Safe Mode: On
US ready to attack Iran



The US has plans in place to attack Iran if other measures fail to stop it developing nuclear weapons, Washington's envoy to Israel says.

Dan Shapiro said the US hoped diplomacy and sanctions would persuade Iran to alter its nuclear programme, but a military option was "ready".

US President Obama has previously said military action has not been ruled out.

The US and its allies say Iran is developing a nuclear bomb, an accusation Tehran denies.

Talks between Iran and six world powers are due to resume in Baghdad on 23 May.

Mr Shapiro made his comments to the Israel Bar Association on Tuesday, a recording of which was later obtained by the Associated Press news agency.

"It would be preferable to resolve this diplomatically through the use of pressure than to use military force," Mr Shapiro said.

"But that doesn't mean that option is not fully available. Not just available, but it's ready. The necessary planning has been done to ensure that it's ready."

Pentagon spokesman George Little on Thursday stressed that Washington's policy on the issue "has not changed at all".

"The ambassador's comments are perfectly in line with what we have been saying for a while with respect to Iran. Our focus in the US is on using diplomatic and economic instruments... to bring pressure to bear on the Iranians to do the right thing," he said.

Mr Little added that Mr Shapiro "was absolutely correct to say that no options are off the table but those options are not something that are being contemplated at this time".

Both Israel and the US have said they consider military force a last resort to stop Iran using its uranium enrichment programme to make a weapon.

Israel, which feels threatened by the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran, has hinted it could launch a pre-emptive strike.

The BBC's Tehran correspondent, James Reynolds, says Mr Shapiro's remarks go further than previous comments by President Barack Obama that all options are on the table, including military action.

Although aimed at an Israeli audience, the ambassador's comments will not go unnoticed in other capitals, including Tehran, our correspondent says.

Six world powers - the US, Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany - are trying to persuade Tehran to reduce uranium enrichment and open up its nuclear facilities to inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Fresh talks opened in Istanbul in April - the first for 15 months - and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton described them as "constructive and useful".

The EU, the US and the UN have all imposed sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme.

In the past, US officials have stressed the regional instability that would result from any attack on Iran.

In March, Mr Obama said there was "still a window that allows for a diplomatic resolution".

He warned there was "too much loose talk of war" and that it was playing into Iran's hands. However, he stressed that all options remained open.

Tehran insists it is enriching uranium to produce medical isotopes and fuel for nuclear reactors.----

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18110191


Added: May-19-2012 Occurred On: May-19-2012
By: MB-UK
In:
World News, Iran
Tags: US, war, Iran, attack, ready, strike, nuclear, issue, tensions, Israel
Marked as: approved
Views: 2185 | Comments: 45 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • One fucking nuclear bomb, which would probably get intercepted from the launch . Can't be the real thing for this shit. What next? going after every country with nuclear arsenal? Go cowboys

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (2)

  • If the world's superpowers spent their resources not on wars but on planet exploration instead, I am quit certain that we would be colonizing the moon or mars, or possibly even have manned exploration outside of our solar system.

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (2)

  • i'll believed it when i see it this shitt been going on now for at least who knows cos cia never tells us the truth.

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (2)

  • Who are America to decide who gets to harness nuclear power ? Look what happened when they got it, they levelled 2 civillian cities !

    Jumped up wankers.

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @Zombiespit

      au contraire, we leveled 2 civilian cities first and then harnessed nuclear power 10+ years later!

      Posted May-19-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Zombiespit If we went back to that time and dropped you off there, the Japanese would tear you limb from limb.

      We never thought of ourselves as superior, they did, if they had their way you wouldn't exist and if we nuked their leadership the war would have continued until they were all dead.

      Grow the fuck up you ignorant short sighted fuck.

      Posted May-20-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @Zombiespit
      payback was a bitch

      Posted May-20-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @machineguneddie Yeah, it's a shame what you've become as a nation though. A populace of over-weight, paranoid, gun toting miscreants, led by a Muslim appeasing negro with a military that couldn't fight it's way out of a wet paper bag and an economy thats 16 trillion in the red. LOL

      Posted May-20-2012 By 

      (0)

    • @Zombiespit we can still kick your ass any day of the weak...

      Posted May-20-2012 By 

      (0)

  • THe USA, the only people to ever use a nuke.

    out of necessity

    strangely the only people who think they can manage the world.

    GO TEAM AMERICA>

    FUCK YEAH

    someone is seriously trying to make shit of america.

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (1)

  • BS! The last thing America can handle is the inevitable $200 a barrel oil price a war would create! America is broke and far from being on course to solve that problem that will likely be the end of America as we know it

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Not going to happen. This is misleading information. Be nice though. Was written, made media, that in around Jan/Feb, Iran will have nukes (in two month) before spring, and Isreal was going to attack before spring. Well it is past before spring, and nothing happened, All hype. Now this is lower info than media has. The Iran Nuke problem been gong on for nearly a decade now "Iran will have nukes withen two years", and this.."Going to attack" never happens. Only the stupid sanc More..

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'MB-UK' has been deleted by author!
    • Comment of user 'MrScabs' has been deleted by author!
  • sure why not? it's about time for another war,.gotta kick up profits you know,.

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (1)

  • "Don't attack Iran. It won't be worth it." ~Iraqi Air Force general Georges Sada, to Saddam, c. 1979

    http://www.amazon.com/Saddams-Secrets-Georges-Hormuz-Sada/dp/1595553304/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1337459843&sr=8-1

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Because the big bosses in isreal wants us to do that otherwise we got no problem with iran at all..by the way where are the nuclear guns we were lookin into iraq?

    Posted May-28-2012 By 

    (0)

  • I'm buying a new HDTV just for the LIVE invasion.

    I heard Iran plants to retaliate with many missiles, so, the fireworks should be great.

    Posted Jun-2-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Cruise missiles and drones. Im sure the idea is to look at satillite imagery of targets over the course of the year they have set as a deadline.
    Inspectors have said they saw detonators and other material that only would be used for previous testing there. So be sure to imagine what was unseen.

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Comment of user 'scubasteve075' has been deleted by author!
  • the US is gonna get fucked

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Cool, it's open season on islamosquitos

    Posted May-19-2012 By 

    (0)