Los Angeles Nuclear Destruction Prophecies
22But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon
at the day of judgment, than for you. 23And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be
brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee,
had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. 24But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land
of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.
Holy Bible, Matthew 11:22-24
through Brian Charles
“It all must go by My hand.
Great will be her destruction! It
is ordained forever!” --Los Angeles
“I wanna destroy it—sunken beneath the sea.” “It will all be gone.” “It will all be blown to rubble—massive
nuclear explosion!” “All this will be a
memory.” --Los Angeles
“It’ll be submerged beneath the sea.” --Sunset Boulevard and all on it
“All this richness must be washed away.” --Beverly Hills
“Suddenly plunged under the sea.” “It’ll be washed away.” --Hollywood
“It MUST go—its sin has risen before Me. Great will be its destruction.” --Westwood Village, L.A.
“It all must be blasted away!” “You see this place? (Westwood Village) It’ll all be gone, blasted apart by My
hand! These people won’t serve Me. They love money. They must be destroyed. Thus says the Lord of Hosts.” --Westwood Village
“It must be blasted away in an instant! –They won’t serve
Me.” “It must be gone by My hand.” “Great will be her destruction.” --UCLA
“They must go—they won’t serve Me.” “—Nuclear destruction, blasted apart! Great is her greed. I have remembered every medical
statement. It MUST be destroyed!” “Flee this place!” “It must be blasted away! It’s a part of My plan! Great will be her nuclear destruction.” --UCLA Medical Center
“It must be blasted away!”
“It’s by My hand!” “All this must
be gone, by My hand!” “It’ll
happen!” “Busses must be blasted
away—everyone must go!” “Great is her
destruction planned!” --Los Angeles
“It’ll all be swept away by the force of My hand! I’M sick of this wicked land. It must be swept away! Thus says the Lord of hosts.”
“The city will be destroyed because of them.” “They’re going to Hell. I have given them many chances to
repent. I have said it.” --L.A. filmmakers, movie industry
“You know, I’M gonna
destroy this place suddenly? Let Me do
it- I control the nuclear buttons.”
“You must go and warn.”
“You must go and warn My people.”
“This city will be sunken by My hand!”
“It’ll be judged by My hand.” “It
must be destroyed—its sin has risen before Me.
You must warn. Thus says the Lord
of Hosts.” --Los Angeles
“Nobody will serve Me.
Nobody will do it My way. I must
judge for that.”
“It must be destroyed.
I’ll judge ‘em for that.” “The
peoples’ wickedness—won’t listen. They love weed. They’ll be destroyed.” “It’s a reproach in My sight. They must be destroyed.” --California marijuana smokers
“I’ll judge for that!”
“I’ll definitely judge for that!”
--the world getting you hooked with the first one given to you for free
“You know this’ll be plunged underwater?” “It’s about to happen.” --Arroyo Grande, CA
“I’ll judge for both!”
--business communities that form controlling ‘old boy networks’ to price
gouge the public, and business communities full of infighting and competition
“I’ll judge for that!”
“I’ll definitely judge for that!
“You can be sure of that!”
“They’ll be destroyed forever!”
“A mighty nuclear destruction!”--places in Christians’ lives where they
said “No” to the Lord
“Someday it’ll blow furious!” “It’s My judgment.” “Lassen too.”
“It shall come down.”
--the big I-5 bridge over the reservoir, north of Redding
“This will all be sunken.”
“It will all be submerged underwater.”
--the Central Valley
“It’ll be washed underwater.” --Santa Cruz
“It’ll all be swept away.”
“They’ll be swept away.”
The big pine trees of Big Sur
“It’ll be collapsed.”
--the coast highway, route 1
“I’ll judge all of that!”
--squandering money on alcohol, drug abuse
“I’ll judge all of that!”
--business ventures based on greed
“Someday it will end.
They’ll have to use antigravity or bicycles.” -- driving cars
“I will judge all of that!”
--the vileness of the left-wing world
“I’ll judge for that!”
--independent women who want a meal ticket, not a husband
“I’ll judge for that!”
--girls only wanting to be with rich guys
“All this will be submerged underwater.” --Long Beach rail yards
judge those who watch television, idol of the 21st century.”
“I will judge them.”
“They will be destroyed.” “I will
punish My enemies in Hell forever.”
“They must be destroyed.” --the
people who love Satan
“I’ll judge ‘em for that!
--With a mighty nuclear destruction!”
“They must be judged.” --the Los
Angeles Satanists, for controlling the media and entertainment
“It won’t always be.”
“I shall reclaim some, those that don’t worship their bodies.” --all the most beautiful women serving Satan
“It’ll be a reality.”
“It’ll happen all over. Mighty
will be the drought. Thus says the
Lord.” --children starving to death
“Destroy My Israel.”
“The Jews won’t obey. They must
be destroyed. Thus says the Lord of
“They must be judged.”
“Send (judgment prophecies) to them.”
“I will judge them all! They must
be destroyed. Thus says the Lord-I have
said it.” --the wicked Israelis and
“They must go—they won’t obey. Thus says the Lord of Hosts.” --The Israelis
“They must be destroyed.”
“I know everything!” “They must
be destroyed!” “They all must go. They refuse to obey.” “They must be destroyed, all of them. Few will survive. I have said it- the Lord of Hosts, Mighty in
Israel.” --the wicked Israelis and
“I wanna destroy because of that!” --pornography
“I don’t like ‘em.”
--Harley Davidson motorcycles
“We would have healed Babylon, but she is not healed:
forsake her, and let us go every one into his own country: for her judgment reacheth unto heaven, and is
lifted up even to the skies.” Jeremiah 51:9
“And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt
be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee,
had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day.” Matthew 11:23
of Prophetic Judgment Against Los Angeles California
Given through Brian
“I’M gonna destroy that
place with such mighty force that you won’t believe it!” --LosAngeles
“I must destroy this
place. It’s sin has risen before Me. It will be sudden. Flee!” --Los Angeles
“This place will be
destroyed suddenly. Millions will die.” --Los Angeles
“You MUST go! Flee the
city of My wrath!” --Los Angeles
“You like it because it
is nice and sunny. Millions will die. It will all be submerged underwater.”
“I’ll destroy this
place suddenly with My mighty hand. They won’t obey Me.” --L.A. andthe Los
Angeles International Airport
“The city must be
destroyed. It won’t obey Me, none of ‘em will. See this place willbe destroyed
suddenly.” --Los Angeles
“I’m gonna destroy this
place suddenly. Few will survive. Millions will die. Repent!”“I must judge this
place. Its sin has come up before Me.”
“This city will be destroyed in a second. Great is My wrath against this place.
It’s people must repent orelse!” --Los Angeles
“I must destroy this
place. Its sin has risen before Me.” --Los Angeles
“All these buildings
will be reduced to rubble.” “Few will survive My wrath!” --downtown Los Angeles
“This will all be
destroyed in a second. Great is My wrath against this place.” Los Angeles and
the Los Angeles International Airport
“Someday it’ll be gone.
It’ll all be destroyed. It’ll be destroyed by force someday.They’ll be desolate
(the highways). I’M gonna destroy it suddenly. Few will survive.It’s sin has
come before Me. I must destroy this place. It’ll all be flattened bynuclear
explosion. It’ll all be wiped away. You’ll see—a mighty nuclear explosion.The
bombs are already in place. It all must go down.” --Los Angeles
“I’M gonna bring it all
down.” --highway overpasses, buildings
“All this land will
break off into the ocean.” --California
“California will be a
thing of the past, swept into the sea.”
“Submerged under the
sea.” --Cajon Summit Mountains
“I’M gonna destroy this
place with a sudden blast!” --Claremont
“Someday this will be a
thing of the past, destroyed by My mighty hand.” --Los Angeles International
“It’ll all be submerged
underwater. It all must go. Its sin has risen before Me. Yes, I MUST destroy
this place. You MUST get out of here! --Los Angeles
“That’s what’s gonna
be. Nothing will be left remaining.” “People are too selfish to serve Me here.
All they want is the world. I must judge them for that-by nuclearfire!” --The
Los Angeles megacity totally destroyed
“I MUST destroy this
place. It’s sin has risen before Me. “It’ll be crumbled beneath your feet.
You’ll see—a great nuclear disaster. See what they do? You must go.” “Greatis
My wrath against this place.” --UCLA
“All this will be
submerged underwater.” “Come down in a
minute!” --UCLA, L.A.
“All this will be
submerged underwater.” UCLA, Bel Air, Brentwood, Westwood Village, Los Angeles
“It will all come down
in an instant.” --Westwood Gateway Towers
“People are too selfish
to serve Me here. All they want is the world. I must judge them for that-by
nuclear fire!” “Nobody wants to obey Me.” “They won’t listen. They’llbe all
gone.” --the people of Los Angeles
“I have waited for many
to repent, for no avail.”
“Many will die,
judgment will be great.”
“Someday this will all
be underwater.” --Los Angeles
“They won’t serve Me.
They serve themselves.” --the Jewish People
“Great will be the
death in the world, starting with My Church.” “Few will serve Me My way.”
“They’ve all followed
their own way and won’t obey. I must judge for that. Amen”
“My people shall be
destroyed, for the sin of their mouths—they talk much but do nothing. They MUST
be destroyed. Amen.” “I will destroy them all.” --God’s people, theChurch and
the Jewish people
“I’ll judge for that!”
--people talking about problems but doing nothing
“I will judge for
that.” “I expect ‘em to help.” --God’s people saying ‘I can’t help you,’when
they’ve been prospering materially and financially
“Destroy My people with
your prophetic word!” “Destroy My people. They won’t do My will.” “I’M gonna
judge My Church because they won’t obey Me.” “I’M gonna judge My people!”
“You’ll see—eternal destruction! They won’t obey!” “Destroy My people. They
won’t do anything about it (Planned Parenthood). They MUST be destroyed! That’s
how it will happensuddenly.Few will survive.” “You must tell. You must send.”
“This land will be destroyed suddenly.” “Great will be her destruction. Flee
for your life, flee! You must go!” --Los Angeles & California
“I will annihilate this
race. Few will survive. Amen” --The American People
“America will be
destroyed by nuclear bombs, because My Church has forsaken Me!”
“I must destroy this
empire. You’ll see it before your very eyes. Its sin has come before Me.”
“That’s why I’M going to destroy the country—the people love lust.” --The USA
“This country will
become an empty wasteland, full of cactus and tumbleweeds.” “All this will be
empty and waste, because My people don’t do My will.” --The United States of
“I’ll judge for both.”
“I’ll judge for both—a mighty nuclear blast!” --America being founded
for the propagation of
the Gospel—the work left undone, and to grow and ship tobacco back to England
“You must go.” “Few
will survive.” “You’ll see—a great nuclear disaster! It must happen.
Its sin has come before
Me—those high mountains will be submerged under the sea.” “Allthis place will
be sunken.” “It all must go under the sea.” “You must get out of here! It’ll be
all gone!” “You must go!” --Los Angeles and California
“Even in disaster I’ll
be with you.”
“I will create a new
“I’ll have mercy on
this place because you asked. The judgment will not come immediately.”
“The judgment will not
come immediately. I’m giving time to repent.”
“I can blast it away.
That’s what I’ll do.” --The Ritz Carlton, downtown Los Angeles
“I will judge for
that!” --pastors who sacrifice Truth for numbers and money and popularity
“Those days will
return.” --the days of having to ride horses to get out West
“The Western deserts
will flow with blood!”
“I’ll judge for that!”
--women not wanting to depend on a man for their livelihood
“I will judge for
that.” --people always looking for a better deal in life
“I’ll judge for that.”
--the racial segregation of the Church
“I’ll judge for that.”
--the bias in science against God and Truth in areas of research and study
“It’s all gonna go
belly-up.” --the economy
“My Church has deserted
Me. I must destroy them for that. By nuclear war. Thus
says the Lord of Hosts.
you, Capernaum, which are exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell:
if the mighty works, which have been done in you, had been done in Sodom, it
would have remained until this day.” Matthew 11:23
ye in the LORD forever: for in the LORD JEHOVAH is everlasting strength: For
brings down them that dwell on high; the lofty city, He lays it low; He lays it
low, even to the ground; He brings it even to the dust. The foot shall tread it
down, even the feet of the poor, and the steps of the needy.” Isaiah 26:4-6
Against Los Angeles
I drive, I see pictures of L.A., raised to the ground. I ask the Lord about the
stands of trees. Will they not be left standing.? An occasional trunk may stand
but without leaf. I see a devastated wasteland! an empty desert! I listen for
the voices of the birds. Even the crows are silent ! Where the city stood and
Cause 1: Global Exportation of a Malevolent Culture
is against you, Los Angeles, city of pornography, city of oppression, home of
rape and exploitation. You have beamed evil and malevolence, violence and
bloodshed, family dislocation and lewdness, pornography and twisted sexuality
across the face of the earth in bold defiance of your God, with your fists
raised in challenge to his, saying stop us, God of love. His patience is
exhausted. His voice to you has never been silent , from the first preachers on
your fields and streets, from the great revivalists to your Jack Hayfords and
Lloyd Ogilvies. Every week, your black preachers thunder against your sins, but
you do not hear, Los Angeles, and when you do hear a fraction, you cry out that
no-one can change these things, let them go on, let them go on...
Cause 2: Global Symbol of Chic Greediness
excellent in business, so lazy in morals. Such is the greed that has consumed
your very being and that of your citizens. Greed and chic. For you love the
shows. You love the glitter. Tinseltown will be no more. Supermodels will
perish with the lowly. Mansions will be raised just as surely as the hard won
homes of the escaping migrant poor of East L.A.
Oh, my people,
says the Lord, how could you ignore me and bring such ruin on yourselves? How
could you be so ignorant of my ways, not willing to fight for truth in the
public office, and control of the pornographic machines of Hollywood ? How
could you buy into the lie that the free market is good and godly and should
never be interfered with, even when daily the evil seeps into your homes
through a cable? How could the godly sit and do nothing effective for decades
to destroy the core of Hollywood's evil ? Now it is time. It is too late to
redeem or convert these structures. It is too late!
Cause 3: City of Incest
is too late to salvage your honor, so many raped, sexually molested, so that
the city seethes with guilt, cries out with mental pains, with images no-one
ought to bear. The wounds of immorality lie like great wounds across whole
communities, as if a butchers cleaver has carved up your fabric. Houses and
homes destroyed into bitterness, violence and incest. And you export this! You
talk about it on shows! Shows to show evil? And you call it news! How depraved
can a city be? And no Christian effectively raises their voice against such
Cause 4: City of Perverted Christianity
of course in church. I forgot about your churches. So many! So many! So
corrupted! So filthy! Greed in the offering basket, oppression and manipulation
in the leaderships, tinsel on the stage. But there are some struggling
congregations that have not denied my simplicities. Some that seek truth in
choosing different pathways of quiet humility. For their sakes I have been
trying to speak and have withheld my hand. Tinsel, greed and immorality abound
within your walls and reflect in your weekly shows. I cannot abide immorality
and worship, injustice and celebrations. An empty Christianity, from liberal to
evangelical to Pentecostal to Catholic, there is little difference. Yet there
are some who have walked in godly obedience.
Cause 5: A City Symbolizing Perverted Justice
children, how I would have lead you to become truly a people. But in the name
of freedom you have perverted justice. Are there no law courts that cannot be
overturned by the wealth of your wicked? Your Rodney Kings, your O.J.s are only
the tip of the iceberg of legalized injustice that marks your land. I cannot
Cause 6: Perversion of Your Gifts to the Nations
hate you, Los Angeles, with a fury, a vengeful hatred for what you have done to
your migrants, those who came seeking new life, new hope, and to them you gave
only bonded labor. I hate you, Los Angeles, for what you have done against the
nations, the shattering of centuries, shattering of marriages and clans. So
much I gave you of creativity, and you turned it into evil. Such a great city
of literature and research, of books and ideas. And you perverted them into
weapons of evil. Called to be a blessing to the nations, you are known as the
scourge of the world. Called to be a light, your media has become a purveyor of
darkness. My soul knows nothing but fury. Why should I not release on you all
the destruction my hands can muster? Why should I not wipe you out of
existence? Give me one reason for allowing you to continue in your pornographic
fantasies, in your lust and wine, in your screenplays of barbarity? But you can
give me no reason. Yet I wait. Yet I delay. I hesitate. For in this great city
there are many who know my name. Why did they not rise up? Why did they not
speak out? Why did they not even try to mobilize? Was the technology of evil
too strong for them?
