By Noah Shachtman and David Axe[/*]
October 29, 2012
This isn’t the only vulnerability in the drone fleet. In March of 2011, an unknown software glitch caused a Predator stationed at a U.S. base in Africa to start its engine without human direction. Last October, as Danger Room first reported, Air Force technicians discovered a virus infecting the drones’ remote cockpits in Las Vegas. It took weeks of sustained effort to clean up the machines. The aircraft, which rely on GPS to guide them through the air, can run into problems if GPS signals are jammed in a particular area — something that can be done with cheap, commercially available hardware. Iranian officials claimed they hacked the GPS control signal of an advanced drone, though it’s impossible to verify that lofty claim.
No one who works with UAVs is questioning the fundamental integrity of the drone fleet at the moment; it would take an incredibly sophisticated hacker to commandeer a Predator, for example. Nor is anyone pretending that this premiere tool of the U.S.global counterterror campaign is flawless.
Predators and the larger, better-armed Reapers transmit video and accept instructions in one of two ways. The first is via satellite, to remote pilots and sensor operators who are often on the other side of the planet; these satellite communications are encrypted, and are generally considered secure.
The second is through a radio frequency signal called the Common Data Link, which is used to share the drone’s video feed with troops on the ground. The CDL’s carrier signal — its specific pattern of frequencies, in a given order and for a given length of time — tells both transmitter and receiver on how to function. The problem is that the Predators’ version of the CDL carrier signal (also known as a “waveform”) didn’t include an order to encrypt the signal. So neither the transmitter on the drone nor the receivers that troops used on the ground employed encryption, either.
There were reasons for this. The original Predator, just 27 feet long, was little more than a scaled-up model plane with an 85-horsepower engine. It had a payload of just half a ton for all its fuel, cameras and radios. And encryption systems can be heavy. (Big crypto boxes are a major reason the Army’s futuristic universal radio ended up being too bulky for combat, for example.) With the early Predator models, the Air Force made the conscious decision to leave off the crypto.
The flying branch was well aware of the risk. “Depending on the theater of operation and hostile electronic combat systems present, the threat to the UAVs could range from negligible with only a potential of signal intercept for detection purpose, to an active jamming effort made against an operating, unencrypted UAV,” the Air Force reported in 1996. ”The link characteristics of the baseline Predator system could be vulnerable to corruption of down links data or hostile data insertions.”
The Predator models steadily grew in power and payload, and took a big leap in dimensions and capability with the 36-foot-long Reaper version introduced in 2007. The Reaper has a 950-horsepower engine and a nearly 4,000-pound payload — more than enough capacity for crypto-enabled systems which, like all electronics, had shrunk in size and weight.
The problem was that, by then, the military had rushed to the battlefield hundreds of Remotely Operated Video Enhanced Receivers, or Rovers – rugged, laptop-sized receivers with screens for watching drone footage. And those early version of the Rovers were developed and distributed so fast, the military once again left the crypto off. “It could be both intercepted (e.g., hacked into) and jammed,” e-mails an Air Force officer with knowledge of the program.
Which mean the Pentagon was stuck, for a time. The military couldn’t replace the old CDL waveform with something encryptable until the Rovers — and the radio transmitters aboard the Predators — could handle such a signal.
Eventually, the Rovers began to be swapped out for newer models. The latest version, the “Tactical Rover,” (.pdf) is about the size of an old-school mobile phone. It can use both the Advanced Encryption Standard an the triple-Data Encryption Standard to secure video feeds. There are now about a thousand of the units in the military’s hands.
And now, the Predators and Reapers are starting to get enhanced radios, too. “The fleet-wide upgrade begins later this year and carries on for several years,” says Maj. Mary Danner-Jones, an Air Force spokesperson. The service is spending $12 million on crypto-enabled Vortex transceivers (.pdf).
That’s allowing a new, hardened waveform to be introduced throughout the Predator and Reaper fleet. The Air Force recently gave Predator-maker General Atomics Aeronautical Systems a $26 million contract to retrofit its drone cockpits to accept the carrier signal, among other enhancements.
The question is why hasn’t this happened sooner. After all, the Navy installed multiple layers of encryption in their ’bots some time ago. Navy spokesman Jamie Cosgrove tells Danger Room that “the vast majority” of naval drones are encrypted – “and have been since development.”
One source who works on developing Navy UAVs, but is not authorized the speak on the record, explains why: ”Standard unencrypted video is basically a broadcast to whoever can figure out the right carrier frequency, so essentially, we are simulcasting to battlefield commanders and the opposing force. If that opposing force knows we can see them and from where, they can take better evasive maneuvers.”
It’s possible that none of the militants America is trying today are as sophisticated as the ones who intercepted that drone video in 2008. It’s possible that the value of such footage-from-above is so fleeting that extremists have never again bothered to grab it. But it’s worth noting that Predator and Reaper video is considered by the U.S. military to be classified information. And when U.S. commanders on the ground get into a firefight, the first call they usually make is for a drone, so they can take a look at the battlefield through the eyes of a drone.
