After a tugboat and its four heavy barges slammed into the Queen Isabella Causeway nearly six years ago, killing eight motorists, lawyer Michael Slack wondered if past boat accidents had weakened Texas' longest bridge. The Texas Department of Transportation said he wasn't entitled to an answer.
"There are sometimes very frustrating limits imposed on safety information, and I think it should be available," said Slack, a lawyer hired by the city of South Padre Island and local businesses after the tugboat accident cut off the island from the mainland.
Federal officials provide some facts about the reliability of bridges across the United States. The public can find out the latest inspection date of a bridge, its location, when it was built and whether it is structurally sound.
But when it comes to finding out more details about Texas' 50,000 bridges, the public can't read actual inspection documents that might shed light on dangerous structures. Over the years, state officials have turned down hundreds of requests for inspection documents on bridges, railroad crossings and highways. Officials say a federal law prohibits them from releasing those documents.
"It's a condition for federal funding," said Sharon Alexander, a lawyer for the Transportation Department who has responded to requests by the public for copies of inspection papers. The law says inspection records for transportation projects that receive federal funding cannot be used as evidence in court.
Alexander said "there's a great debate" among transportation officials across the nation about whether the law also applies to members of the public who aren't part of a lawsuit. In Texas, the Transportation Department has decided to withhold the records from everyone — and the Texas attorney general agrees.
In past open-records decisions, the attorney general's office said the intention of the federal law is to "facilitate candor" of inspectors by keeping their reports private. That rationale has frustrated people like Slack. "Those inspections are done for the public interest," Slack said. "You would expect that stuff would be more forthcoming."
SOURCE:
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/metro/stories/MYSA080307.6A.TexasBridges.34315f1.html

Click to view image: '78027-LL_Bridge.jpg'
By: Facetious for Kicks
In: News
Tags: bridge, inspection, report, public domain, why not, not just Texas
Marked as: approved
Views: 9751 | Comments: 15 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Not Just Your Imagination: Brain Perceives Optical Illusions As Real Motion
-
They're Not Just un-American,But Leftists are Cowards Too:'Conservative' Scarborough Calls on Petraeus,Gates to Fire McChrystal to Keep Obama's Ha
-
Bridge Inspection
-
DRUNK DRIVERS KILL THOUSANDS EACH YEAR… BUT NO DUI REGISTRIES, Why Not?
-
Peter Schiff: Why Not Another World War?
-
Mario live and on stage. Not just the theme, all of 1-1.
-
Why not go back to Israel’s 63BC lines?
-
Parrot Who's Not Just A Pretty Polly
-
Reefer Madness (1938)
-
Report: Antarctic Ice Growing, Not Shrinking
-
Reasons why not to own a ricer




Anyone knowing where their own state stands on the issue, please share. Same for my fellow LLs abroad, where does your country or locale stand on the availability of such information.
Posted Aug-3-2007 ByFacetious for Kicks (962.02) 
Facetious for Kicks View Channel Send Message
(0)
Experts say that the US need 1.6 TRILLION $$$ to rebuild the rotten infrastructure,but for Dumbya war is more important
Posted Aug-3-2007 Bycygiso (721.58) 
cygiso View Channel Send Message
(0)
This same topic was on every radio talk show this morning. The information I was given is that Nationally, 12 percent of bridges are categorized as "structurally deficient," meaning they are deteriorating. In Texas, 4 percent of all bridges %u2013 2,125 %u2013 are so categorized. Of those in Texas, 2 percent, or 483 bridges (17 in the Dallas area), are on major thoroughfares. For once Texas is doing a little better than the rest of the Country as a whole.
What's so terribly sad abou More..
Posted Aug-3-2007 Byvgroove (626.82) vgroove View Channel Send Message
(0)
* %u2013 2,125 %u2013 * don't know what the fuk that is, but I didn't type it.
Posted Aug-3-2007 Byvgroove (626.82) vgroove View Channel Send Message
(0)
Posted Aug-3-2007 ByFacetious for Kicks (962.02) 
Facetious for Kicks View Channel Send Message
(0)
My state got a D.
X(
Posted Aug-3-2007 Bylost_live_leak (36.82) 
lost_live_leak View Channel Send Message
(0)
lets all help perpetuate some fear. it will boost the economy by having us glued to the tv news as they plug expensive commercials along with their high ratings. before you know it, we all die crossing some bridge to go to the mall! I can only hope.
Posted Aug-3-2007 Byshed77 (321.12) 
shed77 Send Message
(0)
Posted Aug-3-2007 ByFacetious for Kicks (962.02) 
Facetious for Kicks View Channel Send Message
(0)
Yes it does.
http://www.srpedd.org/Ch7bridges.pdf
Posted Aug-3-2007 Bybravo61 (8794.96) 
bravo61 View Channel Send Message
(0)
"
Respectfully Zardoz, I must disagree regarding ALL fear being irrational. I might grant that MOST fear is irrational. Fear is, at times, an instinct we cannot help. Having fear sometimes is inevitable.
That said, being that I live in Texas and we cannot see bridge inspection reports, I am heading to the sporting goods store right now for a helmet. LOL!
Posted Aug-3-2007 ByFacetious for Kicks (962.02) 
Facetious for Kicks View Channel Send Message
(0)
Hey at list our tax money is making the Iraqi bridges safe.
Posted Aug-3-2007 ByEight (533.78) 
Eight View Channel Send Message
(0)
least
Posted Aug-3-2007 ByEight (533.78) 
Eight View Channel Send Message
(0)
On the flipside however, the states have a greater responsibility to identify and rectify the problems. The feds usually just answer the state's request for funds. The feds wont come inspect for problems.
Posted Aug-4-2007 ByFacetious for Kicks (962.02) 
Facetious for Kicks View Channel Send Message
(0)