Cause 7: Pastors Failing to Seek Justice
I have loved the pastors of this city, such a bulwark against a collapsing
culture, such people of strength when all around is crumbling. There is unity
in leadership. But they have not done my will in leading a city into
righteousness in its public squares. And there is now insufficient time to
redeem. Pastors have played church and failed to organize the workers across
the city, across the disciplines into effective strike teams to combat the
evil, industry by industry. The pastors wanted the tithe, not the victory
outside their churches of societal change for righteousness, loving their own
voice, they would not listen to the voices of the workshop, the artisan and the
factory worker. So injustice has blossomed and can no longer be cured. Like the
bugs on the roots of a dying plant, there is no solution except to root the
plant out and burn it. They have loved revival and church growth for it fills
their churches. They love events, and even prayer events, but they do not
organize for justice. They know nothing of consistent planning to overturn the
communal sins. They do not organize to speak to the sins of the city fathers.
They do not know the city fathers. They do not know their hidden sins. How is
it that to them I have given the gifts of discernment - special gifts to see in
and beyond the hearts of men? Yet they have not taken them into the streets ,
the legal dens and the marketplace! The hour glass is near empty. The city will
be no more.
these sins, I will destroy it all. It is past my time of warning. This is what
the Lord says,
BRANHAM'S PROPHECY FOR LOS ANGELES
Along with this prophecy, William Branham wrote the following:
“Thou city, who claims to be the city of angels, who has exalted yourself into
heaven and sent all the dirty, filthy things of fashions and things, until even
the foreign countries come here to pick up our filth and send it away, with
your fine churches and steeples and so forth the way you do, remember one day
you will be laying in the bottom of the sea! Your great honeycomb under you
right now. The wrath of God is belching right beneath you. How much longer He
will hold this sandbar hanging over that, when that ocean out yonder a mile
deep will slide in there plumb back to the Salton Sea. It will be worse than
the last day of Pompeii. Repent Los Angeles! Repent the rest of you and turn to
God! The hour of His wrath is upon the earth. Flee while there is time to flee
and come to Christ.” “So I pray Thee Lord, in Jesus Name, let the people shake
themselves tonight and flee from the wrath that is to come, for Ichabod is
written over the doors and over the nation. A black check mark is come across
it, the Spirit of God is grieved away from it, and they’re weighed in the
balance and found wanting. The feast of King Nebuchadnezzar has repeated again
with drunken parties and half-dressed women calling themselves Christians.”
Prophetic Alert: Los Angeles 5
Kiloton nuclear explosion
Date Received: 10/20/99, 5:00 A.M. Stephen L. Bening
In a dream, I was standing in a
room, looking out of a large plate glass window, overlooking a city that had
low rise buildings of about 5 stories as an average. I was at a height of about
5 to 10 stories up myself. It was dark outside.
All at once, I noticed a group of fighter planes heading my way. Suddenly, they
fired a weapon in my direction. The weapon emitted three blue pulses of light.
When they hit the area where I was, I had the sense of being exposed to
radiation, or so it seemed, because the effect seemed to fade. I now realized
that I was having a vision within my dream. I went to gather my wife and my
five children. Before I could move much, I saw the flash of a nuclear
explosion. A voice accompanied the flash which said, "Los angeles has just
been hit by a 5 Kiloton nuclear explosion."
I was frantically trying to gather my family to head downstairs. All at once, I
found myself in a building that was familiar to me. It was Bening Square, in
Carbondale, Illinois. My father remodeled this office building in 1963. He
built a bombshelter in the basement. I had been in this bombshelter when I was
At any rate, we traversed the stairs, going down into the basement, trying to
reach the bombshelter ahead of the arrival of the blast wave. When I reached
the place where the bombshelter was supposed to be, there was a little room in
its place that was a prayer chapel.
I discovered that the prayer chapel was operated by Dr. Zach Fomum of Cameroon
and his wife Prisca. Prisca began to pray with my wife Erica. I was concerned
that I did not know where my eldest daughter Lorel was.
The dream then ended. I looked behind me on the bed and my digital clock was
just turning over to 5:00 A.M. and the Lord impressed upon my spirit that the
dream had been from him.
Contents of this dream were summarized and quickly sent to Apostle Zach Fomum
in Cameroon. After prayer, I was given some private interpretation relative to
my own personal situation, but I have not been given any more light with
respect to the national implications of the prophetic part of the dream.
Your servant in Christ Jesus, Stephen L. Bening
of Los Angeles by Fire Dream
I dreamed that I received a prophecy, but
didn’t receive the words of it. But I sent the prophecy to my
sister. I saw the whole, entire city of Los Angeles on FIRE!!!
Fierce flames were furiously consuming all of the buildings of that vast city,
while I was watching some buildings burning ferociously by big consuming fires
in the suburb of Montclair at the same time.
through Brian Charles
from the city of My wrath." (meaning Los Angeles)
GREAT EARTHQUAKES, SUITCASE NUCLEAR
BOMBS, VOLCANOES, VIRUSES, ECONOMIC COLLAPSE, GEOGRAPHIC SHAKING &
RESHAPING, FLOODS, ETC. WHEN WILL THIS NATION REPENT?Bob Jones
When our cities are leveled. I don't like this thought, but I'm not the only
one having these visions. We're going to have entire cities leveled. I know of
a city that is going to be leveled by a storm. I know of a lot of Midwest
cities that are going to get five feet of rain just like that. Do you have any
idea what will happen to a city that is used to getting 24-36 inches of rain in
a year, if they get five foot of it in two or three days? I was told that
Hurricane Danny (which He revealed to us right before it happened exactly how
it was going to move) was a parable that He was trying to show to the prophets.
That whole hurricane was a warning to the United States, and if they want it,
they can have it. I'm telling you, when people of old cried out, "God, we
are not able to stand it." Holy people and holy prophets cried out and
they stood in the gap, God relented of the judgment. Now there are going to be
cities leveled that can't be stopped. But they can be warned; and only those
who want to be there can be there. I can't stop the leveling of it, but I can
tell you this: God will warn. He will warn those cities. I'VE BEEN TELLING
PEOPLE FOR A YEAR TO GET OUT OF LOS ANGELES. They tell me that they're really
brave out there. (sigh) I'm not that brave. Because that bravery is against
God. IF I LIVED IN LOS ANGELES, I'D GET OUT. I want to tell you something. The
EARTHQUAKE is not the only thing you got to worry about in Los Angeles, and I'm
not sure it will be first. In a vision, I saw suitcases being smuggled in by
terrorists into California. They had NUCLEAR BOMBS in them. Two days after I
brought this in Nashville, a Baptist man came and brought the same word, only
he didn't bring it as a prophecy; he brought it as a reality. He had been in
Russia, and he knew one of Yeltsin's right hand men who told him: "There are 126 SUITCASE ATOMIC BOMBS MISSING from
our arsenal. And we know they have been sold to terrorists, and we believe they
are trying to get them into the United States and Israel."
I don't believe we've got to 2,000. I've been asking the church to begin to
intercede that these suitcases be caught; that these terrorists be caught.
Because Satan intends to start the THIRD WORLD WAR ahead of time. We are going
to have a third world war. It's going to happen. But I'm sure it's not going to
happen before the timing that has been set. [If] one of those explode in San
Francisco, we'd have bombers immediately on their way with atomic warheads and
we'd be in a Third World War. By the way, all of your money would be worthless
then. And everything that you live by would be worthless. What would you do for
WATER? That would be blown up; you wouldn't have any water. AND THAT'S [WATER]
THE MAIN DANGER IN CALIFORNIA. Those things are going to happen. Do you know
what's around Mammoth Lake and some of those places? All the water flumes would
break to Los Angeles. There's a dam there called Hoover. When that thing
breaks, have you any idea of how many? There's 25 million people it would
affect. When that thing breaks, I saw underneath the Salton Sea, and I've spoke
that the real trembling and everything would begin around the Salton Sea, and
that the next warning would come around the Salton Sea. Well, it did. Joshua
Tree and Landers, is where this last one came, which was a warning! I believe
the next one is getting ready to happen when this volcano will erupt when the
plates can't take the pressure anymore. And I believe the pressure are melting
the plates down there to where this has got to be vented, and these earthquakes
are just a sign of what is getting ready to happen. It's getting ready to blow!
When it does, it will break loose all the way to the Sea of Cortez [the Gulf of
California], right up the Los Angeles river. And that plate in there will
separate from the United States, and you can drive a boat up that river. You
can go from the Gulf of Cortez to the Pacific Ocean [Bob mistakenly said the
"Atlantic" ocean]. And Death Valley will be a great inland sea. And
we aren't far from that. I really expect though, something Jim Bakker said,
even before this happens, OUR ECONOMY GETS DESTROYED WITH A GREAT EARTHQUAKE IN
JAPAN. TOKYO. Some of those around; it's already started. And they pull all of
our money out, and our stock market plummets (and it's in the Shepherd's Rod).
So all these things are ready. They aren't....This isn't something we're trying
to scare you with. It's something we're trying to prepare you to SURVIVE. For
one of the worst things that is going to happen to many of you at that time is
FEARING OF FEAR. It's running around like a chicken with his head cut off. It's
time for you to get grounded in your faith. You're going to have to put on
Christ to survive. You're going to have to take off the old man and the
unregenerated nature, and put on Christ.
Dream of Los Angeles NUKED -Revelation 18
Dream on 6/16/85 L.
I had a dream , I
don't know if I was in the spirit or body. I was at a fire station in Los Angeles, CA,
early in the morning hours. Its as if I was transferred there for a temporary
stay. I had my uniform and fire gear in my car. I reported to the captain and
was trying to find a bed to sleep in for the balance of the night. I went to
the dormitory, upstairs, and it was full of beds with men sleeping in them. It
was crowded and I found a bed with out a mattress. So I decided to go down
stairs, when I got there, there were other firemen milling around out in the
front of the station. I could see their faces and I knew some of them from my
earlier days as a fireman.(1962-1978). While outside I was talking to three
chiefs of different rank. While we were talking , a particular high ranking
chief ( I don't know who he was) came running out of the fire house towards his
chiefs car in his turnout clothes, in a panic and I mean Panic. He tried to get
in his chiefs car and drive away,!but his aid (fireman who drives for him)
stopped him from doing so. He kept hollering, "I have to get out of here,
I have to get out of here". The next thing I heard was a whaling noise
(siren). I looked up and heard a noise and saw, it seemed like thousands of jet
aircraft traveling fast with their afterburners blasting. (I was in the
airforce for four years.) There were literally thousands of them. It was dark
in the early morning and I could see the flames coming out of their engines
tail pipes. I made a commit to one of the chiefs, "There is thousands of
them".( They were fighter aircraft.) The chief was looking at me with a
scared look and I said to him, "Jesus is coming". When I said this
there was a bright flash in the sky and the heavens glowed with a bright light.
I fell to the ground and heard screaming of the men around me. I could feel the
heat of the light around me ( It was an atomic bomb) exploding in the Los Angeles area. I then
woke up and had the strangest feeling of emptiness that this is going to happen
in Los Angeles,
IT WAS SO REAL.
Richard D. Riding
San Diego Nuked?
Garrett Crawford - 4/15/07
I was standing over a small model city that had
a toy train in it. This city was San Diego. The toy train ran all through the
city and there was a nuclear bomb on the train. I was so obsessed with this
train and the nuclear bomb that was inside it. I would watch the train and see
where it went, constantly wondering when and where the bomb inside of it would
go off. This train was the focus of my attention and I did nothing but think
about it. After a while I began to lose my focus and my obsession for the train
and the bomb, and I walked away from the model city. After I walked away, the
train stopped and I never got to see if the bomb went off, if it ever even did.
California Nuked Into the Sea?
Sultana - 9/17/07
The year before 9/11, I dreamed of 4
explosions. I told my husband that the World Trade Center was blown up and I
saw an explosion on the ground, then I saw the Pentagon explode.
In the fall of 2003 I began to hear the sound
of pinging like that of a submarine. I began to pray and ask God what this was
and He gave me this dream: I saw a small black submarine, shaped like a fat
cigar off the cost of California. Then I saw it fire a missile and hit the
land, breaking off and sinking a big part of California. Then I saw flood
waters sweep over a large part of the rest of California and I woke up.
(Note from David: I have heard
this before for California and Florida. The Russians and Americans were doing
research to use nukes to turn the earth beneath large areas fluid to sink
I originally saw this warning at a
page on at Asia Times Online website but it was retracted a few hours later.
You can view the retraction and I have included most of the
relevant text below on this page.
There is a good article about this
story at Earth Changes TV and there is more at the 'Details Here' website. Although the verdict of
the Snopes website is that the statement is a
hoax, the evidence that they do have suggests it wasn't written with the
intention of being read by an English speaking audience, and they don't know
who wrote it originally.
It is not possible to be sure if the content of the article is true - but it is
all possible. There are supporting articles at:
Al-Jazeera was granted an interview with one Mohammed al-Usuquf, allegedly
al-Qaeda's number three. Al-Usuquf's most startling revelation is that
"Atomic bombs won't be launched, they are already there". "Seven
nuclear heads have already been positioned on American soil, before September
11, and they are ready to be detonated. Before September 11, American security
was a fiasco, and even later, if we needed, we could position the bombs there.
They arrived through seaports, as normal cargo. A nuclear head is not bigger
than a fridge, so it can easily be camouflaged as one. Thousands of containers
arrive at a seaport every day, and even with very efficient security, it's
impossible to check and examine each one of them."
Al-Usuquf says that the bombs were
bought on the black market: five from the former USSR and two from Pakistan.
The five Russian heads "are from T-3 missiles, also known as RD-107, and
their power is around 100 kilotons each, that is five times the Hiroshima bomb.
The Pakistani ones are less powerful, something around 10 kilotons each."
Each of the Russian bombs would have
cost around $200 million. Al-Qaeda was able to raise the money "because we
have many sponsors. Many countries sponsor us, and also some very rich
people." And not all of these are Arab countries. "Some European
countries as well are also interested in the fall of the US." As to the
"rich people", they are "people who are also tired of seeing the
US bleeding the rest of the world."
And Iraq's Saddam Hussein, says
Al-Usuquf, is not one of these people, "but just a collaborator,
represented by Abdul TawabHawaish, his vice prime minister and responsible for
Iraq's arms program".
Al-Usuquf says that the bombs cannot
be detected by US authorities. "Even if they are old, they were modernized
and are very well hidden. Even if they were located, they have auto-detonation
mechanisms in case something or someone gets close. Even an electromagnetic
pulse is not capable of deactivating them." The bombs allegedly cannot be
detected because "they are enveloped in thick layers of lead". They
could be detonated "by various methods - cell phone call, radio frequency,
seismic shock or by their regressive clock".
Al-Usuquf details the whole plan.
"First, one head would be detonated, which would cause the deaths of
800,000 to 1 million people and a chaos never seen before. During this chaos,
two or three planes, which are now disassembled inside barns near empty roads
in the US countryside, would take off in suicide missions to pulverize another
two or three big American cities with chemicals. Once the disease was
identified, all seaports and airports would be quarantined. Land borders would
also be closed. No plane, boat or car would enter or leave the US. This would
be total chaos." The first target would be the city "that would offer
the best conditions, for example bright sky and winds of eight or more miles an
hour blowing towards the center of the country, so radioactive dust can
contaminate the largest possible area".
