Iran has revealed existence of 2nd enrichment plant, says IAEA
jpost.com
Iran has revealed the existence of a secret uranium-enrichment plant, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Friday, a development that could heighten fears about Teheran's ability to produce a nuclear weapon and escalate its diplomatic confrontation with the West.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad tours the Natanz uranium enrichment facility.
Photo: AP [file]
S
More..LIDESHOW: Israel & Region | World
US President Barack Obama and the leaders of France and Britain plan to accuse Iran of hiding the facility in an address at the opening of the G-20 economic summit Friday, a senior White House official told the AP.
The official said Obama, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy will demand Teheran open the covert facility to inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Iran is under three sets of UN Security Council sanctions for refusing to freeze enrichment at what had been its single known enrichment plant, which is being monitored by the IAEA.
If Russia moves, China may follow
Gaddafi says Iran shouldn't have nuclear weapon
G-8 gives Iran 3 months to stop uranium enrichment
Obama passes anti-nuke resolution
Two officials told the AP that Iran revealed the existence of the second plant in a letter sent Monday to International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei.
IAEA spokesman Marc Vidricaire confirmed receipt of the letter, saying the agency was informed "that a new pilot fuel enrichment plant is under construction," and that it would not enrich beyond five percent, suitable for civilian energy production and substantially below the threshold of 90 percent or more needed for weapons.
Iran told the agency "that no nuclear material has been introduced into the facility," he said. "In response, the IAEA has requested Iran to provide specific information and access to the facility as soon as possible."
The officials said that Iran's letter contained no details about the location of the second facility, when - or if - it had started operations or the type and number of centrifuges it was running.
But one of the officials, who had access to a review of Western intelligence on the issue, said it was about 100 miles (160 kilometers) southwest of Teheran and was the site of 3,000 centrifuges that could be operational by next year.
The officials who spoke to the AP - one from a European government with access to IAEA information and the other a diplomat in Vienna from a country accredited to the IAEA - demanded anonymity Friday because their information was confidential. One said he had seen the Iranian letter. The other told the AP that he had been informed about it by a UN official.
Iranian officials had previously acknowledged having only one plant - which is under IAEA monitoring - and had denied allegations of undeclared nuclear activities.
An August IAEA report said Iran had set up more than 8,000 centrifuges to churn out enriched uranium at its cavernous underground facility outside the southern city of Natanz. The report said that only about 4,600 centrifuges were fully active.
Iran says it has the right to enrich uranium for a nationwide chain of nuclear reactors. But because enrichment can also produce weapons-grade uranium, the international community fears Teheran will make fissile material for nuclear warheads.
The IAEA says Iran has amassed more than a ton of uranium from its older Natanz centrifuges that is less than five-percent enriched and unsuitable for weapons use. But through further enrichment, that amount would give Teheran more than enough material to produce enough weapons-grade uranium - enriched to 90 percent and beyond - for one nuclear weapon.
UN officials familiar with IAEA monitoring of Iran's nuclear activities have previously told the AP they suspected Iran may have undeclared enrichment plants with the state-of-the-art centrifuges that enrich more quickly and efficiently than Iran's mainstay P-1, a decades-old model based on Chinese technology.
The revelation of a secret plant further hinders the chances of progress in scheduled Oct. 1 talks between Iran and six world powers.
At that meeting - the first in more than a year - the five permanent UN Security Council members and Germany plan to press Iran to scale back on its enrichment activities. But Teheran has declared that it will not bargain on enrichment Iran's nuclear negotiator dismissed the threat of new sanctions in an interview released Friday.
Saeed Jalili said that Iran has "the right to uranium enrichment, and we will never give up this right," the German weekly Der Spiegel reported.
"We have lived with sanctions for 30 years, and they cannot force a great nation like the Iranian one to its knees," Jalili told Der Spiegel. "They do not scare us. On the contrary: we welcome new sanctions."
Mark Fitzpatrick, senior fellow for nonproliferation at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, suggested that Iran had little choice about disclosing the secret site ahead of the G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh.
"Iran undoubtedly announced it to the IAEA because they were afraid it would become known to the US and others," he said.
Fitzpatrick said the disclosure "will add to the momentum behind a push for stronger sanctions on Iran" should the Oct. 1 talks in Geneva fail.
Jalili is to meet with European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, US Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns and representatives from Britain, France, Russia, China and Germany.
On Thursday, Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said the Group of Eight was giving Iran until the end of the year to commit to ending uranium enrichment - a process that can produce fissile material for the core of a nuclear weapon - and avoid new sanctions.
The existence of a secret Iranian enrichment program built on black-market technology was revealed seven years ago. Since then, the country has continued to expand the program with only a few interruptions as it works toward its aspirations of a 50,000-centrifuge enrichment facility at Natanz.
Less..
Added: Sep 25 2009 In: middle_east
By: ellhow 
- Views: 1200 |
- Votes: 0 |
- Recommendations: 0 |
- Comments: 19
Comments - sort by newest to oldest
If one country on the planet has a bomb why the others may not have? It's funny. Go on make the bomb.
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "vietnam666" (B)
Good work Iran...This is Great performace from a country from war. That's why anti-muslims always fear the rise of Islam in any country..even somalia. They know that once a people hold fast to Islamic law, no power can stop them.
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "warriors4ever" (R)
Go Iran ! - show the Zionist-supporting terrorists that you have as much right to nuclear power as the rest of the world.
:)
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "Simon_W" (B)
The time is so close to strike sounds like Israel will strike before DEC word is but it will be with the help of U.S,Britain,France while Russia and china sits back beautifully played Obama the least you can do is finish the job Bush half finish but would of it wasn't for those pesky libs way to wait for the last minute you know what a sloppy job Israel would alone will do
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "knowsmuslims" (R)
no matter how hard you try you can't stop us now!!!!!
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "vietnam666" (B)
Get the popcorn folk's Obama has no choice no 1 man runs the U.S the strike is near
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "knowsmuslims" (R)
You again? Go **** YOURSELF again!
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "rman195" (R)
thats why your 14...and will never understand how this world works...ok?
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "Poster101" (R)
yep, becuase they lose their ability to be intelligent and use reason...islam has a way of doing that
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "Poster101" (R)
You again? Go **** YOURSELF again!
don't give your dreams, go make what you tell me to do, you can't resist, it's your nature. bwa hahahahahahahah
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "vietnam666" (B)
Lol !
And the thing is, you're absolutely right :)
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "Simon_W" (B)
Crazy Islam! Moving closer and closer to their own Holocaust. Cavemen vs World Powers...who do you think is going to win??
Posted Sep-25-2009 by "VelR4.6GT" (R)