Safe Mode: On
9/11 core ommisions.

Clear factual vision of remnant core columns on CNN. AFTER THE COLLAPSE STARTS, nearing the end of the collapse. To the point of the video start, 47 high tensile continuously welded steel columns have passed through the path of most resistance, their own axes (plural of axis) rapidly. Clearly the columns have not distorted away from their own axes into a path of least resistance. Each columns has not broken at 1 point of metal fatigue after radically distorting, rather the breaks are clean. The breaks occur at multiple point up both buildings, no long strings distorted or not, are in the remnants. Then the vid ends with the columns falling away. FEMA & NIST don't explain post 'global collapse' of
WTC1+2 the behaviour of the 47X2 continuously core columns of the 2
buildings in either their respective 'pancake' of 'hat truss'
explanations, ALL FACTS. Now CONJECTURE, I believe it might be a little difficult to provide a rational explanation.

Loading the player ...
Embed CodeSwitch Player
Plays: 1144 (Embed: 0)

Added: Jun-26-2012 Occurred On: Jun-26-2012
By: rozza2012
In:
Conspiracy
Tags: 9/11, core, columns, conspirisory, WTC1, WTC2, WTC1&2
Location: Tokyo, Japan (load item map)
Views: 2115 | Comments: 61 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • the only thing interesting here is the mental processes that are getting wound around an axle.

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

  • I wish all these ridiculous conspiracy theorists would go the F away. Nobody believes your shit and nobody cares because we are not paranoid freaks.

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (3) | Report

    • @XR400R you have no idea how stupid you sound

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @XR400R Cheers for the ad hominem attack (name calling) let's me know you've got 100% of nothing.

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

    • Comment of user 'EMAG-K' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
    • @hanzgruber keep chasing that rabbit

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @XR400R wait wait wait, so you're saying a group of Saudi terrorists bypassed airport security, took over a 4 planes filled with freedom loving americans with boxcutters, crashed the planes into the buildings, the flight recorders miraculously survived the flames and were found in the debris, and 2 buildings specifically designed to withstand an impact from an airliner collapsed in a implosion causing minimal damage to the surrounding investments??? and you call me a freak....

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • It is more difficult to provide a rational explanation for all this truther tinfoil hat bullshit still going on.

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

  • The way I see it , in regards to 9-11, there obviously are a lot of questions surrounding the collapse of the World Trade buildings.Being a mechanic and a weldor for over forty years I too have questions , (I have my own answers too by the way). The main thing I have issue with is the forty seven center support columns , and how they could collapse through themselves straight down at free fall speed , with virtually no resistance.After watching a live lecture (online a couple of years ago) Given More..

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (2) | Report

    • @Lugnuts

      Well that about sums up what many professionals had hoped was going to be the logic based questions 'Joe Public' would ask..... cause its certainly what we are trying to answer, and find the answers for.

      I don't give a shit if Islamic terrorists, Aliens or The Pope in Rome himself flew planes into the twin towers... all I want to know is how and why did those buildings collapse killing 3000 people, and collapse using, and abiding by, the existing the laws of physics and forensic rese More..

      Posted Jun-27-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @GrumpyAuldBastard Another thing , when people say that how come there were no witnesses before the collapse of people placing explosives , most were probably killed that day.

      Posted Jun-27-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @Lugnuts

      Well I don't buy that actually.
      I still refuse to acknowledge that explosives where used until it is forensically proven.... which will be difficult, cause the NIST never bothered to look.
      If you don't look, you don't find, and that about sums up the problem.

      I believe terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into the WTC's
      I don't believe the NIST - I don't think they are telling lies, and they sleep well knowing they can put their hand on their heart and did an investigation. .... More..

      Posted Jun-28-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • 9-11 Commission report = POLITICAL SCIENCE ANSWERS for PHYSICAL SCIENCE QUESTIONS.

    Think of the 47 columns standing up right , like being that of a nail.

    It takes several blows of a hammer to drive a nail into a piece of wood.

    South tower , thirty floors collapsing down on 80 floors below , one continuous flow down , no hammering effect , just gravity driven.

    North tower , no upper mass , same effect.

    How does 30 floors maintain the mass needed to compress 80 floors below it ,if the pancake More..