This attack would not knock out the
US, recognizes al-Usuquf, "But the process would be initiated. As with the
World Trade Center, it would be just a question of time for the whole economic
structure to be turned to dust. If the objectives are reached with one bomb and
diseases, probably we will save the lives of other people, but it's risky, and
probably six more bombs will be detonated, one a week, and more attacks with
chemical weapons will be launched." According to estimates made by
al-Usuquf "and Ayman al-Zawahiri", al-Qaeda's number 2, about 15
million people would die, victims of the bombs and the radiation. Among those contaminated
by diseases, "25 percent will die, a figure around more than 5 million,
plus many others due to the chaos and disorder".
Al-Usuquf does not fear an American
military response. "Even if five or 10 cities are chosen at random to be
destroyed, it will still be a small price to pay. The problem is that the
economic despair will be so great that even if it saves [money] by not using
weapons, American liquidity will be near zero, and the US will make more money
selling a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier to Turkey or Italy for $5 billion,
because they will urgently need to recapitalize. But it will be too late.
Moreover, what will remain of an American soldier's morale to fight knowing
that his whole family died and his country ceased to exist? To fight for
The world economy would not
collapse, says al-Usuquf, although "in the beginning, it will be very
difficult. But without the US the world will soon rise in a more just and
fraternal manner. Nothing can stop the plan."
And whatever America does,
"it's too late." When will the attack begin? "I can't
Sunday, December 7, 2003
Q: "How does Al Qaeda intend to
destroy the most powerful nation in
A: "It's a question of
logistics. Using its own poison, that is,
attacking the heart of what they consider the most important thing in
the world: money." -Mr. Mohammed Al-Asuquf, Al Qaeda Third-in-command
Al-Asuquf: "The beginning will
be the detonation of a nuclear device,
which will cause the death of between 800 thousand and one million
people and create chaos on a scale never seen before. During this
chaos, two or three crop sprayers that are now dismantled and stored
in granaries [silos?] close to little-used highways in the
countryside will take off on suicide missions to spray two or three
large American cities with smallpox. That means that once the
smallpox has been identified, all airports and seaports will be
closed by quarantine. Land borders will likewise be shut down. Not
one airplane, ship or vehicle will enter or leave the United States.
This will cause total chaos. White House Press secretary Ari
Fleischman will be very busy."
HOW, WHY AND WHEN TO DESTROY THE UNITED STATES
Is this interview a hoax as the
"powers-that-be" want us to believe?
When you read it, you will see why it has been suppressed, especially
to citizens in the United States...
Yes, it is a hoax, to the extent the
masses continue to believe in
the reality of Al Qaeda, rather than its creators-worldwide
intelligence agencies funding the whole show, and in the case of the
Mossad, its actual participation at strategic intervals.
December 1, 2002 -
The following interview was
conducted by a reporter for the Al-
Jazeera network with the third-in-command of the Al Qaeda
organization, Mr. Mohammed Al-Asuquf. Al-Asuquf's background is
impressive; a doctorate in physics and masters in international
economics. In the interview, he talks of Al Qaeda's plans with total
detachment, with deep knowledge and an unshakeable commitment to his
This interview was sent to Abel-Bari
Atwan, chief editor of Al Quds,
an Arabic-language newspaper published in London, but was never
printed, due to its highly revealing [inflammatory?] contents. A copy
of the interview came to Foz-do-Iguaçu, and was translated into
Portuguese by a university professor in the city's Arab community.
This is probably the only existing
version of this interview not in
Al-Jazeera: What is the objective of
the Al Qaeda network?
Al-Asuquf: To destroy the Great
Satan, that is, the United States and
Incorrect, the Great Satan is the
manipulating the world's power positions.
Al-Asuquf: The USA over the past 60
years has been impregnating
[infecting] the world with its arrogance, greed and malfeasance. It
is the incarnation of all that is evil. The people of this planet
don't deserve this torture.
There is no USA per se; the
satanically controlled leadership marches
to the drumbeat of the long planned agenda for singular global
control, currently in its final stages. The destruction of the US,
via the Trojan horse of terrorism, is the created problem, while also
serving as a final catalyst for global governance.
Al-Jazeera: Isn't this view somewhat
Of course it is, how else could
conflict be elevated unless both
sides created reasons to do so.
Al-Asuquf: No; one only has to
observe recent events. The disrespect
of the Kyoto treaty; the case of the Permanent Court of International
Justice, their inaction with regards to our Palestinian brothers; the
financial greed and absurd speculations in Third World countries; the
complete indifference to other oppressed people and countless other
situations which all of the world's leaders well know. And on top of
all that, the Bush doctrine of "shoot first and ask questions later."
This is an unacceptable abuse and will therefore have very grave
Who can argue with those statements?
Al-Jazeera: But the isn't the
development and influence of America
the fruit of its own competence?
Al-Asuquf: Competence in extortion,
competence in subjugation,
competence in lying. After the Second World War, the USA was the only
industrialized country with its manufacturing infrastructure intact.
Loaning money like a good loan shark, it ended up becoming a very
rich and powerful country; however, its greed remained undiminished.
Today, Americans live like maharajas [?], wasting more than any other
people, spending more than $80 billion per year just on gambling.
They've lost any notion of spirituality and live in constant sin.
With each passing day the USA demonstrates that it doesn't know how
to live with other peoples; for this, it deserves destruction.
Yes, this is true, but the U.S.
change of character is simply the
movie being played out, regardless of whether Al-Asuquf is a willing
pawn or not.
Al-Jazeera: Wouldn't it be easier to
simply assassinate President
Al-Asuquf: In the first place, it
would do no good, other than
turning him into a martyr. When you face a powerful enemy, the best
strategy is not to kill him, but to make him lose his leadership due
to his incompetence, and let him live to watch this unfold.
His removal is immaterial.
Al-Jazeera: Does the Al Qaeda
network have the military capacity to
make war on the United States?
Al-Asuquf: If we analyze history, we
will see that all great wars,
before they were started, were based on previously established
concepts [of war]. But if we observe well, we will see that these
concepts and strategies came to nothing, since a new type of war was
ultimately waged. An example is the construction of the Maginot line
by the French before the First World War, which, in reality proved to
be completely useless against the invading forces. Aircraft carriers,
nuclear submarines, and spy satellites will be useless in the next
Al-Jazeera: American authorities
hold more than 1,000 people
suspected of terrorism since September 11th. Won't this compromise Al
Al-Asuquf: Of those imprisoned,
perhaps 20 to 30 percent belong to Al
Queda. Moreover, they are from the second echelon. We have more than
500 members of the first echelon and 800 from the second, inside the
Al-Jazeera: What do you mean by
first and second echelons?
Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon are
Al Qaeda members who have been in
the United States for more than 10 years, many married with children.
They have detailed knowledge of our plans and are just waiting for a
phone call. They are also known as "sleepers." Those of the second
echelon have arrived in the last five years and have no idea of our
Al-Jazeera: Are even those who are
married, with children, ready to
die with their families?
Al-Asuquf: Yes. All of them are
ready to die. Long live September
Yes, it was the kickoff to the big
Al-Jazeera: What was September 11th
to Al Qaeda's overall plans?
Al-Asuquf: As a general step, it was
just the beginning. It was a way
of calling the world's attention to what is still to come.
Al-Jazeera: How many members does Al
Al-Asuquf: In the first echelon,
about 5,000; in the second, about
20,000, all over the world.
Al-Jazeera: In the detention camp at
Guantanamo, are there any
members of the first echelon?
Al-Asuquf: No, in fact, many of
those there are not even Al Qaeda
Al-Jazeera: How does Al Qaeda intend
to destroy the most powerful
nation in history?
Al-Asuquf: It's a question of
logistics. Using its own poison, that
is, attacking the heart of what they consider the most important
thing in the world: money.
Al-Jazeera: How so?
Al-Asuquf: The American economy is
an economy of false appearances.
There is no real economic ballast to the American economy. The
American GDP of is something around $10 trillion, of which just 1
percent represents agriculture, and just 24 percent represents
industry. Therefore, 75 percent of the American GDP is service and
most of this is financial speculation. For those who understand
economics, and it appears that the American Secretary of the
Treasury, Paul O'Neil, doesn't or doesn't see it, it's enough to say
that the USA acts like a huge "dot-com," and dollars, strictly
speaking, are its shares.
Al-Jazeera: Can you explain that?
Al-Asuquf: The value of a company's
shares is directly proportional
to the profitability of the enterprise. When a business is just a
service provider and doesn't produce any durable goods, the value of
its shares depends on its credibility. Which is to say that if the
credibility of the USA were shaken, its shares (the dollar) would
fall with incredible rapidity and the entire American economy would
begin to collapse.
Al-Jazeera: How can you be so sure
Al-Asuquf: On a smaller scale, it's
exactly what large financial
groups do to the countries of the third world to reap profits in one
month that Swiss banks couldn't get in four or five years.
Al-Jazeera: So how will Al Qaeda
shock the American economy to this
Al-Asuquf: By provoking a deficit of
between $50 and $70 trillion
dollars, the equivalent of the United States' GDP for five to seven
Al-Jazeera: How will this be done?
Al-Asuquf: With the destruction of
the seven largest American cities,
along with other measures.
Al-Jazeera: By what means will this
Al-Asuquf: Using atomic bombs.
Nothing new here.Sollog has warned
for three years now to leave all
western cities due to the danger of nuclear attacks, which he says,
will destroy major cities and with it the global power of the U.S.
Al-Jazeera: With all of the security
in the USA, how, hypothetically,
will these bombs be smuggled onto American soil?
Al-Asuquf: They won't be smuggled
in, they're already there.
Al-Jazeera: What are you saying?
Al-Asuquf: There are already seven
nuclear devices on American soil
which were put in place before September 11th and are ready to be
Al-Jazeera: How did they get in to
Al-Asuquf: Before September 11,
American security was a fiasco, and
even after, were it necessary, we could manage to smuggle bombs into
the United States. They entered through seaports, as normal cargo.
Previously reported during the past
Al-Jazeera: How is that possible?
Al-Asuquf: A nuclear device is no
bigger than a refrigerator;
therefore, it can be easily camouflaged as one. Millions of cargo
containers arrive in seaports each day, and no matter how efficient
security is, it's impossible to check, search through and examine
Al-Jazeera: Where did these atomic
bombs come from?
Al-Asuquf: They were purchased on
the black market.
Al-Jazeera: From whom?
Al-Asuquf: We bought five from the
defunct Soviet Union and two more
Previously reported as well.
Al-Jazeera: How is it possible to
buy an atomic bomb? Isn't there
Al-Asuquf: Before 1989 it was
practically impossible, however after
the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Russian army began a process of self
destruction, and some high generals began to lose their privileges,
and therefore, highly susceptible to corruption. Even General Lebeb,
now deceased, and Hans Blix, the head of the arms inspection
commission of the United Nations, have stated this, notwithstanding
denials by Russian Defense Minister SegueyIvanov.
Al-Jazeera: How much does a nuclear
Al-Asuquf: Somewhere around $200
Al-Jazeera: How did Al Qaeda get
Al-Asuquf: We have numerous
Yes, quite accurate. All Illuminati
Al-Jazeera: Who are they?
Al-Asuquf: There are a number of
countries, which support us, and
also numerous wealthy individuals.
Al-Jazeera: Are all of these
Al-Asuquf: No, there are some
European countries as well which have
an interest in the fall of the USA.
Al-Jazeera: Who are these wealthy
Al-Asuquf: People who are also tired
of watching the USA suck the
wealth out of the rest of the world.
Not exactly. First of all they are
not exactly people, secondly,
they intend to take it all for themselves.
Al-Jazeera: Is Saddam Hussein one of
Al-Asuquf: You could say that he's
just one of the collaborators,
through Abdul Tawab Mullah Hawaish, his vice-prime minister and the
person responsible for Iraq's arms program.
Al-Jazeera: Are these atomic bombs
Al-Asuquf: The five Russian devices
are from the old T-3 missiles,
also known as RD-107s, and their potency is something around 100
kilotons each, that is, 5 times as powerful as the Hiroshima bomb.
The Pakistani bombs are less powerful, somewhere around 10 kilotons.
This is new. My information, passed
on three years ago, indicated
only lower yield suitcase devices.
Al-Jazeera: Can't the bombs be
detected and disarmed by American
Al-Asuquf: No, in spite of their age
they've undergone modernization
and are well hidden. Even if they were found, they have auto
detonation provisions should anything get close to them. Even
electromagnetic pulses would be incapable of deactivating them.
Al-Jazeera: Don't they emit
radiation? Can't they be detected?
Al-Asuquf: No. They are wrapped in
thick leaden cases.
Al-Jazeera: A suspected Pakistani
ship was recently searched and all
that was found were lead bars. Does this have anything to do with the
Al-Asuquf: Yes, however that lead
was just an extra layer, and was
not essentially necessary.
Al-Jazeera: How will the bombs be detonated?
Al-Asuquf: There are numerous
methods, a cell-phone call, radio
frequency, seismic shocks or by timer.
Al-Jazeera: Once detonated, how many
deaths will be caused by these
Al-Asuquf: It depends, since our
plans are very malleable.
Al-Jazeera: So what is the entire
Al-Asuquf: The beginning will be the
detonation of a nuclear device,
which will cause the death of between 800 thousand and one million
people and create chaos on a scale never seen before. During this
chaos, two or three crop sprayers that are now dismantled and stored
in granaries [silos?] close to little-used highways in the
countryside will take off on suicide missions to spray two or three
large American cities with smallpox. That means that once the
smallpox has been identified, all airports and seaports will be
closed by quarantine. Land borders will likewise be shut down. Not
one airplane, ship or vehicle will enter or leave the United States.
This will cause total chaos. White House Press secretary Ari
Fleischman will be very busy.
Al-Jazeera: But the American
government has guaranteed that within
five days it could produce enough smallpox vaccine to inoculate the
Al-Asuquf: There will be
simultaneous suicide attacks against the
vaccine production plants.
Al-Jazeera: Which will be the first
Al-Asuquf: The first city will be
that in which optimal conditions
present themselves, for example, clear skies, and winds of eight
miles-per-hour or less in the direction of the country's center so
that radioactive dust can contaminate the maximum possible area.
Al-Jazeera: Will this attack
annihilate the USA?
Al-Asuquf: No. But the process will
have begun. Who will buy food
products from the United States knowing they may have been
contaminated by radiation? Who will travel to the United States
knowing the possibility of contracting smallpox? Who will continue to
invest in American institutions? Just as with the World Trade Center,
it will be simply a question of time before the entire economic
structure collapses and turns to dust. If our objectives are reached
with one bomb and the smallpox, probably we'll save the lives of
others, however that's risky [unlikely?], and it's probable that six
more bombs will be detonated, one per week, and other attacks with
chemical weapons will be carried out.
Al-Jazeera: How many innocent people
Al-Asuquf: According to estimates
made by me and Ayman Al-Zawahiri,
somewhere around 15 million due to the atomic bombs and their
radiation. Of those exposed to smallpox, 25 percent will die,
approximately five million, and many more due to the ensuing chaos
Al-Jazeera: What about the American
Al-Asuquf: There will practically be
none. Even if five or ten cities
were chosen at random to be destroyed, that would still be a small
price to pay. The problem is the economic despair will be so great
that even economizing by not using arms unnecessarily will occur,
since the liquidity of American goods will be almost zero and at that
point the United States will make more selling its Nimitz-class
aircraft carriers, which cost about five billion dollars, to Turkey
or Italy for one billion dollars, since the country will so urgently
need to recapitalize, though it will be too late. Moreover, how will
the morale of American soldiers be knowing that their entire families
have died and their country no longer exists. Fight for what?
Al-Jazeera: And won't the global
economy also be ruined?
Al-Asuquf: In the beginning it will
be very difficult; a serious
economic crisis will ensue. However, without the United States, the
world will soon arise in a more just and fraternal manner.
Al-Jazeera: And Israel?
Al-Asuquf: As they say... it will be
Al-Jazeera: Does bin Laden's
spokesman, Sulaiman Abu Gheith, know
that you are giving this interview?
