(PAGES IN PDF BELOW)
In 1982 at the "Rebuilding Social Security" Conference at the Heritage Foundation, the plan against Social Security was fleshed out by Butler (a Cato director) and Germanis (an analyst at Heritage) in the Fall 1983 issue of Cato's journal, summarized through quotes here:
"Lenin recognized that fundamental change is contingent upon ... its success in isolating and weakening its opponents. ... we would do well to draw a few lessons from the Leninist strategy. (p. 547)
"we must recognize that we need more than a manifesto ... we must ... construct ... a coalition that will ... reap benefits from the IRA-based private system Ferrara has proposed but also the banks, insurance companies, and other institutions that will gain from providing such plans to the public." (p. 548)
"By approaching the problem in this way, we may be ready for the next crisis in Social Security." (p. 548)
"From a purely political standpoint, it should be remembered that the elderly represent a very powerful and vocal interest group." (p. 549)
A Plan of Action
"The first element consists of a campaign to achieve small legislative changes that embellish the present IRA system, making it in practice a small-scale private Social Security system. ... thenatural constituency for an enlarged IRA system must be ... welded into a coalition for political change." (p. 551)
"The second main element ... involves what one might crudely call guerrilla warfare against both the current Social Security system and the coalition that supports it." (p. 552)
Creating a Private Model
"The reason for designing a “super IRA” law with these restrictions is purely political." (p. 552)
"Social Security reform requires mobilizing the various coalitions that stand to benefit from the change, ... the business community, and financial institutions in particular ... "(p. 553)
"The banking industry and other business groups that can benefit from expanded IRAs ..."
"... the strategy must be to propose moving to a private Social Security system in such a way as to ... neutralize ... the coalition that supports the existing system." (p. 555)
"The next Social Security crisis may be further away than many people believe. ... it could be many years before the conditions are such that a radical reform of Social Security is possible. But then, as Lenin well knew, to be a successful revolutionary, one must also be patient and consistently plan for real reform." (Concluding paragraph, p. 556)
PDF
http://zfacts.com/metaPage/lib/Cato-Heritage-1983-Lenin-Plan.pdf
By: Nurb
In: Politics
Tags: koch, brothers, gop, republican, social, security, medicare, social, programs, heritage, foundation, cato, institute, romney, santorum,
Marked as: approved
Views: 1634 | Comments: 8 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Koch Brothers Ripping-Off Taxpayers
-
Herman Cain: I'm the Koch Brothers' brother from another mother!
-
School Segregation Via Koch Brothers
-
Herman Cain: I'm the Koch Brothers' brother
-
A Rare Look inside a Koch Brothers AFP Group meeting about Tea Party Protest Funding & Organizing
-
The Koch Brothers
-
Koch brothers now at heart of GOP power
-
Koch Brothers sold equipment to Iran despite embargo - Paid Illegal Bribes
-
Liberals plan to ‘uncloak’ the Koch brothers.
-
Herman Cain Funded by Koch Brothers
-
Lexus driver rams Occupy DC protester at Koch brothers-funded event "Repost for commenting"
-
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Claims He's Never Met The Koch Brothers - Didn't Know Who He Was Talking To




Nurb, you're on a roll. Propaganda master. ThinkProgress has you on their payroll? Battle of the thinktanks? LOL
Posted Feb-25-2012 Byflashj2 (728.60) 
flashj2 View Channel Send Message
(3)
@flashj2
The journals are in their archives and accessable to anyone that wants to see their previous meetings.
Why do people act like this is some conspiracy? Ending Social Security and Medicare so the money gets funneled into business sector has been among the GOP's promises since they were instituted.
Why do you think there was an attempt to shift federal dollars from medicare to private insurers first instead of straight to the doctors last year?
Posted Feb-25-2012 ByNurb (1005.12) 
Nurb View Channel Send Message
(2)
@Nurb do the math, increasing costs verses declining income into the programs. It's not sustainable. Personally I think SS can stay a gov't program, it just needs an overhall. too many people use SS as thier sole retirement plan. Which in todays age, can't work. So those that do are hooked on the dem band wagon.
Posted Feb-25-2012 Bygammyland (507.92) gammyland View Channel Send Message
(1)
@gammyland
That's the thing, increasing costs with declining income. A lot of jobs had pension plans 40-60 years ago so people didn't need to rely solely on SS. How do people afford healthcare and retirement when they can't save, even with two income households?
There's more to the problem than people like to admit
Posted Feb-25-2012 ByNurb (1005.12) 
Nurb View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Nurb My point was this is just propaganda wars. I don't trust either sides message or tactics. Smear, propaganda and obfuscation of the true issues, it seems you've taken a side though.
Posted Feb-25-2012 Byflashj2 (728.60) 
flashj2 View Channel Send Message
(1)
I thought the Koch Bros were consertives??
Posted Feb-25-2012 Byaranger45 (2968.28) 
aranger45 View Channel Send Message
(-2)
@aranger45 So?
Posted Feb-26-2012 ByIntellectual (752.34) Intellectual View Channel Send Message
(1)