Safe Mode: On
New theory on Twin Towers' collapse
 Part of channel(s): September 11 attacks (current event)

Explosions triggered by molten aircraft metal reacting with water from sprinkler systems may have felled the Twin Towers after the 9/11 attacks, according to a new theory.

Just before the two World Trade Centre skyscrapers in New York collapsed on September 11 2001, powerful blasts were heard within the buildings.

A leading materials scientist says they could be the key to the dramatic conclusion of the terrorist attacks.

Over-heated steel beams have been blamed for the towers suddenly crashing to the ground after they were hit by two passenger jets.

But Norwegian expert Dr Christian Simensen has another theory. He believes powerful explosions caused by a chemical reaction between molten aluminium from the aircraft and water ripped out the buildings’ internal structure.

“Both scientific experiments and 250 reported disasters suffered by the aluminium industry have shown that the combination of molten aluminium and water releases enormous explosions,” said Dr Simensen, from the SINTEF institute based in Trondheim, Norway.

Almost 3,000 people died after al-Qaida terrorists flew two fuel-laden passenger jets into the World Trade Centre in Manhattan.

The impacts triggered massive explosions and fires, but the subsequent collapse of each tower came as a shock and surprise to those watching the disaster unfold.

Explosions heard just before the buildings fell have led to claims that explosives were set off inside the towers.

Dr Simensen believes after crashing into the skyscrapers the two jets would have been trapped within an insulating layer of debris.

As a result, the aircraft hulls rather than the buildings absorbed most of the heat from the burning aviation fuel.

Molten aluminium from the jets, flowing down through staircases and gaps in the floors, reacted with water from emergency sprinklers on the lower levels, it is claimed.

“I regard it as extremely likely that it was these explosions that made the skyscrapers collapse by tearing out part of the internal structure, and that this caused the uppermost floors of the buildings to fall and crush the lower parts,” said Dr Simensen, who presented his theory at an international materials conference in San Diego, California.

“In other words, I believe that these were the explosions that were heard by people in the vicinity and that have since given life to the conspiracy theories that explosives had been placed in the skyscrapers.”

The Boeing 767 aircraft would have together carried 30 tonnes of aluminium, he said.

Dr Simensen calculated that the temperature of alluminium alloy in the aircraft hulls could have reached 750C, enough to make it as liquid as water.

He told the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society: “All the floors in the Twin Towers were equipped with sprinkler systems. All the water above the hot aircraft bodies must have turned to steam. If my theory is correct, tonnes of aluminium ran down through the towers, where the smelt came into contact with a few hundred litres of water. From other disasters and experiments carried out by the aluminium industry, we know that reactions of this sort lead to violent explosions.

“The aluminium would immediately react with the water, with the result of a local rise in temperature of several hundred degrees, in addition to the explosions that were due to the fact that these reactions release hydrogen. Such reactions are particularly powerful when rust or other catalysts are present, which can raise the temperature to more than 1500C.”

The dangers of combining molten aluminium and water are well known to the aluminium industry, Dr Simensen added. In one experiment, in which 20 kilos of aluminium smelt were allowed to react with 20 kilos of water containing some rust, the resulting explosion destroyed an entire laboratory and left a crater 30 metres in diameter.

“Aluminium-water explosions are like dynamite explosions,” said Dr Simensen. “They were probably powerful enough to blow out an entire section of each building. The top section would than fall down on top of the sections that remained below, and the sheer weight of the top floors would be enough to crush the lower part of the building.”

An article outlining Dr Simensen’s theory has appeared in the journal Aluminium International Today.

http://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/world/new-theory-on-twin-towers-collapse-521426.html


Added: Sep-21-2011 Occurred On: Sep-21-2011
By: Cheesehead
In:
Other News
Tags: Twin, Towers
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 7270 | Comments: 122 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 3
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • I got a theory: Camel fuckers flew plane into tower.....plane exploded on impact and inside tower....heat from burning fuel melted and heated up upwards and downwards steel construction....steel beams gave in to weight..top floors came crushing down and destroyed floors below....the end.

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (8)

  • But how did the temperature reach 750C?
    Aluminium Melting point 660.32 °C
    Jet fuel burning temperatures 260-315 °C (500-599 °F)

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (4)

  • Sounds very feasible to me

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (3)

    • Comment of user 'nuckelhedd' has been deleted by author!
    • @nuckelhedd You can't even contain your hatred of the Jews can you? Typical hateful liberal monkey,no matter if this theory is true or not you have shown what a scared and ignorant rodent you are.

      Posted Sep-22-2011 By 

      (1)

    • @nuckelhedd
      What has jews got to do with it ?

      .............and this posts explanation makes more sense than pigeon poo!

