological, Operation Iraqi freedom, Decade
Marked as: approved
Views: 10140 | Comments: 75 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 4 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
By: Dat1111
In: Iraq, Middle East
Tags: WMD, iraq, kurds, genocide, murder, war crimes, Saddam hussein, 1441, UN, sanctions, nuclear, biological, Operation Iraqi freedom, Decade
Marked as: approved
Views: 10140 | Comments: 75 | Votes: 4 | Favorites: 4 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
Items
-
CNN covered up Saddam Hussein's crimes for fear of safety
-
Kidnap and torture: new claims of Army war crimes in Iraq
-
Group loyal to Saddam Hussein: "We produced a rocket land - land"
-
Richard Perle Denies Iraq Role and War Crimes Charges
-
Letter from President saddam Hussein to the American people
-
Iraqis in a Feild.... American War Crimes
-
144 MPC Mosul, Iraq 2006-2007
-
The fall of a tyrant: Saddam Hussein- Iraqi Freedom
-
Sir Gerald Kauffim and other EU delegates visit gaza and call for trial on Israeli war crimes.
-
Sri Lanka War Crimes Victim From Film Identified.
-
War in Iraq to Be Given New Name
Advertisers





180 000 killed if I may correct.
Posted Nov-26-2007 ByYatzeR (65.22) YatzeR View Channel Send Message
(0)
"Fuck the international community and all who listen to them" - sounds kind of like bush :o
Posted Nov-26-2007 Bydems193 (20.02) dems193 View Channel Send Message
(0)
thats not really a good way to take care of business
Posted Nov-26-2007 ByChristianLeb (155.96) 
ChristianLeb View Channel Send Message
(0)
Posted Nov-26-2007 ByDat1111 (6725.46) Dat1111 Send Message
(0)
Posted Nov-27-2007 ByBronson80 (19.72) 
Bronson80 View Channel Send Message
(0)
If they weren't traitors to their country this would have never happened.
Posted Nov-26-2007 ByBigBoss1 (112.04) 
BigBoss1 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Posted Nov-26-2007 Byneoconjerk (189.02) 
neoconjerk View Channel Send Message
(0)
Let me help you ...
NUCLEAR FUCKING BOMBS
And they weren't found. Plain and simple.
Stop saying they were... it's like arguing income tax law, people will come back with "so you shouldn't pay taxes?" NO THE INCOME TAX IS CERTAIN SINGLE TAX, UNAPPORTIONED AS THE CONSTITUTION DEMANDS.
You're talking about WMDs like there are fucking (pre-9/11) NUKES! THERE ARE NONE IN IRAQ, AND THERE NEVER WILL BE. Chemical weapons (among others) were reclassified to WMD status after the attacks. Saddam had chemical weapons before the attacks, then why didn't we send our entire army in there...? Oh yeah, that little thing called the Cold War... Russia had HUNDREDS of nukes pointed right at us, and did you see the US trying to invade Russia? No, because we would've been toast. Saddam (and Iraq as a country) has never been a viable threat to this country, and should ever be one. The attacks happening to our soldiers is because we are an invading force, and now with Saddam gone, Iraq is becoming more of a haven for "terrorists" that want to kill our men and women in uniform. We needed to never have gone into that country, MINDED OUR OWN BUSINESS LIKE THE FOUNDING FATHERS SUGGESTED. We wouldn't have nearly as many American soldiers die in vain."
Posted Nov-26-2007 ByChristianLeb (155.96) 
ChristianLeb View Channel Send Message
(0)
Most civilian deaths are caused by suicide and vehicle bombs, MORE than ALL artillery and airstrike caused deaths.
Posted Nov-26-2007 Bytxzen (181.48) 
txzen View Channel Send Message
(0)
Posted Nov-27-2007 Byneoconjerk (189.02) 
neoconjerk View Channel Send Message
(0)
How are these people enemies? IF we measured by that standard we would of nuked baghdad by now
Posted Nov-26-2007 ByDat1111 (6725.46) Dat1111 Send Message
(0)
of course, the coaltion of the willing /end sarcasm.
Posted Nov-26-2007 Bydems193 (20.02) dems193 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Let me help you ...
NUCLEAR FUCKING BOMBS
And they weren't found. Plain and simple.
Stop saying they were... it's like arguing income tax law, people will come back with "so you shouldn't pay taxes?" NO THE INCOME TAX IS CERTAIN SINGLE TAX, UNAPPORTIONED AS THE CONSTITUTION DEMANDS.
You're talking about WMDs like there are fucking (pre-9/11) NUKES! THERE ARE NONE IN IRAQ, AND THERE NEVER WILL BE. Chemical weapons (among others) were reclassified to WMD status after the attacks. Saddam had chemical weapons before the attacks, then why didn't we send our entire army in there...? Oh yeah, that little thing called the Cold War... Russia had HUNDREDS of nukes pointed right at us, and did you see the US trying to invade Russia? No, because we would've been toast. Saddam (and Iraq as a country) has never been a viable threat to this country, and should ever be one. The attacks happening to our soldiers is because we are an invading force, and now with Saddam gone, Iraq is becoming more of a haven for "terrorists" that want to kill our men and women in uniform. We needed to never have gone into that country, MINDED OUR OWN BUSINESS LIKE THE FOUNDING FATHERS SUGGESTED. We wouldn't have nearly as many American soldiers die in vain."
Posted Nov-26-2007 ByChristianLeb (155.96) 
ChristianLeb View Channel Send Message
(0)
wtf am i saying, you're obviously a callous dick, of course you would have. that flag doesn't suit you, you need something less neutral i think.
Posted Nov-26-2007 ByWar_On_Errorism (158.88) 
War_On_Errorism Send Message
(0)
Quoted for truth.
Posted Nov-27-2007 Byneoconjerk (189.02) 
neoconjerk View Channel Send Message
(0)