Safe Mode: On
Victory for Barret is a Victory for ALL Workers

One
need not wonder why the “Corporatocracy” has gone all out to ensure a
Governor Walker victory. A victory for Barrett would embolden a working
class that has been depressed by our current economic depression and
fearful of doing anything to upset the “job creators”. After all, just
maybe if you play nice they will bring the jobs back.
The reality is that these “job creators” are sitting on a whole lot
of cash and profits. They have decided to hold America hostage. The
mainstream media will never say that so I will. Corporate America has
purchased the Republican Party and Blue Dog Democrats to ensure that no
substantive tax policies, social policies, or economic policies are
effected.
Inasmuch
as we got the Affordable Car Act, they are attempting to prevent it
from being effected. Inasmuch as corporations are refusing to invest in
job creation in America, they ensure no substantive job bill is passed
even though our infrastructure is approaching third world status.
How can they get a win in Wisconsin? They simply pump dollars into
the state. They create an alternate reality where they simply lie and
state that because of Walker’s policies, jobs were created. They
associate those that want the recall with a group no one wants to be
associated with. These are quotes from a Barrett & a Walker
supporter in the New York Times article “Recall Election Could Foretell November Vote
Among the voters, the sides are stark and, more than a year after
tens of thousands of protesters marched around the State Capitol in
Madison, surprisingly raw.
“We don’t want the state taken over by the Koch brothers,” said Mary
Jean Nicholls, a former teacher, referring to Charles and David Koch,
billionaire industrialists who are among Mr. Walker’s supporters.
Craig Dedo, a computer consultant and Walker supporter, said the race
boiled down to one question: Who runs Wisconsin? “The Democrats and the
unions, who are the takers?” he asked, “or the Republicans, the party
of the private sector and the people who pay the bills?”
What jumps out at me is that the computer consultant equates
Democrats and Unions as takers and the Republican Party as the party of
the private sector and people who pays the bills. That is how effective
marketing works. Make “the other” an entity you simply would not want to
be. Then create a class, however fictitious, that is the bastion of
worth, independence, and good will.




What the computer consultant fails to realize is a vote for Walker is
a vote against his interest. A vote for Walker is a vote for an
ideology that believes in the supremacy of a rigged market that values
humans as nothing but a commodity. This consultant does not understand
that these guys support bills to import high skilled computer workers
that will both depress his wages and price him out of a job? He does
not realize that while unions fight for higher wages and benefits, that
fight also forces the private sector to raise their rates as well. This
is the specific reason why the Right wants to kill unions.
Who is to advocate for good wages, benefits, and working environment
for the average American worker if not unions. Even corporations have
unions. The Chamber of Commerce is a union. Every business trade
organization that lobbies for a group of corporations is a union.
One must remember that businesses have a fiduciary responsibility to
maximize their profits. In a world where workers have no rights (right
to work states) their wages are depressed. As their wages are depressed
their purchasing power is depressed. As their purchasing power is
depressed less money circulates in the economy. As less money circulates
in the economy we get America 2012.
Corporations do not have to worry about a depressed America, their
market is the world. They extract as much capital out of any given
country and then they move on to the next. If you doubt that then make a
visit to the infrastructure build out in the emerging countries even as
we stagnate.
To be blunt, a win for Scott Walker is a notch closer to the American
worker’s path to indentured servitude. The President, the Democratic
Party, and ALL middle class centric organizations have erred in not
engaging in this race in a full throated manner. President Clinton praising Romney’s business acumen , Cory Booker defending Bain Capital,
and Governor Rendell extoling the benefits of vulture capitalism show
where the power currently lies in this country. That three
“Progressives” thought they needed to defend those that extract capital
from the middle class even as they provide no service or product to
society says it all.


Added: Jun-1-2012 Occurred On: Jun-1-2012
By: echo4250
In:
Politics
Tags: recall, wisconsin
Location: Madison, Wisconsin, United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1207 | Comments: 28 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • A victory for Barrett is a victory for workers? So why did unions fight so hard in the primary to beat Barrett? Why hasn't Barrett vowed that he would rescind all of Walker's bargaining law? Why has Barrett himself been so tough on unions in Milwaukee?

    The fact is that the previous Democratic administration left Wisconsin broke and in a deep hole. Walker didn't complain about this. He just pressed the legislature to make the changes in how Wisconsin's government does business in order to f More..

    Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

    (4)

  • A vote for Walker is another stake through the heart of the big union cabals and their symbiotic relationship with the state Democrats. A Walker win is stinging bitch slap to the fleebaggers.

    Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

    (4)

  • LOL!! Laughing my ass off!! Marxists are so funny!!

    Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Public sector unions are a cancer on the nation. A victory for Barrett is a tragedy for the nation.

    Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @kingfordlm you’re an idiot, do you understand the idea of our constitution?

      Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @voteme Ha! Tell me about the idea of our constitution, professor. I can't wait.

      Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @voteme
      Do you? Nothing in the Constitution protects public-employee collective bargaining. FDR was against it. LaFollette (of Wisconsin!) was against it. George Meany was against it. They all knew the danger of giving bureaucracies the power to put their own interests above those of the public they are charged to serve.

      That the Founding Fathers never addressed such a poisonous threat to the republic is testimony to what an outlandish and inconceivable notion it was.

      Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @kingfordlm Freedom...free speech precisely

      Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

      (1)

  • June 5th Barret all the way I’m not for education cuts by the billions and then three days later giving over 1 billion dollars to major corporations as incentives. Oh not to mention these corporations that received this money have directly donated over 1.3 million dollars to the republican PAC. Just watch the debates…Walker is a joke and a failure and his track record shows it… hence why he got laughed at and looked like a bitch during the debates. I mean come on he wouldn’t even make ey More..

    Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

    (2)

  • what a load of crap

    Dem's gave us a 3.6 billion dollar deficit in the last budget, despite a Constitutional Amendment that requires a balanced budget. Walker restores the balance budget without raising taxes or laying off state workers and the Dem's want to recall him. These f*ckers are a joke. The level of their cronyism is disgusting by any standard.

    Almost every dime of that 3.6 billion went to public sector union employees and their Cadillac benefit entitlements.

    The State Teachers More..

    Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

    (1)

    • @tsnwi didn’t bother reading what you said after you stated “Walker restores the balance budget without raising taxes or laying off state workers and the Dem's want to recall him. “ Once again ignorance is killing this country. In walkers budget it raised taxes for senior citizens and raised them even higher on low-wage workers and with his budget it will be a total of $70 million alone in just the next two years. Also by cutting the state Earned Income Tax Credit by $56.2 million and by e More..

      Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

      (1)

  • Unionized government employees are not "working class". They are over-privileged elites who engineered above-market pay, benefits and extreme job protection through political kickbacks and monopoly power.

    Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

    (1)

  • It is very telling when a Governor has to go out of state for funds and that same governor is facing criminal charges. In my Opinion every state should pass laws against outside money going to state elections. It's paramount to treason at the state level.

    Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @Zardoz003

      First, Walker is not facing criminal charges. Milwaukee liberals are investigating all they can to try to destroy him, but they've yet to lay any charges on him.

      Second, yes, Walker has raised a lot of money from out-of-state, but what about the union spending in this election? Almost just as much money is being spent by various special-interest groups on the left, and when the sources of those funds were investigated, most of them were out-of-state, too.

      There is a case to be m More..

      Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @buzzardist you’re also an idiot, do you understand the idea of our constitution?

      Posted Jun-1-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @voteme

      I understand that the Constitution allows free speech, and political donations are considered a form of speech. I also understand that states are not permitted to regulate commerce between states, so money is allowed to move freely among states.

      I also understand that no state in the union bans out-of-state contributions.

      So what is it that you think I don't understand?

      Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @buzzardist wow people these days..."you can’t fix stupid"....you said it yourself free speech…so how is ending the only organization in our society that is allotted direct work related free speech rights and stands up for the interest of working people, following our constitutional rights?

      Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @voteme

      Alright, now you're showing your own ignorance. I assume the "organization" you're referring to is unions. First, my post didn't advocate getting rid of unions. On the topic of unions, I merely noted that Zardoz003's proposal of limiting political spending to in-state sources would be ruinous to unions.

      Second, unions are not one organization. There are many, many, many different unions. More notably, they are far from the only organization in the country that fights fo More..

      Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Go Walker!

    Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

    (0)

  • The most comprehensive electorate
    survey—the American National Election
    Studies (ANES)—is carried
    out by the University of Michigan beginning
    in the late 1940s and continuing on today. What these
    studies show is that Americans
    fall into three categories with regard
    to their political knowledge. A tiny
    percentage know a lot about politics,
    up to 50%-60% know enough to answer
    very simple questions, and the
    remaining 40% know next to nothing.


    to put it simple you Walker supporters understand More..

    Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Public ignorance about unions is bad for American society. You must understand unions are the only organization in our society that stands up for the interest of working people. Unions prevent industrial conflict and disruption to the economy by providing a peaceful and orderly process to settle differences between workers and management. There is so much that goes into collective bargaining discussion and this pertains directly to our rights supported by our constitution. collective bargaining More..

    Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Bwahahahah...Barrett lost

    Posted Jun-10-2012 By 

    (0)