Pensions and health care plans for US troops will be drastically
reduced under a new budget presented by US President Barack Obama on
Thursday. Not all aspects of the DoD will be annihilated, however.
The DoD will ditch medical benefits for troops but continue to spend on its expensive arsenal of doom.
President
Obama joined Defense Secretary Leon Panetta from the Pentagon early
Thursday in a rare public address from the two to talk changes made to
the ledger in regards to the operation of the US military. As the US
begins to scale back on foreign operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, the
Obama administration is finding less of a need for the servicemen and
women that have been on the battlefronts for the last decade. In order
to cut costs, the new budget will thus eliminate positions from the
armed forces and initiate changes to the pension and health care plans
for military vets.Those changes will help balance the Defense
Department’s budget as the Pentagon unveils that it will continue to
invest billions in cutting edge weaponry and cyberspace capabilities.Citing
the end of the war in Iraq and a drawdown of troops in Afghanistan, the
president said Thursday that the US must strategize on how to
successfully prepare for future conflicts. In order to do such, said
Obama, boots on the ground will be needed less and less. Instead, the US
will rely more heavily on an agile, dispersed arsenal of troops and
increased surveillance space age weaponry presence.President
Obama said that the move to scale back personnel comes after decimating
al-Qaeda’s leadership, progressing in Afghanistan and a successful
mission to protect the Libyan people and assist in the overthrowing of
the Gaddafi regime. Despite these victories, however, America must be
prepared for future action elsewhere in the world.“Yes, the tide of war is receding,” said Obama, but “what kind of military will we need long after the wars of the last decade are over?”
“Yes, our military will be leaner, but the world must know that the United States will maintain its military superiority,” he said.
Upon
addressing the group himself, Defense Secretary Panetta announced that
that superiority will come way of relying less on American citizens
during wartime and more on reckless killing machines, specifically
unmanned aircraft. “As we reduce the overall defense budget,
we will protect and in some cases increase our investments in special
operation forces in new technologies, like . . . unmanned systems, in
space and in particular in cyberspace,” said Panetta.The
Pentagon’s new agenda isn’t all slap-dash pension changes and billion
dollar drone investments, though. Panetta also insisted that, despite
rumors that the US will make changes to its doctrine to being capable
of fighting multiple wars to concentrating on just one conflict, the
secretary said that America will still be on the ready to fight
multiple enemies at any single moment. Panetta revealed that the new
plan will place American troops in diverse locals internationally so
that the military could be ready to deploy on any country at any time.“As we move towards this new joint force, we are also rebalancing our gloal posture and presence,” said Panetta. Specifically, “the rise of new powers across Asia and the dramatic changes”
in the Middle East are of concern and will warrant the mobilization of
American troops to be ready on the borders of North Korea and perhaps
Iran. Such action will come during a time of “a very serious deficit and debt problem here at home,” acknowledged the secretary, however, who said that the economic problem poised on America was “a national security risk.”“I do not believe that we have to choose between our national security and fiscal responsibility,” said Panetta.
“We
are not confronting, obviously, the threats of the past. We are
confronting the threats of the twenty-first century. And that demands
greater flexibility to shift and deploy forces, to be able to fight and
defeat any enemy, anywhere,” said Panetta. “How we defeat the
enemy may very well vary across conflicts, but make no mistake, we will
have the capability to confront and defeat more than one adversary at a
time.“As a global force, our military will never be doing only one thing,” added Panetta.
Despite
this additional deployment and development of additional fronts and
bases, also on the agenda, are serious blows to the pensions of
veterans. “We will continue aggressive efforts to weed out
waste, reduce overhead, to reform business practices [and] to
consolidate our duplicative operations,” said Panetta. Under the
Modernizing the Military Retirement System proposal presented to the
Pentagon in August, veterans who have served less than 20 years will see
drastic changes to how the government provides for them after their
time of service.“We need to have a responsible conversation about how we are going to prepare ourselves for the future,” Panetta
said earlier in the year. Under current military procedure, US vets
stand to receive a retirement income of half of their salary after
completing 20 years of service in the armed forces. The Modernizing the
Military Retirement System, however, would put in place a 401k-style
plan that would offer government contributions once vets reach regular
retirement age.Panetta only alluded at the changes to veterans’
benefit packages Thursday morning, saying that the final paperwork will
be available later this month. He did, however, momentarily address the
Defense Department staff that stands to be affected, saying, “I know you have been watching the budget debates here in Washington.”“I
have no higher responsibility than fighting to protect you and your
families, and just as you have fought and bled to protect our country, I
commit to you that I will fight for you and for your families,” plead Panetta, only to immediately add, “There is no doubt that the fiscal situation that this country faces is difficult and in many ways we are at a crisis point.”The president himself only offered that the administration will “keep working to give our veterans the care” that they deserve, but failed to specifically outline the changes.
