Safe Mode: On
US Begins Massive Military Build Up Around Iran, Sending Up To 4 New Carrier Groups In Region

With just one aircraft carrier in proximity to Iran, the Nobel peace prize winner has decided to send a clear message that peace will no longer be tolerated.

As if uncontrollable economic contagion was not enough for the administration, Obama is now willing to add geopolitical risk to the current extremely precarious economic and financial situation. Over at Debkafile we read that the president has decided to “boost US military strength in the Mediterranean and Persian Gulf regions in the short term with an extra air and naval strike forces and 6,000 Marine and sea combatants.” With just one aircraft carrier in proximity to Iran, the Nobel peace prize winner has decided to send a clear message that peace will no longer be tolerated, and has decided to increase the US aircraft carrier presence in the region by a 400-500% CAGR.

From Debka:

Carrier Strike Group 10, headed by the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier, sails out of the US Navy base at Norfolk, Virginia Friday, May 21. On arrival, it will raise the number of US carriers off Iranian shores to two. Up until now, President Barack Obama kept just one aircraft carrier stationed off the coast of Iran, the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in the Arabian Sea, in pursuit of his policy of diplomatic engagement with Tehran.

For the first time, too, the US force opposite Iran will be joined by a German warship, the frigate FGS Hessen, operating under American command.

It is also the first time that Obama, since taking office 14 months ago, is sending military reinforcements to the Persian Gulf. Our military sources have learned that the USS Truman is just the first element of the new buildup of US resources around Iran. It will take place over the next three months, reaching peak level in late July and early August. By then, the Pentagon plans to have at least 4 or 5 US aircraft carriers visible from Iranian shores.

The USS Truman’s accompanying Strike Group includes Carrier Air Wing Three (Battle Axe) – which has 7 squadrons – 4 of F/A-18 Super Hornet and F/A-18 Hornet bomber jets, as well as spy planes and early warning E-2 Hawkeyes that can operate in all weather conditions; the Electronic Attack Squadron 130 for disrupting enemy radar systems; and Squadron 7 of helicopters for anti-submarine combat (In its big naval exercise last week, Iran exhibited the Velayat 89 long-range missile for striking US aircraft carriers and Israel warships from Iranian submarines.)

Another four US warships will be making their way to the region to join the USS Truman and its Strike Group. They are the guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy and guided missile destroyers USS Winston S. Churchill, USS Oscar Austin and USS Ross.

We can’t wait for Iran to feel completely unthreatened by this escalation and to decide to take no action whatsoever as the Nobelists push it even more into a corner from which the only escape, to a rational player, would be outright aggression… Which begs the question just how an irrational player would react.


Click to view image: 'bcaff1139be6-strikegroup.jpg'

Added: May-24-2010 
By: boomersooner
In:
Iran, News, Middle East
Tags: Obama, Iran, Middle, East, Military, Build, Up
Marked as: approved
Views: 12339 | Comments: 65 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 1 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • LMAO at the Illegal war conspirators, they continue on with that crap, how pathetic and idiotic are they. Obama the War Monger wants to fight the world and has no clue what he is doing, What a pathetic moron he is. Got news for the morons that believe that the last president was my hero, you are pathetic idiots. I've lost every election since I was able to vote, no one I've voted for or backed has come close to being President. It will never happen unless the people of the US finally open their More..

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (7)

  • Iran does not want to have a normal relationship with America, even when Obama extended his hand to them, they took that as an oportunity to spit on his face and ridicule him. Iranian clerics, leaders and other lunatics within the regime so want to be our hand of apology, what they want is to destroy America and the West. This regime is hostile by nature against us, and is in the best interest to keep it that way... Our idiotic president has started to realize this, but IMO he's still shocked an More..

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (7)

    • Why did iran offer to help with the gulf oil spill?Seems to me they where extending a hand.Now u have oil washing up on shore because citizens are not even allowed to help stop it.

      Posted May-25-2010 By 

      (0)

    • Oh really? Yeah, you know is called "Rubbing it on your face." Please don't make laugh, Iran wants to help America, yeah right... If we were to allow them to help, they would exploit that, and turn it into a "Bashing America" party, please stop, just stop....

      Posted May-25-2010 By 

      (-1)

    • Comment of user 'knowsmuslims' has been deleted by author!
  • If I was Ahmadinejad, I'd call it a bluff.

    Despite that, I hope we are about to scratch some nuclear weapons plants.

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (6)

  • There will be wars and rumors of wars...Earthquakes in diverse places.. Just sayin.

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (5)

  • this is ridiculous, republicans slam obama as too weak when he opens up military dialogue with russia but when he takes a hard line on iran he suddenly becomes the war monger?

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (4)

  • peace will no longer be tolerated...lol

    these are just back up forces to counteract any aggression from the upcoming IDF air strike

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (4)

  • Total bull shit, we should be doing this to North Korea not Iran, Iran is no threat to us.

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (3)

    • But Iran IS a threat to the stability of Western oil supplies. Why do we care about that? Because of decades of presidents being buddy-buddy with oil corporations rather than getting the US OFF foreign energy dependence. Why do you think we decided to invade Iraq rather than confront NK years ago? You guessed it.

      Posted May-24-2010 By 

      (-11)

    • But then when you say "drill off shore", they call you a righ wing/neo con, so what do we do? We don't want to import oil from the Middle East, but we don't want to drill in US oil deposits, we can't have it both ways.... The left and enviromentalist have to get real.

      Posted May-24-2010 By 

      (11)

    • We can't even safely drill off shore, as seen by the BP disaster. Because of these same incestuous relationships I spoke of earlier, the US does NOT require oil rigs to have emergency safety seals to stop catastrophes like this. Hugo Chavez took the opportunity shortly after the BP disaster to sink one of his own oil rigs just to show the world how these valves can save an entire ecosystem from disaster if installed and monitored the right way(granted, not much in Venezuela is done "right&q More..

      Posted May-24-2010 By 

      (-5)

    • The massive overhaul that you're talking about has to be consistent, straigh forward and with clear goals, but it has to be at a determined pace and stages. Now I don't complete agree with you about fact that there has been an undermining of alternate sources of energy, look at the algae plants and biofuel in New Mexico and Arizona, the US military, to be more especific the Air Force has made more improvements on alternate fuels. The sources are there, but is going to take time and a combination More..

      Posted May-24-2010 By 

      (3)

    • Comment of user 'bs3ac' has been deleted by author!
  • Even the Republicant party has gone down the tubes. Wake up America it't time for us to take this country back.

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (3)

    • Comment of user 'gregory_peckory' has been deleted by author!
  • I call BS on this "Debka" story.
    Four carrier groups?

    bs

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (3)

  • I hope this does not mean the end to those cool speed boat videos! lmao

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (3)

  • Comment of user 'gregory_peckory' has been deleted by author!
  • looks like a few things are taking shape, first this and now I hear the U.S is going to have war games with South Korea, looks like someone is getting ready for something.

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (2)

  • Comment of user 'heavyrocker' has been deleted by author!
  • This is from a site called Debka, whose motto is "We start where the media stop". What is being described in this article sounds exactly like one carrier group moving out to replace the one currently on duty. Nothing suspicious there unless you want it to be there.

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (2)

  • Obama wont attack Iran.....he knows ISrael is close to making a strike on Irans Nuclear reactors, and is only cares about his own interests....keeping the straight open so the oil can get through.

    Posted May-24-2010 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'heavyrocker' has been deleted by author!
    • I doubt if the US will make the first strike.
      What I'm guessing will happen is some other country, already decided, will make the first hits, then the US will be there for back-up.

      Posted May-24-2010 By 

      (2)