Safe Mode: On
Obama adviser David Axelrod makes case for Mitt Romney for President

David Axelrod, Chief Strategist for President Barack Obama, endorsed
Mitt Romney for President on Fox News Sunday this morning. He told
Chris Wallace, “The choice in this election is between an economy that
produces a growing middle class and that gives people a chance to get
ahead and their kids a chance to get ahead and an economy that continues
down the road we’re on.”
That is precisely right and precisely what Mitt Romney’s campaign has been telling people. Good to see David Axelrod agrees.


Added: Apr-15-2012 Occurred On: Apr-15-2012
By: Aubrey
In: Politics
Tags: Axlelrod, Moron, Obama
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 3499 | Comments: 46 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 3 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.

  • They have this illness that, in The Administration's mind, this is still the Bush economy. Sad really.

    They cannot accept their own failure, their own failed policies. I wonder how long Mitt will call this the failure of the 'previous administration'?

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    Flashovr (1885.10)  

    (7)

  • Ya got THAT right, Axelrod! OUT with that socialist, commie puke POS!

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    maxedout (18.32)  

    (5)

  • Yep, he's so smart!! ANYONE BUT OBAMA!!!

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    aranger45 (2989.48)  

    (5)

  • That would make a great ad for the GOP

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    Snarfums (456.34)  

    (4)

  • Sometimes even liars have a slip of the tongue with their twisted way of thinking.

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    Arizona_Patriot (3118.66)  

    (3)

  • Comment of user 'cantstandya' has been deleted by author!

    • @cantstandya "Our party" sounds to me like you have no party. Fuck the Dems and the Cons, let them eat each other, let them all get what they want and see how they like it.

      Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
      Zardoz003 (1575.62)  

      (-2)

    • @cantstandya I served in the military and to be perfectly honest, many many more conservative type people served in the infantry units than anyone else. For you to call conservatives chicken hawks is very much incorrect...now on to other stuff. I'm going to agree ,if it shocks you, that being fiscally conservative is a necessity at this point but I do think that investment in our country and its infrastructure is greatly needed and this pays dividends back to our own economy. I don't understand More..

      Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
      The Grim (746.90)  

      (0)

    • @The Grim "Unfortunately this time around we don't have any great candidates to choose from."

      Ron Paul

      Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
      dav1936531 (513.02)  

      (-3)

    • @dav1936531 Ron Paul is not that great. I give him all the respect in the world for consistency and his fiscal conservatism but his foreign policy is a mess....sure pulling out of every country sounds peachy but its not. Unfortunately his policy of isolationism is something that I desire but the world is so globalized its impossible to succeed at this. Simply closing your eyes to the world will not make the problem go away, it will in fact exacerbate it. Following different foreign policies is a More..

      Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
      The Grim (746.90)  

      (1)

    • @cantstandya "our party" What a joke! Sure you're repub, in a pig ass! Spoken like a true liberal turd. Kinda scares you pinkos that obummer is going to get beaten like a rug in Nov!

      Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
      marc1921 (1459.86)  

      (2)

  • Axelrod. I wouldn't holler soooeeee if the hogs were eatin' him.

    It was a dark day for American when we started letting those people in.

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    TMoray1 (738.56)  

    (2)

  • The only reason we're going with Romney is because when Obambo pulls the Chicago-style "voting-of-the-dead", there's not enough dead Chi-towners (plus blacks and liberal white-guiltists) to overcome the rest of the entire United States' votes for a guy who actually has some of the skill/ability/experience for the job.

    Run-on sentence. Forgive me.

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    staxman (95.20)  

    (2)

  • How many more times are we going to get suckered by these losers up on capitol hill

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    myCondolences (653.78)

    (1)

  • "Hello. Retards R Us. May I help you?"

    "Yeah. Is Barack there?"

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    dav1936531 (513.02)  

    (1)

  • Romney or Obama, is it really going to matter. I guess we will have Romney care instead of obama care.

    Posted Apr-16-2012 By 
    LadyOfTheInternet (20.60)
    LadyOfTheInternet
    View Channel
    Send Message

    (1)

  • Thanks to Arizona Patriot for the full link, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhkcpiwembE. At the end it is clear he is referring to Bush era policy. Video title and editing is kinda misleading.

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    neutral_person (157.92)  

    (0)

    • @neutral_person yes any reasonable person can come to that conclusion. but the irony is that obama has been potus for the last 3 years. so in political bs, it is obamas road now.

      Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
      anarchy2011 (62.82)  

      (1)

    • @anarchy2011 Well I was commenting on the misleading title, not as much Obama's unflattering term.

      Posted Apr-16-2012 By 
      neutral_person (157.92)  

      (0)

  • Well said Dave!

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    Wigglesworth (670.50)  

    (0)

  • The Obama team still not admitting that the "road we're on" is Obama's road...

    I'm not sure what road we'd be on otherwise after the Democrats controlled the White House for the past three years, but unless Axelrod is actually endorsing Romney, he apparently thinks we're still not on Obama's road.

    Obama could manage to last for eight years blaming the president before him the entire time.

    Posted Apr-16-2012 By 
    buzzardist (362.74)  

    (0)

  • Hmmmmm common sense would tell me this is from 2008:
    1. Bottom left Fox News icon is not spinning
    2. No date and time like it usually has
    3. Editing.

    Can anyone confirm this?

    Posted Apr-15-2012 By 
    neutral_person (157.92)  

    (-3)