Safe Mode: On
Rush Job: Inside Dems' Limbaugh plan

NOTE: 2 Videos attached !
A lengthy story, but well worth reading if you are a political junkie like me.

Menderman

Story below:

Top Democrats believe they have struck political gold by depicting Rush Limbaugh as the new face of the Republican Party, a full-scale effort first hatched by some of the most familiar names in politics and now being guided in part from inside the White House.

The strategy took shape after Democratic strategists Stanley Greenberg and James Carville included Limbaugh’s name in an October poll and learned their longtime tormentor was deeply unpopular with many Americans, especially younger voters. Then the conservative talk-radio host emerged as an unapologetic critic of Barack Obama shortly before his inauguration, when even many Republicans were showering him with praise.

Soon it clicked: Democrats realized they could roll out a new GOP bogeyman for the post-Bush era by turning to an old one in Limbaugh, a polarizing figure since he rose to prominence in the 1990s.

Limbaugh is embracing the line of attack, suggesting a certain symbiosis between him and his political adversaries.

"The administration is enabling me,” he wrote in an e-mail to POLITICO. “They are expanding my profile, expanding my audience and expanding my influence. An ever larger number of people are now being exposed to the antidote to Obamaism: conservatism, as articulated by me. An ever larger number of people are now exposed to substantive warnings, analysis and criticism of Obama's policies and intentions, a ‘story’ I own because the [mainstream media] is largely the Obama Press Office.”

The bigger, the better, agreed Carville. “It’s great for us, great for him, great for the press,” he said of Limbaugh. “The only people he’s not good for are the actual Republicans in Congress.”

If Limbaugh himself were to coin a phrase for it, he might call it Operation Rushbo – an idea that started out simply enough but quickly proved to be deeply resonant by a rapid succession of events, say Democrats inside and outside the West Wing.

The seeds were planted in October after Democracy Corps, the Democratic polling company run by Carville and Greenberg, included Limbaugh’s name in a survey and found that many Americans just don’t like him.

“His positives for voters under 40 was 11 percent,” Carville recalled with a degree of amazement, alluding to a question about whether voters had a positive or negative view of the talk show host.

Paul Begala, a close friend of Carville, Greenberg and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, said they found Limbaugh’s overall ratings were even lower than the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s controversial former pastor, and William Ayers, the domestic terrorist and Chicago resident who Republicans sought to tie to Obama during the campaign.

Then came what Begala called “the tripwire.”

“I hope he fails,” Limbaugh said of Obama on his show four days before the president was sworn in. It was a time when Obama’s approval ratings were soaring, but more than that, polls showed even people who didn’t vote for him badly wanted him to succeed, coming to office at a time of economic meltdown.

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee was the first to jump on the statement, sending the video to its membership to raise cash and stir a petition drive.

We helped get the ball rolling on this because we’re looking and listening to different Republican voices around the country, and the one that was the loudest and getting the most attention was Rush Limbaugh,” explained DCCC chairman and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.).

The Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank run by former Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta, also pounced on Limbaugh's "fail" line, drawing attention to it on their well-read blog.

Soon after, Americans United for Change, a liberal group, was airing Limbaugh’s statement in an ad aimed at pushing Senate Republicans to support the stimulus bill.

“It just cropped up out of how much play that comment was getting on the air,” said Brad Woodhouse, who runs the group and is about to take over as communications director at the Democratic National Committee. “When we did it and it generated so much press, it just started to snowball from there.”

But liberals quickly realized that trying to drive a wedge between congressional Republicans and Limbaugh was unlikely to work, and their better move was to paint the GOP as beholden to the talk show host.

This was driven home to them, according to one Democrat, when Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.) took a shot at Limbaugh in late January only to appear on his program the next day and plead having momentarily had “foot-in-mouth disease.”

By February, Carville and Begala were pounding on Limbaugh frequently in their appearances on CNN.

Neither Democrat would say so, but a third source said the two also began pushing the idea of targeting Limbaugh in their daily phone conversations with Emanuel.

