Safe Mode: On
Iran Nuclear Program: Israel Pressured Not To Strike Iran Alone

By: Crispian Balmer
.
.JERUSALEM, Aug 31 (Reuters) - Israel is facing growing international pressure not to attack Iran unilaterally, with the United States in particular making clear its firm opposition to any such strike.

Recent rhetoric by Israeli leaders that time is running out to halt Iran's contested nuclear programme has raised concern that military action might be imminent, despite repeated calls from abroad to give sanctions and diplomacy more time to work.

The U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, has always cautioned against a go-it-alone approach, but he appeared to up the ante this week by saying Washington did not want to be blamed for any Israeli initiative.

"I don't want to be complicit if they (Israel) choose to do it," Dempsey was quoted as saying by Britain's Guardian newspaper on Friday, suggesting that he would view an Israeli attack as reprehensible or illegal.

He went on to repeat that although Israel could delay Iran's nuclear project, it would not destroy it. He said that unilateral action might unravel a strong international coalition that has applied progressively stiff sanctions on Iran.

"(This) could be undone if (Iran) was attacked prematurely," he was quoted as saying.

While Tehran says its nuclear programme is peaceful, Western powers believe it is trying to produce an atomic bomb. Israel, believed to have the only nuclear arsenal in the Middle East, views a nuclear-armed Iran as a threat to its existence.

Adding to the sense of urgency, the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency said on Thursday Iran had doubled the number of uranium enrichment centrifuges in an underground bunker, showing its desire to expand its nuclear work.


CRACKS IN THE ALLIANCE

Israel's vice prime minister Moshe Yaalon said on Friday he feared Iran did not believe it faced a real military threat from the outside world because of mixed messages from foreign powers.

"We have an exchange of views, including with our friends in the United States, who in our opinion, are in part responsible for this feeling in Iran," he told Israel's 100FM radio station.

"There are many cracks in the ring closing tighter on Iran. We criticise this," he said, also singling out U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon for travelling to Tehran this week.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he will speak out about the dangers of Iran in an address next month to the U.N. General Assembly in New York.

He is also expected to hold talks with U.S. President Barack Obama during his visit. A senior Israeli official told Reuters this month that Netanyahu would be looking for a firm pledge of U.S. military action if Iran does not back down.

However, the meeting might well be icy.

Israel's top-selling daily Yedioth Ahronoth reported on Friday that there had been an "unprecedented" and "angry" exchange between Netanyahu and the U.S. ambassador in Tel Aviv earlier this month over Iran.

Quoting a source who was present at the meeting, Netanyahu had criticised Obama for not doing enough to tackle Iran. The U.S. ambassador Daniel Shapiro took exception and accused the prime minister of distorting Obama's position.

The prime minister's office declined to comment on the report and there was no initial response from the U.S. embassy.

Adding to the growing chorus of concern facing Netanyahu, Haaretz newspaper reported on Friday that German Chancellor Angela Merkel had delivered a "harsh message" to Netanyahu 10 days ago, telling him to hold off on any attack plans.

The German embassy in Tel Aviv declined comment.

Israeli officials have repeatedly said that a growing array of sanctions against Iran are not having any impact on the Tehran leadership and believe they will only back down in the face of a credible threat of military action.

However, Netanyahu faces an uphill task persuading his own military and inner circle of the wisdom of a unilateral strike. Political sources told Reuters on Tuesday an ultra-orthodox party in his coalition was opposed to war.
.
.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/31/iran-nuclear-program-israel_n_1845816.html#slide=more247737


Added: Aug-31-2012 Occurred On: Aug-31-2012
By: God_Himself
In:
World News
Tags: Iran, Israel, Video, Iran Nuclear, Iran Nukes, Iran Nuclear Weapons, Israel Iran Nuclear, Iran Nuclear Energy, Iran Nuclear Program, Iranathon, Israel Iran Attack, Israel Iran Strike, Reuters, World News
Location: Jerusalem, Yerushalayim, Israel (load item map)
Marked as: approved
Views: 3565 | Comments: 45 | Votes: 1 | Favorites: 0 | Shared: 0 | Updates: 0 | Times used in channels: 2
You need to be registered in order to add comments! Register HERE
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first | Highest score first
Liveleak opposes racial slurs - if you do spot comments that fall into this category, please report them for us to review.
  • Comment of user 'T0M65' has been deleted by author!
    • @T0M65

      True but the world doesn't want another war especially now that most economies are in trouble.

      Can you imagine how disastrous it would be for most of us if the oil price, the insurance, the transport costs, the commodity prices double or triple overnight?

      One thing is certain, the US and the EU economies will hit the wall and hard...