[/*]
By: BekasKhan
In: Afghanistan
Tags: Afghanistan, Occupation, by, US, NATO, Taliban, Pakistan, terrorist, Punjabi, ISI, Al, Qaeda, Iran, Intel, Drones
Location: Afghanistan (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 4611 | Comments: 20 | Votes: 2 | Favorites: 2 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
The alliance from hell ' US vs Paki-Punjabi Terrorist ISI '
-
Al-Qaeda regrouping in Afghanistan; sponsored by Pakistan terrorist Punjabi ISI
-
Pakistan's Imran Khan slams U.S. war on terror 'Which started with Musharaf, ISI, Full Support
-
New Afghan War Phase, With No Decisive End Seen
-
Our Opinion: Pakistan terrorist Punjabi ISI squanders Malala moment as U.S. stands idly by
-
UN to investigate civilian deaths from US drone strikes
-
Punjabi-Briton accused of '£3.2m' drug smuggling in Pakistan returns to jail with newborn
-
Imran Khan detained and 'interrogated over drone views' by US immigration
-
Afghan extremists 'Pakistan terrorist Punjabi ISI=Al Qaeda' target scouting movement
-
US to work 'again' with Paki-Punjabi ISI to counter terrorism created themselves!!!
-
Pakistani Taliban complains about bad press; even our Punjabi ISI doesn't cooperate fully in Public
-
Only 2 US troops in Uruzgan Afghanistan killed by man in police uniform



I don't see any great controversy. They left off the crypto because of weight issues. Opposing forces are unlikely to be able to exploit the video feed and it would be of limited benefit anyway. Adding a crystallographic capability to any system is a huge step in terms of the physical and support requirements and often limits the capability of the system by making access more difficult. Moreover you have to manage the potential loss of a unit.
Sometimes its easier and better to simply not bother More..
Posted Oct-29-2012 Bywhogoesthere (258.98) 
whogoesthere View Channel Send Message
(2)
There should be a drone channel on cable just filled with live feeds. They would make a fortune selling advertising time and probably pay for the whole drone/anti-terrorist program.
Posted Oct-30-2012 ByPunch_The_Monkey (1156.48) 
Punch_The_Monkey View Channel Send Message
(2)
Those are the cover EM feeds for bozos to waste time decrypting.
The actual feeds are quantum encrypted. Good luck with that.
Posted Oct-29-2012 Bygovett (934.10) govett View Channel Send Message
(1)
Cryptographic systems bulky? They aren't exactly fighting people with access to a code-breaking supercomputer, the very same on-board computer can be used for simple encryption, even a consumer-grade computer can implement AES efficiently. If it's all analog it can still be done, I think they're talking about signal jamming or some kind of 'esoteric' broadcasting here, like that failed universal radio system a few years ago
Posted Nov-14-2012 Bycbravo (239.70) 
cbravo View Channel Send Message
(1)
All forms of cutting edge technology have their teething problems at first. I remember the first Power Macs used to crash all too often. Then there was the first iPhone - gosh that was a little tiresome to say the least!
I'm sure these Drones will get a lot better with time but it is good to get this regular feedback from it's clients on the ground so thanks for that ...
Posted Oct-29-2012 ByBillyBangcock (495.30) 
BillyBangcock View Channel Send Message
(0)
@BillyBangcock just to double check it:
you are comparing ipows with drones?
Posted Oct-29-2012 Bydennix (295.50) 
dennix View Channel Send Message
(0)
@dennix well yes; you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs now can you? Just so happens these eggs are Pakistani
Posted Oct-29-2012 ByBillyBangcock (495.30) 
BillyBangcock View Channel Send Message
(0)
Do they broadcast porn as well? Give the taliban the frequency then, so they can wank before being bombed...
Posted Oct-29-2012 ByExmortis (49.60) 
Exmortis View Channel Send Message
(0)
@Exmortis They have already shagged every goat/mule in the area, no need .
Posted Oct-30-2012 ByRedRum2012 (227.70) 
RedRum2012 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@BekasKhan seeing you gave me negative for my comment, I guess you are the lead mule fucker of the taliban?
Posted Oct-30-2012 ByExmortis (49.60) 
Exmortis View Channel Send Message
(0)
@RedRum2012 You forgot your mother ... lol
Posted Oct-31-2012 Byfarhankhan_82 (8.30) 
farhankhan_82 View Channel Send Message
(0)
well there is always the old way of doing this business.
Posted Oct-29-2012 Byggppgg (898.60) 
ggppgg View Channel Send Message
(0)
Interesting
Posted Oct-30-2012 Byeddvii (238.30) 
eddvii View Channel Send Message
(0)
Waiting for China to takeover them drones and wipe NATO bases, ofc traces lead back to the U S A
Posted Oct-30-2012 Byinfini (69.44) infini View Channel Send Message
(0)
Well, stop and consider this.
The weight of the encryption equipment is one issue. But the biggest issue is that drones are meant to be lost without significant cost.
If the drone that went down over Iran carried crypto gear, for example, the Iranians would now have a good idea how to break the west's most modern encryption methods.
Posted Oct-30-2012 Byhellgremlin (763.12) hellgremlin Send Message
(0)
Have always wondered why somebody hadn't found a way to jam the avionics of those drones, seems they did, Won't be long before somebody finds a way to counter the new transceivers.
Posted Nov-1-2012 BysallyII (329.10) sallyII View Channel Send Message
(0)
This is what happens when you give up all your technology for free to Israel. They sell it to the chinese and russians, then end up hacked, LOL
Posted Nov-2-2012 ByJohnMcLane2008 (772.90) 
JohnMcLane2008 View Channel Send Message
(0)
We dont know shit.....the latest statement was '96 lol
Posted Nov-4-2012 Bymperkins813 (73.30) 
mperkins813 View Channel Send Message
(0)
microsoft software ! American made ! chinese quality !
Posted Oct-29-2012 ByCaptainDangeax (23.68) 
CaptainDangeax View Channel Send Message
(-1)