Al-Asuquf: It was he and bin Laden
who suggested I give it.
Al-Jazeera: Osama bin Laden is still
Al-Asuquf: He is quite healthy, alongside
his commanders Mohammed
Atef and Khalid Shaik Mohammed and Mullah Omar.
Al-Jazeera: Aren't you fearful that
Al Qaeda's plans will be
No, just the link to the Illuminati.
Al-Asuquf: The plan is already in
its countdown, and nothing can stop
Al-Jazeera: Not even if the United
States asks forgiveness and
changes its attitudes?
Al-Asuquf: That won't happen, and
even if it did, it's too late.
Al-Jazeera: When will the attack
I can't reveal that. Allah Akbar.
Suppose terrorists set
off a nuclear bomb in a container in the Port of Long Beach?
"...terrorists conceal a 10-kiloton nuclear bomb in a shipping
container and ship it to the Port of Long Beach. Unloaded onto a pier, it
explodes shortly thereafter. This is referred to as a “ground-burst” as opposed
to an “airburst” explosion."
This is the sort of thing they think about at RAND: New
RAND study models consequences of a nuke attack on a port. (Charles
Meade and Roger Molander, August 2006)
I learned about this from the Homeland
Security Watch blog
The immediate impact is:
The infrastructure and ships in the Port of Long Beach and the
adjoining Port of Los Angeles are completely destroyed by the blast and
Sixty thousand people die or will die soon because of direct
blast effects and radiation poisoning.[/*]
The radioactive fallout of water and sediment from the port
exposes 150,000 people to hazardous radiation levels, requiring prompt
Six million people will try to evacuate the Los Angeles region
to avoid the radioactive fallout.[/*]
Gasoline is in critically short supply because of the effects
on refineries in the Long Beach area. Long Beach refines approximately
one-third of gasoline west of the Rockies, and there is no pipeline
infrastructure to import supplies to the region.[/*]
Radioactive fallout contaminates a 500-km region, prohibiting
residence for 10–20 years. Two to three million residents will require
It may not be simple to redirect incoming shipping to alternative ports -
even with advance planning:
The principal challenge on this issue involves the conflict between the
political desire to mitigate the risks of future attack compared with the
business requirements for continued operation of the ports and the global
shipping supply chain... Viewed from a national security perspective, there
could be an immediate call to close all U.S. ports to incoming traffic. In
contrast, parts of the business community might advocate an early opening of
the ports. However, financial and real estate interests may require financial
risk protection before shipping could resume, and this would be almost
impossible to acquire following the Long Beach explosion. At the same time,
there could be a large-scale exodus from U.S. port cities by local populations
fearing the prospect of a second attack. Taken together, these results suggest
there are reasonable prospects for extended closures of all U.S. ports
following the Long Beach scenario, or at least for periods of substantially
reduced operations. The issue is analogous to the cancellation of airline
traffic following the 9/11 attacks, but the problem is much greater given the
difficulties of screening 20,000 shipping containers per day originating from
ports all over the world.
From a business perspective, the problems revolve around the vital
economic role of U.S. ports and the global shipping supply chain. Taken
together, the Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles are the largest port of entry
to America, and the third largest in the world, handling 30 percent of U.S.
shipping imports by value in 2003. If all U.S. ports were closed, it would have
large economic implications for almost all domestic business operations, and it
would lead to severe disruptions in the availability of basic goods and
petroleum in the United States. That is, there is a high probability that
the Long Beach scenario would have large economic consequences at great
distances from the initial nuclear explosion. It would also have important
repercussions for global business activity because the value of imports and
exports from all U.S. ports represents 7.5 percent of world trade activity. In
the wake of these economic effects, it seems reasonable to assume that there
would be large declines in world stock markets, in contrast to the relatively
limited financial losses that followed the 9/11 attacks. While those attacks
were unprecedented, they had only minor consequences for the economic
infrastructure of the United States.
In February I posted on a relatively more upbeat assessment of an attack on
a port: What
do you do, when the bomber gets through? (February 26, 2006)
August 20, 2006
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Suppose
terrorists set off a nuclear bomb in a container in the Port of Long Beach?:
Study of Nuclear Terrorism from EclectEcon
Suppose: "...terrorists conceal a 10-kiloton nuclear bomb in a shipping
container and ship it to the Port of Long Beach. Unloaded onto a pier, it
explodes shortly thereafter. This is referred to as a “ground-burst” as
Tracked on August 23, 2006 at 07:56 AM
What do you do, when the bomber gets through?
The terrorist bomber won't always get through, but the odds are good that,
despite our best efforts, he'll (or she'll) get through once and a while.
The damage will be reduced if we've thought ahead. This goes for
Jonathan Haveman is a
trade economist. Here's another input into the port security production
function, from his publication, In Search of Greater
Policy Vision for Port Planning and Security (February 2004):
There are big questions regarding port security that are not being
asked. Perhaps the most important is: What is the most effective way to reduce
the likelihood of an attack on a U.S. port?
Here, there is a pair of alternatives: eliminating vulnerabilities, as
current policies do, or implementing a good recovery plan, which current
policies fail to do. Although these are alternatives, they are not exclusive.
The most effective protection will likely involve a combination of the two.
This is so, because in reality, it is unlikely that all vulnerable points will
be covered. Given that there is always some risk remaining, the most
cost-effective means for reducing risk further may be through reducing the
attractiveness of the target.
By way of example, suppose that the ports on the San Pedro Bay were put out
of commission by an explosion for six months. In the absence of a well
thought-out recovery plan, much of the trade destined for U.S. shores would sit
idly by as flows were haphazardly redirected. With a plan in place for this
eventuality, ships far out to sea could easily redirect as soon as the event
occurred, reducing the adjustment cost associated with the port closure. As the
cost of a port closure is reduced, the appeal of an attack on the port is
similarly reduced. Pursuing both sides of the coin would seem the prudent
approach to reducing the likelihood and resulting impact of an attack on a U.S.
In order to most efficiently allocate the limited resources devoted to port
security, spending should be focused on effectively reducing the likelihood of
an event. This means paying attention to both increasing the difficulty of
assaulting a port and mitigating the costs of an event after the fact. Coming
to this conclusion requires greater vision than is currently evidenced in
current port security planning.
I'm not so sure that this would deter an attack on a port. This
probably wouldn't affect the emotional impact of a successful attack; I think
that impact is the terrorist's main objective. But it would reduce the
economic costs of an attack, and contribute to the economy's resiliency in the
face of the terrorist threat.
I learned about Haveman's work from Daniel Drezner,
who recommends: "An excellent primer on port security can be found in Jon D. Haveman, Howard J.
Shatz, and Ernesto A. Vilchis (2005) "U.S. Port Security Policy after
9/11: Overview and Evaluation", Journal of Homeland Security and
Emergency Management: Vol. 2: No. 4, Article 1."
A subscription is required for access to this. Here is a PowerPoint
presentation by these authors on this issue: An Overview
of Port Security Programs .
Revised: title change Feb 27.
Posted: November 08, 2001
1:00 am Eastern
By David Dolan
© 2011 WorldNetDaily.com
Does Osama bin Laden possess the ultimate weapon –
a nuclear bomb – in one form or another? Amid the heightened terrorist alert in
the United States and elsewhere, examination of this radiating topic
reverberates around the halls of Western governments, security services and in the international press.
Meanwhile, I continue to be haunted by the words
of an FBI agent, spoken to me when I was visiting Washington, D.C., in 1995. He
revealed that federal officials had uncovered "substantial evidence" that bin Laden's al-Qaida
terrorist network had
smuggled several Soviet-built nuclear suitcase bombs into the United States.
Although the ultimate proof of this contention would be an explosion that no
one but America's worst enemies wants to take place, the circumstantial
evidence is apparently compelling enough to keep sending Vice President Dick
Cheney to his "undisclosed location."
The fact that the Kremlin built such weapons is
accepted by most Western spy agencies, even if one of the first persons to
publicly reveal it was the controversial Russian General Alexander Lebed. He
claimed in 1996 that negligent post-Soviet Russian officials had lost track of
an astounding 134 of these deadly mini devices, thought to be capable of
completely leveling everything within a couple miles of ground zero – not to
mention covering an even wider area with carcinogenic nuclear poisons.
Even if just a few of the suitcase nukes are
unaccounted for, it would be a few too many.
Reports continue to circulate that some of these
field nuclear devices ended up in the hands of Chechen Muslim groups, who
passed them along (for a substantial price) to bin Laden. While this has not
been concretely proved as far as I can tell, it is clear to Western security
agencies that Chechen rebels have close connections to al-Qaida and its
notorious leader. That bin Laden desperately desires to acquire nuclear bombs
is also quite evident, given that he has publicly said so.
On top of the strong possibility that the Arabian
terrorist leader has gotten his jihad hands on KGB-built portable-luggage
bombs, it is clear that he has strong supporters in the Pakistani nuclear
scientific community. Pakistan's chief nuclear engineer, Bashiruddin Mahmoud,
has not hidden his glowing affection for the turbaned desert warrior. Still, it
is thought to be extremely unlikely that he might have been able to arrange a
nuclear weapons transfer to al-Qaida operatives. Yet his advice would be
invaluable if bin Laden succeeded in getting the material needed to build a nuclear
device from elsewhere, as many experts fear he has probably done.
The contention that bin Laden would have no moral
qualms about using such a hideous weapon on his perceived infidel enemies, even
if most were civilians, is self evident. After all, it was not the recently
revealed CIA office near the World Trade Center that was his main target on
Sept. 11. The Saudi dissident realized that the twin towers would be full on a
Tuesday morning with civilian workers going about their daily jobs. If 5,000 infidel
lives are good to take, surely 500,000 are much better.
Chemical strike on New York
Seemingly confirming that mass slaughter is the
ultimate goal of some Islamic terrorist militants, I was told by another
American security official while visiting the Midwest a few years ago that the
original World Trade Center attack in 1993 had a non-conventional chemical
component. He further revealed that this fact was concealed from the public on
orders of senior
officials in the Clinton administration, although he did not impute them with
evil motives in doing so. He opined that the administration apparently did not
want to "worry" the general public with such frightening details.
According to my source, deadly nerve agents were
placed amid the explosives that blew up in the parking garage underneath the
WTC. The Arab terrorists – whom he thought were probably linked to Saddam
Hussein – apparently hoped that the debilitating chemicals would be widely
dispersed by the truck bomb explosion, killing thousands of people in nearby
portions of lower Manhattan. In the actual event, the
heat of the intense fire that followed the
powerful blast quickly destroyed all but a few traces of the chemical agents,
said my source.
There is substantial circumstantial evidence that
this same "look the other way" attitude carried the day after the TWA
Flight 800 explosion in the skies off of Long Island a few years later. After
all, why spoil the "feel good" '90s with the reality that despite the
collapse of the dreaded Soviet Union, America still had real enemies out there
plotting to reduce her to ashes?
Some who see darker motives behind such apparent
government complacency might wonder if the secular humanist propensity to
totally ignore the Islamic fundamentalist terrorist threat until forced to do
otherwise on Sept. 11 does not reveal something far more sinister. Indeed,
there is apparent room to wonder if some Western secular-humanist leaders –
especially those who openly disdain their fellow humans who choose to look to
the heavens for Divine guidance – have not long viewed the growing Islamic
terrorist menace as a powerful tool to further their ultimate goal of ushering
in a New World Order.
Although Osama bin Laden and his mainly Middle
East henchmen might appear to come from the Middle Ages to most folks in the
West, he is clearly a very clever man. This is demonstrated by his carefully
crafted video sermons, designed to pull every possible chain to stir up the
Muslim masses in support of his self-declared holy war. This guy knows what he
is after, and probably has a long-range game plan of how to get there. It may
well include a nuclear explosion at an appropriate moment.
If you have been following this potential
hair-splitting aspect of the unfolding terrorist story in recent weeks, you
might know that many nuclear experts doubt that the alleged missing Soviet
devices are still able to perform their intended task. Such scientists assure
us that the tritium triggers needed to detonate the portable bombs have undoubtedly
decayed by now, rendering the devices useless. However, some note that it is
possible to recharge the triggers for someone who knows his way around such
technical concerns, which might include the Pakistani scientist Mahmoud.
At any rate, it is relatively easy to produce a
so-called "dirty bomb" comprised of regular explosives laced with
nuclear waste materials. Although the kill ratio would be relatively modest
from such a blast, it would still act as a powerful psychological weapon in a
terrorist war currently focused on the threat of more anthrax attacks.
I have not been able to secure any official
comment about recent media reports that alert Israeli security forces
intercepted a Palestinian terrorist trying to smuggle such a bomb into the Tel Aviv
area a couple weeks ago. It seems that government leaders here think that the
public is stressed out enough as it is, which is surely the case.
However, such an interception might help explain
why Prime Minister Ariel Sharon felt compelled to cancel his important trip to
the United States this week for "security reasons." After all, he is
no longer too upset with the Bush administration for attempting to force Israeli troops out
of Yasser Arafat's towns. Sharon is instead quite pleased that U.S. officials
have now officially placed the groups that were the main targets of his recent
army incursion – known activists belonging to the Popular Front PLO splinter
group, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad group – on the administration's official
terrorist list. He would be happier still if U.S. officials formally recognized
that members of Arafat's own Palestinian Authority have engaged in terror
strikes over the past year, but he knows that would be asking way too much.
If Osama and gang have anything nuclear hidden up
their flowing sleeves, why haven't they revealed this by launching an attack
before now? After all, al-Qaida and Taliban forces are being pummeled by
American aircraft in Afghanistan day after day, with no dramatic terrorist
response so far in the West other than possibly a few anthrax spores in some
The answer could be that recent U.S. government
warnings and stepped up security have thwarted such an attack, at least for
now. Or perhaps the terrorists have been deliberately giving out false
information to wear down weary American security forces and the general public,
waiting for a later day to act when the overall guard has dropped a little bit.
My guess is that the wily bin Laden is not
suffering all that badly at present, despite the massive American bombing
campaign. He knows that support for the counter-terrorism war is already waning
in the West, especially in Europe where hand wringing over relatively modest
civilian casualties is reaching fever pitch (when will all realize that this is
not a game of virtual war?). Meanwhile additional jihad warriors are crossing
over porous Afghan borders everyday, some coming from as far away as England
Without wishing to add to the terrorist problem by
further alarming any reader who is already having trouble sleeping at night, I
suggest that the Arabian "Robin Hood" may be waiting to unleash his
nuclear genii until he can achieve the maximum emotional Islamic response to
such a dastardly attack.
As a longtime friend and observer of many Arabs
belonging to the growing worldwide population of Mohammad's faithful followers,
I would nominate the holy month of Ramadan as the ideal time to strike. It is
always a period of heightened religious fervor in the Muslim world, as I have
witnessed many times firsthand. This year, Ramadan begins on Nov. 17. Such an
audacious terrorist assault would really get Osama's jihad struggle off the
ground – off the ground of the new Ground Zero.
Is the world facing all-out war
in the Middle East? Get David Dolan's "Israel in Crisis,"
Now available in WorldNetDaily's online store!
If you'd rather order by phone,
call WND's toll-free customer service line at 1-800-4WND-COM (1-800-496-3266).
David Dolan is a
Jerusalem-based author and journalist who has lived in Israel since 1980. He
reported for CBS Radio for over 12 years.
Read more: Osama's nuclear bombhttp://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25250#ixzz1IO3mvP7W
Hidden Bombs; Avian Flu; Translations
Nuclear Bomb hidden
in old warehouse in Los Angeles
In the early hours of Sunday morning, 10/9/05 I
had this dream.
(Note: For quite a few weeks now I have been
praying to the Lord that he visit all my friends and relatives around the world
in dreams, visions and revelations and show them that the tribulation is about
to start and that it was time to repent and turn to the Lord.)
