Safe Mode: On
Opposed Piston Opposed Cylinder Engine

An extremely lightweight opposed piston opposed cylinder (OPOC) engine has been developed under a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) program. FEV and Advanced Propulsion Technologies (APT) were asked by the U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research Development and Engineering Center (TARDEC) to modify this engine for heavy-truck applications. Analyzing the two stroke scavenging, the side-injection combustion, and the structure of the key components shows the potential of the OPOC concept. It is predicted for the 465 kW (650 hp) OPOC truck engine. The OPOC engine was designed to be modular. Each module is self-contained and delivers 325 hp. The modules are connected together via the Modular Displacement Clutch, which synchronizes the modules for achieving even firing when both modules are functioning. With an optimized scavenging process, the special design features of the OPOC engine offer a significant step towards the potential of the two-stroke engine having double the power density of a four-stroke engine. An estimated 90% scavenging efficiency has been achieved with unique gas exchange characteristics of the OPOC engine and the use of an electric assisted turbocharger. The OPOC engine runs with almost two times the engine speed (3800 rpm) along with a large cylinder stroke (167.53 mm), as a result of the split stroke of the opposed piston structure. This also improves the power density by another factor of 2.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 7601 (Embed: 0)

Added: Feb-12-2011 
By: CannibalsCookpot
In:
Arts and Entertainment, Arts and Entertainment
Tags: DPOC, engine, DARPA
Marked as: approved
Views: 9842 | Comments: 38 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 8 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • TARDEC...really?!

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (3)

  • sounds like that dipshit doesn't understand the most basic aspects of combustion engines. Piston has to stop moving before igniting the fuel????/ STFU!!! the stupid f'wad must of never used a timing light or rotated a distributer. At least we know he is an ignorant f'wad

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (3)

    • Comment of user 'DiaperPudding' has been deleted by author!
  • how do they lube this thing? Mix the gas?

    My sister was hot on the Mazda rotary engine until she had one. It turned out to be a POS.

    RPMs? so many unanswered questions. 600HP at what RPM?

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'DiaperPudding' has been deleted by author!
  • http://www.ecomotors.com/technology

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (1)

  • 300 hp, but how much torque?

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (0)

  • First off this is not new technology, it has been used in aircraft engines.
    Second, It might look good on paper, and it might look good in a model you can turn by hand.
    Biggest problem is that the cylinder pressure drop per inch of stroke is double than in a single cyl, therefore your stroke must be shorter, then you torque goes down, rpm must go up, which is bad for diesel.

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (0)

  • Yay darpa!

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (0)

  • A Subaru.

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'rclark951' has been deleted by author!
  • I can see lubing this thing is the biggest problem. If they sort that out then perhaps they'll have something.

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (0)

    • Sounds like they are almost there. They have it running and are working on refining it. I'd like to know the RTH of their working engines before breakdown.

      Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

      (1)

  • Comment of user 'rclark951' has been deleted by author!
  • what the hell is this? It's called a boxer engine, porsche has had them for awhile.

    Rotaries are where its at.

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (0)

  • this is not new ...the commer knocker in the (i think)late 50s had the same principle. they were a 7 ton truck and noisey as hell.
    the engine didnt last very long due to exesive wear.

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (0)

    • Thanks for the info mate. From the looks of this one they have a way to go yet.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrAoj5Cuu68

      Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user '' has been deleted by moderator!
    • Comment of user '' has been deleted by moderator!
    • just an addition ..if you google commer knocker you will see what i mean.
      6 cylinders 3 injectors.

      Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

      (0)

    • I think the differance is the elimination of the extra crankshafts. In theory this engine should be smoother running than the Commer, resulting in less wear.

      Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

      (0)

  • maybe its slightly different than a boxer, still doesn't beat a rotary though. You're constantly fighting momentum going back and forth, it makes no damn sense.

    Posted Feb-13-2011 By 

    (0)