Americans United for Change launched a new ad featuring Limbaugh’s CPAC appearance. A left-leaning media watchdog group began a new Limbaugh tracking homepage. Democratic National Chairman Tim Kaine tweaked Steele for his apology. Terry McAuliffe tried to inject Limbaugh into the Virginia governor’s race. The DCCC launched a new website, http://www.imsorryrush.com, mocking the Republicans who have had to apologize to Limbaugh.

And Gibbs served up a made-for-cable-TV quote to end his daily briefing Tuesday.

“I was a little surprised at the speed in which Mr. Steele, the head of the RNC, apologized to the head of the Republican Party,” Gibbs quipped with a grin, before striding out of the press room.

David Plouffe, Obama’s campaign manager last year and a member of his inner circle still, will publish an op-ed in Wednesday’s Washington Post chiding Republicans for being “paralyzed with fear of crossing their leader.”

A senior White House aide has been tasked with helping to guide the Limbaugh strategy.

Outside, Americans United for Choice, a liberal group, and the Democratic National Committee are driving the message, in close consultation with the White House.

Democrats can barely suppress their smiles these days, overjoyed at the instant-ad imagery of Limbaugh clad in Johnny Cash-black at CPAC and, more broadly, at what they see as their success in managing to further marginalize a party already on the outs.

“I want to send Rush a bottle of vitamins,” said Begala. “We need him to stay healthy and loud and proud.”

With President George W. Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney out of the White House and Tom DeLay gone from Congress, the left had been suddenly absent an unpopular right-wing figure.

Few Americans know who the congressional Republican leaders are. Even Sarah Palin is now four time zones away from Washington.

Enter Limbaugh.

It’s something of a back to the future tactic for Democrats: painting the GOP as the party of the angry white male. But unlike Newt Gingrich or other prominent Republicans, Limbaugh doesn’t have to mind his tongue.

And the liberal political apparatus is at battle stations taking note of his every comment.

Media Matters, the left-leaning media watchdog and advocacy group, began a “Limbaugh Wire” web-site Tuesday to track him. “For a long time Americans haven’t really been aware that he’s so influential,” said Eric Burns, the group’s president.

Democrats are now working hard to ensure that changes.

“He’s driving the Republican reluctance to deal with Obama, which Americans want,” said Greenberg. “He’s the policeman [keeping them in line].”

They’ll all get a fresh hook for the story after Wednesday, when a Democratic polling firm goes into the field to test, among other things, Limbaugh’s standing with the public.

All the attention only offers upside for the buzz-hungry Limbaugh, said Carville.

“The television cameras just can’t stay away from him,” Carville said Tuesday, a day when cable news played images of Limbaugh seemingly on a loop. “Our strategy depends on him keeping talking, and I think we’re going to succeed.”

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 3913 (Embed: 0)
Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 3913 (Embed: 0)

Added: Mar-4-2009 Occurred On: Mar-4-2009
By: menderman
In:
Other
Tags: Rush, Limbaugh, Obama, Conservative, Challange, debate, politics, Menderman
Marked as: approved
Views: 5273 | Comments: 50 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • How pathetic is this administration? Such an obvious attempt to find a demon because they know their ideas can carry their water. They won on hatred for Bush and now, the best they can come up with is Limbaugh. Yeah. Obama is quite the inspiration. A sad and tragic joke has been played on America. We will pay a heavy price.

    Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

    (3)

    • even more pathetic is calling a partisan radio entertainer the head of the Republican Party. now THAT'S fucking pathetic!

      Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'danmanjonez' has been deleted by moderator!
  • "Right Wing" talk radio is the best thing that ever happened to the democrats. It gives their people a clearly defined object of hate and fear, and it gives their enemies an utterly useless and meaningless symbol to rally around because much of talk radio is just passive bitching and moaning, and most of the rhetoric is stale and hollow. As a means of political action it is rather impotent, and the past two elections have proven that.

    The libs, for all the faults in their dogma, at More..

    Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

    (1)

    • You are assuming that the left is that smart. I think that they believe that they are superior and their will will be done, and talk radio is the last thing they do not control. They intend to destroy it, thus destroying dissent.

      Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

      (1)

    • "Md. Police Put Activists' Names On Terror Lists(Oct.8, 2008)

      The Maryland State Police classified 53 nonviolent activists as terrorists and entered their names and personal information into state and federal databases that track terrorism suspects, the state police chief acknowledged yesterday.

      Police Superintendent Terrence B. Sheridan revealed at a legislative hearing that the surveillance operation, which targeted opponents of the death penalty and the Iraq war, was far more extensive More..

      Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

      (-4)

    • because Republicans never say God is on their side and they never say they're the party of "family values" vs. those "godless liberals"

      only Democrats conduct themselves that way, huh?

      Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

      (-5)

    • The only way to really destroy dissent is to destroy dissenters. If the milquetoast medium of talk radio gets shit canned, people may start having meetings out on the street, and the language and rhetoric won't be under any lame ass FCC control. It will be much more raw then. Talk radio fulfills a need for validation of thought. People will seek out that validation in other places; not just abandon their beliefs. In many ways, I think talk radio is a destructive opiate and pacifier. It's More..

      Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

      (-1)

    • or we can put those people on "Terror Watch Lists" and kill their free speech that way

      they won't even be able to leave the country or get in without getting fully searched every time and treated like terrorist suspects

      that'll learn 'em for practicing their free speech against a Republican Government during a time of war, huh?

      Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

      (-2)

  • Our economy is in shambles and these guys still feel like they have the time to quash free speech. I am utterly astounded at the number of ignorant people who have no idea they're being played for the dupes they are. In the past, tyrants had to kill for power and to enslave the populace. These days, they can accomplish all that just by posting Youtube videos.

    On a bright note, hope and change came to town yesterday. 5 former vagrants got jobs filling potholes on I-70. That's the good news. More..

    Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'AmericanTitan' has been deleted by moderator!
  • it was a foolish decision to make Micheal Steele the RNC leader. and this is the fallout.

    Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

    (0)

  • zzz

    Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'mpower6428' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Comment of user '' has been deleted by moderator!
  • the committee ensuring fairness (consisting of both democrats and republicans, equally) will ensure the Fairness Doctrine is being enforced fairly

    the left shouldn't control most airwaves and neither should the right. at this time the corporations favor the Republicans because they want "deregulation" which would give them more power

    Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

    (0)

  • McCain, then Palin, now Rush Lardass...WTF are Republicans thinking?

    I guess Bobby Jindal wasn't what they were looking for. Maybe next week they'll have someone new to try and pawn off as their saviour.

    Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

    (0)

  • Its about time for ol' pigface to have his massive coronary to free up some airspace for relevant material instead of his hateful,misinformed spittle.What a welcome death that would be,probably followed by a national day of celebration!

    Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

    (-1)

  • i'm just saying: you're criticizing Democrats for trying to "kill free speech" and i gave you examples of Republicans doing a lot worse than enforce any Fairness Doctrine -- they're wanting people put on "Terror Watch Lists" or arrested for protesting a war

    Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

    (-1)

    • I wiil criticize anybody that wants to kill the freedom of speech, regardless of party, country, nationality, sex, age, gender, race, and all that stuff.

      What do you think about Obama trying to kill talk radio?

      Why attack Rush?

      Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

      (1)

    • how is Obama trying to kill talk radio? be very specific

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (-1)

    • Well, Las, since I like you I will give you the info that you most likely already know. First, congress just discussed (may have passed) not re-instituting the "fairness Doctrine". Good Cover, and the media reported it faithfully. The same day they discussed two other possible bills. One focused on "local programming" requirements, thus limiting the amount of syndicated broadcasting a station can air. Second, bringing back "Minority Ownership" rules...IE: Affir More..

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (1)

    • i read the Fairness Doctrine of old and i support a new version of it, for sure

      Sean Hannity, Limbaugh, Savage, Glenn Beck, and other right-wing partisan pigs need to be forced, by regulation, to allow the other side an opinion

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (-1)

    • Do you support that same doctrine for TV news?