I dreamt that I was in Los Angeles. I was
sitting on a table with an unsaved cousin of mine. He was telling me how the
Lord has been showing him dreams of the whereabouts of the enemy’s nuclear
bombs that have been hidden away in the U.S. He described to me an old,
derelict, rundown warehouse where a nuclear warhead was hidden. In the dream I
was really happy. God was answering my prayers and my friends and
relatives were being warned.
About 12.30AM, Monday morning, 10/10/05 I had
this intense dream.
In the dream I saw people panicking and fleeing
towards the East Coast of the United States. I was wondering what the people
were fleeing from. Then I heard the words “Avian Flu” or something that sounded
similar but I am sure it was Avian Flu. I saw soldiers mercilessly shooting
people who were slow to flee. As I looked at the soldiers the word “Nazi” came
to my mind. I then saw this Polynesian family who were slow to flee. The
parents had decided since they couldn’t make it they might as well hide under
the the big septic tank beside their home. Little did the family know that a
soldier had spotted them. Somehow I knew what soldier was thinking – he was
thinking of blowing up the whole septic tank along with the family.
As the chaos spread, I started praying and said
something like this: “Lord what do you want me to do?” Immediately, my
body had this bright, orange glow. I saw a few other people who had the same
orange glow on them. Like the others I could clearly hear the voice of the Lord
directing me on who to minister to. We were translated from place to place only
at the Lord’s direction. I remember telling a group of people what was
happening and leading them to the Lord. I then was directed to go to someone
whose name was Urn…This Urn had shared a prophecy which I was interested in. I
then woke up at about 1:00 AM thinking it was for real.
Preparing for Mass Destruction Attacks on Cities
John O. Edwards
Monday, July 15, 2002
FEMA, the federal agency charged
with disaster preparedness, is engaged in a crash effort to prepare for
multiple mass destruction attacks on U.S. cities - including the creation of
sprawling temporary cities to handle millions of displaced persons, NewsMax has
FEMA is readying for nuclear,
biological and chemical attacks against U.S. cities, including the possibility
of multiple attacks with mass destruction weapons.
The agency has already notified
vendors, contractors and consultants that it needs to be prepared to handle the
logistics of aiding millions of displaced Americans who will flee from urban
areas that may be attacked.
The agency plans to create
emergency, makeshift cities that could house hundreds of thousands, if not
millions, of Americans who may have to flee their urban homes if their cities
Ominously, FEMA has been given a
deadline of having the cities ready to go by January 2003 – in about six
A source familiar with the deadline
believes the effort is related to making the U.S. prepared for counterattacks
if the U.S. invades Iraq sometime next year.
FEMA is currently seeking bids from
major real estate management firms, and plans to name three firms in the near
future to handle the logistics and planning for these temporary cities.
FEMA officials have told these firms
they already have tents and trailers ordered. The tents and trailers would
provide shelter for displaced populations.
The real estate firms are expected
to provide engineers and architects to lay the plans for emergency
infrastructure needs, such as sewage and electricity.
Editor's Note: This story first
appeared in NewsMax's Insider Report - emailed to subscribers to NewsMax's news
alert service. To sign up for this free service - and receive many stories not
published on NewsMax.com - Click Here.
Read more on this subject in related
U.S. Vulnerable to Catastrophic Attack, Congress Told
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Despite the federal government's expensive efforts to
prevent terrorists from smuggling a nuclear weapon into the U.S., the nation
remains extremely vulnerable to a catastrophic attack, experts have warned a
Highly enriched uranium, a crucial
ingredient in a nuclear device, could be shielded with less than a quarter-inch
of lead, making it "very likely to escape detection by passive radiation
monitors," Benn Tannenbaum, a physicist and senior program associate at
the American Association for the Advancement of Science, testified at the June
21 hearing of the Homeland Security subcommittee.
Committee members were told that the monitors, now installed at ports and
border stations, can't distinguish between naturally occurring radiation from
everyday items like ceramic tile and the dangerous enriched uranium.
What's more, less than a quarter of the radiation devices needed to check
all goods crossing U.S. borders have been installed, federal officials told the
Bethann Rooney, manager of security for the Port Authority of New York and
New Jersey, testified that none of the cargo moving through the largest ship
terminal or goods leaving the port by rail or barge are inspected for
She added that the facility receives about 150 false alarms a day from its
22 radiation portal monitors.
Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-N.J.) said he was worried that the high number of
false alarms has prompted some agents to lower the sensitivity of the
detectors, making them less effective in spotting real danger.
The radiation detection systems installed across the U.S. are "quite
limited in their capabilities and, in general, are insufficient to the
task," said physicist Richard L. Wagner Jr., chairman of the Defense
Department task force on preventing a clandestine nuclear attack.
Said Rep. Pascrell: "I am not too hopeful about this situation."
In a related development, a survey of experts predicted that the likelihood
of an attack with a weapon of mass destruction somewhere in the world in the
next 10 years could be as high as 70 percent.
Most of the 85 experts who took part in the survey – commissioned by U.S.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Richard Lugar - believe that one or
two new countries will acquire nuclear weapons in the next five years, and as
many as five will get them during the next decade.
The survey found that the most significant risk of a WWD attack was from a
radiological weapon, a so-called "dirty bomb" that combines
radioactive material with a conventional explosive device.
The next highest risk was an attack with a chemical or biological weapon,
with a nuclear attack less likely, according to the experts, who included
retired Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf and former CIA Director James Woolsey.
The probability of an attack with any form of WMD was estimated at as high
as 50 percent over the next five years, increasing to as high as 70 percent in
offers details of bin Laden's nuclear plans – Click Here Now
Translation of Secret Chinese Military Manual – Details Here
immigration threatens our security and tears at the fiber of America – Click
Former CIA Director: Terrorist Strike Within U.S. Real Threat
Kenneth R. Timmerman
Tuesday, Aug. 7, 2007
CIA Director R. James Woolsey tells NewsMax in an exclusive interview that
terrorists could strike the American homeland — possibly with a weapon of mass
destruction — this summer or early fall.
He also warns that if Iran fails to comply with international efforts to
stop its nuclear weapons program, the U.S. will have no other option than to
"I think the threat of a serious attack in the next few months is very
real," Woolsey said. A terrorist strike with a dirty bomb or with
biological weapons was "a real possibility." [Editor's Note: Special: 6 Days of Hell - The Coming
War With Iran. Click here for more.]
Woolsey's comments echo those of FBI Director Robert Mueller, who told
NewsMax in May that al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear
device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.
Terrorists Plotting Now
While Woolsey doubted terrorists would be able to acquire a nuclear
explosive device, he warned that terrorists were trying to acquire one, either
on the black market from the former Soviet Union, or from Iran or North Korea.
The former CIA director said he favored "really tough sanctions"
on Iran for another few months, but if that failed to bring Iran's nuclear
weapons program to a halt, the United States had no other choice but to bomb
Iran's nuclear sites.
He also blasted those in the State Department who believe we can convince
the Iranians through negotiations to stop their nuclear programs. "I've
never thought there's a chance in hell of that," he said.
Asked what three things we need to do to make America more safe, Woolsey
said that the first and most important was not to tie the president's hands
when it came to intelligence collection.
Efforts by Democrats to require court orders to intercept international
communications amounted to "shooting ourselves in the foot," he
More Pressure on Iran
Next, he said the United States absolutely must step up pressure on Iran, by
focusing on Iran's weak economic underbelly and the wellspring of popular
discontent with the regime.
In the longer term, Woolsey said it was essentially that the U.S. beef up
its military forces and to prepare Americans psychologically and politically
for a long war with radical Islamic terrorists.
"I think this is a long war, and we need to treat it as such, and go on
a full war-footing," he said.
Woolsey had plenty more to say on the topic of Iran, wrapping up the
interview with a list of things needed to keep the United States safe.
NewsMax: Everyone now seems to agree that Iran poses a threat to the
United States. But opinions differ on what to do about it. Where do you stand
in the Iran policy debate in Washington?
Woolsey: I'm still in the camp, but probably only for a few more months, of
those who want to try really tough sanctions. And I mean, doing everything we
did to the Soviets in the Cold War, everything anybody could think of to
undermine their economic system.
Beginning right now, we need to work with those countries that sell refined
oil products to them, such as gasoline and diesel, of which they import about
40 percent, to figure out how to get those stopped.
We need broadcasting into Iran in the fashion we used to do on Radio Free
Europe during the Cold War into Eastern Europe. I testified about these things
last time nearly two years ago to a Senate committee, saying it was getting
late. So I don't know if sanctions can work. But I believe there is a chance
that really blocking their imports of gasoline and refined diesel would work,
by bringing a lot of dissention from minority groups which are nearly half of
the country, and from regular citizens, as happened a few weeks ago with
Ahmadinejad's gas rationing and increase in gas prices.
So I would still like to see us try that not half-heartedly but vigorously,
and not be deterred at all by the threats and the other steps that they will
Remember, the Persians invented chess. They're good at it.
Their most valuable piece, their "queen" really, is their nuclear
weapons program. Syria rises to the level of a rook, since that's a government.
Hamas, Moqtada al-Sadr, Hezbollah, they're all pawns.
Whether it was the war with Israel or what, they move their subordinate
pieces around in such a way as to protect their queen. Once they have a nuclear
weapon, the world changes in some extraordinarily unpleasant ways.
So I believe that for a short time — I don't know if its four to five
months, or a year, but it's surely not much longer than that — we can still try
tough sanctions, and all the other steps — the right kind of broadcasting, and
all the rest. And if that doesn't work, then we're in a situation where we have
a choice of letting Iran have a nuclear weapon, or using force. And at that
point, with great reluctance, just as I think he was reluctant to advocate it
but has done so, I agree with John McCain.
Force is the worst option except for one. And that is allowing Iran to have
a nuclear weapon.
NewsMax: The State Department seems to want to negotiate with Iran over
Iran's support for Iraqi insurgents. Is this wise?
Woolsey: I rarely flat oppose talking to adversaries, but the time you want
to do it is when you have an edge over them, not they have an edge over you.
I think that in spite of some recent military successes, the situation in
Iraq is particularly difficult with the Maliki government, and with Moqtada
Sadr on the whole relatively unconstrained, that they are relatively speaking
in a stronger position than I would like to see for us to take any initiative
It might have been different right after Baghdad fell, when clearly they
were very worried. That would have been a good time, if one felt there was
advantage to negotiations, to talk to them. But I am not confidant that we're
not going to have any positive effect from these negotiations.
NewsMax: Should the U.S. have seized what is being touted as an Iranian
initiative in April 2003?
Woolsey: I don't know how much of an initiative of theirs it was. I've heard
stories about it. All I'm saying is that if you're going to negotiate with an
adversary, the time to do it is when they are the demandeur, when they are
feeling weak and you have just demonstrated strength. And April-May 2003 was
such a time.
NewsMax: Do you see any signs that the administration is preparing to
take military action against Iran?
Woolsey: I don't know and I wouldn't necessarily know. If one was going to
use air power exclusively, which I think would be likely and appropriate, it
would not necessarily be something that would take a huge amount of lead time.
Probably two or three weeks, not two or three months.
NewsMax: Some Navy people have suggested to me that we would get our
carriers out of the Gulf first.
Woolsey: That would be a possibility, because it's a constrained sea, and
they have lots of small boats that could be used to attack with cruise missiles
on them, and they have cruise missiles with a range to potentially be effective
against U.S. naval forces in the Gulf, whereas the open ocean — the blue ocean
— is our "Briar Patch," as in the Uncle Remus story.
That's where we're at home and where we want to be. Certainly our carrier
aircraft have the range along with B-52s and B-1s and B-2s to reach targets in
Iran even if they're operating from the open ocean as distinct from the Gulf.
So I'm leaving it up to the admirals and the secretary of defense where and
when to put carriers. But my instinct would be that one would be better off in
the open ocean with several carriers rather than have some stay in the Gulf.
But there are weapons systems and tactics I may not be aware of.
NewsMax: Do you see any signs that the Iranians are preparing to take
military action against us? And how seriously should we take their threats?
Woolsey: I think you want to listen particularly to what they say to one
another. So their threats of destroying Israel, if they can, are as real as
"Mein Kampf." Their potential to unleash Hezbollah, which is the
world's most professional terrorist organization, much more capable really than
al-Qaida or others, could conceivably do a lot of damage in the U.S. as well as
various places abroad, including Iraq.
I don't think that's something that should deter us if we have to take
action to deter them from potentially having a nuclear weapon.
NewsMax: The director of national Intelligence, Adm. McConnell, FBI
Director Mueller, and the president have all warned that the terrorists want to
strike us again here at home. How real is the threat of a WMD attack — possibly
a nuclear attack — on the American homeland by terrorists?
Woolsey: Well, I think the threat of a serious attack in the next few months
is very real. It's what Mike McConnell and Mueller have said, and what Chertoff
said about his gut feeling.
A lot of people made fun of that, but I think that was a senior government
official trying to communicate something without saying here's my evidence,
because if he says that, he might have blown the source or method of
intelligence. So I think various things that he and McConnell and Mueller and
others have been saying all suggest that there's a real possibility — now I
don't know which particular terrorist group — of something happening and
possibly something very bad, late this summer or this fall.
I think that unless al-Qaida or the Iranians have been able to obtain a
loose old Soviet nuke, it's unlikely it could be a nuclear detonation. It might
be possible they could get hold of other nuclear material, like cesium or
strontium, which is much easier to get hold of, and have something like a dirty
bomb. And certainly biological material, like anthrax, is much easier to
produce and get hold of than fissionable material.
And we don't know what the North Koreans might be willing to sell to Iran.
They have essentially a joint ballistic missile development program; the Shahab
and the Taepo Doing/No Dong are essentially the same missile, certainly with
the same ranges.
North Korea has several bombs worth of plutonium, but plutonium bombs are
harder to construct than simple highly-enriched uranium bombs. We believe that
it's possible that North Koreans had a HEU program, and at one point they
seemed to admit it. But I don't know of any estimates of what they have or what
So if one's trying to think of a source of a bomb that terrorists, whether
al-Qaida or Hezbollah, might be trying to get their hands on today, a nuclear
weapon might be extremely difficult, unless they've been able to buy or
otherwise obtain one of the old Soviet suitcase nuclear weapons.
NewsMax: Do you think those are real?
Woolsey: Certainly the Soviets had atomic demolition munitions that were
relatively small — ours were smaller, I think. But each of us had ADMS that
could easily be carried by one man. That was also true of some of the smaller
nuclear artillery shells that existed. So it's not impossible that a terrorist
group could try to get hold of a former Soviet relatively small nuclear
NewsMax: Why do you think we've not been helping the pro-democracy groups
Woolsey: I don't know. It's one of the things that we advocated in the
committee on the present danger a couple of years ago, that I advocated to the
Senate Homeland Security Committee nearly two years ago. I suppose it's because
there are disagreements inside the U.S. government. Some people believe we can
talk the Iranians out of their nuclear program. I've never thought there's a
chance in hell of that.
NewsMax: What are the three things we need to do to make America more
Woolsey: Well, the thing that we can do in the short order that is most
important is not to cut back on our intelligence capabilities, whether it's
through restricting the president's ability to intercept communications or
otherwise. We know how to do that reasonably well and don't want to shoot
ourselves in the foot by cutting back on it.
The second thing are the steps we talked about with Iran, from broadcasting
to cutting off their imports of gasoline and diesel and all the other financial
and economic steps. Those would be the two in the really short order that would
be on top of my list.
Further down the line, I think we need a substantial increase in our
military forces, in our overall national stance of going on a war-footing. I
don't think this is just a law enforcement matter.
I think this is a long war, and we need to treat it as such; and go on a
full war-footing, from everything to making it easy for John Does to give
alerts when they see the flying imams doing their thing, to working closely
with allies in the Middle East, I think particularly with Israel. And a wide
range of similar steps.
Can America avoid a nuclear
‘D-Day'? Get the INSIDE story – Click Here Now.
