Safe Mode: On
UK Cameron urged to repeal insults ban

This is a press release from Peter Tatchell

“David Cameron should announce legislation to reform Section 5 of the Public Order Act. The public consultation closed in January and the government was due to announce its decision in April. We are still waiting. We believe that a majority of submissions to the consultation support a change in the law,” said Peter Tatchell, Director of the human rights advocacy organisation, the Peter Tatchell Foundation.

“Most MPs back reform, as does the former Director of Public Prosecutions, Lord Macdonald QC. The government’s delay and hesitation is unjustified. The criminalisation of mere insults under Section 5 is a threat to free speech. There are other laws to deal adequately with harassment, threats and serious abuse.”

Mr Tatchell was speaking at a protest outside parliament this morning, organised by the Reform Section 5 campaign: www.reformsection5.org.uk

“In 1994, I was prosecuted under Section 5 for displaying a placard that condemned the Islamist extremists of Hizb ut Tahrir who had advocated the murder of LGBT people and Islamist governments like Iran and Saudi Arabia that have the death penalty for homosexuality. My placard read: ‘Islam Nazis behead & burn queers.’”

“If the criminalisation of insults was abolished, the rest of Section 5, which outlaws abusive and threatening words or behaviour, would remain in force. This is quite sufficient to protect vulnerable people and communities,” added Mr Tatchell.

“While our campaign does not encourage or endorse insults, we don’t believe they should be criminal offences. There have been too many abuses of this draconian law. Section 5 was invoked 18,000 times in 2009.

“Section 5 has been used against a student who joked that a police horse was gay, a pensioner who said that religious beliefs were fairy stories, a street preacher who criticised homosexuality as immoral and a youth who condemned Scientology as a dangerous cult.

“The Home Office is still considering its response to the public consultation, which saw many people make the case for the removal from Section 5 of ‘insulting words or behaviour.’ Civil liberties campaigners, faith groups and secular organisations have joined forces to have the phrase removed on the grounds that it restricts free speech and unfairly penalises protesters and preachers.

“Supporters of the campaign to reform Section 5 include: The Christian Institute, The National Secular Society, The Peter Tatchell Foundation, The Bow Group, Big Brother Watch, and The Freedom Association.

“The reform Section 5 campaign has cross-party support in parliament. A ComRes poll found that 58% of MPs support repealing the insults ban and 62% believe that the criminal law should not prohibit mere insults,” said Mr Tatchell.



http://hurryupharry.org/2012/08/30/cameron-urged-to-repeal-insults-ban/


Added: Aug-30-2012 Occurred On: Aug-30-2012
By: funkyyaya
In:
Other News
Tags: free speech,
Location: London, England, United Kingdom (UK/GB) (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1656 | Comments: 11 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'MrScabs' has been deleted by author!
  • The Llibs MUST destroy Ryan or else...If Romney wins and does a decent job as president, he'll get re-elected. And guess who will take his place and probably for 8 years. Paul Ryan.

    This is an epic nightmare for the left and their hysterics are showing. It's glorious.

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (1)

    • Comment of user 'MrScabs' has been deleted by author!
  • British politicians have swallowed the kook-aid of political correctness whole heartedly. Poor Britain.

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (1)

  • about fucking time....

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Im sure there has been a couple of judges on about this. If you swear at the police you shouldn't be nicked as it isn't assault. It fills up the courts time etc.

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

    • @para001

      No it is not assault, but it is an offence if members of the public are present and someone uses threating, abusive, or insulting behaviour which can cause harassment, alarm, and distress.

      Lets be realistic here the public order act, or section 5(1) to be precise, was designed to be used in place of breach of the peace (which formed a catch all). One of the issues is that the law was being misused by the CPS, dropping an affray (multiple people fighting/threatening/extreme behaviour More..

      Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

      (1)

  • silly silly law ,she must of got tired of being called a#$%I^%^% fat cow of a %&^&&$#&(,,,wtf was that?? some one is smashing the door in !!!!oh no its--------------------araaahghaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Home or Homo Office?

    Posted Aug-30-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Hmm, first our British brethren gave up their guns and now they are giving up their free speech.

    With no arms to take it back it is gone forever.

    Posted Aug-31-2012 By 

    (0)