Safe Mode: On
Treasury: U.S. to lose $25 billion on auto bailout




by David Shepardson
Detroit News
Original Link:
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20120813/AUTO01/208130392

Washington -The Treasury Department says in a new report the government expects to lose more than $25 billion on the $85 billion auto bailout. That's 15 percent higher than its previous forecast.

In a monthly report sent to Congress on Friday, the Obama administration boosted its forecast of expected losses by more than $3.3 billion to almost $25.1 billion, up from $21.7 billion in the last quarterly update.

The report may still underestimate the losses. The report covers predicted losses through May 31, when GM's stock price was $22.20 a share.

On Monday, GM stock fell $0.07, or 0.3 percent, to $20.47. At that price, the government would lose another $850 million on its GM bailout.

The government still holds 500 million shares of GM stock and needs to sell them for about $53 each to recover its entire $49.5 billion bailout. At the current price, the Treasury would lose more than $16 billion on its GM bailout.

The steep decline in GM's stock price has indefinitely delayed the Treasury's sale of its remaining 26 percent stake in GM. No sale will take place before the November election.
Treasury spokesman Matt Anderson said the costs were still far less than some predicted.
"The auto industry rescue helped save more than one million jobs throughout our nation's industrial heartland and is expected to cost far less than many had feared during the height of the crisis," Anderson said.

The Obama administration initially estimated it would lose $44 billion on the bailout but reduced the forecast to $30 billion in December 2009.

But the recent estimates are not as optimistic as last year.

The Treasury Department said in a May 2011 report that its estimate of auto bailout losses was $13.9 billion. The Congressional Budget Office also estimates a $14 billion loss. The CBO has written off $8 billion of the government's auto bailout as an unrecoverable loss.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has decried the losses on the auto bailout and insisted that forcing GM and Chrysler Group LLC to go through bankruptcy first would have saved taxpayers money.

But President George W. Bush — who gave the automakers and their finance arms about $25 billion in his final weeks in office in bailout funds — said there wasn't time.

Taxpayers incurred a $1.3 billion loss on the $12.5 billion bailout of Chrysler.

The Treasury also has put on hold an initial public offering initially planned for last year in Ally Financial Inc. because of market weakness. The government holds a 74 percent majority stake in the Detroit auto finance company as part of its $17.2 billion bailout and has recovered $5.7 billion.

GM CEO Dan Akerson told employees at a town hall meeting Thursday that the company was working to take actions to boost the automaker's sagging price.

dshepardson@detnews.com


Added: Aug-13-2012 Occurred On: Aug-13-2012
By: copperdog3
In:
Politics
Tags: auto, bailout, Obama, GM, Treasury, Chyrsler, Ford, Billions, And, Billions
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1143 | Comments: 14 | Votes: 3 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Well, nice to see the big O's investment acumen on full display. Wonder what else he could do with our money?

    Posted Aug-13-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Where's the lib moron trying to convince everyone they paid back every dime?

    Yeah.. That's what I thought..

    Same moron trying to convince everyone to re-elect Obama

    Pathetic

    Posted Aug-14-2012 By 

    (3)

  • But that bailout was a total success! Ask obummer he takes all the credit!
    "GM CEO Dan Akerson told employees at a town hall meeting Thursday that the company was working to take actions to boost the automaker's sagging price."
    You know like forcing their dealers to take more inventory and count that as sales.This would be funny if there weren't real people suffering because of it.

    Posted Aug-14-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Pres. Obama signed an order to give $70 bill. to Israel, so what's the problem with saving an industry with $25 bill.?

    Posted Aug-14-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @Triode The bailouts didn't save the auto industry. All it did was guarantee later failure. GM didn't have to change it's business model at all.

      Posted Aug-14-2012 By 

      (2)

  • Comment of user 'Boing' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Nice picture. Can somebody hand me a hand gun please? Something bigger than a .40 if you don't mind. I don't want to wing myself here.

    Posted Aug-14-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Stupid is what stupid does. And life isn't a box of chocolate.Simple.

    Posted Aug-14-2012 By 

    (0)

  • A monkey could have seen this coming.

    American cars are shit, always have been. The people from the previous generation had no mechanical knowledge and just drove what the radio and tv told them to buy.

    This bailout was a ponzi scheme.

    Posted Aug-14-2012 By 

    (0)

  • meh. the UK just spent this on two weeks of hosting the olympics, i reckon the US can handle it

    Posted Aug-14-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Meanwhile my alternator died so I ordered another one from Government Motors. It took two days to ship it up from Mexico. Course it was the wrong one and I had to wait another four days for them to ship another one up.....from Mexico.

    Posted Aug-14-2012 By 

    (0)

  • The problem with government helping to run anything should be obvious. They can't even get close to balancing a budget.

    The first rule of capitalism: if you can't make a better product at a lower price you go out of business. GM should have gone under, all the government did was buy off 200,000 UNION employees and untold tens of thousands of retired UNION votes.

    You and I were lucky enough to pay directly into their reelection plan,by purchasing votes.

    Posted Aug-15-2012 By 

    (0)