Speaking of flexibility and necessity of getting rid of “Cold War-era”
weapons nevertheless didn’t keep the Pentagon from recently investing
in some astonishingly expensive and arguably antiquated weaponry. The
move to make shifts in the budget come only days after it was revealed
that the US will soon have in its arsenal the USS Gerald R Ford aircraft
carrier, which will not only serve as the world’s most expensive
battleship ever created — but the most expensive weapon as well at a
price tag of $11.5 billion for the single ship. As RT reported in
August, the US has also been in plans to secure $23 billion in space age
drone aircraft planes as well. Before ending his statement,
Panetta succinctly outlined the plan by putting forthspecific changes:
the diminishing of the US joint forces; the mobilization of troops
specifically in the Middle East and Pacific; increased relationships
with allies and strengthening the nation’s ability to strike quickly and
confidently. Panetta said that there is “some level of additional but acceptable risk in the budget plan,” and added that the administration was not left with easy choices in drafting it.
Obama’s
address from the Pentagon’s briefing room Thursday morning marked the
first time that any commander-in-chief crossed the Potomac to speak from
the Defense Department’s headquarters. Upon closing his remarks and
handing the room over to Leon Panetta, Obama said that the latest effort
from the DoD “reflects the guidance” that he “personally gave” throughout the process of drafting the budget.
https://rt.com/usa/news/obama-panetta-pentagon-strategy-251/
By: 104JebackaBrigada
In: Politics
Tags: Military, Obama, Middle East, North Korea, Iran, USA, Government Spending
Location: United States (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 1648 | Comments: 30 | Votes: 0 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
Advertisement below
|
|
| Liveleak on Facebook | |
|
LIKE Liveleak.com |
-
Israel to UN: North Korea arms proliferation destabilizing the Middle East
-
Third Camp TV on Bush's Middle East Peace Tour
-
Escape From North Korea
-
The United States of Israel
-
EMP Nightmare: How Iran or North Korea Could Destroy America with a Single Bomb
-
Deciphering Obama's message to the Middle East
-
Bush prepares for a 9 day trip to Middle East to contain Iran
-
Obama Middle East Trip: Muslims Want Tangible Change
-
North Korea 'planning more missiles'
-
(documentary) "Escape From North Korea" (Aug.2007)
-
New map of middle east and afghanistan, pakistan
-
Gordon Brown puts Israel lobbyist in charge of Britain's Middle East policy




Obama is a Miserable Failure Of Epic Proportions.
Throw Rocks at democrat voters, until they stop moving.
Posted Jan-5-2012 ByVikingRapeSquad (1335.00)

VikingRapeSquad View Channel Send Message
(6)
Obama=fail
Posted Jan-5-2012 Byjoy3 (81.40) 
joy3 View Channel Send Message
(3)
The people who deserve and worked will get screwed so the money can flow to the welfare recipient's Illegal's and so-called Minorities.
Take this Shit-bag down.
Hard.
Posted Jan-5-2012 ByDave556 (1953.46) 
Dave556 View Channel Send Message
(3)
oh yeah stick it to the boys a little bit more, If I was in the army down there by down there I mean the states, I'd be like fuck this it aint worth it anymore, They already get payed sweet fack all, so lets cut some more. If we send them to Iran we will have to charge them for their plane ticket. 1 way of course. oh and their spouse will have to pay for the funeral.
Posted Jan-5-2012 Bycdnspr (114.14) 
cdnspr View Channel Send Message
(2)
No mention of the reduction in the Bureaucracy. With this "leaner" military Barry will bring the draft back into the fold.
How about changing foreign policy, maybe then you won't have to steal from the people that fight your idiotic wars. Unbelievable.
Posted Jan-5-2012 Byjoeashbubemma (154.60) 
joeashbubemma View Channel Send Message
(1)
Gee...great. Let's cut what was promised to those who have served already, and instead let's buy more drones. Drones don't need pensions.
On the other hand, the Iranians will hack the drones and hijack them as soon as we try to deploy them, which means they aren't much use except to had Iran, Russia, and China our technology. With plenty being lost to hacking, too, Washington will still be funneling billions to defense companies, which will keep the political kickbacks flowing in the directi More..
