Safe Mode: On
Taliban snipers who killed ten British soldiers die in air strike

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1305099/Taliban-snipers-killed-British-soldiers-die-air-strike.html

Four deadly foreign mercenary snipers hired by the Taliban have been killed after being tracked down by British Special Forces in Afghanistan.

They were among at least three pairs of crackshots recruited by the Taliban from Pakistan, Egypt and Chechnya.

The mercenaries – who can kill troops at a range of up to 650 yards – are understood to have shot dead up to ten British soldiers in recent weeks.

The victims include Sapper Darren Foster, 20, from Whitehaven, Cumbria. He was picked off from long distance by a single shot which went through a gap just 9in wide in a protected look-out post in Sangin valley, Helmand Province.

News of the Taliban deaths came as a British soldier was killed during a firefight with insurgents yesterday as he provided security for a meeting between Afghan elders and Nato forces.

The soldier, from the 1st Battalion The Duke of Lancaster’s Regiment, was killed during an exchange of fire in the Nad-e Ali district of Helmand.

Lieutenant-Colonel James Carr-Smith, spokesman for Task Force Helmand, said: ‘He died in the course of his duty. He will be sorely missed and his actions will not be forgotten. We will remember him.’ His next of kin have been informed.

The death brings to 332 the number of British troops killed in Afghanistan since operations began in 2001.

It was in Sangin ten days ago that the first two foreign ‘dogs of war’ met their deaths. A second pair were killed on Friday.

In both cases, elite SAS and SBS troops, working with crack US and Afghan Special Forces, were involved in the covert hunt for the snipers.They had orders to ‘take out’ the deadly riflemen who have caused havoc among coalition forces with their so-called ‘fire and run’ tactics.

Senior military sources told The Mail on Sunday that locals tipped off Afghan National Army troops of the exact locations of the snipers.

Once the identities of the sharpshooters had been confirmed through close surveillance, Special Forces teams called in an air strike.

The pilots of US F-16 jets were sent the precise co-ordinates to target their high-explosive bombs in order to eliminate the enemy without killing or injuring innocent civilians.

A military insider said last night: ‘These foreign snipers are crackshots who work in teams of two – one spotting the target, the other firing the fatal shot.

‘Once they have hit their target, they disappear and find a new location. The trouble is that we can take two snipers out and another two will be recruited to replace them.’

British commanders have become increasingly concerned at the number of troops killed by gunfire rather than roadside bombs, and the fact that the Taliban is using specialist foreign snipers.

Major-General Gordon Messenger, an MoD spokesman for Afghanistan, said: ‘What the guys are seeing on the ground, not just in Sangin but also in Nad-e Ali, is an increased use of the tactic of single shots at range.

‘It would be vastly overplaying the professionalism and the effect of these people to call them snipers. But, of course, we’re adjusting our tactics to counter it.’

* Six Afghan policemen were found shot dead yesterday in their station house in Helmand Province and three more were accidentally killed by friendly fire in the north of the country, a Nato spokesman said last night.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1305099/Taliban-snipers-killed-British-soldiers-die-air-strike.html#ixzz0xJin5Bag


Added: Aug-22-2010 
By: deltaboy2006
In:
Afghanistan, Middle East, Citizen Journalism
Tags: Afghanista, Taliban, military
Marked as: approved
Views: 18784 | Comments: 49 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'nurdmyth' has been deleted by author!
  • "Four deadly foreign mercenary snipers hired by the Taliban have been killed after being tracked down by British Special Forces in Afghanistan"

    Their position was given away by their body odor. Crack English bulldogs were employed by the Brits.

    Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

    (4)

  • I hope they died a painful long death.. stupid smelly dirty taliban.

    Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

    (4)

  • Comment of user 'proenyar' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Just love this sedntence:

    ''It would be vastly overplaying the professionalism and the effect of these people to call them snipers. But, of course, we%u2019re adjusting our tactics to counter it.%u2019

    yeah they sucked so hard you felt the need to send the SAS and SBS and american and afghan special forces after them.

    Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

    (2)

  • please please please tell me their was a diseased pig strapped to that bomb.

    Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

    (2)

  • That's good, but more will come...

    Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

    (2)

  • In the 1st Afghan War 1800's, the Afghan's Jizail rifles were more accurate and longer range than the British Army musket.
    Crazy, but their tech was actually better. Redcoats considered to the Afghans to be dangerously good shots, although weak at close quarters

    Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

    (2)

    • "Their tech was actually better"

      Im guessing but you must be refering to their choice of ground "tech" ?

      Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

      (2)

    • Basically, the musket was only accurate up to 60 yards, and that's against a target in the open, not hiding behind a rock 200ft above you.
      The Jizails could fire accurately to like 150/200 yards and they had huge targets in the open.
      So you could say technologically they were better armed than us.

      But everytime the British climbed up the hillsides with fixed bayonets, they would run, it became like clockwork.
      Read a book on this war...

      Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

      (0)

    • Yes,you could say they they were technologically better armed than the British and then you could say they were not.
      Your stating the harassing tactics of their methods of war which played only a harrassing part.The jezail was only any use for that.
      To stop a British Army invasion of that time(occupying their capitals) required a defeat of them on the field, this being attempted by Afgan Armys in greater numbers.All of which failed due to better dicipline and tech.
      British combat defeats of t More..

      Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

      (2)

    • I have,and it all points the way to say you should nt hand pick minor details.

      Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

      (0)

    • Question: Wasn't most of the British army stationed in Afghanistan back in the empire days consisted of indian regulars?

      Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

      (0)

  • Comment of user 'Ezel89' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Comment of user 'shark44' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Comment of user 'gregory_peckory' has been deleted by author!
    • If you had read the article it said this was a tip-off.

      Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'gregory_peckory' has been deleted by author!
    • The info at a guess was sufficient for what they were going to get.
      I dought they wanted to send them birthday cards.

      Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'gregory_peckory' has been deleted by author!
    • ...and retribution,which does happen believe it or not.

      Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

      (0)

  • So now all is well in Narco state Afghanistan

    Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

    (0)

  • This article is totally bullshit !
    how did they know that they got the intended sniper or person keeping in mind that they didn't know his identity at the first place ?!
    and it seem Taliban are playing the same game of US army with hiring mercenaries don't blame them if so u should blame your self first .

    this article is just a try to cover of US army deep wounds there , they are so fucked up there

    Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'GeberJackson' has been deleted by moderator!
  • Iran will pay dearly for this.

    Posted Aug-22-2010 By 

    (0)