Safe Mode: On
Lawmakers In Poorest States Fail Poverty Scorecard

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. poverty rate jumped to 14.3 percent in 2009 -- its highest level since 1994 -- while lawmakers in some of the poorest states consistently voted against key antipoverty measures, an advocacy group said on Monday.

In its annual "Poverty Scorecard", which grades members of Congress on their voting records on poverty-related legislation, the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law found "there is often a negative correlation between a state's poverty rate and the voting record of its members, meaning the states with the highest poverty rates had delegations with the lowest average scores in voting to fight poverty."

Both senators in Mississippi, where one in five people are living in poverty, received an "F" for their antipoverty voting records in 2009. Sens. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) voted against extending unemployment benefits, the Paycheck Fairness Act, an amendment to extend the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) jobs program, and ten other poverty-fighting bills that could have provided financial relief to their low-income constituents.

In South Carolina, which had a 17.1 percent poverty rate in 2009, six out of eight lawmakers received grades of "D" or lower on their antipoverty efforts, with Sen. Jim Demint (R-S.C.) earning the lowest possible grade of "F-" for voting down all of the 14 measures on the Center's list.

The "Scorecard" found that a significant percentage of lawmakers with poor voting records on antipoverty measures are from Southern states, including Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, South Carolina and Oklahoma, and that several states with higher-than-average poverty rates have Congressional delegates with good records in voting to fight poverty. Every delegate in New Mexico, for instance, earned an "A" for their efforts, despite the state's 18.1 percent poverty rate.

"We publish the Scorecard for the sake of transparency; so that people are able to see what their elected officials are doing to fight poverty," said the Center's Director of Economic Security Dan Lesser in a statement. "Our senators and representatives need to be held accountable for their efforts, or lack thereof, in this fight."

The Census Bureau defined poverty in 2009 as an annual income of less than $21,954 for a family of four and $10,956 for an individual. About 43.6 million Americans lived below the poverty line last year -- the highest number in 51 years -- and the poverty rate for children under 18 jumped to a whopping 20.7 percent.

With a mind-boggling 44 million Americans living in poverty in 2009; it was imperative that our elected representatives enact measures in 2010 to try to reverse the trend," said Lesser. "Some of them chose to act, while some didn't, and we as voters need to know that."


Added: Feb-8-2011 
By: RicoShay
In:
News
Tags: Poverty Scorecard, Republicans failed, Red States are Poor States
Marked as: approved
Views: 6051 | Comments: 26 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • So you have almost the population of the UK living in poverty. Isnt capitalism great. O wait, they are only people living in pverty, they dont matter anyway /sarcasm

    Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

    (2)

  • Remember kids!! Republicans love you......until you're born!

    Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

    (1)

    • Democrats have been in power for several years. They have helped the poor how? How many school lunch programs to buy for one B2 bomber?
      Neither party cares about poor Americans at all. This will not change, ever. And if the day comes when the fat rich fuckers get hung up by their feet, i for one will be cheering, if not helping.

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (-1)

    • They've helped the poor by being afraid to steamroll the Republicans because they might lose power. Haha.

      Really, no matter how you slice it, Republicans would look bad in this. If they voted against it, you can laugh at their followers who consistently vote against their own interests.

      If instead the Republicans vote FOR poverty measures, they come off as hypocrites. So at least to their credit, THEY are acting consistent and you're left to laugh at their followers.

      The under $250 More..

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (2)

    • We can no longer pay the national debt which means the financial day of reckoning is coming. Things will get SO bad, that what you describe and what you see in Egypt as of late, may well happen here. THAT will be a hell of a thing to see and experience. I suspect some time in the next 10-30 years.

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (0)

    • Remember adults you only get that welfare increase the year before elections. Just remember where you got that free cell phone for babies daddy so he can sale dime bags while you live in section 8 housing.
      Remember the Democrats love you when you are poor and more people become poor while Obama is in control.
      Democrat Party the party of the poor making more people under the poverty level each year.

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (0)

    • Oh boy... What? You think Democrats love poor people so much that they want to keep them poor? That's just nuts.

      What you're saying is just factually untrue. But, hey you're entitled to your own opinion. It's just unfortunate for you that it's based on other peoples opinions (Fox the Propatainment Channel and/or Limbaugh)and not facts.

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (0)

  • Doh! Forgot to add this

    http://www.povertyscorecard.org/

    Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

    (1)

  • Absolute bullshit. A liberals idea of an anti-poverty measure doesn't work. Look at Detroit.

    Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

    (0)

  • And yet, it's states and cities run by Democraqts that are generally experiencing fiscal meltdowns and urban collapse.

    Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

    (0)

    • So how do you account for the fact that Mississippi just earned the honor of having the largest percentage of its population on Food Stamps of any state in the country? It's over 20%!!!

      So the Republican reps from Mississippi block the extension of unemployment benefits "on principle" but then have 1 in every 5 people in their state so poor they can't even afford to feed themselves.

      What a great example of how Republican social & economic policies! All our problems will be s More..

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (-1)

    • Yep. They have lots of poor folks in Mississippi. Yet nobody is starving. And the state has managed to avoid running to the brink of fiscal default with a 34 billion dollar budget deficit like California.

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (0)

    • Nobody is starving because of the federal food stamp assistance!

      A balanced budget doesn't mean shit when 20% of your population relies on assistance the state doesn't provide and 18% don't even graduate from your piss poor public education system.

      I understand the point you are trying to make, but if there's one thing you shouldn't do, it's use a state like Mississippi as a shining example of what you can achieve with fiscal and social conservatism.

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (0)

  • "anti poverty measures"......lol. you mean hand outs. there are plenty of those already. it does sound a lot more dignified when you call them "anti poverty measures" you can't just keep taking money from people who work for a living and give it to people who dont. theres no shame in voting that shit down.

    Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

    (0)

    • Hmmm so you think the poor only consists of people who don't work? Think again!

      http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-working-poor

      This is what wealth distribution towards the rich has gotten us. It's time to turn the tables for a decade or so!

      As far as the people who don't work... not all of them are deadbeats like the right tries to make them out. I work with 100's each week and they're fighting for their survival every damn day!

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (0)

    • trust me. i know all about poverty, brother. better than you and probably better than 95% of people on this site. i grew up dirt-neck poor in rural Arkansas. my mom and dad never took one dime of charity from anybody. i remember eating canned soup every night for dinner for weeks at a time, and the house that i grew up in should have been torn down 50 years before we moved into it. you just don't know as much as you think you do from what you read from your "blogs" he he.
      i am a grown More..

      Posted Feb-9-2011 By 

      (0)

  • Comment of user '' has been deleted by moderator!
  • "Government's never learn, Only People Learn"

    - Milton Friedman

    Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user '' has been deleted by moderator!
    • they've all gone to China, we need tariffs because in 10 or 20 years we will be fighting the Chinamen tooth and nail.

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (1)

    • Comment of user 'htos1' has been deleted by author!
    • perhaps and maybe not. look at the vdeos of mexico and brazil, not many lightweights there. Thanks to the gabachos there is food a plenty.

      after this is a dilemna inside of an enigma. Which we will have to deal with in he next 5 to 10.

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (1)

    • Republican Governor

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (1)

    • Under Liberal President.
      What we going to have 4 more years of it's Bush's fault or are we going to replace the Talking wonder and his 500 promises. If we wait long enough there will be a recovery. They say the economy is improving guess what 2.4 trillion in credit card debt as of 12/31/2010. Wonder how much of that is by unemployed people.

      Posted Feb-8-2011 By 

      (-1)