Posted Jan-5-2012 Bybuzzardist (362.74) 
buzzardist View Channel Send Message
(1)
Sounds like a shake up to ready for a Multiple front conflict,..
I sure in the fuck hope Obama and Panetta don't cast us in a World War this year,.I have plans you know,...
Posted Jan-5-2012 BySharkGuy (1509.10) SharkGuy View Channel Send Message
(1)
This guy has gotta go. Cut pensions and healthcare? Ok, well, lets start with Congress and see how that goes, then I want to see it trickle down.
Posted Jan-5-2012 ByTexasguy817 (238.32) Texasguy817 View Channel Send Message
(1)
@Texasguy817 start with the president's retirement package.
Posted Jan-5-2012 Byaureliusva (535.52) aureliusva View Channel Send Message
(2)
@aureliusva How about we start with Congress' health and retirement package and see how the "fiscally conservative" Republitards whine like little girls.
Posted Jan-5-2012 Bycdlcrash (320.60) 
cdlcrash View Channel Send Message
(-1)
@aureliusva
Yup, he can only work for 4 years and get God knows how much.
Posted Jan-7-2012 ByTexasguy817 (238.32) Texasguy817 View Channel Send Message
(0)
Man-child becomes more arrogant by the day,the threats the American prople face come more directly from a President that does not respect the Constitution or the Republic and the guide lines set therein.
Posted Jan-5-2012 Bysocalxplorer (166.50) 
socalxplorer View Channel Send Message
(1)
@socalxplorer How doesn't he respect the constitution? Do have any proof or links or are you just babbling like most of your kind do?
Posted Jan-5-2012 Bycdlcrash (320.60) 
cdlcrash View Channel Send Message
(-3)
@cdlcrash
How? Where have you been living for the past three years?
Posted Jan-5-2012 Bylostonthebeach (3248.14) 
lostonthebeach View Channel Send Message
(1)
@cdlcrash If you don't have a clue by now you are a lost cause. Just pull the covers over your head and keep your hand out like "your kind" do!
Posted Jan-6-2012 Bysocalxplorer (166.50) 
socalxplorer View Channel Send Message
(0)
@socalxplorer Just as iI said, not 1 iota of proof. Thanx for proving my point, carry on loser.
Posted Jan-15-2012 Bycdlcrash (320.60) 
cdlcrash View Channel Send Message
(0)
@cdlcrash Bite me boy
Posted Jan-19-2012 Bysocalxplorer (166.50) 
socalxplorer View Channel Send Message
(0)
Huh?
Posted Jan-5-2012 Byseangail (99.24) seangail View Channel Send Message
(0)
everyone wants a balanced budget and less taxes It has to come from some where. maybe if bush didn't start two wars and cut taxes at the same time ( the first time that had ever been done)then it wouldn't have to be done now.
Posted Jan-6-2012 Bytrailertrashrnr (318.80) 
trailertrashrnr View Channel Send Message
(0)
RT propaganda crap. Here's a blurp from NYT about bennies and health care -
"Mr. Panetta is also examining personnel costs, with cuts to future retirement benefits and fees for health care offered to Defense Department retirees on the table."
That is all that was mentioned. And this has been the same story for many years.
Posted Jan-5-2012 Byjoe prole (1642.40) 
joe prole View Channel Send Message
(0)
As I have said,this POS of a president will be GONE in a very few months. Remembered as just a sh*t stain to progress.
Posted Jan-5-2012 By555chevy (1095.78) 
555chevy View Channel Send Message
(0)
@555chevy Fox News fits you perfectly
Posted Jan-5-2012 Byseangail (99.24) seangail View Channel Send Message
(0)
@555chevy Um. Have you been keeping up to date with the news? That shitstorm that just happened in Iowa has the Dems laughing their asses off. Obama should be thanking the GOP for doing his campaigning for him.
Posted Jan-5-2012 Bystevecore (814.28) stevecore View Channel Send Message
(-3)
@555chevy 4 more years dummy mark my words.
Posted Jan-5-2012 Bycdlcrash (320.60) 
cdlcrash View Channel Send Message
(-2)
That's my strategy, buys lots of guns and never go to the doctor. I don't see the issue here :)
Posted Jan-5-2012 Byhighlogic (89.36) highlogic View Channel Send Message
(0)
I dunno, people are cheaper then drones.
Posted Jan-5-2012 Byfredbutz (21.20) 
fredbutz View Channel Send Message
(0)