Clerics Plan a Nuclear Showdown with the U.S. – Click Here!
alert: You must have emergency radio
Make your fortune
in Sectors – avoid the S&P! Click Here Now
Brain from Alzheimer's, Parkinson's
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Plans Nuclear Attacks on 7 U.S. Cities
Thursday, May 31, 2007
The newly released book "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of
America and the Western World," (Prometheus Books) paints a
frightening picture of al-Qaida's nuclear ambitions — one every American must
Seasoned investigative reporter and former FBI consultant Paul Williams
reveals the alarming potential for nuclear terrorism on U.S. soil and the
sinister connections among organized crime, illegal immigrants, and al-Qaida. [Editor's
Note: Get Paul Williams' explosive "The Day of Islam" FREE — Click
Recently, FBI Director Robert Mueller, in an interview with NewsMax,
confirmed Williams' main claim. Mueller said al-Qaida's paramount goal is
clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of
Mueller told NewsMax that at times, the threat feels so real he lies awake
at night thinking about the prospect.
Williams maintains that al-Qaida is not content on blowing up one nuclear
device or even simply a "dirty" nuke — but wants to explode real
nuclear devices in seven U.S. cities simultaneously.
Williams says these cities are New York, Washington, D.C., Las Vegas, Miami,
Boston, Houston, and Los Angeles.
Mueller seems to confirm this claim of multiple attacks, saying both New
York and Washington would be likely targets. Already Williams says the U.S.
government has Washington webbed by "choke" points to detect nuclear
For many Americans the threat of
al-Qaida's nuclear ambitions begins in the time after the horrific 9/11
But as Williams shows so clearly,
al-Qaida has been devising its nuclear plan since the early 1990s — and the
U.S. government and other intelligence services have been well aware of
For example, Williams quotes Michael
Scheuer, a senior CIA official who headed the agency's bin Laden unit.
Scheuer admitted the CIA "found
that [bin Laden] and al-Qaida were involved in an extraordinarily sophisticated
and professional effort to acquire weapons of mass destruction — in this case,
nuclear weapons; so, by the end of 1996, it was clear that this was an
organization unlike any other one we had ever seen."
Remember, Scheuer is describing the
period before 9/11, proving again that bin Laden had been investing enormous
time, resources, and money into getting nuclear weapons for more than 10 years.
Bin Laden and his adherents believe
this nuclear cataclysm will usher in "The Day of Islam," the dream of
radical Muslims to see all of humankind fall in submission before the throne of
Allah as the "Great Satan," America, is brought to her knees.
Williams is not surprised at all
that bin Laden has planned to launch such nuclear attacks, suggesting his delay
is consistent with his past pattern of activities. For sure, it is a plan that
has been long in its hatching.
Based on the "forgotten
testimony" of the FBI's "Confidential Source One," as well as
other sources, Williams first presents evidence of bin Laden's purchase of
highly enriched uranium in Sudan and nuclear devices from the Chechens and the
He then offers further information
on the workings of Pakistani scientists and technicians from the A.Q. Khan
Research Facility to maintain and upgrade al-Qaida's "bespoke nukes"
(with explosive yields in excess of 10 kilotons) for the "American
Williams explosive revelations are
even more worrisome because they are not simply backed up by speculation and
anonymous sources, they are sourced with government reports and comments made
"on the record" by top officials.
Among the explosive revelations in "The
Day of Islam":
In 1996, al-Qaida's "paymaster" and a top
lieutenant for bin Laden walked into a U.S. embassy in Africa and spilled
the beans on the terror group's activities — including that al-Qaida had
purchased nuclear material in the Sudan [/*]
The incredible story of a Brooklyn, N.Y., mosque that
was receiving "stipends" from Uncle Sam for more than $2 million
a year up until 1993 — when it was discovered the mosque was the nerve
center for the first attack on the World Trade Center [/*]
The fact that despite the hoopla about the war on
terror, only one member of bin Laden's shura — or high command — has been
The case of a Chicago charity that raised millions for
bin Laden and even paid for one of his operatives whose sole job was to
acquire nuclear weapons [/*]
Evidence the Saudi intelligence service claims bin
Laden has an arsenal of between 40 and 70 tactical nuclear weapons [/*]
Russian sources that claim bin Laden bought 12 to 15
fully assembled nuclear weapons [/*]
Ties between al-Qaida and the Chechen rebels who allegedly
acquired nuclear suitcase devices [/*]
Bin Laden's claim to a Pakistani journalist two months
before 9/11 that acquiring nuclear was "not difficult" —
claiming they were available from Russia for between $10 million and $20
Author Tom Clancy's revelations he was "first
bemused, then stunned" to find how easy it is for a wealthy person to
develop a nuclear device equal to that dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki [/*]
How atomic blueprints are available from Amazon.com! [/*]
Evidence bin Laden spent between $60 and $100 million
to build nuclear devices with the help of scientists from Pakistan,
Russia, and China [/*]
The damage even a low yield "junk" nuclear
device would do to New York — with an estimated 250,000 dead in several
The remarkable story of two British secret agents who
penetrated al-Qaida's camps in Afghanistan — and reported to Britain that
the terror group was finishing work on radiological weapons [/*]
The stunning admission of the head of Britain's MI5 who
confirmed that "renegade" scientists had provided al-Qaida with
the knowledge they needed to build a nuclear device [/*]
New Jersey: the strange case of a Pakistani who died of
radiological poisoning soon after 9/11, a man who had apparently served as
a "mule" to transport the deadly material into the U.S. [/*]
Axis of Evil: the secret alliance between al-Qaida and
Iran that brings together two religious groups with one common goal:
destroying the U.S. [/*]
And much, much more [/*]
[Editor's Note: Get Paul Williams'
explosive new book "The Day of Islam" FREE
— Click Here Now.]
In "The Day of Islam,"
Williams takes you on a virtual tour of al-Qaida and its global operations.
You will discover their operations
not only cross through Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, and other Muslim countries — but
through Latin America, Mexico, and even our neighbor Canada!
What emerges is a harrowing picture
of international terrorist activities, all aimed at the destruction of the
United States and the collapse of the Western world.
Williams also reveals the man who
has been tapped by bin Laden to lead the "Day of Islam" attack in the
U.S. — a man who served as the "fixer" of 9/11 and yet has never been
caught. He is believed to be here in the United States.
This dangerous man has wormed his
way into American culture: He speaks perfect English and passes himself off as
an Italian American. He is "the most dangerous man in the world."
FBI Director Mueller has called this
man "the next Mohamed Atta" — but most Americans have never heard of
him or seen his image. Williams expresses dismay that the FBI, well aware of
this terrorist's threat, has not fully alerted the American public.
Indeed, al-Qaida reportedly had 42
operatives as part of its 9/11 attacks, and some 23 remain as
"sleepers" in the United States.
Williams also reveals that
al-Qaida's operations continue here in the United States, supported by supplies
and personnel who simply slip through Mexico and across our porous border.
Williams names names — including top
al-Qaida operatives that have admitted that Mexico remains the main conduit
point for al-Qaida penetration into the United States. This includes the
smuggling of nuclear materials.
"The Day of Islam" also offers a full translation of the "fatwa" —
the religious order bin laden received in 2003 which "grants al-Qaida
permission to kill 10 million Americans by way of nuclear weapons."
For those who think that al-Qaida
has been disabled, dismembered, or neutralized, the "Day of Islam"
will provide a wake up call like never before.
Editor's note: Get Paul William's
explosive new book "The Day of Islam" FREE
— Click Here Now.
Read more on this subject in related
A Nuclear 9/11. It Could Happen.
is racing to acquire a nuclear device.
They want to detonate it in an American city.
A Newsmax report goes inside the effort to stop them.
A Hiroshima-sized nuclear device smuggled into the U.S. inside a cargo
container detonates in California's Port of Long Beach, killing 60,000 people
instantaneously, exposing another 150,000 to deadly radiation, touching off
massive fires and forcing the evacuation of 6 million panicked people in the
Los Angeles basin.
Could it happen?
Top experts say it not only could happen, it is "more likely than
not" to occur within the next several years.
Last month the Obama administration admitted that al-Qaida is frantically
trying to acquire a nuclear device.
Now Newsmax magazine talks to some of the top experts in the U.S.,
including interviews with former CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden and current
FBI Director Robert Mueller.
In Newsmax magazine's special report, "Nuclear D-Day,"
we take an in-depth look at the frightening and ever-growing threat of a
nuclear attack orchestrated by terrorists or a rogue state like Iran.
The report was written by New York Times best-selling author and Newsmax
Contributing Editor Kenneth R. Timmerman, who was nominated for the Nobel Peace
Prize in 2006 for his work exposing Iran's nuclear program.
He warns that a nuclear strike against a high-profile American target
remains the No. 1 goal of Islamic terrorists. And when they do strike, the
experts say, America almost certainly will be grossly unprepared to handle it.
You can also check out our FREE offer — the Emergency Radio — a $30 value
and something every home must have. Go Here
This exclusive Newsmax report explores:
The CIA's startling assessment about
al-Qaida's nuclear plan [/*]
Financial markets and more — the
grave repercussions of a nuclear blast [/*]
Bin Laden's "religious
duty" to obtain a nuclear weapon [/*]
Does Iran already have the bomb? [/*]
Three broad ways terrorists can
obtain a nuke [/*]
preparations for biothreats[/*]
Iran's ominous ties with Chavez's
North Korea's growing nuclear
A frightening number: 1,562
"confirmed incidents" of nuclear materials smuggling [/*]
The "dirty bomb" threat
against American cities [/*]
Former CIA chief Michael Hayden's
warning about al-Qaida and WMDs [/*]
Fugitive Adnan Shukrijumah:
"the next Mohamed Atta" [/*]
Chilling claim: al-Qaida bought
three suitcase bombs [/*]
How Iran could conceal a nuclear
Why Obama's nuclear security summit
was misguided [/*]
Al-Qaida's attempt to bomb France [/*]
The federal response plan that's
called "a joke" [/*]
Cheney: Interrogations prevented
attacks after 9/11 [/*]
The Nuclear Security
Administration's impressive efforts overseas [/*]
How terrorists could build a bomb in
the U.S. "from scratch" [/*]
Bipartisan commission: WMD attack by
terrorists by 2013 [/*]
Three rules for surviving after a
nuclear blast [/*]
And more [/*]
Find out how you can get this report FREE — PLUS get an Emergency Radio
worth almost $30 with our FREE offer. Go Here
Is a Threat to America
Charles R. Smith
Thursday, March 14, 2002
Chinese Weapons Development and
Sales Are Directed Against the U.S.
China is angry at the United States.
The communist Chinese government unsuccessfully pressed the Bush administration
to deny permission for Taiwan's defense minister, Tang Yiau-ming, to attend an
arms conference in Florida.
On Monday, Tang met with U.S. Deputy
Undersecretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz while visiting the U.S. defense
industry conference. As a result of that meeting, the communist Chinese are
"We express our strong
dissatisfaction and indignation," stated Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman
"We believe it will not only
foster the arrogance of Taiwan independence forces, it will also damage
Chinese-American relations and cross-strait ties," said Sun.
Communist spokesman Sun also noted
that China was "deeply shocked" by a recently declassified report
that named China as one of six possible nations that could face nuclear strikes
from America. Sun stated that China was seeking an "official"
explanation of the report from Washington. Sun emphasized that China is a peace-loving
The U.S.-Chinese 'Bilateral Military
Many in the U.S. press, academia and
political structure characterize China as our "strategic partner," a
nation with similar goals and views as the United States. The U.S. policy of
appeasement, that China is a peaceful giant, was documented in the official
correspondence of Clinton Defense Secretary William Perry.
In a 1995 letter to Chinese General
Ding Henggao, U.S. Secretary of Defense Perry wrote that "advancing the
military relationship between our two nations remains an objective which we
agree serves the long-term interests of peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific
Perry wrote quite clearly that the
Clinton administration wanted close ties to Beijing by "reiterating my
support for our bilateral military relationship."
Less than six months after Perry's
offer for a "bilateral military relationship," the People's
Liberation Army launched a simulated nuclear attack against the two largest
cities in Taiwan. In 1996, the PLA Second Artillery Corps fired dummy missile
warheads only a few miles off the Taiwanese coast.
The 1996 missile crisis nearly
started World War III. The Clinton administration had to respond to Beijing's
threat to start a nuclear war in the Straits of Taiwan. Clinton's reaction was
to send in the U.S. Navy and our aircraft carriers.
Chinese Plans for Nuclear War With
The Chinese military took quick
notice of the U.S. carriers, and in 1999 the communist army Office of the
Central Military Command wrote a report on future nuclear combat with the
"China is not only a big
country, but also possesses a nuclear arsenal that has long since been
incorporated into the state warfare system and played a real role in our
national defense," states the Chinese military commission report.
"During last crisis across the
Taiwan Straits, the U.S. tried to blackmail us with their aircraft carrier(s),
but when their spy satellites confirmed that our four nuclear submarines which
used to be stationed at Lushun Harbor had disappeared, those politicians
addicted to the Taiwan card could not imagine how worried their military
commanders were," notes the Chinese army report.
"In comparison with the U.S.
nuclear arsenal, our disadvantage is mainly numeric, while in real wars the
qualitative gap will be reflected only as different requirements of strategic
theory. In terms of deterrence, there is not any difference in practical value.
So far we have built up the capability for the second and the third nuclear
strikes and are fairly confident in fighting a nuclear war. The PCC has decided
to pass through formal channels this message to the top leaders of the U.S.
This is one of the concrete measures that we will take to prevent the
escalation of war in the spirit of being responsible."
Chinese General Wants to Nuke L.A.
There is little question that China
is "responsible" when it comes to nuclear war. Since 1996, the
Chinese army has not stopped its acts of atomic-tipped aggression and
intimidation. For example, two years after firing missiles at Taiwan, Gen.
Xiong, then second in command of the People's Liberation Army, threatened to
vaporize Los Angeles.
Not once during the entire 40-year
Cold War between the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. did any Soviet general threaten to
vaporize an American city. It is certain that the Kremlin would have fired any
officer who made such a statement, because of the threat to global peace.
In contrast, Gen. Xiong remains
second in command of the People's Liberation Army, ready to hurl his nuclear
forces into battle with America on a moment's notice.
According to the CIA, China is
expected to continue its rapid deployment of ballistic missiles along the
Chinese mainland, within striking distance of Taiwan.
China's short-range ballistic missile
arsenal could reach "several hundred" by the year 2005, stated Robert
Walpole, a national intelligence officer, during a Senate hearing on
The CIA intelligence analyst also
revealed that Beijing is working on three new intercontinental ballistic
missiles, the Dong-Feng 31, a longer-range variant of the Dong-Feng 31, and the
submarine-launched JL-2. The DF-31 and JL-2 both have an estimated range of
over 7,000 miles and can shower the U.S. West Coast with nuclear warheads.
Chinese Nuclear Weapons
In addition, the leaders in Beijing
have taken every opportunity to export missile and nuclear warfare equipment to
such nations as Iran, Pakistan and Iraq. The entire Pakistani atomic arsenal
was built from scratch with the direct assistance of the Chinese military,
including advanced nuclear warhead designs from PLA labs and nuclear-tipped
missiles directly out of the Chinese army inventory.
The "National Intelligence
Estimate," a threat analysis published by the CIA, noted that Beijing has
"enabled emerging missile states to accelerate development timelines for
their existing programs" and sold "turnkey systems to gain previously
non-existent capabilities – in the case of the Chinese sale of the M-11 short-range
ballistic missile to Pakistan."
In 2001, the U.S. lodged sanctions
against the China Metallurgical Equipment Corp. after it continued to ship
missile parts to Pakistan, violating Beijing's sixth promise to stop such
exports. It should surprise no one that the People's Liberation Army owns China
During the 1990s, the Chinese army
also exported an advanced air defense network to Iraq through another front
company, in direct violation of the U.N. ban on military sales to Baghdad. The
Bush administration openly complained about Chinese military sales to Iraq and
eventually bombed several sites occupied by Chinese military engineers working
for Saddam Hussein.
