Safe Mode: On
Obama, Desperate for Votes, Attempts to Gut Welfare Reform And Bribe Parasites With FREE MONEY....Democrats, Total Scum.

Republicans accuse HHS of gutting welfare reform with quiet policy change


Published July 13, 2012

FoxNews.com




http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/13/republicans-accuse-hhs-gutting-welfare-reform-with-quiet-policy-change/

Republicans are accusing the Obama administration of
unilaterally gutting welfare reform after the Department of Health and
Human Services quietly notified states that they may seek a waiver for
the program's strict work requirements.

HHS made the announcement in a policy memo Thursday, news that
slipped well below the radar amid a raucous day on the presidential
campaign trail. But a few prominent GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill picked
up on the change, and accused the administration of overhauling one of
the most important bipartisan agreements of the past several decades.

"President Obama just tore up a basic foundation of the welfare
contract" Republican Study Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, D-Ohio, said
in a statement. He also called the move a "blatant violation of the
law."

Mitt Romney on Friday spoke up on the change, saying: "President
Obama now wants to strip the established work requirements from
welfare." He said "the linkage of work and welfare is essential to
prevent welfare from becoming a way of life."

How exactly the HHS change will play out is unclear. In Thursday's
policy directive, the department said the states may seek a waiver from
the work component of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
Program, in order to "test alternative and innovative strategies,
policies and procedures that are designed to improve employment outcomes
for needy families."

HHS stressed that any alternative should still aim to get welfare
recipients into gainful employment. Any plan that "appears substantially
likely to reduce access to assistance or employment for needy
families," will not be approved, the memo said.

But HHS is suddenly allowing for more flexibility in a program known
-- and in many circles, lauded -- for its rigid framework. Currently,
states have to have 50 percent of their caseload meet certain work
participation requirements, though there are ways around that as many
states fall short.

The latest department directive
suggested alternative plans could "combine learning and work" to
fulfill the work requirement, or let "vocational educational training or
job search /readiness programs" count as well.

The hard-fought welfare reform agreement in 1996 was struck between
the Bill Clinton administration and a Republican-led Congress. It is
still considered a signature legislative achievement from that period.

The number of people on TANF has decreased dramatically since 1997,
but roughly 4 million people are still enrolled according to federal
figures. The change comes in the middle of a competitive election fight
between Obama and Romney.

Rep. Dave Camp, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, and
Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, ranking Republican on the Senate Finance
Committee, have written to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius asking for a
more detailed explanation of the change and her authority for making it.
Both expressed concern that the change would strip the crux of the 1996
welfare reform deal.

"This ends welfare reform as we know it," Camp said in a statement.



"I'm disappointed that after years of sitting on their hands and
failing to propose any significant improvements to the TANF programs,
the Obama Administration is once again over-stepping their authority and
attempting to circumvent Congress through an unprecedented bypass of
the legislative process," Hatch said.


Added: Jul-13-2012 Occurred On: Jul-13-2012
By: VikingRapeSquad
In:
Politics
Tags: obama, democrats, welfare, breeder, paradise, no work
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1414 | Comments: 51 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Wow, this guy El Dumbo is out of control. He is obviously desperate for votes. What will he do next? He is OK with the gays getting married, no more deporting illegals, let illegals come on in at will do what they want take what they want, now he is gutting welfare reform so the losers of the world don't have to work. They can just sit at home and wait for their checks. So he has the gays, the blacks, the hispanics......who is next?

    One thing is for sure is if you are straight, white, an More..

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (5)

  • That photo is funny as hell, talk about a butt ugly couple.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (4)

  • he has to be the worst president in US history

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (4)

  • The never ending assault continue's...uggggh

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Workfare is the answer. Here's a job. Take it and do it or you don't get money. Get people cleaning the streets, cutting city grass etc.

    It's win win. People get money to live on and the taxpayer gets value for their tax dollars.

    Problem solved. Next!

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (3)

    • @jum_runky - FDR did the same thing in the 1930's via the WPA and CCC strange thing is they called it "Socialism" back then too but it and WW-II got us past the First Great Depression.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @jum_runky Nice theory but lets add prisoners to the list, nothing like back breaking hard labor to change ones mind about being a criminal.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @lordpincer274

      You bet. FDR was one of the best presidents that the US has ever had. I admire the man immensely.

      That was before liberals were brain-dead entitlement whores.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @jum_runky I somewhat agree with your point. I don't think anyone should get paid to not work. It produces the environment the urban shit holes we see in cities (as well as what is seen in rural areas).

      Basically, if you are physically incapable to dig ditches, then you need to push papers. And if you are incapable to crunch numbers or something, you will need to work physically for your pay. If you can do neither, and still must depend on a government income, you should become a ward of the st More..

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @ChumCannon

      I can get behind that. Free money just breeds laziness and creates ghetto conditions.

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (1)

  • the parasites were going to vote for the food stamp president anyway...this is just Obama fucking over the public like normal.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (3)

  • The gay african knows it is finished. It's just doing as much damage as possible before January.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Making it easier and easier to become dependent on the government.

    I am convinced this man wants every single citizen to become a direct recipient of government aid.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (2)

  • How could anyone vote for this corrupt piece of shit?

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (2)

  • I didn't think it was possible for a single president to destroy a country in just one term. Obama proved me wrong. For you idiots that voted for him.. How is that hope and change working out for you? Do you like being a dependent?

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @Diverdanm They LOVE being dependent, it was the hope and change THEY wanted-now they can just sit around and smoke dope, drink 40's and fuck, fuck , fuuk, as Michelle has asked them to do

      Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

      (0)

  • People who are going to vote for this four-four flusher are either: Ignorant, suckering into the glamorization of the ad campaign (The last major reason why this con got into the white house in the first place), or an outright simpleton.
    Why would any person in their right mind vote for someone who promises to give more money to the people who are voluntarily do nothing?
    It is one thing to be a welfare-rat but it is completely another thing for those who are genuinely in desperate need while s More..

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (2)

  • This happened with the last Liebour government in Britain, politicians will do anything if they think they will get votes.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Yes, fuck this asshole and his transexual wife. This is why some people should not be allowed to hold office. Look at that top picture--these are the twits in charge-turning the USA into a vast Detroit as fast as they can

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Throw a banana and run like fuck!

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (1)

  • This is pretty rich, coming from a rapist.

    Posted Jul-13-2012 By 

    (1)