Safe Mode: On
Wrong Court Ruled on Arizona Law/Smack down of Obama by SCOTUS may be inevitable.

In a stunning development that could potentially send the nation into a Constitutional crisis, an astute attorney who is well-versed in Constitutional law states that the ruling against the State of Arizona by Judge Susan Bolton concerning its new immigration law is illegal.

The attorney in question submitted her assertion in a special article in the Canada Free Press. Her argument states in part, "Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days?

American lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder.

But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face.

"Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says: "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Par

-

Added: Sep-15-2010 
By: HydrogenEconomy
In:
Iran, News
Tags: scotus, supreme, court, obama, arizona, constitution, smack, down
Views: 10120 | Comments: 52 | Votes: 5 | Favorites: 4 | Shared: 2 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • How come Im not seeing this in the news.

    Posted Sep-15-2010 By 

    (9) | Report

    • Comment of user 'Zardoz003' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • The MSM Compelling News Criteria:

      1. Anything that slams a conservative
      2. Lohan, GaGa, Madonna
      3. Anything even slightly close to anti Black racism (if white perpetrator)
      4. Obama Fluff
      5. All Else

      Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

      (4) | Report

  • This is big.

    Now we'll see if we're still America.

    Posted Sep-15-2010 By 

    (8) | Report

  • Funny, wasn't Obama a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago for something like 12 years. He doesn't even look out for his own does he.

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (6) | Report

  • GO ARIZONA!!!!!!!!!

    Posted Sep-15-2010 By 

    (5) | Report

  • The Supreme Court long ago interpreted that clause as giving it the right but not the absolute duty to exercize original jurisdiction. Except for suits between states, the Supreme Court automatically delegates jurisdiction for suites against states to the Federal circuit courts.

    Posted Sep-15-2010 By 

    (4) | Report

  • regardless...charge him with treason, arrest him, sentence him to die in front of a firing squad, carry out the sentence, then if there are any questions...he will get his day in court.

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (4) | Report

  • Comment of user 'htos1' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Those men who wrote the Constitution were geniuses.. they were giants compared to the clowns we have today.

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (3) | Report

  • Comment of user 'jsczerby' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • oh my and our illustrious leader... who is a LAWYER didn't know that??

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (2) | Report

    • Comment of user 'jsczerby' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • this is what happens when you put politics above america

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Conmstimunition wha is that pa?

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Good Post, Hydro-E ...Thanx for the info. I can't wait for the excuses the administration comes up with, about this.

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Oh, SNAP !

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

  • "The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to high heaven."

    Hmm--I wonder if the court will, or can, hear a single omnibus suit addressing malfeasance and abuse of office by a president?

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

  • this is a bunch of B.S. Violent crimes have not been as low as they are now in Arizona for over 30 years how can you compare that to any war torn country? Those facts are straight from the department of justice there is something very hypocritical in the ancestors of immigrants denying others the same rights their ancestors had and they're looking for the same your ancestors were. if there's a bunch of violent crime happening I could understand you but there's not there is no justification for More..

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

    • Tax payer money to teach "ethnic studies"? unless it's "ethnic American studies" I don't think so. Let mom and dad do that.
      If you want to "open up" YOUR house for them, by all means invite them over. But they aren't welcome in mine, my choice.
      In the mean time I have an even better idea. Why don't they just stay in their own country and make it just like America? Then they'll be happy to stay there. Or is that too simple a solution?
      I know that America did just th More..

      Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

      (0) | Report

  • Ah, now I understand; you think there is some sort of difference between Obama and Bush.

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (0) | Report

  • The Canada Free Press? mmmm ok why Canada? The constitutional right of a state to declare war if being invaded is ridiculous. First of all what is this invasion you speak of? You must be talking about those "headless bodies" ahhh oook. Of course since we hear of murderous immigrants rushing thru the border with machine gun in hand killing citizens on a regular basis..AZ should declare war on Mexico and they along with JT Ready's neo-army would be crushed by the Mexican/U.S. allied for More..

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (-5) | Report

  • To quote George Bush; Its just a G-D piece of paper

    Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

    (-6) | Report

  • Wonder why one of these right wing constitutional lawyers didn't catch it...probably to busy filing 'Obama is not legally entitled to the office' cases....LOL!

    Posted Sep-15-2010 By 

    (-12) | Report

    • Comment of user 'knowsmuslims' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • Wow all kinds of goodies in that thar Constitution. So a state has the right to invade another country huh? So if Brewer gives the go ahead Sheriff Arpaio can charge into Mexico on his white steed and slay those cartel varmints? Yahoooooo Joe! Go get'em general.

    Posted Sep-15-2010 By 

    (-16) | Report

    • Now your making sense.

      Posted Sep-15-2010 By 

      (2) | Report

    • Is that the best you can come up with? I don't think anyone here is suggesting a 'Joe Arpaio Expeditionary Force' campaign into the Mexican desert.

      I'm not a lawyer, but I gather from that article Obama Inc had no legal (Constitutional) right to do what they did, which as we all know has never been an obstacle for them before.

      Posted Sep-15-2010 By 

      (11) | Report

    • Sober up...

      Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

      (9) | Report

    • I guess you don't know what the word "State" means in term of a government body. If a "State" decided to break away from a Federal/Union, it could declares itself independent and become a country.

      Posted Sep-16-2010 By 

      (0) | Report