Safe Mode: On
Guess the 1080p movie for July 15th, 2012 - 720x480 update
 Part of channel(s): Movie Scene LL Challenge (promoted)

Okay... No idea if this update thing is going to work or not but here's the same clip, same bitrate, but at 720x480 in mpeg2. I clicked the 'update' button to do this so I don't know if it's making a whole new post or adding it to the existing post.

.

Loading the player ...
Embed Code
Plays: 613 (Embed: 0)


Added: Jul-15-2012 Occurred On: Jul-15-2012
By: BloodyPeasant
In:
Liveleak Challenges
Tags: Guess the 1080p movie for July 15th, 2012 - 720x480 update challenge
Location: Assawoman, Virginia, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1273 | Comments: 14 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 4
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • What Dreams May Come

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • What Dreams May Come (1998)...too easy

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • definitely loads faster

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • What dreams may come.

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Repost! What Dreams Come. Great film.

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • What dreams may come, i love this movie

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Deffo What dreams may come as others have said. Worth a watch if you've never seen it.

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Aim for a 3 or 4" diagonal screen. It's a computer. Not a TV with people sitting on the floor with their noses 6" from it :-)

    This looks like 2500kbps rendering and runs just fine now.

    Pretty soon, the majority of viewers will be on handies (not pads) with 3 or 4" diagonal screens.

    It's a great target format as you can get great quality at low bandwidth.
    You are still in both Pillar Box and Letter Box mode tho :-0

    Almost there, the rest should be downhill now.

    Posted Jul-15-2012 By 

    (0)

    • Comment of user 'BloodyPeasant' has been deleted by author!
    • @BloodyPeasant

      It's either the standard window or full screen.

      Using a screen capture and Paint.net I make the standard window about 680 by 350 pixels.

      On other sites it varies, and YT will let you embed any pretty much any size you like.

      Clearly though, throwing a 720pixel high image into a 350pixel high window means a lot of wasted stuff.

      Some may say that oversampling is a good idea, but only up to a point. Beyond that, it's just sucking bandwidth.

      I find 1280x720 at 2500kbps the ideal More..

      Posted Jul-16-2012 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'BloodyPeasant' has been deleted by author!
    • @BloodyPeasant

      That's a very detailed scene, and I think it could still go down to 2500kbps.

      Why optimise the bitrate?
      To get views.

      People on slower bandwidth will just give up watching the stutter.

      Also,there's a break even point where the higher bitrate is simply wasted.

      I got tought this by a guru at Exposureroom.com some years back.

      For the typical YT and LL windowed (not full screen) videos, 2500kbps rendering to complex material is fine.

      I run on less than 2MB broadband, so I am f More..

      Posted Jul-17-2012 By 

      (0)

    • Comment of user 'BloodyPeasant' has been deleted by author!
  • Comment of user 'MANNY_THE_CREATOR' has been deleted by item owner!
  • Comment of user 'SkyClad' has been deleted by author!
  • Very strange movie. Good plot, just one of those, cant go take a piss without losing something and getting lost in it.

    Posted Jul-16-2012 By 

    (0)