"We raised earlier in the
administration concerns about what might be going on with Iraq," stated
Bush national security adviser Condoleezza Rice on Chinese missile
However, the Chinese army sales to
Iraq have not stopped. PLA front companies continue to provide camouflage for
Beijing as it attempts to export more advanced weapons to Iraq.
For example, the harmless-sounding
Shandong Arts and Craft Company is in fact a front for Chinese missile
proliferation. In 2001, the firm acted as a cover for a PLA military delegation
to Iraq seeking to sell advanced long-range missile technology to Saddam
China Is a Threat
The China apologists in the United
States assure us that the communist state is not a threat, that it is a
peaceful nation prepared to take its place in the world. Their simplistic view
of Chinese history omits the past 40 years of confrontation with America.
They refuse to see Beijing's growing
inventory of advanced missiles, warships and planes. They ignore years of
espionage and covert political influence through contributions to U.S.
political campaigns. They continue to seek appeasement despite the overwhelming
evidence of missile and nuclear weapon proliferation.
In the next 40 years, China will
attempt to take its place among the world's superpowers. China's growing
arsenal of advanced weapons will enable it to do so in a forceful and violent
manner. It is time that we recognized what the People's Liberation Army already
knows – that America is its No. 1 target.
Read more on this subject in related
A product that might interest you:
Find out the complete details of China's Military Buildup in
"Bitter Legacy: NewsMax Reveals the Untold Story of the Clinton-Gore
Fears Sneak Russian Attack
January 25, 2000
By Stephan Archer
LOS ANGELES – StanislavLunev, the
highest-ranking Soviet spy ever to defect, warned members of Congress Monday
a pre-emptive nuclear strike by Russia on American soil is a real
At a House Committee on Government
Reform hearing here, the one-time colonel in Soviet and then Russian
Federation military intelligence, gave a chilling presentation of his
country’s Cold War plans to defeat the United States.
Under federal witness protection,
Lunev was escorted into the hearing room with a black bag covering his head.
From behind a screen to shield him
from the view of the audience, Lunev testified Soviet generals had designed a
special plan for the future war against America and its allies in which
special-operation forces commanders would come to the United States and other
NATO countries a few days – maybe even a few hours – before actual war.
Using weapons systems that had
already been hidden at strategic points throughout the United States, he
said, the Soviet generals would have demolished the country’s political
infrastructure by destroying strategic facilities and assassinating top
military leaders such as the president and vice president just hours or
minutes before a nuclear missile strike.
Lunev said one of his espionage
assignments had been to scout "drop sites" for weapons caches.
He said he believes Russian
military weapons are currently hidden in strategic points all across the
United States and Europe for just such a purpose.
Those hidden stockpiles of weapons
would include portable nuclear devices, chemical and biological weapons,
conventional weapons and incendiary devices, he said.
Lunev told the panel the weapon
caches could be used whenever the Russian commanders in charge are given the
He added that Russia is using
Chechnya as a test battlefield for a future "real" war that may be
with the United States and its allies.
"Of course, you understand
that this is history," Lunev told the congressional panel after
describing the Soviet plan.
"I need to tell you that
history's history, but unfortunately, the current situation is not very good.
"These military plans are
still consistent with Russian generals, and these military plans in time of
possible war would be fulfilled by special-operations forces
Also present at the hearing was
Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., chairman of the House Committee on Government
Reform; Rep. Tom Campbell, R-Calif.; Curt Weldon, R-Pa.; Joe Scarborough,
R-Fla.; Dr. William Green, political science professor for the national security
studies program at California State University, San Bernardino; and former
Central Intelligence Agency officer Peter Pry.
Burton said, "Some members of
the media are indicating we might be trying to create paranoia and a new Cold
War. That's untrue.
"I'm distressed that some
members of the media think we're trying to scare everyone to death."
Asked by reporters why he chose
California for this hearing, Burton said, "It's my understanding that
there are many potential targets for Russian sabotage in California.
"California is the most
populous state in the nation. If there are hidden caches of explosives in
this state, that's very dangerous. That's why we're here."
Campbell, who represents a
district in this state, said, "There is a high likelihood of positioning
weapons in California."
Concerning the possibility of a
first strike by Russian forces against the United States, Pry, formerly with
the CIA, said the opportunity had presented itself numerous times during the
1980s and 1990s.
For example, in 1995, he said, the
West and Russia experienced a missile crisis "more dangerous than the
1962 Cuban missile crisis."
Pry said that in January 1995,
NASA and Norway, in a joint project, launched a meteorological rocket to
study the aurora borealis, but the Russian Foreign Ministry never received
notice of the launch due to a clerical error by an inexperienced staffer.
As a result, Pry said, Russia
almost launched its nuclear missiles aimed at the United States.
Only then-President Boris Yeltsin,
not believing the West would attack, held off the launch and waited to find
out if the missile did, in fact, veer off course over the Russian mainland,
claims that our Russian policy is a success, many of us have watched and worried
and warned for years that the Russian policy has careened toward
failure," he said.
"The administration's Russian
policy has been more of a public-relations campaign to persuade the American
people all is well rather than a hardheaded, bulleted program to really
advance free enterprise and democracy in Russia and to protect U.S. vital
Weldon said the Clinton
administration has had a consistent pattern of not wanting anything to
surface that might give the perception of a potential or real problem in the
relationship between the United States and Russia, including the theft of
International Monetary Fund dollars, abuse in insider trading in Russia and
arms-control treaty violations.
Although many questions regarding
U.S. foreign policy with Russia are aimed at the Clinton administration,
Weldon said, the hearing was not a "Republican witch-hunt."
Burton observed that Rep. Henry
Waxman, a Democratic member of the committee who represents a Los Angeles
district and is a staunch defender of the Clinton administration, chose not
come to the hearing.
"I really regret the State
Department isn't here today," Burton said. "They just jumped
through hoops not to testify."
Weldon said that in November of
last year he introduced House Resolution 380, expressing concern over the
location and removal of weapon caches placed in the United States by the
Russian or Soviet governments.
Sixteen Republicans and 16
Democrats signed the resolution. Even so, the administration has not asked
the Russians for the specific location of the weapon stashes in the United
Do these stashes pose a threat to
Campbell, speaking for his
constituents in California, seems to think so. He said although he doesn’t
think the United States should back Russia into a corner, he believes the
administration should ask Russia the tougher questions concerning the
whereabouts of the weapon stashes.
"I am a representative,"
said Campbell. "I am owed an answer."
It has not been easy for Campbell
to get one. On Dec. 6 of last year, Campbell wrote a letter requesting
information about the location of Russian weapon caches in the United States
to Clinton’s National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright and Defense Secretary William Cohen. Only Cohen responded
to Campbell’s letter, on Dec. 16.
In the letter Cohen said,
"Thank you for your letter requesting information about the location of
Russian weapon caches within the United States. I have asked the
undersecretary of defense for policy, Mr. Walt Slocombe, to promptly address
this request and he will get back to you as soon as possible."
Campbell, upset by the brief
response he received from Cohen, told NewsMax.com when push comes to shove a
subpoena might be needed, but it was wise to try other means first.
Native Chinese on the China Dictators' World Conquest
Friday, Jan. 19, 2007
His name is Zhang Hongbao, and the Chinese dictatorship declared him to be
a criminal, but he managed to escape from China to the United States, where
he was recently "killed in a car accident."
In 2005, "World Chinese Net" posted his essay: "The Chinese
Communist Party's Post-Nuclear Super Weapons and Its Strategic Goal."
Now, the CIA and other Western intelligence/espionage organizations are
assumed to have been penetrating the dictatorship of China and studying this
subject, along with Western professors of Sinology. And here I draw attention
to a native Chinese. Yes, a native Chinese, without any degree or post, may
know what the Western intelligence/espionage and academic sinology do not.
When I, a native Russian, emigrated with my family to the United States in
the early 1970s, I told The New York Times and the CIA that the Soviet
dictatorship had been developing post-nuclear super weapons, which neither
The New York Times nor the CIA would believe to be true for the next 20 years
until Yeltsin, who needed peace for his reforms, did not exhibit in 1992 for
international inspection the pre-1992 Soviet development of such super
How could I know what the CIA and The New York Times refused to know for
another 20 years?
I was a native Russian, not a foreigner (such as a Western spy) in Russia
to be kept off anything connected with Soviet military secrets. My wife was
also a native Russian, and she became without any difficulty the editor of
the Soviet edition of the international magazine "Nuclear Physics,"
under the auspices of the most important Soviet nuclear research institute,
headed by Skobeltsin, the founder of Soviet nuclear physics, and staffed by
internationally known Soviet nuclear physicists.
As my wife told me, Skobeltsin had announced at a general meeting of his
subordinates that his institute was to discontinue its nuclear research and
to launch, instead, laser research, for example.
It was obvious to me what was unknown to the CIA and The New York Times
until 1992: the Soviet nuclear research had been succeeded by the development
of post-nuclear super weapons.
There is no need for a native to penetrate his or her country.
He or she is part of it. Zhang Hongbao begins his essay with five major
military technologies, and ironically, first comes laser technology, which
the founder of Soviet nuclear physics mentioned as a field of research to
succeed the nuclear weapons research in Soviet Russia.
Zhang's next question (Page 3) is to be expected: "Who is really in
control of China today?"
Not a single leader or an emperor, but a "leaders group," a
highly complex combination of power-holders. They threaten each other's
power, but the cumulative power of them all is threatened by what Zhang calls
a "full scale crisis." Politically, China "has a nascent human
rights movement"; the influence of the democratic West and hence
democratic demands "are stronger and more forceful than ever";
"religious forces are responding to the overseas religions of
influence"; "unemployment is high"; "there is a large and
impoverished peasant class"; "official greed and corruption are
rampant"; "Taiwan, Xinjiang and Tibet are pushing for independence
and they activate the underground forces."
Every issue is like a sizzling blasting fuse on top of a mount of dry
The English translation of the old Chinese name of China, translated into
English as "the Middle Kingdom," is more adequately translated by
Zhang as "the Centre of the World." The only way out: back to the
Center of the World! "This process is the process of conquering the
United States and taking over the world."
The job must be done by post-nuclear super weapons that have the following
1. One hit destroys the enemy beyond any possibility of enemy resistance
2. Maximum scale and speed of destruction
3. Destruction is traceless. Before the enemy learns about it, the enemy
4. The goal is to wipe out the 2.6 billion inhabitants of the United
States and 53 friendly and allied countries
Is the above scenario realistic?
As big as the elephant is it can be destroyed by a rat. For example,
"if the power supply for the United States and its friendly and allied
countries is suspended for one or two months (a power outage), the basic population
of the United States and those countries (2.6 billion people) will be
The 21-page essay in 8-point type is signed:
Zhang Hongbao Leisurely wrote in Los Angeles February 16th, 2005
Then follows a list of ranks of foreign top government the officials to
whom Zhang Hongbao essay was to be delivered, and a list of the countries to
which it was to be delivered.
Still, Zhang Hongbao's essay of 2005 has been so far ignored.
Finally, the telephone, fax, and e-mail of the sender: Department of
National Military Strategic Research, China Shadow Government.
* * *
You can e-mail me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Can America avoid a nuclear
‘D-Day'? Get the INSIDE story – Click Here Now.
Are We Safe From Nuclear Attack?
Could terrorists smuggle a nuclear bomb through a U.S. port and explode it on
American soil? Now that North Korea has nuclear devices — could they or
terrorists they work with attack a major U.S. city?
other questions are answered in a recent NewsMax Magazine special report "Avoiding Nuclear D-Day."
report, authored by best-selling author Kenneth R. Timmerman, finds the
threat is real -- and reveals what the U.S. government had done to stop such
NewsMax report reveals how high-tech gear and vigilance are protecting
Americans from terrorist nuclear threats.
NewsMax report takes an in-depth look at how security measures in the U.S.
have been completely overhauled since 9/11.
get this report with our FREE offer and a $35 fleece jacket by Going Here.
blockbuster NewsMax report explores:
True story: a chilling intel alert
set off a frantic search for a nuclear warhead smuggled into the U.S. [/*]
The inside facts about al-Qaida's
attempts to acquire a "dirty bomb" that would unleash deadly
Why a nuclear detonation in New
York City is "everyone's worst nightmare." [/*]
How the U.S. reacted when an intel
report suggested New York was about to be hit with a nuclear device. [/*]
How a powerful gamma-ray device
can scan cargo cartons - without opening them. [/*]
Why President Bush chose Michael
Chertoff as the new Homeland Security Secretary. [/*]
The "rogues gallery" of
potential nuclear players - more than just bin Laden threaten our
Terrorists' potential points of
entry: 3,700 terminals, 301 ports. [/*]
The "suitcase nuke" -
real or hoax? [/*]
How 2002's Container Security
Initiative is "pushing the borders outward." [/*]
The new large X-ray screening
machine that can "see" through 16 inches of solid steel - we
have some of the first pictures of these devices. [/*]
Why terrorists need a scenario
with "zero risk." [/*]
How a new security chief revamped
the Port of Baltimore. [/*]
Why Ed Koch believes we are in a
"war of civilizations." [/*]
The B-54 - America's one-man,
58-pound nuclear weapon. [/*]
How the Coast Guard went to sea to
head off a suspected nuclear attack on New York. [/*]
And much, much more. [/*]
special edition of NewsMax
Magazine features an exclusive interview with Customs and
Border Commissioner Robert Bonner, who counters claims that his detection
strategy is a "dead end" and says: "We've proven that you can
risk-manage the terrorist threat."
out how you can get this report FREE. Go Here Now.
Linked to JFK Plot
Monday, June 4,
2007 10:07 a.m. EDT
Thursday, NewsMax.com featured an in-depth story on a
little-known name in the terrorist underworldwho nevertheless has been
called the most wanted man in America because of his efforts to explode nuclear
Now Monday's New York Post is reporting in a Page-One cover story that this
same man is the suspected "invisible hand” behind the plot to bomb a fuel
pipeline feeding New York’s JFK airport.
This terrorist is Adnan el-Shukrijumah, the so-called "Fixer"
behind the 9/11 attacks.
He is perhaps the most dangerous man in the world because a stunning new
book, "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of America and the Western
World," by a former FBI consultant reveals that this man is leading
al-Qaida's scheme to detonate nuclear devices in several U.S. cities. [Editor's
Note: Get Paul Williams' explosive "The Day of Islam: The Annihilation of
America and the Western World" FREE — Click
The Post calls el-Shukrijumah the "so called nuclear-whiz kid” — a
"tantalizing terror figure” with a $5 million bounty on his head.
According to the paper, el-Shukrijumah was "the radical big shot
investigators hoped to snag in their 18-month JFK-plot probe.”
The Post also confirmed that he is same man Osama bin Laden has tapped to
hatch the terror group's nuclear plan in the U.S.
According to law enforcement sources, el-Shukrijumah's name surfaced several
times during the FBI's surveillance of the JFK plotters' phone conversations.
Three of the JFK plotters were natives of Guyana, as was Adnan. The Guyana
connection caused raised eyebrows among U.S. investigators. One law enforcement
source told the Post that Adnan was "always in the shadows."
The U.S. was allowing the JFK plot to continue in hopes of snatching
el-Shukrijumah, but had to make arrests when one of the conspirators planned to
fly from Trinidad to Venezuela, where the U.S. has no extradition rights.
NewsMax story, based on Paul L. Williams’ "The Day of Islam: The
Annihilation of America and the Western World" book, included this warning
from the author: "No one on planet earth is more of a threat to the lives
and well-being of every man, woman, and child within the United States than
As the story disclosed, Williams has compiled evidence that bin Laden
designated el-Shukrijumah to arrange a simultaneous nuclear attack on seven
U.S. cities — New York, Washington, Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, Boston, and
el-Shukrijumah is now believed to be operating within the U.S.