      .

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @T0M65 Not to mention that a war in that region will spinnhing out of control and your country the USA will definitely get sucked in and the world economy will go straight down the shitter.

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @God_Himself if sweet crude goes to $400 a barrel for a prolonged period of time it's all over for the world economy and that will make regional wars over food water oil almost inevitable.

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (2)

  • Comment of user 'MB-UK' has been deleted by author!
  • Israel is like a mad god barking, but when shit hits the fan they want the Americans to do their actually dirty work.

    Posted Aug-31-2012 By 

    (6)

  • Netanyahu is a winy little b*tch begging America to attack Iran. I wish someone would put a bullet in his head.

    Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

    (6)

  • Israel trying to drag everyone into a world war. lol

    Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

    (6)

    • @Drox
      Why would it be a world war?
      WHat a load of crap!

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (-5)

    • @Freejay Simple, Russia has already said if Iran is attacked without pure justification it will defend Iran. With that in mind, the US would of course ally with Israel if Russia jumps in then if US jumps in the other allied countries will also jump in (UK, Germany, Australia, ect). Then China would most likely have to choose a side which would most likely be with Russia and Iran. Does that answer your question? lol

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @Drox
      Hahahahahahaha
      But they know there is plenty of justification.
      Russia and China wont jump in to help Islamic extremists....except supplying weapons.
      They have enough of their own problems to deal with!

      Quit the crappy scare mongering!

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (-4)

    • @Freejay Actually Russia and Iran have a pretty tight relation. Mostly due to Russia supplying them with weapons and Iran supplying Russia with Oil. Do you really think Russia is gonna sit by while Israel takes out their main Oil supplier? Wake up bro. lol

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (3)

    • @Freejay Better a scaremonger than a warmonger.

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (3)

  • There's been a lot of talk and not a lot of anything else about Iran in the last few years....


    Hopefully it stays that way.

    Posted Aug-31-2012 By 

    (5)

    • @lucidx1 I read an interesting article that was stating that Iran probably already has a couple bombs and that the one thing they actually lack is a delivery system.
      Also since the news is that they have doubled their production , if it's true, They are trying to get ahead of the game and have multiple weapons.
      Either way if and when they pull a Pakistan and test a bomb, which they won't do until they can deliver one to. It will signal to the west that it's to late and they will have to be handl More..

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @givemeadamnname
      Ugh, why are nuclear weapons a thing.

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (0)

  • Wish Israel would just shut the f up and attack allready, if they're so keen on bombing Iran - they can do it themselfs.

    So go ahead, stop running your big mouths and fight your own wars.
    That way you get what you want and the rest of us don't have to listen to any more of your pathetic whining.

    It's a win-win.

    Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

    (3)

  • Obama told them to wait untill after the elections to do any more on the matter months ago. I dont belive he will invole the US military in any more overseas wars if elected. Israel wants help?? Go talk to Nato.

    Posted Aug-31-2012 By 

    (2)

    • @GradySizematters I read somewhere that Israel will probably strike by October of this year because; after the elections they fear that Obama will play hard ball with them as a lame duck president.

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (0)

  • time to nuke that wargrieving shithole called israehell.

    worst nazis on earth.

    60 years ago there was man yelling for war. oh and he gassed 6million jews

    LOL!!!!!

    Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

    (1)

  • Comment of user 'musashi9' has been deleted by author!
  • HaHa!

    Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

    (0)

  • No shit, israel is trash solo

    Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

    (0)

  • i wonder what hitler would say??

    Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Israel would be incinerated if struck Iran - there's no doubt in my mind.

    Posted Sep-5-2012 By 

    (0)

  • Don't do it alone Israel.
    Take some nukes along to tell these hadji Cocksucker's loud and clear.
    You don't fuck with Israel.

    Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

    (-3)

    • @Dave556 if Israel attacks the Israel will be fucked in the ass a big time.. after these muslim arabs sorted then the jews are the next, Iran is the last on the map, then what comes? why would you fight jews or muslims? let fuckers fights each other and we watch.. you cocksucker zionist jews welcome to fuck off to the middle east and help your brothers by the way.. clean up operation will be started.. thanks for being what you are.. ;)

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (1)

    • @IHATEZIONS
      Can you repeat that in English please??

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (-2)

    • @Freejay yeah, after iran, we won't need you any more.. kiss your ass and good bye israel. ;p

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (2)

    • @IHATEZIONS
      And i am sure you backed the Arabs in the last 6 wars they waged on us too :)

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (-1)

    • @Freejay in your dreams.. I don't support anyone. I am not a fighter I am a lover.

      Posted Sep-1-2012 By 

      (1)