January 26, 2009
A new scientific study led by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reaches a powerful conclusion about the climate change caused by future increases of carbon dioxide: to a large extent, there’s no going back.
The pioneering study, led by NOAA senior scientist Susan Solomon, shows how changes in surface temperature, rainfall, and sea level are largely irreversible for more than 1,000 years after carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are completely stopped. The findings appear during the week of January 26 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“Our study convinced us that current choices regarding carbon dioxide emissions will have legacies that will irreversibly change the planet,” said Solomon, who is based at NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colo.
“It has long been known that some of the carbon dioxide emitted by human activities stays in the atmosphere for thousands of years,” Solomon said. “But the new study advances the understanding of how this affects the climate system.”
The study examines the consequences of allowing CO2 to build up to several different peak levels beyond present-day concentrations of 385 parts per million and then completely halting the emissions after the peak. The authors found that the scientific evidence is strong enough to quantify some irreversible climate impacts, including rainfall changes in certain key regions, and global sea level rise.
If CO2 is allowed to peak at 450-600 parts per million, the results would include persistent decreases in dry-season rainfall that are comparable to the 1930s North American Dust Bowl in zones including southern Europe, northern Africa, southwestern North America, southern Africa and western Australia.
The study notes that decreases in rainfall that last not just for a few decades but over centuries are expected to have a range of impacts that differ by region. Such regional impacts include decreasing human water supplies, increased fire frequency, ecosystem change and expanded deserts. Dry-season wheat and maize agriculture in regions of rain-fed farming, such as Africa, would also be affected.
Climate impacts were less severe at lower peak levels. But at all levels added carbon dioxide and its climate effects linger because of the ocean.
“In the long run, both carbon dioxide loss and heat transfer depend on the same physics of deep-ocean mixing. The two work against each other to keep temperatures almost constant for more than a thousand years, and that makes carbon dioxide unique among the major climate gases,” said Solomon.
The scientists emphasize that increases in CO2 that occur in this century “lock in” sea level rise that would slowly follow in the next 1,000 years. Considering just the expansion of warming ocean waters—without melting glaciers and polar ice sheets—the authors find that the irreversible global average sea level rise by the year 3000 would be at least 1.3–3.2 feet (0.4–1.0 meter) if CO2 peaks at 600 parts per million, and double that amount if CO2 peaks at 1,000 parts per million.
“Additional contributions to sea level rise from the melting of glaciers and polar ice sheets are too uncertain to quantify in the same way,” said Solomon. “They could be even larger but we just don’t have the same level of knowledge about those terms. We presented the minimum sea level rise that we can expect from well-understood physics, and we were surprised that it was so large.”
Rising sea levels would cause “…irreversible commitments to future changes in the geography of the Earth, since many coastal and island features would ultimately become submerged,” the authors write.
Geoengineering to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere was not considered in the study. “Ideas about taking the carbon dioxide away after the world puts it in have been proposed, but right now those are very speculative,” said Solomon.
The authors relied on measurements as well as many different models to support the understanding of their results. They focused on drying of particular regions and on thermal expansion of the ocean because observations suggest that humans are contributing to changes that have already been measured.
Besides Solomon, the study’s authors are Gian-Kasper Plattner and Reto Knutti of ETH Zurich, Switzerland, and Pierre Friedlingstein of Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.
NOAA understands and predicts changes in the Earth's environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and conserves and manages our coastal and marine resources.
Click to view image: '0c7128c3561f-ohnoglobalwarming.jpg'
By: CriticalThinker
In: News, Other
Tags: noaa, global warming, climate change
Marked as: approved
Views: 10693 | Comments: 37 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 1 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
BBC Headline: What happened to global warming?
-
GLOBAL WARMING IS A COMPLETE FRAUD AND A CON.
-
The Great Global Warming Scam
-
Global Warming, cooling off?
-
Global warming and partisan politics
-
Global Warming Will Sink East Coast: Report
-
Sen. Debbie Stabenow: "Global warming creates volatility. I feel it when I'm flying"
-
Global Warming, Climate Change, or None of the Above? Himalayan glaciers not melting because of climate change, report finds Himalayan glaciers are ac
-
James Hansen's Supervisor States Global Warming as Fear Mongering
-
ClimateGate Man-Made Global Warming Climate Scam-Actual Proven Conspiracy Glenn Beck
-
Egypt - "Rising Tide" - the threat of global warming (Oct.2008)