[Editor's Note: Get Paul Williams' explosive "The Day of Islam: The
Annihilation of America and the Western World" FREE — Click
Deploy New Missiles
Charles R. Smith
Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2001
Chinese missiles can reach U.S. with
U.S. defense officials have
confirmed that China is preparing to test a new missile capable of delivering
nuclear warheads directly to the United States.
The Chinese Army Second Artillery
Corps is preparing to test its new Dong Feng 31, or "East Wind," ICBM
during the next few days. The DF-31 reportedly can carry a single 3-megaton
H-bomb or three 90-kiloton nuclear warheads. The missile has an official range
of over 4,800 miles.
The Dong Feng 31 reportedly is
equipped with U.S. missile and warhead technology that was obtained by China
through espionage and legal and illegal technology transfers from the Clinton
administration. It is expected that the Chinese army will declare the DF-31
operational within the next 12 months.
Chinese Navy Missile
The new PLA long-range weapon test
comes only days after a Chinese navy test of a similar submarine-launched
nuclear-tipped missile. The China navy test of a Julang 2, or "Great
Wave," missile took place three weeks ago in an area located off the coast
of north central China.
U.S. intelligence sources recorded a
"pop-up" test of the JL-2 from a specially modified Chinese
Golf-class diesel submarine. The test simulated the first step in a
submarine-launched ballistic missile firing by ejecting the missile from its tube.
In an actual launch, the missile's engine would be ignited after clearing the
The Chinese navy plans to deploy the
JL-2 missile aboard China's newest ballistic missile submarine, known as the
Type 094. The Chinese navy reportedly will take command of the first
JL-2-equipped Type 094 submarine in the next 12 months.
"From open sources, one cannot
assess the real range of the JL-2," noted Richard Fisher, a senior fellow
and defense analyst at the Jamestown Foundation.
"Most sources note it is the
sea-borne counterpart to the DF-31, which is credited with a 8,000 km (4,800
mile) range. However, there is some unconfirmed reporting that the JL-2 may
have longer range."
U.S. Navy sources expressed concern
that a JL-2-armed submarine could sail to within a few hundred miles of the
U.S. West Coast. Such a move would place West Coast cities at
"point-blank" range, enabling the Chinese submarine to shower Los
Angeles or San Francisco with nuclear warheads. The move would also place most –
if not all – U.S. cities within range of the H-bomb-equipped missile.
"It is likely that the goal for
the JL-2 is to be able to reach the western U.S. from the Yellow Sea, an area
that the PLA can defend with near-current ship and aircraft resources. But of
course, if the Type 094 SSBN is able to reach launch points outside this area,
the JL-2's reach will increase," stated Fisher.
"India also fears this new
SLBM, as it expects that the PLA will produce enough Type 094 SSBNs to pose a
credible second strike presence in the Indian Ocean," noted Fisher.
New Russian Missile
The Chinese missile tests are taking
place at the same time Russia is trying to sell a new supersonic land attack
missile. Russian missile maker NPO Mashinostroyenia announced in October that
it was introducing a new version of the SS-N-26 Yahont cruise missile.
The Yahont ramjet-powered missile
can reach targets up to 162 nautical miles away at speeds in excess of 1,500
miles an hour. The Yahont was originally designed to be an anti-ship attack missile,
but NPO Mash is now offering a new version called the Yahont-M that can strike
land targets with "extreme accuracy."
The deadly Yahont missile is being
offered for sale to Iran, India and China. The missile can be air-launched,
sea-launched or even launched from a submerged submarine through a torpedo
tube. The Yahont reportedly flies at treetop level at a blistering speed of
over 2.6 times the speed of sound.
NPO Mash is offering the Yahont-M in
combination with the Kondor-E targeting satellite. Russian officials are
offering to sell high-resolution satellite data to program the Yahont missile
for land targets or even turn over a complete Kondor-E satellite with a radar
designation targeting system.
The space-based targeting
combination is being offered for export "to countries that lack the
over-the-horizon targeting capability" required to operate the Yahont.
China and Iran in Space
U.S. officials are concerned because
China reportedly may arm newly-purchased Russian navy vessels with the deadly
Yahont missile. While China may not elect to purchase the Kondor-E satellite,
it can easily modify a newly-developed SMMS imaging satellite to supply the
same space-based targeting information.
According to U.S. defense officials,
China and Iran are jointly developing the SMMS, or small multi-mission
spacecraft. The 1,034-lb. satellite will carry a low-resolution CCD camera and
Iranian space engineers were in
Beijing in September reviewing progress on the joint space satellite program.
The SMMS satellite is scheduled for launch in 2004 atop a Chinese booster
China already has a mature medium
resolution space imaging satellite program. However, the SMMS will allow the
PRC and Iran to improve missile targeting and autonomous military
reconnaissance. China has reportedly also offered similar military satellite
capabilities to Pakistan.
Read more on this subject in related
A product that might interest you:
Adm. Moorer Warns: China Plans War!
China's Master Plan
to Destroy America
By Colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui
Introduction by Al Santoli
As incredible as it may be to
believe, four years before the Sept. 11 bombing of the World Trade
Center a Chinese military manual titled Unrestricted Warfare touted
such an attack – suggesting it would be difficult for the U.S. military to
Here is an excerpt from Unrestricted
“Whether it be the intrusions of
hackers, a major explosion at the World Trade Center, or a bombing attack
by bin Laden, all of these greatly exceed the frequency bandwidths
understood by the American military...”
Surprisingly, Osama bin Laden is
mentioned frequently in this book.
Now NewsMax.com is making the
CIA translation of this shocking book available to all Americans.
On Sept. 11, 2001, Americans and
the world witnessed one of the most horrific acts ever to take place on
Our media and government were
quick to declare the acts of that day as simply terrorism by a nationless
group known as al-Qaeda.
In reading China’s military
manual Unrestricted Warfare, you will learn that the events of Sept.
11 were not a random act perpetrated by independent agents.
Instead, Chinese military
planners believe that terrorism is just one of the many tools at the hands
of nations and their terrorist allies to wage total war against the United
You will be surprised to learn:
The two PLA colonels who
authored Unrestricted Warfare have been hailed as heroes in
China since Sept. 11 [/*]
The Chinese state-run
propaganda machine is cashing in on the terror attacks ... producing
books, films and video games glorifying the strikes as a humbling blow
against an arrogant nation. [/*]
Chinese Communist Party
officials are saying that President Jiang Zemin has obsessively and
gleefully watched and re-watched pictures of the aircraft crashing
into the World Trade Center. [/*]
The CIA’s own translation
agency reported that this book identifies the U.S. as China’s main
enemy, and details how a weak nation can destroy America using
unorthodox attacks – like the 9-11 attacks. [/*]
China is preparing itself
and encouraging others to engage the U.S. in total war. The book is
chock full of plans and strategies, from using computers, to smuggling
illegal immigrants, to manipulating the stock markets, to influencing
the U.S. media, to using weapons of mass destruction – all to destroy
Recent press reports indicate
that China has assisted and continues to assist militarily and economically
the Taliban and al-Qaeda – even after Sept. 11.
The doctrine of total war
outlined in Unrestricted Warfare clearly demonstrates that the
People’s Republic of China is preparing to confront the United States and
our allies by conducting “asymmetrical” or multidimensional attacks on
almost every aspect of our social, economic and political life.
The media and Congress are
keeping a lid on this book because of the implications of U.S.-China
economic and trade relations.
But now you can bypass them by
getting a copy yourself!
Here’s what others say about Unrestricted
“You need to read Unrestricted
Warfare because it reveals China’s game plan in its coming war with
America.. ... China thinks it can destroy America by using these tactics.”
Adm. Thomas Moorer
Former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
“The 9-11 attacks may just be
the beginning. Many terrorist nations and groups will try to imitate this
operation … and China’s war book Unrestricted Warfare will be their
Maj. Gen. John K. Singlaub
Former Chief of Staff,
US Forces Korea
“Unrestricted Warfare is
evidence linking China to 9-11. It is also their plan for global operations
Wilson C. Lucom
To purchase the book, click: NewsMax.com - America's News Page.
REVIEWS from AMAZON Customers
57 of 68 people found the following review helpful:
It's all true and the truth does
hurt., March 2, 2004
[url=http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A1YY2LFLCBL3QY/ref=cm_cr_auth/002-3410457-0933643]U2pop "u2pop"[/url] (Atlanta) - See all my reviews
This is a padded edition with
more hype on terrorism and fear than necessary. The original text by Lang
and Xiangsui is a fascinating look at the true weaknesses of the American
military system. It is with this book that China identifies America as its
sole predominate enemy.
I fully believe and support our
military in any and all of its endeavors. However the book correctly points
out, among other things, that the US has an obsession with human
casualties. It is because of this that wars are fought from a distance,
with technology, in order to minimize casualties. This is something that is
very evident to anyone who's looked at the American military's history.
From World War 2 to Desert Storm II, the increased use of technology and
the public outcry over casualties has increased ten fold. This book,
correctly so, advances the theory that in the event of a war between China
and America, there will be an unconventional war sorts or rather "the
war will be fought an won in a war beyond the battlefield" using terrorism,
financial institutions, computer hackers, among many others.
The sale of this book is mainly
a money making scheme since the CIA translation is available for free all
over the internet. On the other hand, this is an excellent book for any
foreign policy enthusiast, but more importantly, for those military
intelligence analysts who we hope are reading it. This is what China really
thinks and the truth really does hurt.
Seven prophetic visions seen
by William Branham in 1933
In June of 1933, while preparing for a two-week tent
meeting in Jeffersonville Indiana, William Branham experienced a series of 7
prophetic visions. William Branham said:
The Lord Jesus spoke to me
and said that the coming of the Lord was drawing nigh, but that before He came,
seven major events would transpire. I wrote them all down and that morning I
gave forth the revelation of the Lord.
The following is a summary of the
seven visions and links to more detailed analysis of the fulfilment of each of
1) Mussolini would invade Ethiopia, and
later come to a shameful demise.
2) Adolph Hitler would start the Second
World War, and come to a mysterious end.
3) Facism and Nazism would be swallowed
up into Communism, and Russia would emerge from the U.S.S.R.
4) Science would advance to the point where
cars would no longer require drivers.
morals would pervert and decline considerably.
6) A beautiful, but cruel, woman would
rise to great power in the United States.
7) America would be reduced to debris,
craters, and smoke.
Destruction of Los Angeles
Jump to: navigation, search
Biltmore Hotel, Downtown Los Angeles, where William Branham prophecied that
Los Angeles would roll into the sea.
William Branham had just finished preaching a series of meetings in Los Angeles in April 1965, when
asked bythe Full Gospel Business Men who organized the
meetings to preach just one more service for them.
So, on April 29, William Branham stood behind the podium
at the Biltmore Hotel in Los Angeles,and preached
a sermon called "Choosing of a Bride".
Two notable things occurred during this service:
was a steady stream of people leaving the building during the service who
could not handle the severity
of the preaching. These included the same people who had
attended (and engaged in) William Branham's
sermons in LA since April the 24th.
this sermon, William Branham prophecied that the city of Los Angeles would
one day slide into the
ocean, and a new coastline would form at the Salton Sea.
Recent Significant L.A. Earthquakes
March 16, 2010
January 17, 1994
October 1, 1987
February 9, 1971
March 10, 1933
Pico Rivera (10 miles SE)
Reseda (20 miles NW)
Rosemead (8 miles E)
Sylmar (24 miles NW)
Long Beach (20 Miles S)
and the Sandbar
Hill, May 1, 1923: Oil extraction honeycombing the oilsands
Los Angeles is one of the largest cities in the world. It
is also one of the only cities in the world with significant active oil
extraction within city limits. The sediment in the Los Angeles basin is up to 6
miles (10 km) deep, and includes the following oil fields:
Beach Oil Field
Angeles City Oil Field
Oil Field (3rd largest oil field in the U.S.)
Beach Oil Field
Hills Oil Field
Combined with the danger of existing fault lines that Los
Angeles sits on, the potential for a devestating natural disaster is
Time Magazine recorded the
partial sinking of Long Beach in the 1950s, blaming the cause on excessive
drilling in the area. Since that time, oil producers have been pumping water
into the earth to replace the oil they extract. The only problem with this
process is that water has different properties than oil, as residents of
Daisetta, Texas learned in 2008 when the walls of an underground salt-cave
(from which oil brine had been extracted) disolved, creating a sink-hole 900
feet wide by 260 feet deep. Between 1932
and 1960 iodine was harvested from oil brine extracted in the Los Angeles basin
- raising the question of whether the water being pumped into the earth is
currently disolving structural minerals under Los Angeles.
One problem with subsistence (the sinking of land) is that
it can create megatsunamis if they occur near water. History records the
following megatsunamis created by landslides:
AD - 100ft waves hit Alexandria after an earthquake off Crete.
AD - 330ft waves killed 15,000 villagers when parts of Mount Unzen, Japan slid
into the sea.
AD - 1,720ft waves destroyed Lituya Bay, Alaska, after an earthquake caused a landslide.
And, of course, the Salton
Sea is about two hundred feet below sea level, and if that big churning, that
earth swallowing in like that, with hundreds of square miles, hundreds and
hundreds of square miles sinking into the earth, that'll throw a tidal wave
plumb to Arizona. (Sermon:Ashamed of Him,
Jeffersonville, Indiana, July 11, 1965)
And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth
them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the
sand (Matthew 7:26)
America in Ashes
Jump to: navigation, search
February 2, 2011 Update
U.S. and Russia sign a new START treaty, limiting each countries nuclear
warheads and launchers, and allowing each country to visually inspect the
other country's weapons. BBC Online
In June 1933, William Branham experienced a series of 7 prophetic
visions. In the seventh and final vision
was an explosion, and the nation of America was turned into ashes from coast
to coast. Soon after,
September 12, 1933, LeóSzilárd conceived of the idea of the nuclear chain
reaction while waiting for a
light in Bloomsbury, England.
has yet to be fulfilled.
The last and seventh vision was wherein I heard a most
terrible explosion. As I turned to
look I saw nothing but debris, craters, and smoke all over the
land of America.
Church Age Book", Chapter 9, William Branham
Branham's suggestions on the Method and Motive of America's Destruction
I want to ask you something. They
claim that this new hydrogen bomb... And that's the only ones we know of.
We don't know what they got back
the sleeve. But they can stand in Moscow, Russia, and time a bomb right
on this building by the stars, and
guide it by radar, and got them placed to every major nation, and every
major city in the world. Just pull
on a string, and there she goes. Somebody's going to drink too much vodka
one day; there it'll be.
Sermon: A Greater Than Solomon Is Here, Bloomington, IL,
April 12, 1961.
When God sends a gift to the people
and they'll recognize it, it's always a golden age. But when they
refuse it, there's nothing left but
a chaos for that generation. Now, listen closely. If God had sent the
Holy Spirit in this age for a sign,
and we reject It, there's nothing left but a destruction. But if we refuse
it, we'll sure to be blowed off the
earth. The atomic bombs are hanging ready now, each one afraid to pull
the trigger.But someday, they'll
have too much vodka and press the trigger. And when that--that bomb
passes through that radar, sound...
When it goes through there, there'll be others go the other way. And
you know what will take place? The
world can't stand it. ...Before that can happen, the Church will be gone.
Queen of Sheba, Tifton, GA, January 10, 1960.
Today's Recipe For Disaster
In the process of
trying to create peace and stability for herself and other nations, the
has become a
common target of hatred of various movements and governments aroung the
are filled with articles on the United States and her involvement in
and coverage of
the negative local response to such involvement. With many countries
nuclear technology and advanced delivery systems, it's not hard to imagine
destruction that might occur if irresponsible agression materialized.
Oklahoma City Bombing
9/11 - New York in Ashes
New Orleans & Hurricane Katrina
17, 2009: Obama shelves Europe missile plan. BBC Online
By: Eternal Agony
Tags: Los Angeles, California, nuclear atack, nuclear detonation, nuclear destruction
Location: Los Angeles, California, United States (load item map)
Views: 73382 | Comments: 43 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 1 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 1
|Liveleak on Facebook|