      Who decides what the content is? You and I get together and say, OK, Keith Olberman had an hour, now Hannity gets an hour. Katie, Charlie, and Tom had their half hour, so no American Idol tonight, we have to give Rush half an hour on each station...

      ?????

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (1)

  • The democrats are making him look like the "de facto" leader?

    Hell Rush calls himself that anyways!

    What the hell are we even bothering with this point??

    Of course it would be "political gold" if this continued like this. Rush is such a blathering idiot. As the spotlight gets bigger and brighter on him, sooner or later, he will really say something stupid.

    Being fair here to both sides.....

    Imagine if Sean Penn became the "de facto" leader of the Demo More..

    Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

    (-1)

  • OMG! Are you people really arguing about "talk radio" being "attacked" and its some sort of loss of "free speech"????

    Ummmm, being in the communications industry for 25 years.....TRUST ME.......

    There are plenty of other forms of sending information, entertainment, news, data, etc than just AM/FM radio.

    Get with the freaking program cavemen. Hell, I bet most of you dont even know that that the old tried and true UHF bandwidth is scheduled to be shutdown, an More..

    Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

    (-1)

    • Who uses UHF these days? I have an anteanna on the roof for TV, listen to Rush in the truck or at work, on the net if I am home.

      Rush is not on satellite radio....not enough listeners on that to compete with his market share. He says It would reduce his audience, even though he would make more money. Call that ego driven if you like, but XM has not caught on everywhere yet...and I hope it does not...like I said, I have an atteana on the roof for tv.

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (0)

    • Ummmmm.....


      Your using VHF, UHF. Sorry man, you really need to get with the times. No licensing for UHF has happened in ages, its day is done. Soon its bandwidth will be auctioned off to the higest bidder for other purposes. Media and data come other more efficient ways now.

      UHF was done decades ago.

      If you really are clinging to UHF media, then you just prove my point.


      Outdated. As the AM/FM band of "bandwidth" will soon become.

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (-1)

    • I think I am confused. I use an anteanna for TV, FM/AM for radio. I use DSL for the Internet. How am I clinging to UHF media?

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (0)

    • Sorry type-o on the "VHF/UHF"

      I meant to say "your using VHF, not UHF"


      If you still have an antenna for TV (well...you need to move up with just that!), your just watching VHF. Unless you have a TV from 25 years ago.

      Let me guess you have a "cable ready" TV with rabbit ears right?

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (0)

    • Roof mounted anteanna...It is called the "Stealth". Looks like three wings....keeps my neighbors guessing. I got my digital box last April. When I got this new computer, I got a TV tuner put in it...got the rabbit ears on top of my 20 inch flat panel. Pretty cool, can move that little 3 inch screen anywhere on my desktop...it even has picture in picture! I get 12 channels regularly, 20 more when the weather is clear. I can even watch 9 channels at a time....all PIP size. Cool st More..

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (0)

  • Why would you listen to Rush Limbaugh? The man flunked out of college his fist semester. I'm not saying he couldn't have self-educated himself but that dose not seem to be the case. The opinions he supports often have no factual basis and when he dose give statistics to support his case, they are more often then not, wrong.

    Posted Mar-4-2009 By 

    (-1)

    • they support him because they're too lazy to look up his 'facts'. it doesn't help with their "Suspension of Belief" factor (Psyche 101)

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (0)

    • not too mention conspiracy to commit trafficking of illegal drugs..

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (0)

    • Did you listen to the 90 minute speech Rush made that I posted?

      Be Honest, Las.

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (1)

    • i can only handle him 10 minutes at a time. there's only so much garbage a man can take

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (-1)

    • I am flooded with liberal shows. I don't have cable, so that is all I get. Go to his website and read the transcript...isn't that fair enough? You like to read...so read it, no applause, no gestures, just words....Other than Talk Radio, all I get is Liberal crap...oh and NPR.

      Posted Mar-5-2009 By 

      (1)