Even the most liberal "scientists" agree that humans would have to disappear from the planet completely for hundreds of years for the planet to start to "cool down". LMFAO at the global warming moon bats. Yeah, let's follow Al Gore and his minions by reverting back into hunter gatherer societies. Stupid mofos. In 100 years, we'll be able to terraform Mars. Imagine what we'll be able to do here on earth. News flash, Al Gore wasn't the first person to realize that the weather c More..
Posted Jan-26-2009 ByMmarone (21.74) 
Mmarone Send Message
(3)
Terraforming wont change the temperature. The average temperature is -60 C on mars. Have fun dooming your grandchildren to never being able to walk outside without a space suit...
Posted Jan-27-2009 ByEpitope (653.16) Epitope Send Message
(0)
No good man. Mars is experiencing global warming too. So is Jupiter and Pluto and Triton. etc. etc. So we can't move there either. We're all screwed. And all because YOU had to drive a car. Hope you're f'n happy with yourself!
Posted Jan-27-2009 BySTON3P0NY (217.24) STON3P0NY View Channel Send Message
(0)
And some are just now figuring out Al Gore is a stupid moron?
Posted Jan-26-2009 ByNeinkenheimer (660.96) Neinkenheimer View Channel Send Message
(3)
The article supports Al's position to the point where AGW is real. The conclusion is, it is too late. We screwed the pooch and it is now having puppies :(
Posted Jan-26-2009 ByCriticalThinker (3951.02)

CriticalThinker View Channel Send Message
(0)
The people who are promoting the global warming hoax care nothing about the environment. They are using it to get the public in a fearful and reactionary minset, so they well accept a global carbon tax and further erosion of national sovereignty to the United Nations under the guise of international laws and taxes.
Posted Jan-26-2009 ByIndividualist (117.48) Individualist View Channel Send Message
(1)
if i have learned anything about humanity once shit hits the fan we organize and fix the problem.
Posted Jan-26-2009 Byass128 (122.96) ass128 View Channel Send Message
(1)
Apart from the bear on the ice, the most obvious sign that this is mere emotional spin is the lack of positives listed in the effects of CO2 emissions.
This is yet more junk science for the consumption of the masses to keep the 'scientists' and bureaucrats in jobs.
Posted Jan-26-2009 ByCadae (144.08) 
Cadae View Channel Send Message
(1)
YESSSSS!
Now that it doesn't matter, I am going to fuel my care with burning styrofoam cups and kitchen ware.
Posted Jan-26-2009 ByBenk1984 (34.26) 
Benk1984 View Channel Send Message
(1)
They know nothing yet everybody thinks they do, sad and ignorant people.
Posted Jan-27-2009 ByDaRyz (106.94) DaRyz Send Message
(1)
Isn't that amazing how people on here who are pretty much science illiterate think they know better?
Posted Jan-27-2009 Bybommer1 (267.46) bommer1 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Oh and lets not forget that the rise in skin cancer is because of the lost ozone layer!!! What a farce this is. Look at when the skin creams came out to protect us from the ever so increasing lose of the ozone layer. Its kind of amazing that the rates in skin cancers went up when the cream became more abundant! What ever we put on our skin goes directly into the pores and is absorbed. So with all the CHEMICALS in skin lotions and creams, I ask, what is really the cause of the rise in skin cancer More..
Posted Jan-26-2009 Byjlvia33 (67.66) jlvia33 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Why post this ?
The avererage IQ on this site is about 55.
Posted Jan-26-2009 ByhsirgOOgrish (88.04) 
hsirgOOgrish View Channel Send Message
(0)
King George says that this is normal.
Posted Jan-26-2009 ByLifeinPictures (132.86)

LifeinPictures View Channel Send Message
(0)
We should all stop farting.
Posted Jan-26-2009 Bydanny777 (165.42) 
danny777 View Channel Send Message
(0)
I am darn glad to hear that! No more guilt, no more sacrafice to the UN! Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last!
Posted Jan-26-2009 Bymenderman (3161.22) 
menderman View Channel Send Message
(0)
No such thing as just 'global warming'
on planet earth.
Every planet in the solar system is warming up,
(FACT BTW)
so therefore it is "solar system warming".
Nibiru is affecting us already.
The NWO just want to carbon tax your ass to
pay for their doomsday underground projects.
And when these truths are obvious,
it will be too late.
-------
"Riding the end time wave of joy,
peace, love....and a good cup of tea"
Posted Jan-26-2009 ByPlausible_Deniability (21.60) Plausible_Deniability Send Message
(0)