      Posted Sep-22-2011 By 

      (0)

  • The sprinkler system failed because the aircraft severed the lines . . . so where did the water come from again? Also, if any of the aluminum melted, it would simply have run to a lower floor and solidified again. If this idea came from a real scientist, he should retire. My quess - some twirp made this up for fun. +Leave the families of the victims in peace+

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (2)

    • @Nepean109

      The sprinkler system failed because the aircraft severed the lines . . . so where did the water come from again?


      uhhh...There was water in those severed pipes...

      Come on man. Think a little bit harder.

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (3)

    • @jw2585
      WAS being the operative word.........

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (-3)

    • @umzimkulu

      I think he was implying that because the planes severed the pipes, there was no water because the sprinklers weren't working. I was just pointing out that the water would obviously just come out of the severed pipes and not just disappear.

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (2)

    • @Nepean109 im sticking with the 'venturi' affect...the heat sucked up the wind...the hotter it got the faster it sucked up the wind to the where the fire was...the airplanes had just taken off and had full fuel...

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (1)

    • @jw2585
      You people will grasp at any straw won't you.

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (-2)

  • makes more sense than most theories I've heard so far. who knows.

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (2)

    • @sanchoslophophora how 'bout 'venturi' affect...the fire would cause the air to be sucked upwards to the fire..the hotter it got the faster the wind went up the middle...look at the vid's and you can see a great amount of wind blowing in the tower...its being pulled upward to the fire where it just got hotter...did i repeat myself?

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (0)

    • @buoymarker

      How about a fire demon hoping round all over the place starting fires. I think this is probably more plausible.

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (-2)

  • Are the 9-11 liars running out of nonsense, so they have to make up crap to fill in the holes in their stupid fairy tales.

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (2)

  • all of you are faggots

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (2)

  • Everyone knows it was a nano-super-mega-ultra-humongo-nuclear-thermite-explosion that took down the twin towers.

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'dallenvt' has been deleted by author!
  • LOL. Thats some funny shit.

    Posted Sep-22-2011 By 

    (1)

  • has anybody who BBQ's ever used the canister that you is a tube and a handle..you put paper in it and the venturi effect causes it to ignite the charcoal on the top...this is the same sort of 'dynamic physics' that happened to the towers...f'in nuts

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'nuckelhedd' has been deleted by author!
    • @nuckelhedd http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHXcibEJ1lc&feature=player_embedded#!

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (0)

  • A fine effort, but very misleading!

    Firstly, the melting point of common aluminium is around 1400 degrees, and even then, in an an open and flowing environment, the liedenfrost effect would diffuse any combustable situation.

    Secondly, this theory relates to aluminium alkyl which is a saturated hydrocarbon, not the disintegrated hull of a plane, most of which is on the street below.... and his experiments are done in a controlled environment.
    Thats like comparing a fart to nuclear fusion when t More..

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'nuckelhedd' has been deleted by author!
    • @nuckelhedd ..... thank you!

      I'll even take it a step further in laymans language.

      Inside each tower was enough aluminium in JUST the air conditioning alone to build several Boeings, and it all finished up in a big pile at ground zero.

      Now, according to the NYFD, an intense fire burned at the core of this rubble that contained tons of A/C aluminium for 6 weeks, and they poured millions of gallons of water on it...... and nothing exploded!

      Go figure.

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (3)

    • @GrumpyAuldBastard

      Your whole comment is spot on. Nicely worded

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (2)

    • @GrumpyAuldBastard

      LOL and what is 1400 degrees ferenhiet converted to celcius? 760! wow and what temp did it say in the article? hmmmm

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (1)

    • @GrumpyAuldBastard

      And THE BUILDINGS NEVER FELL AT FREEFALL SPEEDS, JESUS PEOPLE.

      I'm curious to what your science background is?

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (0)

  • Here we go again. And I just took my aluminum hat off. What klaus123 said = the truth.
    All the "planted explosives" theorist - to do such an eloquent job someone had to PLACE the explosives. Like, in corner offices and stuff. You know, where CEOs worked? Who the fuck came in and planted them? "Oh, I'm sorry Mr. Moshberg, a arab-looking handy man needs to place some weird lookin' shit behind your corner desk.."
    Really??? Whoever believes this shit should come see me abo More..

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (0)

    • @mugo damn you are a genius because in the history of the world, no building ever closed a floor for renovation.

      Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

      (0)

    • @Lwe5113 U would be the genius then, because obviously they would have to close multiple floors, if not all, of both buildings for "renovations". Riiight. Need a bridge?

      Posted Oct-7-2011 By 

      (0)

  • Aluminum conspiracy!


    That's all I've got. I'll work out the details over the next few joints and post an amateur 2-hour movie about it online in a week.

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (0)

  • Thumbs up if you agree thruthers are brainwashed beyond repair

    Posted Sep-21-2011 By 

    (0)