    Posted Jun-27-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • obviously an inside job..... the blind sheep refuse to see it because they like their blind lives..... aaahh..... cognitive dissonance..... their ignorance must be bliss....

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • OP, please can we take a look at your own 'rational explanation' summarised, before we completely rule out the official version of events.

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • after i saw this video, that proofed that they used at 9-11 artists in tv, and still used this person today for occupy & other fake events, i`m sure..and lot of people switch now to the truth, you feel this at facebook, at youtube and on the streets.. what a crime and i really hate, they did this with the usa.. this is an unbelievable abuse of a country, that was occupied so hard from united kingdom long long time ago and fight free, paying a high price for this and today they are again occu More..

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @Stimpy555

      "proofed [sic] that they used at 9-11 artists in tv"

      Trust me, you're too stupid to realize just how stupid that sounds. Seek help...

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

  • Well this is the primary issue for anyone involved in construction engineering.
    If we could get past being shouted at and accused of being loonies, then maybe it might be possible to have an honest forensic investigation into what happened.

    Look at this picture:
    http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/6813/wtc1core.jpg

    Everyone refers to the exterior skin collapsing, but its the internal core that was the primary load bearing... if you can imagine your arms outstretched and being held up by a brush More..

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

    • @GrumpyAuldBastard Yes I try to point out that to folks, they tend to obsess about the actual collapse, which has to much potential for conjecture, much prefer, the core problem.

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @rozza2012

      Exactly.
      I do not want to get dragged into some of the preposterous conspiracy theories I have read, but I would love a mature discussion on the on the basic laws of physics and principals of construction that have allowed man to go from mud huts to highrise steel structures.
      Those principals have remained true to this day, and the only occasion they have been fundamentally ignored, twisted out of all proportion, and in some instances, re-written, was when WTC's 1,2&7 fell.

      I a More..

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @GrumpyAuldBastard Loons repeat the same mistakes over and over and expect a different outcome. Once truthers can quit doing that then the loony tag will be dropped. Also, if Richard Gage and his ilk would pass off the petition he has signed and the 1 million dollars he has collected then maybe you could get another investigation.

      "Everyone refers to the exterior skin collapsing, but its the internal core that was the primary load bearing... if you can imagine your arms outstretched and be More..

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @barogers619

      Well thank you for that.
      Agree or disagree, its nice to see someone at least apply logic and science to a response.

      However, I don't agree with you.
      Having read both the NIST report on the twin towers, and the Nov 2008 report on WTC 7, it is quicker and simpler to point out basic flaws in their conclusions, but flaws that equally apply to all 3 buildings.

      For example, NIST’s Shyam Sunder himself admits that WTC 7 fell in free fall for a period of 2.25 seconds.
      Dividing the bui More..

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @barogers619 Very well said!

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

  • I'm glad there are people who live in denial , those who think everything is just fine .

    Don't wake up , we need you to keep the economy going.

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (1) | Report

  • Twat

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Comment of user 'NSAID1010' has been deleted by author (after account deletion)!
  • GET....A....LIFE.

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • cement powder......... a democrazy of peace

    Posted Jun-27-2012 By 

    (0) | Report

  • Is this the NONSENSE channel?

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (-1) | Report

  • Path of least resistance !?!?!?

    Deluded fool alert!!

    Havent we had a talk about this rozza?

    Oh thats right you avoided the conversations, nevermind!!

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (-1) | Report

    • @barogers619

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (0) | Report

    • @barogers619 Please explain again oh great 1 why under a compressive load the axis of a straight section of anything, steel in this case, is for that section, the path of most resistance, whist distorting into away from its axis the path of least resistance. Once again this is not about collapse but the behaviour of an element (1 of 4)whilst collapsing.

      Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

      (1) | Report

    • @rozza2012 One must understand that the building wasnt tow blocks but many pieces assembled together.

      Drop a bowling ball thru 40 glass tables from 4 stories up and see if it follows the "path of least resistance"?

      Learn some simple physics concepts for christ sake.

      Posted Jun-27-2012 By 

      (-1) | Report

  • IT MUST BE CONCLUSIVE PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You twofers are fucking idiots. Just STFU already.
    http://www.debunking911.com/

    Posted Jun-26-2012 By 

    (-2) | Report