Israel Betrays America into War with Iran
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
Items
-
Mossad to Assassinate Obama to force US into war with Iran?
-
Israel is pushing America to attack Iran
-
Infolive.tv's CEO To Al Jazeera - Israel Does Not Want War With Iran.
-
Possible Consequence, War With Iran.
-
Pentagon wants $100 million extra to be prepared for a war with Iran.
-
Israel pushing US into war with Iran
-
Israel pushing US into war with Iran (Israel = the biggest threat to mankind)
-
USA says Israel can start war with Iran
-
Israels War with Iran
-
A London Taxi driver gives his say on Israel and the real reasons the West wants war with Iran
-
The Republican back door to war with IRAN
-
AIPAC is pushing us to war with Iran for Israel
Advertisers





i may be wrong but every time i hear the word zionist i always figure they just hate the jews to the point their opinion no longer holds weight with me. Also i don't consider this so much a betrayal as a preemptive strike. and no im not a hebe i just dont think that they're responsible for every american problem.
Posted Apr-3-2012 Bydreaming04 (57.50) dreaming04 View Channel Send Message
(3)
@dreaming04 shooting the messenger doesn't change the message.
Posted Apr-3-2012 ByEva_Destruction (2728.14) 
Eva_Destruction View Channel Send Message
(1)
@dreaming04
Ever heard of 'Jews against Zionism'?
Posted Apr-3-2012 Byxtr3mh4x0r (152.20) 
xtr3mh4x0r View Channel Send Message
(1)
@dreaming04 Israel taking advantage of the united states support isn't even questionable. It's obvious. Of course they're not responsible for all of the problems in the US but dragging them into war is one of them, and when it comes down to it, war is what's destroyed America in the last 11 years. I wouldn't be one bit surprised if they had previous knowledge of the 9/11 attacks and didn't say anything. Fuck i wouldn't be surprised if it WAS isreal. Does the preemptive strike mean blowing up Ira More..
Posted Apr-3-2012 By1shot555 (190.28) 
1shot555 View Channel Send Message
(2)
I don't agree with Duke on the large part of his positions (he's largely untouchable as is the case when you earn the title "anti-semite"), but the fact is Israel doesn't have clean hands:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair
Posted Apr-3-2012 ByBlack Spade (124.10) 
Black Spade View Channel Send Message
(2)
You can call him a racist or you can call him a congressman or you can call him the leader of the KKK but you can't deny what he is saying.
Posted Apr-3-2012 ByRoccoSantoro (506.20) 
RoccoSantoro Send Message
(2)
US war with Iran = DRAFT = nationwide protests = the whole government house of cards comes tumbling down. Not gonna happen. We're fresh out of False Flags since any attempt will be immediately perceived as such by the public.
Posted Apr-3-2012 ByEva_Destruction (2728.14) 
Eva_Destruction View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Eva_Destruction
One could use the term "False Flag" to dismiss almost any military action one doesn't agree with.
Calling something a "False Flag" only works if there are facts to back it up.
Otherwise calling everything a "False Flag" is as credible as Chem-Trails.
Posted Apr-3-2012 Bywharris (2247.22) 
wharris View Channel Send Message
(0)
@wharris hitler started war against Poland in 1939 with a false flag involving dead german prisoners dressed in Polish army uniforms. This is well documented. There is also plenty of evidence, including US sailor's eyewitness accounts, that the "Gulf of Tonkin incident" in 1964, that was Johnson's pretext to escalate the Vietnam war, never happened or did not happen as the government said it did. That's only two of the easiest to prove False flag incidents.
Posted Apr-3-2012 ByEva_Destruction (2728.14) 
Eva_Destruction View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Eva_Destruction
Agreed with both. Tonkin was weak at best. (Wasn't Johnson a Dem BTW?)
But,(and you knew there would be a 'but')
One could view everything through the lens of "False Flag". And not everything happening around us is a "false flag" to get us into a war.
I think in order to call something a false flag in real-time, you are going to need something tangible.
I tend to think the term "False Flag" is a bit overused these days.
Posted Apr-3-2012 Bywharris (2247.22) 
wharris View Channel Send Message
(0)
@wharris maybe so. BUT. There's a problem with false flags - it doesn't matter in truth, what they are. It matters how they are PERCIEVED.
Posted Apr-4-2012 ByEva_Destruction (2728.14) 
Eva_Destruction View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Eva_Destruction
Agreed
Posted Apr-4-2012 Bywharris (2247.22) 
wharris View Channel Send Message
(1)
really, you start a video with David duke on the screen. You really don't have a clue. I'm surprised Duke hasn't converted to Islam yet. The guy is a tool
Posted Apr-3-2012 Bytrailertrashrnr (318.30) 
trailertrashrnr View Channel Send Message
(0)
we are at war with Iran?
Posted Apr-3-2012 Bywharris (2247.22) 
wharris View Channel Send Message
(0)
Iran did try terrorist attacks, they failed... they arent very good at it. (for the time being anyways)
Posted Apr-3-2012 ByElParcero (264.98) 
ElParcero View Channel Send Message
(0)
fairytail.
Posted Apr-3-2012 ByNECKSHOT (873.86) 
NECKSHOT View Channel Send Message
(-1)
If America goes to war with Iran it will be because they are a terrorist nation. The sick cult of islam is to blame for almost all the conflicts we see in the world today
Posted Apr-3-2012 Bytsnwi (291.00) tsnwi View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@tsnwi
"The sick cult of islam is to blame for almost all the conflicts we see in the world today"
Not sure about that, you should read more books, and watch less tv ;)
Posted Apr-3-2012 ByVibroBoy (66.96) VibroBoy View Channel Send Message
(1)
@tsnwi Number of nation Iran has attacked in 60 years =0
Number of nation America has attacked in 60 years=35
wakey wakey
Posted Apr-3-2012 Bynomadlife (113.90) nomadlife View Channel Send Message
(0)